I am happy for Barry – he finally outed himself as the first American gay president. Technically, he didn’t do it on his own initiative – actually Newsweek Magazine did it by boldly stating the fact on its cover. If that ailing publication, which is still a major part of the mainstream media, says so, it must be true. After all, Obama, the mediocre community organizer, who was so embarrassed by his dismal academic record that he had to seal it for eternity, owes everything that he has achieved to the media.

Last week we witnessed a poorly executed charade involving Obama and Biden, in which they simulated confusion about who of them came up first with the idea to support the homosexual marriage.

One may wonder about the reasoning of such a statement. This decision, which affects a tiny percentage (most gays don’t marry) of the already tiny 2% homosexual minority, carries quite a lot of emotional charge, which will affect the voting decisions of the majority.

It is strange that Obama would go into such an explosive issue when the US economy is in a dismal state and the scary deficit (with the even scarier national debt) is very likely to ruin the country. Instead of tackling the major issues, the President turns to something that is guaranteed to polarize the electorate. Truth to be told, the gay marriage question may affect the voting preferences of the conservative people. As of the ghetto blacks, who overwhelmingly dislike homosexuals (just ask Rosie O’Donnell about that), it doesn’t look like Obama’s position would sway their vote. I am sure they’ll vote even for the Scarecrow of the Tin Man, if they promise them more food stamps and other free stuff.

It was interesting to observe how Obama’s views on gay marriage evolved over the years. Before he was elected, he clearly stated that that type of matrimonial bond is not something he would support. In the interview, during which he revealed his new position, he told the tall tale about how he spoke with many people and even consulted with Michelle (yeah, right). Finally, he came up with that epiphany.

Obama’s opponents were quick to dismiss his turnaround as another political ploy. But what if he was sincere? What if he really found his inner gay and set him free?

That’s what the homosexual community has always insisted on – gayness is not a choice, but a genetic condition you are born with. I am not sure about that statement, but I am convinced that someone can turn gay under the rights influence.

Over the last days more and more people have started looking for clues about Obama’s sexuality. A story released by a White House insider is circulating the net. It claims that Obama and his buddy Rahm Emanuel have been for years members of an exclusive Chicago bathhouse, where men can “get together and play safely”. I can’t verify it, so I’ll look for clues in what is already known about Barry (and what he still hasn’t managed to hide, seal or classify).

It is a well-known fact that his promiscuous mother Stanley (what a name – it would perfectly fit a butch) had a soft spot for exotic men. That would’ve been all perfect, if she preferred mentally stable people. However, all her contacts came from the deranged Marxist and Third-World revolutionary types, who are as weird as their white counterparts.

As a result, the (alleged) father of her first child turned out to be a Kenyan Marxist, who was also a polygamist and an alcoholic. It’s no wonder Barry never knew him. As if that was not enough, later Stanley dragged her little Barry all the way to Indonesia, where he had to immerse himself in a totally different culture.

And of all of the millions of girls available in the country and capable of doing the job, Stanley picked a homosexual transvestite to become her son’s “nanny”:

“His nanny was an openly gay man who, in keeping with Indonesia’s relaxed attitudes toward homosexuality, carried on an affair with a local butcher, longtime residents said. The nanny later joined a group of transvestites called Fantastic Dolls, who, like the many transvestites who remain fixtures of Jakarta’s streetscape, entertained people by dancing and playing volleyball.”

Some of the other reports went into even more details, saying that the tranny nanny often tried Stanley’s lipstick on Barry’s lips, which made the little rascal happy and cheerful.

Once they came back to America, Obama continued to get his life education from “mentors” coming from the same “mom circle”. Among them we see Marxists, communists, lefty terrorists, deranged preachers, black racist professors, but not a single person from whom he could’ve learned something useful.

In 2008 The New York Times published two poems by Barack Obama. According to the paper, they both appeared first in a college journal in 1981. In one of them the then 19-year-old Barry provides us with a glimpse at his disturbed mind. (His lack of talent is quite obvious and I admire his decision to stop writing poetry).

Here is one of the poems, I am quoting the whole thing, because otherwise my lefty friends may accuse me that I am taking verse “out of context” (the emphasis below is mine):

POP

Sitting in his seat, a seat broad and broken
In, sprinkled with ashes
Pop switches channels, takes another
Shot of Seagrams, neat, and asks
What to do with me, a green young man
Who fails to consider the
Flim and flam of the world, since
Things have been easy for me;
I stare hard at his face, a stare
That deflects off his brow;
I’m sure he’s unaware of his
Dark, watery eyes, that
Glance in different directions,
And his slow, unwelcome twitches,
Fail to pass.
I listen, nod,
Listen, open, till I cling to his pale,
Beige T-shirt, yelling,
Yelling in his ears, that hang
With heavy lobes, but he’s still telling
His joke, so I ask why
He’s so unhappy, to which he replies…
But I don’t care anymore, cause
He took too damn long, and from
Under my seat, I pull out the
Mirror I’ve been saving; I’m laughing,
Laughing loud, the blood rushing from his face
To mine, as he grows small,
A spot in my brain, something
That may be squeezed out, like a
Watermelon seed between
Two fingers.
Pop takes another shot, neat,
Points out the same amber
Stain on his shorts that I’ve got on mine, and
Makes me smell his smell, coming
From me; he switches channels, recites an old poem
He wrote before his mother died,
Stands, shouts, and asks
For a hug, as I shrink, my
Arms barely reaching around
His thick, oily neck, and his broad back; ’cause
I see my face, framed within
Pop’s black-framed glasses
And know he’s laughing too.

That’s quite an unpleasant picture, isn’t it? Two sweaty guys sitting in a living room (or a bedroom) and watching TV engulfed in the stench of alcohol fumes and cigarette smoke.

Out of respect for Obama’s sanity, I will assume that “Pop” doesn’t refer to his father, otherwise the situation described may become more weird and repulsive than even the most complicated cases of Dr. Freud.

The guy with the “thick, oily neck” is most likely one of Obama’s numerous mentors, who, for some reason, is dissatisfied with his protégé. I partially agree with him – Barry hasn’t “considered the flim and flam of the world” because the affirmative action had made things really easy for him.

Barry doesn’t say what that big guy has done for him, but he is obviously infatuated with “pop” and listens carefully to his harsh criticism without saying anything. The passion escalates to the point where Obama pulls a mysterious mirror from under his seat (why the heck did he hide a mirror under a seat?).

Then in the highlighted part “pop” takes another shot of Canadian rye and we suddenly are told that both of them are in their underwear. “Pop” is already pleasantly drunk and he takes the opportunity to point at an “amber stain” on his shorts, which is exactly like the one Barry has on his shorts. And as if this is not enough, “pop” makes him smell pop’s smell, which also comes from Barry’s body.

The author doesn’t clarify if the identical “amber stains” originate from urine or semen. However, the passionate hug, which follows, clearly tells us that the stains revive fond memories. A pee stain can’t create such nice memories (unless you are on the kinky side), so I am going with the second option.

Barry, I know that we are supposed to consider homosexual sex beautiful, but come on, making the smell of a semen stain on your underwear the emotional centerpiece of your poem??? Euww!!! I thought you had higher standards!

Couldn’t you write something about your composite girlfriend? At least the smelling part would’ve been more pleasant…

So I leave it up to you to decide if Obama has evolved into being more tolerant to the gay community or has just released something that always existed in him (not that there’s anything wrong with it!).  Obama is a gift that keeps giving…

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

 

The pin above (sold at the event) summarizes the nature of today’s nakba rally, which took place across the Israeli Consulate in Toronto. I had no idea it was scheduled for Tuesday.  Compared to the last year’s noisy event, the attendance was much more modest.

As usual, the event was organized by the usual strange bedfellows –the International Socialists (who are actually hard-core communists), Palestine House, the Israeli Apartheid Week crowd, and the Hamas-supporting “celebrities”.

I saw the weird lady, who always carries a stack her comrades’ publications at such events. As always, she tried to sell me a communist paper for a buck:

 

The organizers brought a lot of signs (among which I saw “Zionism=Racism” and another one condemning the “racist state of Israel”) but they were wise enough to leave them near the benches in front of the museum and stick to their immediate demands:

 

Of course, the Palestine House guys were there. At far left you see one of their officials, who, at the opening night of this year’s IAW, delivered a speech promising that they are going to march next year into Israel and “liberate” Jerusalem and the whole Palestine:

 

Soon after him arrived the incredible Khaled Mouammar, the former president of the Canadian Arab Federation. He was definitely happy to be among his lefty buddies:

 

I also spotted in the small crowd Ali Mallah, the anti-Israeli activist (and BCF nemesis). He managed to combine in his demeanor both the pride of his influence over the movement…

 

…and irresistible charm:

 

As I was standing there, an aging communist lady next to me pointed at a young woman and explained with excitement that she was Eva Bartlett, Canada’s Rachel Corey, who often travels to Gaza to protest against the Jews and serve as a human shield when they attack the Palestinians (her husband is a Gaza Arab).

 

Eva’s face looked strangely familiar – only later I realized that I saw her at the opening night of this year’s IAW.

She was one the main speakers, who brought some videos depicting the plight of the Palestinian people in Gaza. Those films were some of the crudest examples of Palliwood’s fake propaganda, which showed false confrontations and shootings conceived and executed so clumsily that they could make an impression only on the die-hard lefty dimwits.

Miss Israeli Apartheid Week herself opened the event:

 

Then Khaled grabbed the microphone and switched to his usual repertoire of Israel bashing and Jew-hate rhetoric thinly disguised as an attack against Zionism.

 

At that point I left. I think it wasn’t only me who felt disappointed – maybe if Miss IAW, NDP Ali, anti-Zionist Khaled and Hamas Eva had something of value to say, they would have attracted many more people of their own kind. Hopefully, next year they may come up with something more entertaining…

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

 

Yesterday I went to Queen’s Park (the location of the Ontario Parliament building) to cover a rally organized by the Ontario GSA Coalition, an organization, which is trying to push the so-called “Gay-Straight Alliances” on our schools.

According to some of the websites, which promoted the event, they expected several hundred people to attend, but the turnout was low – most likely well below 100.

 

Before going into details about the rally itself, let me give you some background. It will help you understand why that initiative is so bizarre.

I learned about the event from an e-mail sent to me by the Centre for Inquiry. Years ago, that was an organization supposed to promote free thinking and rationalism. Later they deteriorated into becoming one of the numerous lefty groups, which support strange fringe causes. Last year, after the Mosqueteria scandal erupted at Valley Park Middle school, it took CFI’s director Justin Trottier over a month to make a statement about the case.

While Justin is reluctant to condemn the Islamic school invasion, he and his colleagues have no problem bashing the Catholic schools. In the e-mail they wrote:

“RIGHT NOW the fundamental rights of students are being violated in Ontario.

Catholic schools are denying students the right to form Gay-Straight Alliance groups (GSAs)

This denies LGBT students the right to create groups which work to:

1. Create safe environments in schools for      students to support each other and learn about homophobia, transphobia,      and other oppressions,
2. Educate the school community about      homophobia, transphobia, gender identity, and sexual orientation issues,      and
3. Fight discrimination, harassment, and      violence in schools.

Research shows three-quarters of LGBTQ students feel unsafe at school and that GSA clubs are one part of the solution. Supporting GSAs is not treating one group differently. Those who oppose GSAs are guilty of doing just that.”

Before CFI was a place where you could listen to and debate with witty and creative people (like Dr. Robert Buckman, John Robert Colombo, etc.) – now you see them talking about “transphobia”, “gender identity” and other weird concepts, which make sense only within the walls of OISE. And now they want to force the Catholic schools to accept homosexual organizations.

I am well aware of the potential wrath of the militant gay lobby when I discuss those issues. That’s why I always put in the text my standard disclaimer: I have absolutely nothing against homosexuals, provided they keep their sexual activities within bedrooms, bathhouses, gay bar toilets or other confined spaces and don’t make children part of those activities.

And this is the problem here – GSA’s are organizations, which will be promoted among children, and “learning about homophobia” would inevitably include “education” about gay sex.

Further down in the message, CFI quoted some of the opponents of GSA, probably with the purpose to show what unenlightened bigots they are:

“Here’s what the opponents of the Bill are saying

“I was bullied in school. I don’t believe sexual orientation is a cause of bullying.”- Rabbi Mendel Kaplan

“This Bill 13 smacks of social engineering. As a mom I don’t want my children taught there are six genders.” -Kim Galvao (Chair of Concerned Catholic Parents of Ontario)

“This is limiting Catholic schools to teach Catholic doctrine. Catholic schools are against gay-straight alliances.” -Dominic Tse (Senoir Pastor Chinese Community Church)

“Are our children second class? This creates a tiered system… This Bill 13 embraces the teaching of a radical sex ed.” -Charles McVety (President, Canada Family Action Coalition)

“Many congregations rent space in schools for their Sun worship. Bill is a Trojan horse to promote an agenda. Has nothing to do w bullying.” -Rondo Thomas (Executive Director of the Evangelical Association)”

What is wrong with a mother who says that she is disturbed by the concept of “six genders”? Apparently CFI has abandoned the scientific thinking and accepts as gospel the “gender identity” ramblings of mentally disturbed people.

Ironically, two of the people, quoted as “enemies” of the anti-bulling bill, are themselves victims of homosexual bullying. The Jewish community knows quite well how Rabbi Kaplan was dragged through the mud for months for expressing his religion’s views on homosexuality. Dr. Charles McVety went through a similar ordeal for the same reason – his TV show was censored and eventually cancelled. It takes quite a nerve to attack two religious leaders on the bullying issue, when they have been silenced by the mighty gays.

After reading the enemy quotes, I was left with the eerie feeling that something is missing. Of course! Where is the Islamic opinion?

I happen to remember the statement on homosexuality of Abdullah Hakim Quick, a prominent Canadian imam and Islamic scholar:

“They said, what is the Islamic position on “homosexuality”? And I told them: Put my name in the paper. The punishment is death. And I’m not going to change this religion.”

The quote is much worse than any other in the list and it is very well known, but it is not included and no other Muslim opinions are included either. Why is that? The reason is actually very simple – Rabbi Kaplan and Dr. McVety are a very easy target. What can a Rabbi do to you? The worst thing he can do is to curse you in Yiddish. And the Christian Minister can say something similar, but he still won’t go beyond words.

At the same time, a Muslim barbarian has a wide array of tools, which could put you in your rightful place if you don’t behave – he can shoot you; he can bomb you; he can set you on fire; he can spray acid in your face. The possibilities are endless… None of the CFI cowards, Justin and his buddies, would take the risk of enraging a bearded savage.

And the last point they were making in the message was about Bill 13, so I had to check it out and here is what I found quoted on the Ontario Parliament site:

“Bill 13 2011

An Act to amend the Education Act with respect to bullying and other matters

The people of Ontario and the Legislative Assembly:

… Believe that students need to be equipped with the knowledge, skills, attitude and values to engage the world and others critically, which means developing a critical consciousness that allows them to take action on making their schools and communities more equitable and inclusive for all people, including LGBTTIQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered, transsexual, two-spirited, intersexed, queer and questioning) people;”

It is funny that McGuinty and his stooges adhere to the idiotic gay terminology (maybe the spirit of Smitherman is still floating around the building). The homosexual alphabet soup describing the queer universe had a few more letters added to it. What in the world does “questioning” mean? Is that some kind of an insecure homosexual or a tranny, who at any moment may return to his/her/its original state? And what’s the difference between “gay” and “queer”? Wasn’t it supposed to be the same thing? Maybe if Justin Trottier has kept the humanistic and rational nature of his organization, he could’ve given me the answer.

So CFI was one of the major forces behind the GSA drive. However, the rest of the organizers and speakers were even more remarkable. For example, the unions were there as well, like the Canadian Autoworkers union and its queer division (with the rainbow flags in the picture):

 

Correct me if I’m wrong, but weren’t the unions created to defend the labour interests of their members? After all, that’s how they make their money – from collecting members’ dues. Instead they are fighting transphobia.

The main speaker was Fred Hahn, the president of the notorious CUPE Ontario.

 

He kept rambling about how important was to get that anti-bullying bill going. From his words it appeared like the only purpose in the lives of his union’s 50,000 members is to get that law passed.

The fiery union rhetoric of Comrade Hahn paled when compared with the quiet, but vile passion of the next speaker. That was Davina Hader, the tranny whom McGuinty handpicked to deal with the stubborn resistance of the Catholic schools to his government’s intention to destroy them.

 

When Davina was appointed a few months ago to take a major part in our Premier’s campaign to ensure homosexual diversity in Ontario’s education, he/she/it was quoted as saying:

“The problem the Liberals have been up against with regard to GSAs is the separate school board,” Hader says. “Boards have been saying ministry policies are not enforceable because Catholic schools have special rights. Well, they can’t use that card anymore. This is a push for equality in education right across the board. With this we are teaching the people at the top, and they’re going to have to listen. It will be mandated as part of their curriculum. They won’t have a choice. Queer youth are being bullied and some are killing themselves, this is something that will go a long way to help our youth and effectively change the way the next generation looks at queer people.”

(h/t BCF)

What a feisty tranny – those damn Catholics won’t have any right to be different and would be forced to listen. The speech at the rally wasn’t that different. He/she/it stated that Bill 13 has already past second reading. Additionally, Davina has already been working on including the “gender identity” in Ontario’s Human Rights Act.

Then we heard three more speakers – students, who were going to be the foot soldiers, destined to implement the homosexual alliances in Ontario’s schools.

 

Although the crowd wasn’t that big, the people showed clearly what they stood for:

 

It’s nice to have the Sexual Intellectuals on the Run in the forefront of the fight against what’s left of the Christian religion in our country. I am curious how those pansies are going to introduce their point of view in Muslim schools.

And of course, there was no way to avoid the lie that promoting homosexuality in schools would make everything in them fine and dandy:

 

And I had no idea that GSA’s are simply an innocent support group (it looks like the sex club option would be more appropriate):

 

Take a look at the next picture:

 

It is clear that the tiny “right-wing” phrase was added after the sign was completed and somebody noticed that saying “Catholics don’t like gays” might not be the best generalization they can come up with.

And I am not sure how safe would this hijab girl would be after attending a gay rally:

 

It was an interesting experience to observe all those people –the deluded, the Marxists, the freaks – and think how they are united by the frightening idea of destroying the world around them. The scariest part is the ease with which they are ready to ruin traditions and ideas that have sustained our civilization for hundreds of years.

Morality doesn’t mean anything anymore – the most important part is to get rid of all institutions that maintain it. They make it look like those gay alliances are just innocent kids’ groups, while in reality they are opening the floodgates to more destruction, because the groups will need homosexual councillors and guides, who, once inside the Catholic schools, would start to erode them methodically.

Recently that repulsive faggot Dan Savage (he called himself a faggot in his column years ago, so that’s good enough for me) attacked religion and the Bible in particular during an appearance at a high school. There is no reason to think that anything different would happen here when the perverts who run the gay parade take control over the GSA’s. Then we may see the TNT men in schools:

 

Or trannies that are even uglier than Davina:

 

There is nothing easier to break and destroy…

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

 

 

Earlier today JDL-Canada organized another protest against the planned return to our country of the convicted terrorist and murderer Omar Khadr. The protest took place in front of Toronto’s Sony Centre, where the President of Israel Shimon Peres was scheduled to speak.

 

Unlike the last week’s protest, which went practically unnoticed by the Muslims, today we saw a crowd of Arabs and lefties across the street.

 

They came up with the marvellous idea to seal up their mouths with duct tape, which kept things quiet for a while, but that didn’t last.

It was easy to spot in the crowd our old “friends” from previous pro-Muslim rallies. There was Miss TDSB, who last summer organized the event in support of the Muslim prayers in the Valley Park public school:

 

The bearded guy from the same event was there as well, although this time he chose to wear Western clothes:

 

 

The organizers of the Israeli Apartheid Week didn’t miss the opportunity to show up either:

 

And what “Palestinian” event would be complete without the useful lefty idiots? Here is one of the five or so protesters, who hang out every Friday in front of the Israeli Consulate:

 

Somebody from that self-hating group even brought a “Jews against Israel’s War Crimes” sign:

 

As I said, things were relatively quiet for a while, but the arrival of Shimon Peres and his entourage put an end to the silence.

 

The Arabs started to scream, chant and shout. After observing them for a while, JDL responded in a way that was more humorous than angry:

 

The “Palestinians” didn’t miss the opportunity to state clearly their political preferences. The sign calling for release of the child killers and terrorists from the Israeli jails was prominently displayed, although it called those people “political prisoners”:

 

They didn’t forget the flag with the Temple Mount mosque, which clearly showed what they intend to do with Jerusalem (I wonder what the Arabic words on the flag mean):

 

Everybody had a great time (at least those on the JDL side). Arabs are not allowed to have good time, otherwise they may offend Old Mo. There is one good thing about looking at those angry people – it keeps you on your toes and never lets you forget what the real intentions of those people are.

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

I have never seen such a brawl in the real life:

What are those fat broads fighting about? Is this a part of their sacred culture?

Notice how none of them gets injured.

One thing is sure – they all will vote for their savior Barack Obama.

 

 

Unless you have lived in an Afghani cave for years, you must’ve heard of Omar Khadr – the only Canadian held at Guantanamo and one of the worst terrorists to ever emerge from our country. Encouraged by his family, he joined Al-Qaeda early on and dedicated his life to destroying everything that the democracy in Canada stands for.

His “work” culminated in the murder of US Sgt. Christopher Speer, an army medic, during a battle in Afghanistan, in which Omar’s father, a financier for the terrorists, was also killed. The rest of that horrible family are very much alive and all of them have been involved in terrorism as well. I can think of any other group of scumbags that deserve to be tried for treason and stripped of their Canadian citizenship.

Despite the years spent in detention, Khadr never showed any remorse. He is now eligible to apply to be transferred to Canada, even though the US psychiatrists have warned that he is still dangerous. Of course, the pro-Muslim Obama administration has refused to share those findings with Canada – they are ready and willing to hide the truth in order to get rid of him.

Khadr has strong allies among the Canadian Left. The leader of the Liberal Party Bob Rae has called him a “child soldier”. It almost makes you feel sorry for the poor baby.

Omar wasn’t a child – during World War II people his age in the Soviet Union often faked their age to join the army and fight Hitler. They took full responsibility for their actions. So did Omar, although he, like Hitler, was on the side of evil.

It’s easy for Bob Rae to call for Khadr’s return – in his guarded gated neighbourhood or in his limo he would never encounter any crazed Muslim terrorists. This is not the case for the rest of us, the ordinary people. A filthy animal like Khadr can strike in our apartment buildings or the subway or the buses.

Shobie Kapoor, one of those ordinary people, started a petition to prevent the return of Khadr to Canada.

 

She makes it very clear that getting Khadr back into the neighbourhood would make everybody feel insecure. Her family came from India and they had a first-hand experience with Muslim extremism.

She was interviewed by SUN TV and many people supported her cause. Today JDL-Canada organized a protest in downtown Toronto (Dundas Square) to bring awareness to the petition.

JDL members and supporters handed out many fliers with details of the Khadr case and the text of the petition.

Some people stopped to talk about the petition:

 

Others even spent long time discussing with us the Middle East and Israel:

 

Of course, some were not exactly happy, especially the security, which didn’t like the spot where we were standing, so we had to move:

It was a great event, which showed that people are interested in learning about the dangers of terrorism, although many of them had little knowledge about the Khadr case. As an added bonus, the guys who usually give away Muslim propaganda pamphlets in front of the Eaton Centre weren’t there today.

 

JDL is going to continue repeating the event over the next few weeks.

If you really care about safety of our country, you may consider signing the petition. Here is the link:

Petition to stop Omar Khadr

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

 

 

The cute cat in uniform is Iemon (pronounced ee-eh-mon). He works for a police station in Kyoto (Japan).

According to Mainichi newspaper, Kayo, the wife of Tatsumi Yamada, a police sergeant, found Iemona few years ago, when he was a homeless kitten. She raised him and he turned into a healthy and friendly cat.

The desk in the small police station became his favourite spot and he made many friends among the local people who visited the place.

There are many elderly people in that neighbourhood (over 30%). Common problems among them are the fraudulent phone calls they receive to lure them into making bank transfers to scammers. Dealing with those calls was the job of sergeant Yamada.

He came up with the idea to get Iemon involved in his investigations. His wife made the cat’s uniform and hat. Whenever Yamada is called to investigate a suspicious call, he takes with him Iemon. He says that when the cat is with him, the elderly people tend to listen to his advice more carefully and are more eager to discuss their problems with him. Iemon is also very popular with children.

Only in Japan…

(h/t Toshie)

Thanks to the idiotic immigration policies created by Pierre Trudeau, affirmed by Brian Mulroney and Jean Chretien, and followed by Stephen Harper, Canada has become a favourite target of crooks who present themselves as “persecuted” refugees. Our country is a number one in the list of gullible countries, which would take in every shyster with even the most outrageous claims.

The crucial reason for that reputation is not difficult to guess – the generous benefits provided to everybody who puts his or her foot on Canadian soil are more than enough to spur those people into action. Because of the 1985 Charter decision of the Supreme Court, we now must treat every invader at the same level as the lawful Canadian residents.

As a result, those questionable claimants are treated better and get more benefits than the ordinary Canadians, who are forced to foot the bill with their taxes. The refugees receive free dental care, prescription drugs, eyeglasses and other goodies. If we need those things, the rest of us must pay thousands of dollars and the only consideration we get from the state is a tiny tax deduction.

Everybody can take advantage of that generosity – from Tamils who were able to pay up to $50,000 to smugglers to get them into Canada to thousands of Hungarian gypsies, who come here with phony histories of persecution.

Well, finally the government found the courage to take action. It proposed to cut those extravagant expenses, leaving only the most essential health care. It looks like everybody should support those measures, especially in times when the occupy movement kooks constantly whine about the lack of jobs and high tuition fees.

But those people are not known for their rational thinking. That became clear when their political representatives in the NDP and the Liberal Party opposed the limiting of the health care expenses for refugees.

There is nothing surprising in that – during the previous Parliament Olivia Chow introduced a private bill to eliminate the “discrimination” of new immigrants based on health condition that could be a burden on the country.

Bob Rae, the leader of the liberals, is a very rich man. I am sure that if he teams up with Olivia, they can pool enough money into a fund, which will cover all the free dental care for all phony refugees.

Yes, I am dreaming. I know that the socialists are very generous distributing other people’s money while they jealously guard every penny of their own money (which in most cases is stolen from the taxpayers anyway).

If you are not familiar with the proposed changes that would introduce some sanity in the refugee system, here you can get more details.

If you agree with the idea that you can spend your own money in a better way, than giving it away to international fraudsters with the help of Bob and Olivia, you may let the government (and Minister Jason Kenney in particular) know that you agree with the changes. Here is a link to a petition you can sign:

http://www.jasonkenney.ca/petition/

It is hard to believe that somebody would attack a proposal that respects the Canadian taxpayers, but that’s the reality in our country, where the lefties are a dominant force…

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

 

I have been following the Alberta election campaign closely. Even though the media coverage is biased against the Wildrose Party, the polls consistently show that it has a significant advantage over PC Alberta. Polls are often inaccurate and biased as well, but sometimes a small event in a campaign can reveal the real situation in a very profound way.

Such a “small event” is the ad above. Although it supports PC, it looks like it has been made either by a saboteur within the party or the “Liberal Strategist” Warren Kinsella (the Torontonians may remember his Mafia-style radio ads with a Tony Soprano-like voice for Rocco Rossi’s mayoral campaign, which reduced his popularity from 8% to zero).

However, it appears the ad is not a parody. If it is real, it reveals such a sheer desperation that it proves beyond any doubt that Wildrose will win by a landslide.

It’s hard to believe that those snotty hipsters would change anybody’s mind in Alberta (even with the addition of the foul-mouthed self-proclaimed Latino guy, who for some reason speaks with Pakistani accent). Don’t get me wrong – the ad may work in my part of Toronto, but I live in Mrs. Jack Layton’s bunker and the actors in the ad are the common type you meet in the streets. They would vote in even a chimp, if he runs against the conservatives (yes, we have “progressive conservatives” in Ontario).

It is hard to believe that fans of PC Alberta could support the party by attacking the industry, which provides the money they waste, and ridiculing Albertans and their heritage. An interesting twist is that even the conservative Harper is attacked in that “conservative” ad.

Other than providing some strictly emotional criticism – the Flintstones, the lake of fire and the “homophobia” – the ad doesn’t address any real issues that PC Alberta would resolve better if re-elected. That can appeal to the common contingent of Toronto’s hipsters, who are always present at any ridiculous protest, but again – how many of those can you find in Alberta?

It looks like Alberta is in the initial stage of the self-destructive progressivism that has ruined Ontario. Anything in Ontario’s heritage, which doesn’t meet the standards of the Muslim imams or the progressive homosexuals, is being expurgated mercilessly.

Alberta (at least on the surface) is still keeping its heritage. In June 2009 I went there for an event taking place at the Calgary Stampede site. I saw there that nice girl, who demonstrated some of the traditional riding skills. She even showed me how to use a lasso.

 

I wonder how much longer this is going to last. Once you have the progressives in charge, PETA will insist on replacing the real horses with robots in the name of fighting animal cruelty. Then maybe the Indians would get the Albertan hat banned as a symbol of colonialism and oppression and replace it with some of the funny hats their tribes use. And most of the riders are white – that could be treated as pure white supremacism, which should be eradicated. What about creating quotas for racialized, aboriginal, transgendered, transvestite, two-spirited or any other imaginable special interest group? And why not just shut down the Stampede as a “relic from the colonial past”?

The same week I saw that the progressives were working on that – I watched the Calgary gay parade. Compared to Toronto it was a meager event, with a few dozen participants and even fewer spectators, but I am sure it will grow.

 

Yes, they were nice people as well. A guy, who was following the angels with balloon wings, handed me some gay pamphlets and a free condom.

So what’s the link between the video and the pictures?

It’s actually very simple – if you let the lefty snobs control the province, you’ll see fewer and fewer cowgirls and more and more chubby gay angels with pink umbrellas.

Of course, both of them are only symbols of what may come to Alberta. Gay angels are just a small part of the set of “progressive” values those snobs carry with them. They are like locusts, which devour everything they can and then move to a new land.

They helped elect three times the homophilic David-Suzuki-eco-friendly multiculturalist government of Dalton McGuinty, which is slowly, but surely bankrupting Ontario. They even managed to drive Caterpillar out of Ontario. Apparently many of those hipsters are moving to Alberta, because it offers better opportunities, but they are still carrying their stupidity with them.

Given the chance, they are going to shut down the oil sands through taxation and regulation, distribute billions of dollars among useless interest groups, which don’t work, and litter the province with windmills, which don’t work either.

But here comes the big surprise – once you shut down the most reliable Canadian industry, the natural resources, there will be no land or province left to devour. It’s strange that Alison Redford has chosen such people to advance her cause. If they have their way, Canada won’t be much different than Northern Siberia, where in the man-eat-man environment the debates about the gay marriage are not exactly the most popular topic.

Canada has become a rich and prosperous country because of the hard work of its people, not because of its stand on gay marriage or due to giving away money to lazy and/or crooked people in third-world countries.

The choice is clear – although Wildrose may not be that experienced, at least it gives Alberta the chance to manage itself properly, while voting for Redford’s party, which promises you spending, censorship and support for special interest groups at the expense of the majority, is the sure-fire way to self-destruction.

It’s your move, Alberta…

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

 

I took this picture at an event featuring Lars Vilks (the Swedish cartoonist who got into trouble with the Muslims for drawing a dog with Old Mo’s head). It was the first time I saw Lars Hedegaard.

That was a gloomy event – several of the Vilks’s appearances during his tour in Canada were cancelled (citing security concerns). JDL-Canada ensured the safety of the Toronto event, so it could proceed.

Lars Vilks maintained his sense of humour during his talk, explaining how he was beaten by Muslims, how they burned his sculptures and even set his house on fire.

The other Lars (a journalist and historian from the Danish Free Press Society) lacked that artistic cheerfulness. In a somber tone he explained that he had troubles with the Danish law over accusations of hate speech. Apparently, he criticized Islam and its treatment of women in a talk with a journalist who released the recording without his consent.

He was charged under Denmark’s Article 266(b), which has the same vague meaning as Canada’s Section 13 of the Human Rights Code, but unlike Canada, where the Human Rights Commissions grill you, in Denmark the courts deal with the accusation. The point is that to get a conviction, the prosecutor just needs to show that the statement has offended (or might have offended) somebody. It’s irrelevant if the statement is true or not.

After that gloomy evening, both Larses flew back to their countries – Lars Vilks hoping to convince Muslims to be more open-minded and Lars Hedegaard to face the Danish court.

A few months later we heard the great news that Hedegaard has been acquitted – true, on a technicality, because his remarks were verbal – but still that made us proud that the free speech prevailed. That feeling didn’t last – shortly after that the prosecutor appealed the verdict to a higher court and Lars was convicted. Then he appealed and the case went to the Supreme Court of Denmark, which is supposed to make its decision soon.

His whole ordeal shows how ridiculous the hate speech laws are. The Danish law was introduced long time ago to protect the Jews, but more groups and reasons for hate are being added to the point where it simply shuts down any criticism. And in this case, by banning criticism of Islam, the law paves the way for the advancement of one of the most militant religious ideologies in the world today. An ideology, which doesn’t hide its intentions to dominate the world. At the same, time not a single one of the Muslim fanatics, who abound in Denmark, has ever been charged with hate speech.

The Danish Supreme Court is secretive and it won’t allow discussions, however, they allowed Lars Hedegaard to make a statement (you can read it below the way it was published online, h/t BCF).

Whatever the outcome, the fact that in the 21^st century a peaceful scholar is dragged through the mud for daring to criticize a violent ideology is a disgrace for Europe and its rulers.

Here is Lars Hedegaard’s statement:

Response to Charges of Hate Speech

by Lars Hedegaard

Honourable Supreme Court,

My attorney has presented juridical arguments to the effect that I must be acquitted and I shall refrain from elaborating.

However, allow me to express my quiet bafflement that somebody can claim that it has been my intention to accuse every last Muslim father in the world of abusing his children – particularly in light of the fact that I have carefully explained that it was never my intention to disseminate such an absurd contention.

For precisely that reason, I would have welcomed an opportunity to review the statements I now stand accused of having uttered before they were placed on the Internet. If the interviewer had fulfilled this basic journalistic obligation, I would have demanded that my remarks be corrected so as to reflect my true opinions and the prosecutor could have saved the trouble of dragging me through the courts.

I am even more baffled at one of the claims about my person that has been circulated in connection with this case, namely that I am a racist. I have never been, I am not now and I shall never be a racist. On the contrary, all my life I have opposed racist attitudes, by which I mean hatred towards and denigrating speech about people due their descent, skin colour or other so-called racial characteristics – in other words, antipathy against or ill treatment of people due to circumstances over which they have no control.

Islam is not a race and therefore criticism of Islam cannot be racism.

Islam, which lurks behind this entire case, has been described from a variety of viewpoints. Some say that it is a religion, others that is an all-encompassing ideology that contains a religion, still others emphasise its cultural norms, its culturally transmitted customs and practices. Some even maintain that Islam is so multifaceted that it is impossible to describe it.

But regardless of one’s approach, it must be clear that Islam is not a hereditary human attribute.

If our Western freedom means anything at all, we must insist that every grown-up person is responsible for his or her beliefs, opinions, culture, habits and actions.

We enjoy political freedom and we enjoy freedom of religion. This implies a largely unlimited right to disseminate one’s political persuasion and religious beliefs. That is as it should be. But the price we all have to pay for this freedom is that others have a right to criticise our politics, our religion and our culture.

Islamic spokesmen have the freedom to advocate their concept of society, which implies the introduction of a theocracy governed by god-given laws, i.e. sharia, the abolition of man-made laws and by implication freedom of expression and democracy. They are free to think that women are inferior to men as concerns their rights and their pursuit of happiness. They are even entitled to disseminate such opinions.

I cannot recall a single instance in this country where an Islamic spokesman has been prosecuted for saying that, of course, sharia will become the law of the land once the demographic and political realities make it possible. This despite the fact that we have several examples of, e.g., imams who have openly declared that the imposition of theocracy is a religious duty incumbent on all believers.

In return, these theocrats and sharia-advocates must accept the right of those who believe in democracy, free institutions and human equality to criticise Islam and to oppose its dissemination and the atavistic cultural norms practiced by some Muslims.

It is this right – I would even say duty – to describe, criticise and oppose a totalitarian ideology that I have tried to exercise to the best of my ability.

My speech and my writings have had no other purpose than to alert my fellow citizens to the danger inherent in the Islamic concept of the state and the law.

I have made no secret of the fact that I consider this fight for our liberties to be the most important political struggle of our time.

I would not be able to live with my guilty conscience if – out of fear of public condemnation and ridicule – I refrained from telling the truth as I see it.

And regardless of the outcome of this trial, I intend to continue my struggle for free speech and against totalitarian concepts of any stripe.

 

I have always been amazed at the creative ways in which Great Britain is trying to self-destruct. Its politicians wouldn’t sit still until the country goes down the tubes.

The latest case involves Lord Ahmed (Nazir Ahmed), a Peer from the Labour Party. Although “Lord Ahmed” sounds like a name from a corny joke, Ahmed is a real politician with considerable influence. After making a fortune from questionable real estate deals, he went into politics and eventually was granted his Lord status with the help of Tony Blair.

In 2007 the crazy lord became notorious for his opposition against the government when it bestowed knighthood on Salman Rushdie. The lord said that it was the same as if the Saudi government honoured the “martyrs” of the September 11 attacks.

 

Earlier today it was reported that while in Pakistan, His Lordship has offered £10 Million for capturing George W. Bush and Barack Obama:

“In an expression of solidarity with Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) Chief Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, British parliamentarian of Kashmiri origin Lord Nazir Ahmed has announced a reward for the [capture] of U.S. President Barack Obama and his predecessor, George W. Bush.

“He made the announcement at a reception arranged in his honor by the business community of Haripur on Friday [April 13, 2012]. Former [Pakistani] foreign minister Goher Ayub Khan, Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl’s (JUI-F) central leader Hafiz Hussain Ahmed, and [Khyber Pakhtunkhwa] Provincial Minister for Education Qazi Muhammad Asad were also present [at] the occasion.

“Lord Nazir said that the bounty placed on Saeed was an insult to all Muslims, and [that] by [offering it], President Obama has challenged the dignity of the Muslim ummah.

“‘If the U.S. can announce a reward of $10 million for the [capture] of Hafiz Saeed, I can announce a bounty of £10 million [for the capture of] President Obama and his predecessor, George Bush,’ Lord Nazir said, adding that he would arrange the bounty at any cost, even if he was left with the option of selling all his personal assets, including his house…”

Isn’t England a weird place? Only a few months ago they had a football fan arrested and sent to jail for making racially offensive remarks on Twitter.

Now we have an arrogant Muslim, who is ready to give away millions of his money for a terrorist cause and nothing happens to him. And he is not an ordinary Muslim – as a Lord he has sworn allegiance to Her Majesty the Queen and is supposed to protect the interests of his country. Instead, he is not ashamed to support openly the Muslim terrorism and savagery.

Did Tony Blair get a bribe to promote that Islamic piece of garbage? If Lord Ahmed and Baroness Warsi are the best and the brightest politicians that the Muslim community in Great Britain has to offer, I wonder what the rest of them would do, if they get power.

The case shows that Muslims have no intention of adapting – their elites apparently do everything to undermine the countries they move to. Otherwise, the “moderate Muslims” would’ve condemned the deranged Lord long time ago. You don’t hear a peep from them – they are either too scared or simply agree with everything he does. (It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that the second option is most likely the reason for their silence.)

So dear moderate Muslims, where are you? Are you going to take a stand for your country? Or would you reinforce the idea that Muslims can’t be trusted in a position of power?

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

 

Tonight I went to the Orthodox Easter service. Just came back with a few pictures (sorry for the quality, it’s the best I can do with my camera at night).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This afternoon the Pakistani shia community in Toronto organized a protest rally near the Pakistani Consulate. I never thought that I would ever say it, but that was a Muslim demonstration that I (to a great extent) supported.

The immediate reason for it was the slaughter of 200 shia Muslims in Pakistan, but it looks like those atrocities have been going on for years. According to the leaflet the organizers were handing out:

“Recent atrocities include: on route to Gilgit, Baltistan, approximately 2000 extremists stopped busses that were heading home, pulled out the shia’s and beat them fatally. Stoning, kicking, bashing with sticks and gouging their eyes out. Around 200 are suspected to be murdered.

43 killed during an Ashura procession in Karachi

34 killed during Arbaeen

43 killed on route for ziyarat to Iran

10 killed during Eid prayers

8 tortured and murdered in Parachinar.

Their hands and feet were cut off and then they were killed. More than 1400 Muslims were slaughtered in Parachinar from 2007-2011. These are human beings. They are your brothers and sisters. What will you do for those innocent victims?”

Yes, they were human beings – and so were the Christians and the Ahmadiyya Muslims in Pakistan, who have been systematically slaughtered in a similar way for decades. However, very little information about those atrocities makes its way into the media.

Maybe if all Muslims showed the same outrage over every case of oppression and mistreatment involving a minority group, the shia would have been safe now.

Walking among the participants, it was such a pleasure to see the signs condemning the most aggressive Muslim bully in the world – Saudi Arabia.

Some called for closure of the Saudi hate schools in Pakistan and attacked the country’s king:

 

 

They didn’t spare even the Taliban – it was a strange feeling to learn that they are disliked. You can see “Down with Taliban” and “Shame on King Abdulla” in the picture at the top. Another sign observed that it is “Easy to Be Taliban, Hard to Be Human”:

 

Even one of the speakers, an imam, whose name I missed, said that everybody in Pakistan had to be treated with respect, especially religious minorities. He stated that the Pakistani government has disgraced itself by failing to protect its own citizens.

 

I said in the beginning that I supported the rally to a great extend – and here comes the big “but” – instead of paying more attention on what really is wrong with the situation in Pakistan, where even the Muslim sects can’t get along, the organizers didn’t miss the chance to include the Jews in the mix of complaints.

Israel has neither the interest nor the capabilities to control Pakistan, but the sign in the first picture implied that somehow that tiny country has the sinister goal to “divide and conquer” (and of course the Muslims have uncovered that plot).

That insane theory was brought up again in the speech of Zafar Bangash, the notorious Israel hater and fanatic. It was very odd to see him at an event caused by the clash of two groups of Muslims. It was the same as inviting a clown to give a eulogy at a funeral.

 

Even the best conspiracy theorists would envy his way of weaving totally different ideas and forces into a mad plot. You can listen to his speech at Blazingcatfur, but let me give you a few details.

He started by blaming the Saudi wahhabis’ influence on the Pakistani government. But the wahhabis didn’t act alone – they were lackeys of the British, who installed Saud’s dynasty. Now Saudi Arabia has extended its servitude – it serves Israel and the American imperialism, trying to help them spread their influence. It is not by chance that the Saudis provoked that battle within Islam in Pakistan – their purpose is to create animosity between Pakistan and Iran.

The Muslims should respect Iran because it is the only true Islamic country in the world. Iran’s leaders (whom Bangash met) are the only true Islamic government as well. Only by supporting Iran, Muslims can hope to achieve the goals of their religion. The profound changes in the Muslims countries make the enemies of Islam tremble and with the help of the Islamic Republic, the Muslims will soon march to liberate “Palestine” and “Al Quds” (Jerusalem). So as one could expect, the fight between shia and sunnis will eventually lead to the destruction of Israel.

It was a sad end for the rally. It started as an event marking a real human tragedy and Bangash singlehandedly managed to turn it into a farce with his lunatic ravings.

I wonder if it’s too much to demand sanity from your speakers. If the Muslims in Pakistan take their guidance from people like Zafar Bangash, I see long decades of fights, hand cutting, eye gouging, gutting and plain old stabbing in the future of Pakistan…

Good luck with that!

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

 

Happy Orthodox Easter!

 

 

It was nice to see that Mike Tyson has joined the racist choir of the mainstream media and celebrities of different colours and views, calling for George Zimmerman’s lynching.

What else could you expect? Tyson is one of the role models of the US ghetto community. A convicted rapist and skilled ear-eater with the manners of a Neanderthal caveman, he is all that the cool gangsta boys want to be.

In a recent interview with Yahoo News, when asked about the case of Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman, he generously dispersed his wise opinion about the current situation in America. One of his suggestions was about how to deal with Zimmerman:

“It’s a disgrace that man hasn’t been dragged out of his house and tied to a car and taken away. That’s the only kind of retribution that people like that understand. It’s a disgrace that man hasn’t been shot yet. Forget about him being arrested–the fact that he hasn’t been shot yet is a disgrace. That’s how I feel personally about it.”

It looks like the good old lynching, against which Martin Luther King Jr. supposedly fought, is still considered the best solution among the black elites.

Of course, Mike Tyson is a dimwit (the fact that they convinced him that he could perform successfully a one-man show is a testimony to that). And his condition is not a result of a lifetime of head blows. That’s the way he has always been; that’s why they love him more than any black scientist. But the funny thing about our society is that often it takes an idiot to express openly what other people are thinking.

Barack Obama and Eric Holder, although suit-wearing college graduates, have done their fair share of action to contribute to Zimmerman’s lynching, attacking him long before before he was charged. Obviously they act in a much more refined way than Mike the Brute, but their purpose is exactly the same.

Barry Obama must be proud to have Mike Tyson among his voters…

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

 

Wiebo Ludwig, Canada’s most notorious convicted terrorist, has died.

A look at his life reveals what’s wrong at so many levels with the current situation in Canada.

When CTV Calgaryannounced his death, the news started with:

“The man best known for taking a stand against the oil industry has died of esophageal cancer. Ludwig, 70, spent nearly 20 years at odds with the oil industry.”

Note the language – “stand against…” “at odds with…” – it sounds like he was one of the many cockeyed lefties, who were yelling against capitalism.

The truth is, he was much more than that – a terrorist and criminal, who went through life suffering very little in terms of punishment for all the atrocities he did. He was suspected of shooting a girl at his farm in 1999, but was never arrested. Judging from the fact that a rural farm in Alberta is not as crowded as Chinatown, maybe taking the case seriously could’ve help to catch a criminal…

Then he was finally caught red-handed after bombing gas and oil facilities. For some strange reason, his activities were considered “vandalism”. He got away with only about two years in jail.

His “conviction” showed that the Canadian Government is as bad as the media in dealing with people like Ludwig. Actions, which would’ve been considered terrorist, if committed by anybody else, were ignored – like in many other cases, his self-proclaimed environmentalism absolved him from anything bad he has ever done.

Of course, for the Left he was an undisputed idol. They were ready to overlook his Christian fundamentalism just because they considered him such an important soldier in the fight against the dreaded oil industry. The fact that he looked like their other idol, Karl Marx, didn’t hurt either.

It was a strange connection, because Wiebo was the typical grumpy Luddite, who could’ve survived on his farm for years without oil or gas, while the urban pansies, who adored his destruction spree, couldn’t have lasted a day without those hated commodities.

You probably know the common saying that if you can’t say anything good about the dead, you’d better say nothing.

Wiebo Ludwig’s death is one of the rare cases when you can’t say anything good, but saying nothing is like expressing silent support for a terrorist. The world becomes a much better place when people like him leave it.

Good riddance, Wiebo…

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

It’s nice to know that the black racist industry in the USA is thriving. Other than Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson’s racket enterprises, the black T-shirt business is catching up as well. In the middle of the Trayvon Martin-George Zimmerman case, the black community is sure to take a position against the “pussy ass cracker” Zimmerman in defense of the drugdealing thief Martin. Nice portrait of the “community”! Here is the T-shirt:

 

 

About a month ago I wrote about the efforts of the Toronto Police to recruit hijab-wearing Muslimas. Despite the outrage of the ordinary people and a few media outlets, it doesn’t seem like the police have figured out how absurd the idea is. One of my regular readers, “The Lone Ranger”, expressed his opinon about the issue. As it frequently happens, many more people hold the same views (although they often don’t have the time or the courage to write it down).

That’s why I think it is good to have The Lone Ranger’s opinion quoted in its entirity:

 

OK, I’m going to be controversial here. The slide in policing standards began when they accepted homosexual officers. Political correctness and moral relativism has caused enormous damage in almost all Western societies over the past 25 years. A little later, sprinkle in a large helping of multiculturalism and social engineering to the brew and you end up with an explosive concoction. The very idea of Muslim veiled women walking around Toronto in police uniforms and with high caliber Glock semi-automatic pistols strapped to their hips is a nightmare waiting to become a reality.

Will these Muslim female officers have to police the annual gay pride deviants fest? What will they do when they encounter naked homosexual men and lesbian women on the streets? Or will they be assigned desk duties during gay pride month so as not to be offended by the sight of naked adults on our streets? Will they be excused duties to attend Ramadan, while Christian officers are obliged to work through Easter, Christmas and Thanksgiving? Will they be given sick leave when their husbands beat them black and blue as all “good” Muslim men are supposed to do when their spouses step out of line?

I can see nothing but trouble here. This experiment with Muslim & Sikh officers in the UK police has already floundered badly due to the enormous cultural and religious differences. Indeed, the created of separate ethnic police forces within police forces will ultimately lead to the destruction of any cohesion within the rank and structure of our city police services, and the break up of our society along religious and cultural lines.

” “Police in London already give victims the right to ask for a Sikh officer to be involved in an investigation, but the scheme could be introduced for other religions elsewhere.

Chief Supt Joanna Young, from the Met’s Criminal Justice Policy Unit, said: “If it’s a success, I would encourage the other (police) associations to do likewise.”

The project is intended to help investigate “honour” killings and forced marriages but Metropolitan Police Federation chairman Peter Smyth said: “We’re stretched thin enough already. Are Sikh officers going to have their rotas changed so there’s always one on duty?

“It’s political correctness gone mad. We talking about the creation of a separate force within a force.”

But Palbinder Singh, chairman of the Metropolitan Police Sikh Association, said: “I don’t believe a white officer is ever going to be fully conversant with a Sikh.”

And this from Jihad Watch:

“You remember when far-right extremists blew up those bombs in London on July 7, 2005. This “rebellion” should induce authorities to wonder which side these Muslim police are really on. But it won’t. “Muslim police say Islam not to blame for terror attacks,” by Robert Winnett in the Telegraph, January 20 (thanks to Pamela):

Muslim police officers have rebelled openly against the Government’s anti-terrorism strategy, warning that it is an “affront to British values” which threatens to trigger ethnic unrest. The National Association of Muslim Police (NAMP) claimed that ministers were wrong to blame Islam for being the “driver” behind recent terrorist attacks. Far-Right extremists were a more dangerous threat to national security, it said.

The officers told MPs that Muslims were being “stigmatised” by the Government’s attempts to tackle terrorism, which was adding to “hatred” against entire communities.

In the official intervention, the association said the Government’s anti-terrorism policies could not “continue unchecked”.

The comments, made in a seven-page memorandum to a parliamentary committee investigating extremism, are embarrassing for Gordon Brown. They indicated that Muslim officers may be reluctant to take part in “hearts and minds” anti-terrorism campaigns.

The organisation, which represents more than 2,000 officers, was previously publicly backed by Mr Brown. The Prime Minister said the association was crucial to bridge the historic divide between Muslims and the police….

In an analysis of the Prevent strategy, which is a set of policies designed to stop radicalisation, the organisation claimed: “The strategies of Prevent were historically focused on so-called Islamist extremism.

“This has subjected the biggest black and ethnic minority community, and second biggest faith group, in an unprecedented manner, stigmatising them in the process.

“Never before has a community been mapped in [such] a manner … it is frustrating to see this in a country that is a real pillar and example of freedom of expression and choice.

“Our British system is a model for the world to follow, yet we have embarked on a journey that has put this very core of British values under real threat.”

The association warned there were “echoes” of the racism of the 1970s and 1980s which led to inner city riots. “We appear to have ignored the lessons learnt from these dark days,” the officers said….

The Muslim officers believe the Government is wrong to blame Islam as the main driver of terrorist activity.

Research by “those convicted of terrorism acts shows Islam was not, and is not, a real driver but all our strategy seem to focus on is this un-evidenced view of Islam being the driver,” they said. The Government said that confronting Islamic terrorism was one of the key priorities of the anti-radicalisation strategy. Last night, the Foreign Office admitted that funding for counter-terrorism policies in Pakistan had been cut….”

The Lone Ranger

Here is another specimen from my gallery of people, who are sure-fire supporters of Barry Obama.

According to the person, who posted the video, the following happened:

“In evolution class at Florida Atlantic University

“The slide we were on just before was about Female Sexual Selection. For instance, female peacocks have selection in their mates, preferring the males with the bigger train of feathers.. Somehow she went off on some tangent with a question about how does Evolution play a role in the killing of all black people…

She was escorted out of class and I heard she was tasered and arrested by the police “- Rachel Bustamante”

 

Scary, eh? It comes to show that affirmative action rarely works in fields that require higher intelligence, like real science – too much effort may cause her head to explode (but she would definitely survive if she enrols in social work or black studies).

Enjoy your voters, Barry…

 

The inevitable side effect of the civil rights movements and the affirmative action procedures, which followed it, was the addition of the useless “Black Studies” to the numerous other useless courses and subjects in the liberal arts departments of the American universities.

The “scholars” who work in that field depend entirely on the White Man to pay for their “work” just because of his irrational guilt. Most of their students are also guilt-ridden white kids. Their “brothers” and “sisters” don’t give a damn about the black studies.

The funny looking idiot in the video below, who looks and acts like a fag, who just came off of a homosexual parade platform, is Dr. Kamau Kambon, a prominent black studies “scholar”. Just watch the short video, he has some great ideas:

Are you surprised the way I am? His speech is simultaneously a call for genocide and incitement to riots. Imagine if a white person says just one tenth of what Kambon said – he will be immediately arrested, with all mainstream media calling for his execution.

Yet that piece of garbage in the video can get away with anything.

There is just one small detail that Dr. Kambon hasn’t thought of – if he exterminates all whites, the academic bums like him and the ordinary welfare bums in the ghetto will survive only until the next welfare check. Oh, wait there will be no next check, because the white people, who will be supposed to cover it, would be dead. So in about 30 days the blacks, who follow Dr. Kambon would start to kill and eat each other.

I am really fascinated that the black community has such luminaries. I am sure that Dr. Kambon generously supports with parts of his academic welfare handouts the re-election campaign of Barry “The Welfare King” Obama. Go Barry, go! With friends like that retarded “doctor” you don’t need any enemies.

© 2012 Blogwrath.com