Muslim Terrorism in Australia and the Trashy Left That Enables It

 Powered by Max Banner Ads 



The satanic cult has struck again, this time in Australia. After over 16-hour long ordeal, during which a Muslim terrorist held dozens of hostages in a Lindt coffee shop in Sydney, the case was ended after heavily armed police stormed the place. Three people are dead; fortunately the violent Muslim animal is one of them.

As usual, the mainstream media went out of their way to downplay the terrorist attack and present it as some kind of an odd occurrence that is not so important. The independent internet sources followed the crisis diligently. The Canadian blogger Blazingcatfur pointed out early on, while the events were still unravelling, that this was a terrorist attack:

In a blow to the left wing narrative of denial and the MSM in general the Muslim(s) holding hostages at a Sydney cafe has demanded the media call the event an attack by the Islamic state.

The Muslim(s) have further demanded an Islamic State flag be supplied in return for the release of hostages and that a meeting be arranged with the Aussie PM.

That was a classic case of Muslim terrorist attack.

It was quite amazing that the leading papers had “questions” about what was really happening, while one of the first pictures taken after the hostages were trapped inside showed two staffers forced to hold at the window a black Muslim flag with Arabic script.

The supposedly conservative Canadian newspaper National Post released an article with a large headline comforting its readers that that wasn’t actually the ISIS flag, but another type of Muslim banner:

That isn’t an ISIS flag that hostages are forced to hold up in the cafe window. It is the Shahada

What a relief! Don’t you feel great now? It is so much better to know that the hostages are threatened with murder by somebody carrying the Shahada flag, instead of being threatened with murder by somebody who carries the ISIS flag. Wait a minute, aren’t both options the same? Not in the imaginary world of the media…

The article goes further into diminishing the terrorist danger and even praises the craftsmanship of the beautiful flag:

MacQueen said if the siege “was centrally organized from Syria or Iraq” by ISIS, the hostage-taker would not have used the Shabadah.

The people holding hostages “may be young guys, maybe not savvy,” he said. “They’ve got their hands on a bit of paraphernalia to suggest they have aligned themselves with the IS.”

A translation by Australia’s Fairfax Media found the cafe-window flag was remarkable for the precision of the classical Arabic script.

Mass-produced flags typically skip the more complex grammatical notation – such as short vowel signs – because they are hard to reproduce. But this flag was precise in detail, suggesting it was not mass-produced.

Again, it appears that the poor hostages could be grateful for being held by a terrorist knowledgeable in complex Arab grammatical notation, instead of a bunch of ignorant young guys with a hastily made flag. It obviously doesn’t matter that in both cases you would be dead in the end.

The CBC, which defended its own Muslim sex pervert Jian Ghomeshi to the bitter end (the hostage taker in Sydney also turned out to be a sex pervert), also did their best to obfuscate the real nature of the horrible events. A commenter (Solo712) summarized their coverage quite well:

CBC coverage summary of the hostage taking: 1) motives of the kidnapper are unknown, 2) flag displayed in the window is an ‘Islamic declaration’ (in fact it is ‘shahada’, oath of faith saying ‘There is only one God, Allah, and Mohammed is his prophet’), 3) 90,000 Australian responded to the hashtag “Illridewithyou” offering to act as shields for people dressed as Muslims riding trains against insane Islamophobes, 4) the second group of 5 hostages “has been released”. This contradicts the earlier item that the first five escaped and made the hostage taker “very angry”. You gotta love the CBC spin on this.

The unintended positive effect of the Muslim terrorist attacks on the West is that they reveal weaknesses, omissions, and even scandalous incompetence in the way our countries are governed. The Sydney terror wasn’t an exception. While the events were unfolding, the information about the Muslim terrorist that started to trickle in, revealed a few shocking facts about how the Australian government is dealing with the Muslim extremism.


The Sydney Muslim terrorist in happier times

The Sydney Muslim terrorist in happier times

The terrorist was the 50-year old Iranian “refugee” Man Haron Monis. He was one of the thousands of parasites, who came in 1996 to take advantage of the generous Australian welfare state. He was also a self-styled “Sheikh” and a preacher.

The police revealed that they had been very familiar with that Muslim creature. There was a long laundry list of criminal charges against him, including accessory to murder and sexual assault. According to the information, he was currently out on bail for 47 sexual assaults. The murder charge is related to the death of his wife.

Well, I have never been to Australia, but I know that its judicial system is governed by the British common law, which is also applied in the UK, USA and Canada. Australian precedents are sometimes quoted in Canadian courts. If that is so, how the hell a Muslim sex maniac suspected of 47 assaults could walk out on bail?!

It seems that the Australian courts had been heavily influenced by the sharia rules that are lenient to Muslims, who sexually abuse kaffir women (after all, the Koran says that they are slaves that don’t deserve much respect). Right now, as I wrote before, the free speech activist Eric Brazau is held for a fifth month in Toronto without bail for criticizing Islam on the subway. The difference in treatment is self-evident.

But wait, there’s more! The Iranian Muslim animal is known in Australia for sending hundreds of defamatory letters to families of soldiers, who have died in the war against terror. In full compliance with the sharia law, all he got for that despicable activity was 300 hours of community service.

He also ran an extremist website and used Twitter to preach his barbaric views.

2014-12-15 14_21_10-AUSTRALIA_ Tweets from the Muslim terrorist Sheikh Haron, hostage taker, ISIS su2014-12-15 14_22_01-AUSTRALIA_ Tweets from the Muslim terrorist Sheikh Haron, hostage taker, ISIS su2014-12-15 14_22_47-AUSTRALIA_ Tweets from the Muslim terrorist Sheikh Haron, hostage taker, ISIS suThe mainstream Muslim organizations tolerate such behaviour and try to present it as some kind of a harmless, though overzealous passion. The notorious booklet United Against Terrorism, released by the RCMP, the National Council of Canadian Muslims and other organizations, tried to paint jihad (Islam’s terrorist element) as a “noble concept” and suggested that Muslim radicalization is not a big deal (on page 9):


Radicalization is a more advanced form of extremism and can find itself manifesting in the political and social views. Radicalization, just like extremism, does not always necessarily translate into terrorism or other related forms of violence. Radicalism becomes problematic when it causes hatred and manifests itself through violence that can harm individuals or society. In the more common use of the term, radicalization implies the recruiting and brainwashing of individuals (especially youth) to take up such violent narratives.

For more information refer to:


Anyone can hold radical views or opinions on geo-political, economic, environmental, social or religious matters. The challenge is to distinguish them from calls for violence, believing and acting on these calls to violence either against individual civilians, groups or the state and its government. The call for violence includes promoting hate that may lead to violence and inciting violence and hate through the spoken or written word or through one’s actions.

It’s all nice, but with the rampant radicalization, which is so common in Islam, you never know which crazy follower will snap out with tragic consequences for all of us.

However, despite the government support for violent Islam, the latter won’t be able to make serious advances, if it weren’t for the thousands of deranged lefty useful idiots, who hate our civilization and are ready to support anyone who wants to destroy it. They are willing to distort any event and make vile terrorists look like innocent victims. While the hostages were still held and nobody knew what their fate would be, the useful idiots were up in arms defending Islam without a single word of compassion for the real victims.

As it is customary in these crazy times, the main battles for “social justice” are fought with hashtags on Tweeter. (Do you remember the hashtag war against Boko Haram calling for release of the abducted Christian girls? Despite Moochelle Obama’s holding a paper with the hashtag, looking like a wounded puppy, the girls are still being raped by the Muslim savages.)

This time the newly-invented hashtag was “I’ll ride with you,” offering protection to the Muslim fanatics in religious attire, who will supposedly be targeted by violent Australians the next day. The creature below came up with the idea:

2014-12-15 12_25_59-Sir Tessa (@sirtessa) _ TwitterIt is not clear if “Sir Tessa” is a man, woman or a simple tranny, but he/she/it will scare the hell out of any Muslim willing to ride with it. Tessa hasn’t probably bathed since Gillard’s administration. He/she/it made an offer to the Muslims in a tweet:

2014-12-15 12_27_55-#illridewithyou_ Australians offer support to Muslims after Sydney siege _ ToronLater Tessa needed to clarify that it won’t be a pleasant ride, because the creature can communicate in the morning only through a phone. Obviously, the brain activity kicks in late after a regular hangover or too much of coke snorting.

2014-12-15 12_26_46-Sir Tessa (@sirtessa) _ TwitterOf course, if it is something designed to put down Australia, it doesn’t matter if a junkie or a drunk is proposing it. It will be supported by all means. The Twitter army of deranged lefties adored the idea and embraced it:

2014-12-15 12_13_43-#illridewithyou_ Australians offer support to Muslims after Sydney siege _ Toron“Let muslim Australians know you’ve got their back.” (While they are shooting other Australians in the back.)

It is so much better to ignore the ugly truth about the Muslim barbarism and pretend that we are a huge, happy, shiny family.2014-12-15 12_14_21-#illridewithyou_ Australians offer support to Muslims after Sydney siege _ ToronI am sure that most of the idiots supporting the idea would ecstatic to read Sir Tessa’s racist rants against the race that comprises Australia. That person runs a blog, where you can find a long post with the following pearls of racist wisdom:

You are not doing anyone a service. Just as we are never able to not be PoC [Person of Colour], you are never excused from being white. You will always hold the balance of power, and there is nothing in the current circumstances that absolves you from your privilege. You are kicking down.

The message is that people like me are lesser. The message is that you, the hegemony, just like the idea of being progressive. You love the idea of being good and active and part of the rebellion. You love that idea. But you’re not prepared to think of non-white people as anything other than lesser. You’re not even prepared to admit the possibility of this unconscious bias.

To dismiss this as ‘online drama’ is an exercise of white privilege. To call for everyone to ‘get back to work’ is an exercise in white privilege. To ‘stay out of it’ is an exercise in white privilege. I’m repeating myself because for fuck’s sake this is repeating because the problem is not being addressed.

The usual insane orgy of spiritual self-mutilation… That pathetic piece of trash thinks that its self-humiliating ramblings will win the benevolent support of those who invaded Australia. It obviously is impossible to comprehend that the veiled Muslim gargoyle willing to ride with this creature will still hate it – there is no place in her world for somebody like it. And this is the unfortunate truth about those people – they never realize they are being used.

Sir Tessa and the Iranian terrorist are a perfect match. The terrorist despises Tessa but is willing to use his/her/its help to drag down the Western civilization. Then it will be over – there will be no place for such creatures in a Muslim Australia. For starters, there will be nobody to write welfare cheques anymore and in the Mad-Max-like Muslim world, Tessa’s art creativity won’t be a good match to the brutal survival skills of an average Muslim jihadist.

Such useless white trash like Tessa wants nothing less than destroying the only world they can survive in. It is up to us to stop them.

© 2014

Auschwitz Bedding for Sale in Bulgaria



The current moral decay of Europe is a fact that can’t be ignored. In such environment anti-Semitism pops up with inevitable predictability. The surrender of traditional values increases the influence of dark and destructive forces. They are everywhere – killing of Jews in France by Muslim fanatics; persecution of Jews in Sweden by the same people; mass boycott of Israeli goods in Ireland, etc. It all happens due to the reluctance of the governments to get involved.

Another example in that somber string of events comes from Bulgaria. The news site Club Z (h/t I.S.) reports about a strange item placed for sale on one of the large Bulgarian buy and sell websites. The ad was selling “Bedding set for Nazis with swastika and Auschwitz” for 70 Bulgarian leva (that’s about Canadian $52). The item was exactly what it claimed to be.

auschwitz-bedding-in-bulgariaAs you can see in the screenshot, the set includes a pillow with the design of the official German Nazi flag, a comforter depicting the entrance of the Auschwitz concentration camp and a bed sheet whose design can’t be seen. The ad was placed on November 28 and removed shortly after Club Z published the article about it on December 12, meaning that it was kept for two weeks and few people had problem with it.

The ad was posted by someone going under the name “psimeonoov” and offered only one set, but didn’t provide details about its origin. Judging from the quality of the items, it is very unlikely that the seller produced them himself. There is probably someone with industrial capabilities behind it and hopefully the government could get to the bottom of the case (if they desire so).

Club Z also reports that there were comments to the ad displaying the number 88, which they explain as an abbreviated symbol of “Heil Hitler” (H is the 8th letter in the German alphabet). Further in the article they remind the readers that similar displays are punishable under section 108 of the Bulgarian Criminal Code:

“Spreading of fascist or other anti-democratic ideology or involvement in activities to change by force the social and state order established by the Constitution of Republic of Bulgaria are punishable by prison time of up to 3 years or a fine of up to 5,000 leva.”

Unfortunately, that section is rarely applied. Consecutive corrupt governments have neglected the worsening of the conditions in the country. Only after the terrorist act in Burgas two years ago, when 7 Israeli tourists and a Bulgarian driver were killed, they started doing at least something. Now Muslim radicalism is being noticed after ignoring for many years the work of Saudi Islamic foundations among the Bulgarian Turks and gypsies.

Ironically, comments similar to those under the ad also appeared under the Club Z article. It’s troubling that some supported that seller. A “Veselin Markov” observes:

“Now it’s time to send the police dogs after the hundreds of stands selling t-shirts, souvenirs, and all other garbage with the images of the disgusting Lenin, Stalin, stars and other communist symbols, faces and slogans! We are waiting! And… you idiots, when you sell something, you are simply selling it! The supermarkets don’t promote murder of animals, if they sell meat. Do the liquor stores promote alcoholism or the pharmacies drug use???”

It is a confusing statement, but there were worse comments:

“The bedding set is superb, whatever they say, that’s part of history. As we all know, we can’t and we shouldn’t forget it.”

“When Hitler came to power, he introduced a 5-day work week, 8-hour work day, mandatory vacations and resorts for workers. How many of the whining “anti-fascists” here know about that? Even the Discovery History channel admitted it. It’s a fact. And what are the work time and the pay for the workers in the field of tourism at the [Bulgarian] Black Sea cost, do you know? Fascism and exploitation is what is happening here and now.”

Those are the comments they approved. Club Z removed a comment from someone going under the name “Gestapo,” so I can imagine what he or she wrote.

Anti-Semitism has always been present in Eastern Europe. It gets stronger during social turmoil, when it is necessary to find somebody to blame and Bulgaria has been in such turmoil since the fall of communism. Unlike in Russia, in Bulgaria anti-Semitism has always been limited to grumbling and spreading conspiracy theories. There has never been violence or pogroms.

During World War II, despite the fact that Bulgaria was part of the Axis, all the 50,000 Bulgarian Jews were saved from deportation despite Hitler’s constant pressure. It was a joint effort of several forces – King Boris III, the Parliament (especially his speaker Dimitar Peshev), and the Bulgarian Orthodox Church, with the overwhelming support of the people. (That fact is often ignored, while the saving of the Danish Jews is widely publicized. The same applies to Japan, which saved over 20,000 Jews in Shanghai, rejecting the demands of Himmler’s emissaries to exterminate them).

That didn’t end up well for the participants – the King died in August 1943, shortly after his last meeting with Hitler in Berlin. He got sick in the airplane on his way back, which started a rumour that he was poisoned by the Nazis. In 1944 the Soviet Union occupied Bulgaria (there was no war and not a single Russian soldier was killed) and installed a communist government. Within the first few years nearly 70,000 people were killed in communist repressions. Peshev survived, but spent many years in jails and concentration camps to die in abject poverty. As of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church, well, you know what happens to churches under communism.

The Bulgarian Communist Party, which was a tiny organization during the war, and its even tinier functionary Todor Zhivkov (who later became president), took the credit for saving the Jews. As of the Jews, after the restoration of their state, most of them immigrated to Israel (only about 5,000 remained).

The communist government didn’t contribute much to improving the image of the Jews. On the contrary, after the 1967 war, to accommodate the “progressive” Arab dictators, Bulgaria severed its diplomatic relations with Israel. Later, in 1975, it was instrumental in promoting and adopting the infamous UN resolution, which equates Zionism to racism and racial discrimination. The official newspapers (and they all were official) used to publish anti-Israeli cartoons and propaganda, which nowadays you can see only in Arab newspapers.

After the fall of communism things improved at government level, but the anti-Jewish feelings are still lurking underneath. It didn’t help that organizations promoting globalist values (like the Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, the Open Society Institute and others) entered aggressively the public space, often engaging in activities that ignore the reality in the country (whitewashing the rampant gypsy crime, for example). Many of those organizations are generously financed by George Soros and the circle around him, which feeds the flames of anti-Semitism – he is seen as a sinister head of a Zionist plot to destroy the country. Of course, few people in Bulgaria know that his activities harm Israel as well.

Is there any lesson to be learned here?

I guess we should always remember that our world has become much more complicated than it was during the bipolar world order, which dominated it 25 years ago. We must not take anything for granted – even such simple fact that everybody is supposed to know what happened in Auschwitz. In the times of Honey Boo Boo and the Kardashians, the worldwide dumbing down of the masses is frightening. The 5-minute attention span makes is necessary to remind everybody about the ugly events in the world history. That may help to prevent them from happening again.

© 2014

Another Pathetic Muslim Convert Threatens Canada



It appears that the militant Islam in Canada has found an elegant way to pursue its sinister goals – instead of using the “pure” Arab Muslims, it now relies on average Canadian suckers, who have had the misfortune to join that questionable cult. Now we have a whole collection of those losers; not only can you spot those converts at any pro-Hamas rally in Toronto – pale girls with hijabs and scrawny red-haired guys in night gowns – but some of them also do the dirty work of the Muslim terrorists.

Last year an Orthodox Greek from London (Ontario) died as a “Muslim martyr” in an attack in Algeria. Another guy from the same city – a Korean – spent time in jail in Africa for terrorism and naturally, when he came back, our compassionate government didn’t bother him at all. Both terrorists, who recently killed Canadian soldiers (in a Quebec town and in Ottawa) were converts, who could be described most accurately as bums.

Nobody knows how many of those converts are fighting for ISIS in Syria and Iraq. Some of them emerge from time to time either as deceased martyrs or propaganda tools. The latest specimen to make his existence know in the internet universe is John Maguire. In a video released by ISIS a few days ago, he made numerous threats against the country, where he was born and raised – Canada (h/t BCF).

Despite his attempts to look like a scary warrior of Islam (by using aliases worthy of a first-class PLO terrorist, like Yahya Maguire on Twitter and Abu Anwar al-Canadi in the video), he can’t escape the image of a pathetic loser, who would do anything to make somebody like him, including joining a death cult.

He can’t even grow a normal beard and his effeminate look must be a major turn on for his hairy terrorist comrades of Arab descent. I suspect that he becomes the target of their stormy passion when the number of sensual goats present in the ISIS camp is insufficient.

As one may assume, there was nothing remarkable or traumatic in his upbringing:

Maguire grew up in Kemptville, Ont., about 50 kilometres south of Ottawa. His father was a mechanic who used the family garage as his auto shop, and his mother worked in a nursing home. He was one of two children and had a pet horse. He played guitar in a punk band called the Shackles, which held concerts in church basements. He also played hockey, an experience he references in the ISIS video.

A clue about his transformation could be found in the fact that he attended the University of Ottawa. Universities like it (and York University in Toronto) and specifically their liberal arts departments are breeding ground of militant environmentalism, anti-Semitism, social-justice-ism and other forms of acute leftist insanity. Though many of the affected don’t go that far and eventually (almost) outgrow that phase, those who want to do more continue their “work” and Islam provides a convenient channel.

If it weren’t for Islam, the two terrorist murderers, the London guys and Maguire, all of whom had no purpose in life, would’ve led a boring and lacklustre existence with the occasional screams and curses at anti-Israeli demonstrations. The Muslim jihad gave them a definitive purpose, showed them that they “could be contenders, could be somebody” (if not in this life, then for sure in the next, surrounded by 72 perpetual virgins, hopefully women).

Many Muslims, born into the cult, are aware of its problems and keep their distance, though they don’t oppose it (in Islam apostasy is ruled by the principle of separation of body and head). That leaves the poor suckers, who converted, to do the dirty work of achieving Muslim domination, from which all Muslims will benefit. Isn’t it time to treat Islam as a dangerous supremacist ideology (because that’s what it is)?

© 2014

The Vicar of Baghdad Visits Toronto



The persecution and extermination of Christians, which have plagued the Middle East for the last few years, rarely receive the coverage they deserve in the mainstream media. The attempts to whitewash the most repulsive Muslim barbarism, which causes them, as a phenomenon that somehow has nothing to do with the “real” Islam often distorts that coverage.

It is always a surprise and an unforgettable experience to see in person somebody, who has been in the heart of the events in that turbulent area. On Tuesday night we had the rare chance to meet such a person at St. Paul’s Bloor Street Anglican Church. The Reverend Canon Andrew White, also known as the Vicar of Baghdad was its guest.


The Vicar of Baghdad in Toronto

The name with which he became famous came from his position as the Vicar of the only Anglican Church in Baghdad. He is representing a dwindling and dying congregation and his appearance the other night sadly matched that gloomy reality. He looked as if he was transported from a bygone era – old-fashioned glasses with thick lenses and equally old-fashioned suit with a bow tie and matching pocket square.

For the most of his life he had to fight many challenges that sometimes can crush a weaker person. In his 30’s he was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. Though the condition has impaired his ability to speak clearly, the Vicar has not allowed the disease to slow him down.

He went to Iraq during Saddam’s years, invited by the only Christian in the dictator’s circle – Tariq Azis. The Vicar became a witness of the dictatorship (which nevertheless guaranteed Christians’ religious rights). Then he saw the destruction of the wars and the emerging Islamic cruelty, rarely seen before. In the beginning of his stay he was able to move freely around, in the recent years the Vicar was forced to go out surrounded by dozens of armed guards, if he wanted to stay alive.

In his message he talked about Mesopotamia, the place so closely related to the events described in the Old Testament. Then the Christianity left its mark there, starting from St. Thomas. It flourished despite the many problems, but the newest forms of Muslim fanaticism are most likely going to put an end to it. The majority of the Christians in Iraq had been chased away, many of them killed, and the remaining don’t see any future there and want to get out.

All that Rev. Canon White hears now are more and more stories of murder and cruelty against Christians most of whom he knew personally. Somebody from his church called him recently crying – the Muslim terrorists gave him a choice to convert to Islam or die. He chose to utter the hated Muslim conversion phrase and now he was devastated, asking: “Will Jesus accept me now?” The Vicar replied that Jesus would always love him and look over him.

Another tragedy he shared with sadness was the similar attempt to convert four Christian Iraqi boys – they refused to indulge the Muslim terrorists and were beheaded. The Vicar saw in that the heroism of the Christian martyrs coming back to life in a new era. (That speaks clearly about the abyss dividing the Christian and Islamic concepts of martyrdom – in Christianity it is about withstanding the challenges against your faith, sometimes to the point of sacrificing your life; in Islam martyrdom is measured by the number of the infidels the faithful could kill with their suicide vest.)


The Vicar sings

Despite the tragic fate of the Christians that he discussed during his presentation, he still didn’t want to give up and abandon the believers in Iraq. He tried to cheer up the audience by asking it to sing “Down in My Heart”. The audience was too depressed to do that, so he had to start singing and even jokingly “chastise” the visitors as being the most boring of all the places he had been to. That finally did the trick and lifted people’s spirits, urging them to sing.

The Vicar’s whole life has been dedicated to his beloved Christian flock and even in those difficult times he was thinking of them. He sold books and posters and it was the only way to keep those people fed and warm in the camps where they had to live.

It was an unforgettable evening strangely dominated by the opposing emotions of hope and despair.

© 2014

Lena Dunham, Rape Allegations and the War on Men



The mantras of “war on women,” along with “systematic institutionalized racism,” have been the cornerstone of Obama’s policy of divide and conquer. Barry the Omega Man has persistently strived to prove that he is just “one of the girls” in order to gain the coveted female vote. His propaganda machine exploits imaginary issues, which are dear to the hearts and minds of the most radical of the radical feminists.

You may remember how Mitt Romney’s phrase “binders of women,” said during a public presentation, was immediately explained as a sinister intent to “dehumanize” women (while all Romney meant was that his office at the time had the information about many women). An even odder choice was Sandra Fluke, a standard-bearer of Obama’s agenda, who became famous for demanding that other people pay for her contraceptives. Anyone who disagreed with her was fighting women. The supporters of that over-aged “student” failed to notice that the amount of contraceptives she demanded was enough to keep a well-staffed whorehouse in Reno running for months.


Now Ms. Fluke is forgotten or at best seen as a fluke in the campaign of an incompetent President. However, the propaganda machine is still running and it needs new heroes. It even becomes more aggressive and from a defender of women from imaginary attacks, it turns into a tool to fight men. The recent disturbing surge in false rape accusations, which are widely circulated as truth by the liberal media, are a proof of that disturbing trend.

Take for example Lena Dunham. She is a celebrity-du-jour, at least one step above the Kardashians, because she has her own real HBO show – “Girls,” which I haven’t seen (and that’s an unintended bonus from cancelling my HBO channel years ago). As it is often the case, the desire of the publishers to milk the fleeting fame of such young “starlets” results in horrible biographies or memoirs of people, who never had a life worth covering (the Olsen Twins and Justin Bieber anyone?). Lena Dunham is not an exception. Random House published recently her “memoirs” Not That Kind of Girl: A Young Woman Tells You What She’s “Learned”.

Soon after that the esteemed author got into trouble with Ben Shapiro from He noticed some disturbing parts in the book describing Lena’s relations with her kid sister. Putting it mildly, she described actions, which could land a person in a court of law defending himself or herself against molestation charges. Despite the fact that Shapiro quoted the exact passages, Lena was still furious and threatened him with a lawsuit. (Looks like the cutting-edge feminists are above the law.)

It turned out there was more – Breitbart revealed that the book also contained accusations of rape, committed by an easily identifiable person:

The man identified as “Barry One” in a Breitbart News investigation debunking Lena Dunham’s story of being raped in college by a “mustachioed campus Republican” named Barry, has made his first official statement since the release of that report. Through his attorney, identified as Aaron Minc, Barry One has set up a legal fund to cover current legal expenses, clear his name, and to potentially file suit against Ms. Dunham…

“All proceeds will be spent by Barry on legal costs and related fees associated with defending Barry’s reputation,” the statement reads, “including, but not limited to, potentially pursuing Lena Dunham and Penguin Random House for harm caused to Barry’s reputation from the publication and sale of Ms. Dunham’s memoir.”

At that point I decided that I had to read the book to form a fair opinion about Ms. Dunham. I admit – it was a torturous experience. Musings of an empty-minded girl with an empty life. Other than the escapades with her sister, she was involved in eating cold pizza; maintaining a messy room; turning to veganism; kicking out her father regularly from the family bed in the middle of the night to sleep with her mother and many other little things, which could hardly keep the reader’s attention. No matter how hard she tries to look disturbed, her boring privileged life can’t turn her into a new Holden Caulfield; neither can her (or her ghostwriter’s) lackluster writing make her a new Salinger.

She compensates for mediocrity by trying to be shocking, but that doesn’t help either. We are told that she learned about the concept of rape at an early age (sorry, no page numbers, I am quoting the Kindle edition):

When I was seven I learned the word “rape,” but I thought it was “rabe.” I pronounced it like the playwright, not the broccoli, and I used it with reckless abandon. One afternoon as I read on the couch, my two-year-old sister toddled over to me, her balloon-printed pajamas saggy in the butt from a dirty diaper. Oh, the injustice of having to live with a child. Grace, wanting desperately to play, grabbed at my feet and ankles. When that failed to elicit a reaction, she began to climb me like a jungle gym, giggling that baby giggle.

               “Mom! Papa!” I screamed. “She’s rabing me! She’s rabing me!”

The dirty diaper stopped Lena from responding in her proper way. Her obsession with rape rears its ugly head a couple of years later when she is with her Irish nanny Noni coming back from school (Lena feels compelled to tell us that Noni couldn’t open properly her mouth due to jaw damage in a car accident). When a newspaper vendor looks at Lena, she whispers at Noni: “I think he’s trying to rape me.”

Though she claims she is attracted to jerks, they still need to have something “progressive” in their views:

Mike was the first person to go down on me, after a party to benefit Palestine, on my dorm room rug. I felt like I was being chewed on by a child that wasn’t mine.

Who could’ve suspected that a PLO weapon-buying party could induce such a powerful desire for oral sex? Though Lena digs jerks, her positive feelings don’t extend to creepy guys on the wrong political spectrum, like “Barry,” who was already mentioned:

Barry, Audrey and I agreed, was creepy. He had a mustache that rode the line between ironic Williamsburg fashion and big-buck hunter, and he wore the kind of white Reeboks last seen in an ’80s exercise video. He worked part-time at the library, and I would often see him skulking along the aisles, shelving books in the wrong places. In social settings, he commanded attention with his aggressively masculine physicality and a voice that went Barry White low. There was a story about him punching a girl in the boobs at a party. He was a Republican. All reasons to avoid him and to wonder why they let him into the living room of Renson Cottage so much.

I can almost imagine the OTHER Barry – the Oval Office Barry – reading the description and nodding approvingly with a toothy smile.

Still, Lena can’t resist him after a party (just a regular debauched party, not a gathering in the name of a holy social cause):

Barry leads me to the parking lot. I tell him to look away. I pull down my tights to pee, and he jams a few of his fingers inside me, like he’s trying to plug me up. I’m not sure whether I can’t stop it or I don’t want to.

She doesn’t specify whether he jammed his fingers in before or during the peeing process – regardless of the sequence, this is a picture you can’t unsee, no matter how hard you try. Then she brings Barry to her place:

Now Barry’s in my place.

               Now we’re on my floor, doing all the things grown-ups do. I don’t know how we got here, but I refuse to believe it’s an accident.

               Now he’s inside me, but he’s only sort of hard. I look onto the floor, by his pale bent knee, and see he’s taken off the condom. Did I tell him to wear a condom? The condom came from my first-aid kit. I knew where that was, he didn’t, so I must have crawled for it. A choice. Why does he think it’s okay to take it off?

               I come to a little, realize this is not a dream. I tell him he has to put the condom back on. He’s not hard, and now he’s going down on me, and he’s pushing his dick in my face. It feels like a finger without bones.

               I moan, as if to say, I like this, so much.

               He calls me baby. Or says, “Oh baby,” which is different.

               “Do you want to make me come?” I ask.

               “Hunh?” he asks.

The next day Lena shares the experience with her friend Audrey, who expertly whispers: “You were raped.”

Lena is not sure about what exactly happened, but is inclined to find the statement credible (as would be any man-hating radical feminist). Since this is a memoir and her life chronology could be checked easily, the Oberlin Barry can be easily identified. The legion of dimwits, who worship Lena, could make his life miserable (not to mention the authorities that could open a rape investigation). So when Barry starts to fight back, the defamers grudgingly react:

She then goes on to describe the incident in a good deal of detail, and as a Breitbart story by John Nolte notes, there is an easily identifiable Oberlin conservative from that era named Barry; indeed, that Barry has already been identified as the person from Dunham’s book by many people. But the Breitbart story also notes that many other details don’t add up, and that the allegations about Barry may thus be inaccurate…

TheWrap now reports that Random House has put out a statement exonerating this Identifiable Conservative Barry, and saying that the alleged rapist wasn’t really named Barry at all:

“As indicated on the copyright page of Not That Kind of Girl by Lena Dunham, some names and identifying details in the book have been changed. The name ‘Barry’ referenced in the book is a pseudonym. Random House, on our own behalf and on behalf of our author, regrets the confusion that has led attorney Aaron Minc to post on GoFundMe on behalf of his client, whose first name is Barry.

We are offering to pay the fees Mr. Minc has billed his client to date. Our offer will allow Mr. Minc and his client to donate all of the crowd-funding raised to not-for-profit organizations assisting survivors of rape and sexual assault.”

Naturally, the publisher will try to keep cashing on the controversy for as long as possible. But the whole thing is confusing – if this actually was a memoir, the events and people (though under different names) need to reflect accurately reality. If Lena’s life was so boring that she had to pad it up with phony stories like the Seinfeld’s J. Peterman, that speaks volumes about her and her publisher’s “integrity.” The big problem is that an innocent person suffers due to the desire of that useless woman to be interesting and original.

The saga continued (h/t BCF):

On November 3, National Review’s Kevin Williamson published a profile of Dunham that included a short interview with Barry One. Williamson writes:

It takes me about two minutes to discover a Republican named Barry whose time at Oberlin coincided with Dunham’s. A few minutes later, I know a great deal about him: Where he works, where he lives, what he majored in, his high-school-prom plans, people we know in common, and other surprising intersections between our lives. When I call him at his office, I get the distinct impression that I am not the first reporter to have done so. “I don’t have anything to say about what I know you’re calling about,” he says. We speak very briefly, and he is concerned that I will use his name.

Dunham was aware of Williamson’s piece. Incredibly, rather than exonerate this man, Dunham took to twitter to attack Williamson.

Lena Duhman knew.

Lena Dunham said nothing.

Instead, she let this poor man twist in the wind for more than six weeks until the threat of a lawsuit finally forced her People to do the right thing. Minc told THR that for two month he’s been asking Dunham’s representatives to clear his client’s name.

Lena Dunham is not an isolated case – she is simply a very public face of the fictitious “war on women” and its equally fictitious main element – the “rape culture.” In the sick mind of the militant feminists, the latter permeates every fibre of our society and is displayed in everything men do. Even the 9-year old Lena felt that the newspaper vendor was trying to rape her with his eyes.

The problem is that those delusions don’t simply reside in their heads – they crawl out and poison everything through imposing absurdities in our daily lives. The obsessive search for micro-rapes in the “oppressive Western patriarchy” blinds us to the horrors of the real dangers. The old-school feminists (yes, they still exist) have been warning us for decades about the plight of Muslim women, but the militants see that as one of the charming features of their culture. In such environment, it is naturally that the systematic rape of 1,400 children in the UK city of Rotherham by Muslim savages would go unnoticed.

It’s no wonder that the typical Western male has no chance in that war. Many still remember the Duke University case, when a psychotic black hooker falsely accused three of its lacrosse team players of rape. The university and the local judiciary turned against the students and it took them years to clear their names. The old racist extortionist Jesse Jackson even promised scholarship to the hooker, whether her story was fabricated or not.

Recently Rolling Stone magazine tried a similar scam, publishing a leading story about “Jackie,” a student, supposedly gang-raped at an UVA fraternity. They didn’t even bother to check the story of the other side, because everything “sounded right.” After publicly humiliating the unfairly accused, the magazine was forced to admit grudgingly that no rape took place. That didn’t stop the warring feminazi – they maintained that every accusation should be taken at face value and the accused men must be considered guilty until proven otherwise, as the following “bright mind” explains (h/t BCF):

This is amazing. Even as Rolling Stone’s alleged gang-rape story falls apart, and The Washington Post published several articles on Saturday putting the facts out that collapse the allegations, the Post website still contains an article titled “No matter what Jackie said, we should automatically believe rape claims. Incredulity hurts victims more than it hurts wrongly-accused perps.”

Feminist and MSNBC analyst Zerlina Maxwell doesn’t care about the facts, only about the quote-unquote larger picture of a rape culture. This is the triumph of ideology over evidence, emotion over science. All these people who lectured about McCarthyism and Arthur Miller’s play on the Salem witch trials are chanting that the evidence is less important than the allegation…

[She said]…This is wrong. We should always believe, as a matter of default, what an accuser says. Ultimately, the costs of wrongly disbelieving a survivor far outweigh the costs of calling someone a rapist. Even if Jackie fabricated her account, UVA should have taken her word for it until they could have proved otherwise.

The accused would have a rough period. He might be suspended from his job; friends might de-friend him on Facebook. In the case of Bill Cosby, we might have to stop watching, consuming his books, or buying tickets to his traveling stand-up routine. These errors can be undone by an investigation that clears the accused, especially if it is done quickly.

That stupid woman is beyond salvation (that’s why she works for MSNBC) – she considers Facebook de-friending a harsh effect and fails to notice the devastating consequences from the fake accusations on the accused and their families. People like her practically call for abandonment of the judicial principles established by our civilization. They advocate the return to the worst medieval practices of witch hunting with the only difference being that instead of witches, the targets are men. And in the brave new feminazi world that is perfectly normal.

© 2014

Ben Levin’s Trial Continues in Toronto



The trial of the former most powerful person in the Ontario education continued today in the same courthouse. As you are aware, he was arraigned on 7 charges involving child pornography and pleaded not guilty.

Today’s session was dedicated to procedural issues and the case itself wasn’t discussed. Ben Levin and his lawyer Clayton Ruby didn’t show up at all. The defense was represented by Mr. Ruby’s partner G. Chan. After a short conversation with the judge, Mr. Chan and Ms. Garcia, the Crown Attorney, decided that they needed private time to discuss the details. The judge left and both sides went out to work out their differences. The recess continued for nearly an hour.

After they came back, each side explained how much court time they will need to complete the presentations. In the end of the discussion with the judge, it was decided to schedule the next hearing for December 11 at 10 a.m. in the same courthouse (1000 Finch Avenue West).

Maybe because of the publication ban, there were no media representatives. However, the number of the people from the public increased – four people showed up this time. During the recess I had a long conversation with a lady, who was interested in the case. That was her first time to attend court proceedings and she didn’t know what to expect.

She explained that she was there because of the complete media blackout of Levin’s case. It was frustrating to her that such alleged crimes, which affect children, receive so little attention. She mentioned that some of the charges date as far back as 2008 and found it difficult to comprehend that nobody in the government at the time suspected anything. She said that she followed carefully the educational policies in Ontario and especially the dysfunctional Toronto District School Board. She had many questions, but it was very unlikely that anybody in Kathleen Wynne’s government would answer them.

It’s a sad state of the affairs and Ben Levin is probably just the tip of an iceberg. I wonder if we will be allowed to dig deeper and see more of the iceberg or everything would be covered up like every other scam and scandal of McGuinty/Wynne’s clique.


© 2014

Miscarriage of Justice – Libel Judgement against Ezra Levant



The decay of Canada’s values continues with full speed. There is already a judgment in the high-profile libel trial against Ezra Levant, which took place earlier this year. It was started by one of the three Muslim students, who a few years ago tried to destroy Maclean’s Magazine through the human rights commissions with the help of the anti-Semitic Canadian Islamic Congress. The judge in the case just awarded $80,000 plus legal costs to the plaintiff Khurrum Awan.

This monstrous miscarriage of justice will make it easier for every Muslim extremist or anti-Semite to go after his or her critics. With the help of judges who don’t give a damn about the values and the future of Canada, Islam is gradually winning in Canada. Ezra Levant is not going to roll over and take the abuse – he has already expressed his determination to appeal the unjust decision:

Today I lost the lawsuit against me brought by Khurrum Awan, the former youth president of the Canadian Islamic Congress.

You can read the full ruling here. The judge awarded Awan a whopping $80,000 plus legal costs.

I am reviewing the technical aspects of the ruling with my lawyer. But there is something terrifying, buried in this ruling, that I already know I simply must appeal — all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary.

On paragraph 166 of the decision, the judge ruled that calling Awan an anti-Semite is defamatory, and that’s one of the reasons I lost, and have to pay him so much money.

But Awan was, at one time, the youth president of the Canadian Islamic Congress, an anti-Semitic organization. At the time Awan was its youth president, the CIC was led by a notorious anti-Semite, Mohamed Elmasry. Elmasry famously went on national TV to state that any adult in Israel is a legitimate target for terrorism. The CIC has publicly called for the legalization of anti-Semitic terrorist groups.

And yet the judge ruled that it is defamatory to call the former youth president of an anti-Semitic organization, anti-Semitic. Because he denied it in court, and said he never knew about his organization’s infamous misconduct.

This is a shocking case of libel chill that should concern anyone who is worried about radical Islam, the right to criticize it, and the right to call out anti-Semitism in the public square.

Read the rest and learn how you can help Ezra here.

Ben Levin’s Child Porn Trial Begins amidst Dead Silence



Before I started attending trials and hearings earlier this year, I never knew that there were so many courthouses in Toronto. This morning I had the chance of visiting a new one, way up north at 1000 Finch Avenue West. It was the place where a hearing concerning Benjamin Rubin Levin, a.k.a. Ben Levin was about to be held.

Ben Levin with the Liberal Royalty in 2013

Ben Levin with the Liberal Royalty in 2013

You may remember that last year, shortly after he appeared in the picture above with Justin Trudeau, Kathleen Wynne, and Bob Rae at the annual homosexual parade, Levin was arrested. Shockingly, he was charged with possessing and producing child pornography.

What made the case even more shocking was the status of the accused. Levin was a high official of the Ontario Liberal Party with strong connections to its leadership. He was a Deputy Minister of Education in McGuinty’s government. When Kathleen Wynne took over, he became a member of her “transition team.” Even worse impression made the fact that he was a professor of education at OISE (University of Toronto).

After waiting for over a year, the case finally started moving through the courts. Today’s proceedings were supposed to be a preliminary hearing, but shortly after it started, Levin’s lawyer Clayton Ruby asked for an immediate trial. The request caught the Crown by surprise – they learned about it the night before and didn’t have the time to prepare. There was a recess to sort out the issues, but eventually the Crown agreed to proceed. The main news is that Ben Levin was arraigned and he pleaded not guilty. There were 7 charges in total, all linked to child pornography.

The judge imposed a publication ban to protect the witnesses. The proceedings will resume on Friday at 10 a.m. in room 304 (1000 Finch Avenue West). Ruby appeared with Gerald Chan, partner in his law firm. Ben Levin looked calm and collected; he was accompanied by a male friend (or relative).

Here is the worst part – other than the prosecutors and the lawyers, the courtroom was empty. One may expect that with such high-profile case of alleged sex transgressions against children by a prominent educator (involved in creating the new sex education curriculum) the journalists would be flocking the court, willing to inform the Canadian public about the extraordinary case.

Nothing like that happened. The only representative of the mainstream press was Faith Goldy from Sun News. After the hearing she tried to interview Levin while he was walking toward his car, but he kept his mouth shut with the resolve of a Zen monk.

The fact that a trial with such importance could be ignored by all prominent journalists is not a big surprise. The media in Canada is morally bankrupt; they have given up on their most important purpose – to inform the public on vital issues. They are much more interested in manipulating the public’s mind according to questionable and often harmful principles. They are ready to spend thousands of dollars to find out what Rob Ford smoked after work or at which tree he peed late at night, instead of following the case of a potential predator, who might have harmed children (of course at this point nothing has been determined – Mr. Levin may turn out to be as innocent as heaven’s angel or guilty as hell, that’s why he is having his day in court; however, the media must report about it).

I suspect that the media’s passionate love affair with the Liberal Party is at the bottom of that indifference. They would crucify a conservative for the smallest transgression, but will give a free pass to the crooks of Queen’s Park, who squandered billions of dollars on cancelling gas plants, eHealth, global warming scams and countless other schemes. The extended halo of the Liberal Party is big enough to protect Mr. Levin from being discussed in the press.

And there are so many questions to be asked. The scandalous sex education curriculum, which was shelved in 2010 after strong protests, is being brought back under the pressure of many “progressive” and homosexual groups. Only this time everything is done in secrecy – the curriculum hasn’t been published and only “select” limited number of parents will be allowed to see it and comment on it with only 30 words (h/t Marvin).

What do Kathleen Wynne and educators like Ben Levin have to hide? Is the curriculum so outrageous that it has to be imposed in secrecy to avoid backlash?

Judging from the stuff they teach kids at OISE, Mr. Levin’s employer, they have quite a few things to hide. At a conference last year aimed at promoting the homosexual school clubs – “gay-straight alliances” – to over 100 underage children, OISE promoted things that no reasonable person would see as appropriate.

Right in the middle of the library, two black gay guys were holding a workshop with underage girls on how to put a condom on a rubber black penis (if you don’t believe it, there is a video of that in the linked post); an organization was recruiting gay kids for intergenerational fun with old homosexuals; there were even booklets by the Government of Ontario with tips on how to work as a tranny hooker (with the disastrous economy under Kathleen Wynne that could become a viable job option).

The largest workshop at the conference was taught by a sex pervert, who was into BDSM, plain sadism and erotic choking (no, it wasn’t Jian Ghomeshi).

And of course you’ll never find that anywhere in the media – protecting children from perverts and predators is not a trendy cause; it may offend and enrage the homosexual lobby.

Is it any wonder that the alleged sex crimes of Ben Levin are being met with dead silence by the Canadian media?

© 2014

Tense but Peaceful Standoff – JDL-Canada at Palestine House



As I mentioned earlier, Dr. Nazi Khatatba, one of the head honchos of Palestine House, said about the planned JDL-Canada vigil “you are welcome in the Palestine House if you didn’t learn the lesson from [your] last visit.” Despite the implied threat, yesterday’s event was peaceful. Apparently, the Arabs were those who learned the lesson that beating Jews in Canada is not a very profitable venture.

The event started at 2 p.m. when the JDL-Canada members and their supporters gathered across the street from Palestine House. Unlike the last time, when the Arabs brought in a huge violent crowd, very few people opposed the vigil.


Palestine House (with the reflections of the protesters)

The supporters of Hamas were hiding inside and you could see them behind the glass door and the windows – grumpy and unfriendly, but avoiding direct confrontation. A few of their photographers walked in front of the House diligently taking pictures and filming the protesters.


Hamas and Che Guevara are a perfect match

I spotted just one “friend” from the previous fight. Despite the quasi-military camouflage jacket, this time he was peaceful – nervously smoking and “patrolling” the parking lot.



Peacefully walking…

…and attacking Jews in better times

…and attacking Jews in better times

The lack of physical confrontation was compensated by something that resembled a musical duel. The Arabs placed near the sidewalk powerful loudspeakers, which blasted horrible Arab music and jihad rap. JDL matched the challenge with its own source of music, which was just as loud. Still, this was much better than a fistfight.

There were more representatives of the media at this protest and they kept walking around with their cameras and microphones trying to figure out why the two groups stood against each other. From listening to their questions, it was painfully clear that most of the cute reporters knew very little about the Muslims extremism that caused the protest. And I don’t think that the “Palestinian” side explained the situation.


“I know nuthin’”

JDL-Canada and their supporters brought Canadian and Israeli flags. The signs they carried condemned the Arab terrorism and opposed the destructive work of Palestine House, which for years has been a major support centre of Hamas, PLO and other anti-Semitic terrorist organizations. Some of the leaders of the House have personally expressed anti-Semitic and pro-terrorist ideas.


“Shut Down Palestine House”


The flags



“Criminal Charges against Palestine House”

After singing the Canadian National Anthem and Hatikvah, the JDL-Canada Director for Ontario Julius Suraski explained why the group organized the protest – to oppose the harm done by Palestine House. Then he introduced the National Director Meir Weinstein, who gave an emotional speech. He exposed the devious nature of that institution, which, under the guise of “cultural centre” promotes hatred. That doesn’t help education or integration. Even the defunding of Palestine House (which used to get $1 million yearly in government funding) didn’t serve as a wakeup call. They continued to do exactly what they were doing before. The only solution is to shut down that harmful institution.


Julius Suraski and Meir Weinstein

Weinstein was followed by a few words by Vera Held and a short speech by Mark Vandermaas (the founder of Israel Truth Week). He reminded the participants that organizations like Palestine House obfuscate and distort the truth about the Middle East. Their main target is Israel, which they want to delegitimize, hiding the fact that its land was recognized by the international community in 1922 as a home of the Jews.


Mark Vandermaas

Here is a short movie, which shows highlights from the event:

© 2014

Why JDL-Canada Will Hold a Protest at Palestine House Tomorrow



On Sunday, November 23, JDL-Canada is going to hold a vigil for the latest victims of the Palestinian terrorism in Israel – the four Jewish rabbis and the Druze policeman, who were killed by Arabs in Jerusalem. This is the third similar event in the last few years. The first one was to commemorate the extermination of the Fogel family by Muslim terrorists, the second took place just a few months ago after the kidnapping and brutal murder of three Jewish teenagers in Judea and Samaria.

The vigil will start at 2 p.m. across the street from Palestine House and the address is:

It is not an accident that the event is held in front of that “institution.” Palestine House is a well-known nest of supporters of the Muslim terrorism and Hamas. Anti-Semitism is the norm at that place. Last year, at the annual Al-Quds rally in Toronto, Elias Hazineh, former official of the House, called for the Jews in Jerusalem to be shot. This summer at a pro-Hamas rally another official called for a third intifada, which has to be carried out by the “Palestinian” diaspora as well, thus promoting terrorism in Canada. Naturally, in our politically correct society both of them got away with promoting violence.

It was a disgrace that this anti-Semitic institution was receiving millions of dollars in federal funding. It took years to stop that. The lack of taxpayers’ funds did little to curtail their vicious propaganda. A major mouthpiece of that propaganda is the newspaper published in that place (in Arabic) – Meshwar. Thanks to its editor Dr. Nazih Khatatba the Arabs can enjoy what is considered humour in their circles, like the blood libel cartoon, which appeared recently in Meshwar.

meshwar3After the latest terrorist attack in Jerusalem, Palestine House’s officials made sure to make public their joy that Jews have been killed. In an editorial Khatatba called for an armed fight against Israel (the quotes, which follow have been translated by Jonathan Halevi and posted on his blog):

“While confronting the Israeli racist activities in al-Quds [Jerusalem] and the repeated incursions into al-Aqsa Mosque, the people of al-Quds and the Palestinians in the [West] Bank and the areas of ’48 [meaning the State of Israel] had to react and even with primitive ways available to them according to the circumstances in order to counter the occupation. The security apparatuses of the Palestinian Authority and the occupation cannot spot [in advance] and thwart the newly innovated modes of operation like the ‘run-over’ and stabbing operations in al-Quds, Tel Aviv and the West Bank. [Based on that] observers believe that its [‘run-over’ and stabbing operations] scope will expend into a new intifada…”

“The adherence to the heritage of Yasser Arafat [founder of Fatah, PLO and Palestinian Authority], his principles and fundamental positions, for the sake of which he and tens of thousands were martyred, will come through continuing the path of national reconciliation [between Fatah and Hamas] based on sound foundations, achieving national unity [between Fatah and Hamas], supporting and assisting the national unity government and adhering to the option of all-out struggle with the rifle, which for its protection Yasser Arafat and thousands of martyrs died.

“There is a need to reconsider the functions and missions of the [Palestinian] Authority in a way that its first and main mission will be supporting and assisting the all-out struggle and this requires the immediate cessation of the security coordination [with Israel] and the security cooperation with the occupation…”

And of course to make sure that the call for turning the Palestinian Authority into a Hamas-like entity (not that there is a big difference at this point) that will deal with killing Jews, the mad doctor adds another dose of Arab humour – cartoon where a tiny Jew is about to be crushed by the jihad wheel.

run over cartoonThe fans of Muslim terrorism are good at using the social media to promote their cause or simply to make threats. The same doctor wanted to convey to the Jews the message that what he promotes as the fate of Israel also applies in Canada. Referring to the planned vigil on the 23rd of November, he warned JDL-Canada on his Facebook page:

The Jewish [Defence] League [JDL Canada] decided to hold a sit-in in front of the Palestine House next Sunday to protest against comments posted on Facebook with regard to the events in al-Quds [Jerusalem]. It [JDL Canada] blames Nazih Khatatba and Monira Kitmitto [both are board member of the Palestine House] of incitement of terrorism and antisemitism. You are welcome in the Palestine House if you didn’t learn the lesson from [your] last visit [on July 3, 2014].”

The previous event (on July 3) that the mad doctor refers to was the previous protest, where the Arabs crossed the line of verbal anti-Semitism and physically attacked the participants. A Japanese woman was pushed and the racist Arabs yelled racist slurs at her. A few other people were beaten with wooden sticks and one had to be taken to the hospital.

MVI_0217015MVI_0217102As if that wasn’t enough, Khatatba even boasted in another Meshwar editorial, published in issue 108, July 11 2014, page 6 (translated from Arabic by Jonathan Halevi):

“Had the Police not intervened with very large forces, a massacre would have occurred, as the Palestinians were very provoked…”

Evidently, the rabid Arabs are bringing their intifada to the streets of Canada.

Proving that in those circles women are as evil as men, another Palestine House celebrity joined the Canadian intifada. I mentioned that in another post, but let me say again that the board member Monira Kitmitto used Facebook to praise the two Muslim terrorists.

monira kitmitto facebook postHer comment (translated by Halevi) was:

“In al-Quds [referring to the massacre of Jewish worshippers in Jerusalem synagogue on November 18, 2014] like in the Galilee, the [West] Bank, Gaza and the Negev [referring to similar terrorist attacks carried out recently by Palestinians], in spite of the consecutive tragedies there is a spirit of manhood in the air and heroism on the ground. Ghassan and Udai Abi Jamal [the Palestinian cousins who murdered with a handgun, an axe and a knife 4 rabbis and wounded 8 in Jerusalem massacre], you are role models and an example [for others]. Glory to both of you and to all [others who committed similar operations].”

In the poster showing a man holding a long knife in front of the photograph of the two terrorists there was the following caption: “[Ghassan and] Udai Abi Jamal, you are the pride of our nation.”

However, the fiery Monira didn’t stop there. A few days later she posted another sample of Muslim “humour” – a cartoon openly threatening the Jews. An Orthodox Jew is surrounded by the tools that the Muslim savages will use to kill him – axe, knife, car, AK-47.

monira kitmitto nov 19, 2014She added her opinion to the cartoon: “All land under your feet is hell.” Maybe the land under her feet has also become hell, because soon after that she shut down her Facebook page.

Those are truly evil and dangerous people. Make no mistake – if they had the numbers and the weapons, they would slaughter everybody who opposes their satanic cult. Hatred is the only thing that gives a “meaning” to their lives.

I am not saying that to scare you – those people should be exposed and stopped. The same old saying applies here – for the evil to triumph all that is needed is the good people to do nothing.

Let’s all do something, let’s be there tomorrow with JDL-Canada.

© 2014

Bill Warner Discusses Political Islam in Toronto



On Monday Dr. Bill Warner, founder of and one of the most prominent critics of Islam in the USA, had a presentation in Toronto. Trained as a physicist, he brought to the research of the often contradictory and elusive subject of Islam the methods of natural sciences. The result was a clear and meticulous analysis that is very difficult to refute. If you think that his results brought him respect and recognition in the Muslim circles, you are wrong (more on that later).


Bill Warner speaks in Toronto

The event was organized by JDL-Canada. Other than being one of the very few Jewish organizations to confront anti-Semitism openly on the street and in the university halls, JDL-Canada has been inviting to Toronto for years personalities involved in affirming free speech and fighting against Muslim extremism. Those were people, who, according to the mainstream media in Canada didn’t exist or shouldn’t have existed.

That gave us the opportunity to meet the Swedish cartoonist Lars Vilks (attacked and persecuted for drawing the “prophet” Mo) and the Danish free speech advocate Lars Hedegaard, who was nearly killed in his home by a Muslim terrorist. We also met the outspoken British politician Paul Weston, fighter against Islamization, who recently was arrested for quoting Sir Winston Churchill.

Also from England came Gavin Boby – the “mosque-buster” – who is a lawyer working against the Muslim takeover of neighbourhoods. His experience in stopping fanatics from gradually ruining whole areas and buying the houses at very low prices might be soon useful in Canada, especially when we already have attempts at “parking jihad.”

And of course, we will never forget Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer. The vilest Muslim fanatics organized a campaign against them and JDL-Canada to ruin (unsuccessfully) the event.

There has never been a dull moment and Dr. Warner was not an exception. The event was sold out; even Tarek Fatah was in the audience and had a discussion with Warner after the lecture.


Bill Warner in discussion with Tarek Fatah

He speaks calmly (though he has a great sense of humour); he is respectful to Muslims and his findings are backed by thorough research, which involves even statistics, yet for years he has been the target of attacks and persecution. He explained that with the deterioration of the public discourse in the USA. While in the past people would’ve said “I disagree with G.W. Bush’s policies, because…” and explain why, now the most common statement would be “Bush is an idiot.” Blackmail is the most common approach, that’s why The Southern Poverty Law Center lists Bill Warner among the top 10 hatemongers of the USA.

(Behind that odious name is hiding a money-making scam. Some scammers push you into MLM, others sell time shares, and SPLC makes money by scaring people. They collect tens of millions of dollars tax-free to “monitor” hate groups. With KKK and neo-Nazis being active many years ago that probably made some sense. Now they have to go after odd targets to justify their existence, like pick-up artists, who teach guys how to seduce girls. Their targets are also the pro-family organizations and of course Bill Warner. However, you won’t find in their list any Muslim organizations, even those that have been indicted and punished for supporting terrorism, like CAIR.)

Maybe the main reason for the leftist blackmail is Bill Warner’s rationality – he always emphasizes that he deals with a rational study of political Islam. He doesn’t deal with Muslims and is only interested in their ideology. In an age, where reason is shunned and feelings and imaginary constructs (like gender fluidity or that you can consider yourself a woman even with a penis) are the “scientific” norm, the rationalism of Bill Warner is an unforgivable sin.

That distinction between the scientific method and the politically correct apologetics was clearly covered in his presentation:

bill-warner-presentation-2Warner sees Islam as a political doctrine – the goal of its creator Mohammed was political expansion. In the early period, while he lived in Mecca, he basically tried to present himself as a new prophet, who continues the Jewish tradition. The result of that was the Meccan part of the Koran, which is more tolerant and humane – Mohammed was trying to attract new followers through persuasion. In the 13 years he spent in Mecca he convinced only 155 people. After he moved to Medina, he turned to violence, jihad, which brought him the real success. That period is reflected in the parts of the Koran that promote violence.

bill-warner-presentation-4bill-warner-presentation-5However, the Koran is not the only source of Islam. There are other scriptures, which contributed to the formation of that ideology and without them the Koran can’t be fully understood. Those are the Sira, interpretations, and especially the Hadiths, a very detailed description of the life of Mohammed and his companions. The Koran comprises only 14% of that, with the Sira being 26% and the Hadiths 60% of the Muslim scriptures. Here Warner emphasized again that he was interested in analysis and criticism mostly of the doctrine of Islam, not in criticizing Muslims.

bill-warner-presentation-6bill-warner-presentation-7Mohammed is the central character of those scriptures. The doctrine is built and revolves around his personality. For example, his early attempt to present himself as a Jewish prophet turned into hostility and rejection of the Jews when the latter rejected him. As a result, he divided the people in the world into two groups – those who follow his religion and the unbelievers, the kafirs. Very large portions of the Muslim trilogy are dedicated to dealing with kafirs. According to Warner, dealing with the kafirs is the essence of the political Islam.

bill-warner-presentation-10bill-warner-presentation-11The political doctrine, which aimed at conquering the world and converting the kafirs, rapidly grew in the Muslim scriptures. In the Meccan part of the Koran, its main tool – jihad – was not mentioned at all, but it dominates the Medinan Koran and the later scriptures. Also, the hostility toward Jews is almost invisible in the Meccan period, but grows later.

bill-warner-presentation-12bill-warner-presentation-13The violent methods adopted by Mohammed and later continued by his followers and heirs achieved great success in converting very large number of people. Islam has a peculiar feature – the doctrines from the early, “peaceful” period coexist with the concepts of the later “jihadist” time without any attempt to reconcile them. That creates a dualism in Islam, which is difficult to understand in the West, where logic is expected to dominate science or any other doctrine. It makes impossible to refute the ideas of Islam – they are simply foreign to consistency or logic.bill-warner-presentation-15

bill-warner-presentation-14The dualism creates ethics, which is inconsistent and justifies deception in the name of advancement of Islam. When we add to the mix the lack of the Golden Rule, i.e. the idea of moral reciprocity, the result is an ugly doctrine, which is destructive and hardly fits in the West.

bill-warner-presentation-16In the end Dr. Warner signed a few books and responded to the questions of the participants.

bill-warner-in-toronto-2© 2014

Muslim Terror and Depravity in Jerusalem



Islam is one of the most peculiar cults on the face of the earth. More of a political ideology than a religion, it lacks even the simplest moral rules that most other religions observe. Instead of the principles of ethics, followed by most people to harmonize their relations, in Islam we find an odd collection of thousands of “fatwas” (religious edicts), which control every aspect of a Muslim’s life.

Since most people are totally ignorant about the nature of that cult, they assume that Islam is just like the other religions, preaching love and acceptance. Many Muslims are aware of that and try to maintain the peaceful façade – you have heard numerous times that “Islam is peace” (in reality it is a mindless submission to allah and Old Mo). At the same time, its true violent nature lurks behind and from time to time cracks the façade. The outbursts of jihad are difficult to ignore by even the most naïve Western admirers of the cult. That’s why Islam has such nightmarish PR problems – even for the greatest masters of taqiyya (the Muslim deceit) it is very hard to reconcile both sides.

The relations between Jews and Arabs in the Middle East (even before the restoration of Israel) are a prime example of that conundrum. No matter whether the Arab organizations fighting Israel consider themselves secular or Islamist, they follow exactly the same path of deceit and ruthless expansion established by the fake prophet in the 7th century.

While Israel time after time had compromised in the name of the elusive “peace” and the even more elusive “two-state solution,” the Arabs have gone through a string of intermittent actions of fake acceptance, complaints, more demands, and, what is essential, even more violence against the Jews. In an individual, those would be the signs of schizophrenic behaviour, but few realize that whole peoples can suffer from the same malady.

The Arabs, who live in Israel and Judea and Samaria have the unique opportunity to benefit from the co-existence with the most prosperous country in the region, which has achieved everything through talent and hard work, not by selling oil. In other Muslim countries those “Palestinians” are treated like slaves, starved or even killed. Yet the crippling mental disease of Islam has closed their eyes – all they can think of is how to continue their jihad and inflict more damage to Israel without realizing that they cause even more damage to themselves (after all, even if they destroy the Jews, they still won’t be able to eat Kassam rockets and knives).

Many outsiders are incapable of understanding that collective schizophrenia and probably think that the odd Arab actions must be a response to some diabolical, Elder-of-Zion-style Jewish plot, which is hard to figure out.

The events, which started this summer with the Hamas rockets against Israel, culminated this morning with an attack against a synagogue in Jerusalem. Two Arab terrorists attacked the praying Jews with a gun, axes and cleavers.

terror-har-nofThe two Muslim animals hacked the people in the synagogue. Four of the injured – Moshe Twersky, Aryeh Kupinsky, Cary William Levine, and Avraham Shmuel Goldberg – died from their wounds. The police were quick to respond, but the terrorists turned against them as well. As a result, the police officer Zidan Sayif, a Druze, was also killed. More than 20 kids became orphans because of that terrorist act.

As one may expect, the coverage in the West was ambiguous and it looked like the words were carefully selected in order not to offend the Muslim extremists. When broadcasting a statement by the Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat, CNN used a caption stating “Deadly attack on Jerusalem mosque.” It is hard to determine whether this was an attempt at dark humour or the “great” CNN reporters believed the Arab lies that only Jews can attack in Jerusalem.

cnn181114iiOur Canadian media, which have very little sympathy for Israel, followed close behind. The CBC, which still suffers from the damage caused by its own Muslim sex pervert, covered the terrorist attack in an “unusual” way (h/t Sarah B.). They titled their online coverage “Jerusalem police fatally shoot 2 after apparent synagogue attack.”

Truly strange choice of words – in the body of the story it is stated that two “Palestinian” men armed with axes and knives wounded people in a synagogue. I am sorry, but when two Arab savages start hacking Jews with axes, this is not an “apparent” attack – it is very much a REAL terrorist attack. But the good old lefties from CBC simply can’t fault two Arabs, who are shot by the police. Arabs are always innocent.

cbc-attack-report-2Naturally, the supporters of Muslim terrorism in Canada went even further. Monira Kitmitto, Palestine House board member praised the terrorists in a Facebook statement. (Palestine House is an anti-Semitic Arab club in Mississauga, near Toronto, which has been involved in violence against Jews.) According to the security expert Jonathan Halevi, here is how Ms. Kitmitto expressed her support:

Monira Kitmitto is a Palestinian activist, resident of Oakville who serves as a board member of The Palestine House in Mississauga (Ontario) and is also a member of the Coalition Against Israeli Apartheid (CAIA). She has worked in Palestinian refugee camps Lebanon and was an active member in the Union of Palestinian Women.

Following the news reports on the massacre carried out by Palestinian terrorists in Jerusalem synagogue, Monira Kitmitto posted (November 18, 2014) the following on her Facebook page (translated from Arabic):

“In al-Quds [referring to the massacre of Jewish worshippers in Jerusalem synagogue on November 18, 2014] like in the Galilee, the [West] Bank, Gaza and the Negev [referring to similar terrorist attacks carried out recently by Palestinians], in spite of the consecutive tragedies there is a spirit of manhood in the air and heroism on the ground. Ghassan and Udai Abi Jamal [the Palestinian cousins who murdered with a handgun, an axe and a knife 4 rabbis and wounded 8 in Jerusalem massacre], you are role models and an example [for others]. Glory to both of you and to all [others who committed similar operations].”

Monira Kitmitto also posted a poster featuring a man brandishing a long knife and the pictures of terrorists with the caption: [Ghassan and] Udai Abi Jamal, you are the pride of our nation.”

monira kitmitto facebook postThis is the type of snakes that the lenient policies of “diversity” and “multiculturalism” allow to flourish in Canada. Make no mistake, they are waiting for their chance to strike.

And as usual, the Muslims forgot that they are supposed to project the image of compassion and tolerance – in Gaza they started celebrating the massacre with sweets and dances (probably in Palestine House they did the same).

2014-11-18 16_33_41-4 JEWS MURDERED IN SYNAGOGUE TERROR2014-11-18 16_34_59-4 JEWS MURDERED IN SYNAGOGUE TERRORNot much new here – we witnessed the same on September 11, 2001, after the attack in the USA. At the time the leading Muslim PR liars went out of their way to convince us that only a few stupid people did that. With every passing year, after many more terror acts, it became more and more difficult to hide or explain the Muslim jubilation in response to death and terror.

This brings us to our starting point – there is no morality in Islam. Depravity is a norm in that murderous cult. Maybe not all Muslims follow those “principles,” but those who do are strong enough to impose their view on the rest. Islam is incompatible even with the simplest norms of proper behaviour – anything that is different is going to be stomped on and destroyed by its jihad machine.

© 2014

Bill Warner on Political Islam – Presentation in Toronto



The prominent American critic of Islam Bill Warner, founder of,  will have a presentation in Toronto on Monday, November 17, 2014. The event is sponsored by JDL-Canada.

He will speak in detail about the political role of Islam, which through its violent concept of jihad, has been responsible for the murder of over 270 million people.

The event will take place at 7:30 p.m. at the Toronto Zionist Centre, 788 Marlee Avenue (at Lawrence and Allen Expressway). The fee is $15 at the door.

For more information, please call 416-736-7000.


Justin Trudeau Explains How Smart Justin Trudeau Is



Justin Trudeau had an appearance in Toronto earlier this week to promote “his” memoirs “Common Ground.” I already covered the bit where he was confronted by a bunch of crazy anti-oil environmentalists.

However, the most interesting (though boring for most people) part of the presentation were the lengthy reminiscences about his lacklustre childhood and family life, which he unsuccessfully tried to make challenging and exciting. He was desperately pushing the image of an undervalued gem that is as good as any other politician in Canada. Justin went too far praising himself.

In the short video segment below he filed obliged to tell his audience what a great mind he is. During a few seconds missing from the beginning, he said that he wanted to share a secret – his opponents thought that he was not an intellectual and didn’t have deep thoughts, but he was extensively schooled at the dinner table by his famous father.

Father and son delved into philosophy and history, wrapping their minds around problems big and small. So now he has the confidence to confront anybody on an intellectual level.

Well, one can only envy his narcissism, which towers Mount Everest. Normally, advertising your own great mind rakes of desperation – the best policy is to leave to the others to appreciate your greatness by your deeds. But since Justin has not done any deeds worth respect, other to ride the Pierre Elliott Trudeau’s nostalgia to win the Liberal Party leadership, he has no choice but to praise himself. With every passing day he looks more and more like Obama in 2008, when the latter was still able to fool plenty of people.

For starters, to prove his great mind, he could write his own memoirs, instead of outsourcing the task to an almost communist collective of journalists (which included even the “conservative” Jonathan Kay). Another hit for him would’ve been to finally formulate his elusive vision for the future of Canada, which he wants to build after ousting Harper. At this point, the women infatuated by him are influenced mostly by his beautiful hair than by any actual political views (and so is the “anybody-but-Harper” camp).

Enjoy the deep intellectual mind of Mr. Trudeau:

© 2014

CIJR Colloquim in Toronto: Gaza and the Media Wars against Israel



Canadian Institute for Jewish Research – Toronto presents the Annual Sabina Citron International Colloquium:

“Gaza and the Media Wars against Israel”

Sunday, Nov. 16, 2014, 9:00 a.m. – 3:00 p.m.

Prof. Sally Zerker (York U.)

Steve Emerson –Director, the Investigative Project on Terrorism
Richard Landes – Historian, (Boston U.), “Pallywood” & websites
Diane Bederman – Distinguished Israel-issues journalist
Jonathan Halevi – Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
Barbara Kay – Nationally-syndicated National Post writer
Lawrence Solomon (Financial Post)

Shaarei Shomayim Congregation
470 Glencairn Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5N 1V8

$36.00 per person – seniors $ 18.00 – students free; Coffee, Lunch served.
RSVP: 1-855-303-5544, or

For more information, please visit

CIJR Nov 16 2014 Toronto Media Flyer

1 2 3 4 55