Archive for the ‘Canada – Islam’ Category

Sometimes I wonder what it would be like if I hop into a time machine and transport myself into the future. Last week I had such an experience while attending Toronto’s first halal food fest. Finding myself in a crowd dominated by hijabs, niqabs and bearded guys with long robes, where hearing somebody speak English was a pleasant surprise, made me realize what Toronto will look like with the current rate of immigration.

 

The event was organized in a very Muslim fashion – crowded and disorderly. It took place in the International Centre in Mississauga. There was a very long line and the reason for it became clear seeing the inside – the space was relatively small, with a very large room left empty apparently to serve as a prayer room.

At the entrance they handed everybody a Festival Guide, which had on the second page a personal message from the lying dyke of Queen’s Park:

“I am very pleased to see a flourishing halal food industry in Ontario. Its growth has supported local farmers and businesses, and given consumers more choice. Beyond that, halal food is an expression of the vibrant multicultural society that we have built together.”

Of course, Kathleen Wynne, like any Liberal politician, who has graduated with flying colours from the McGuinty school of deception, most likely doesn’t mean that. Painting the Muslim conquest as vibrant multiculturalism ignores the fact that in a proper Muslim society lesbians like Wynne (though unelected) not only won’t be in power, but it is questionable how long she would survive.

The food presented was quite mediocre. Instead of showing good authentic Pakistani, Turkish or similar restaurants, which exist in Toronto, the fest was dominated by “conquest cuisine” – items from different cultures with imposed halal touch. You could taste plain burgers (but halal), halal Italian food, halal Mexican, and even halal sushi.

 

The few stalls with traditional food were placed outside for good reason – the heavy smoke from the BBQ’s made it difficult to breathe.

 

 

 

The food was a secondary attraction. Most of the businesses presented dealt with items designed to keep the Muslims within the iron grip of their religion. There were hijab and niqab dealers; Muslim art; Muslim home decorations. CIBC was trying to make Muslims feel like in Saudi Arabia by offering sharia banking (link).

The book stands offered a wide range of literature for the pious Muslims.

 

 

 

 

 

 

And those were just the English books. God knows what was hidden in the pages of the books in Arabic and Farsi. The organizations promoted matched the books, like the masjid below, advertised by two baghead ladies.

 

They also lured the devout Muslims with sweepstakes for a trip for two to Mecca. As a non-Muslim, I felt completely excluded from the Ontario multicultural paradise, because the organizers would’ve never let me win.

 

The whole atmosphere of the event made perfect sense once you saw the happy attendees. The majority of them looked like they just landed in Toronto on a flight from Mecca.

 

 

I agree with dyke Wynne – our multicultural society is very vibrant. It vibrates so strongly that its incomparable parts are falling apart like in a monster created by Dr. Frankenstein.

This fest gives us a rough idea about what future the fanatical Muslims have in store for the Toronto kafirs. It ain’t pretty…

And here is a short movie from the event, which may make you feel even more depressed:

 

© 2013 Blogwrath.com

The barbaric sharia law is entering Canada again. A few years ago the attempt to introduce it in Ontario through sharia family courts was defeated. That happened through a grassroots women’s movement, which scared the government of Ontario. If it weren’t for that pressure, the political establishment would’ve adopted sharia in the name of multiculturalism.

 

The second entry is pushed in a more clever way – through a large financial corporation, which is CIBC, the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. This is huge when you consider the fact that this is one of the five giant banks dominating Canada’s financial industry. At last week’s Toronto Halal Food Fest, CIBC had its own booth promoting sharia compliant investing.

 

Sharia is the questionable Muslim contribution to the jurisprudence and the political organization of society. It asserts the medieval supremacy of Islam over infidels and women, combined with barbaric punishments for most transgressions, like stoning adulterers and killing apostates and homosexuals.

The innocently sounding sharia family courts serve as a tool of affirming the Muslim women’s status as inferior creatures. From a Muslim point of view, if a husband utters three times the words “I divorce you,” that’s a perfectly legal sharia divorce. If a wife wants to divorce, she should go through the humiliating sharia courts, whose purpose is to force her to stay in an abusive marriage.

Things are not different in sharia banking. Sharia banks in Saudi Arabia, Iran and other backward places provide the financing for the Muslim terrorism and for expansion of the Wahhabi and Shia fanaticism around the world. It’s a totally separate issue that sharia banking, meaning that it avoids interest charges (which we are told were invented by the evil Jews), is a total scam. A bank can’t exist without charging interest and the fact that the sharia banks try to hide it behind “service charges” or “joint venture fees” can fool only the idiots who deal with those banks.

I am far from suggesting that CIBC is financing terrorism, although sharia banking would always attract a few unsavoury characters. I am also sure that if I suggest that they are doing that kind of banking for any other reason than serving our fellow Muslim-Canadian fanatics and making them feel like they live in the shitholes they left to get a (supposedly) better life in Canada, there will be an army of lawyers trying to disprove my point.

After all, CIBC is a multi-billion dollar corporation, which can easily afford to destroy a poor blogger like me, who unwisely is questioning its noble image. And if that happens, the Saudi and Iranian banks will be applauding that victory over “Islamophobia.”

But here is something you may consider, CIBC. Adopting sharia banking by a private corporation will only embolden the fanatics you serve. It is just a tiny first step that would allow them to say in the near future: “See, we already have sharia banking in Canada. Why don’t you allow us to have sharia courts?”

And there is another thing that the bankers lack. It’s a weird concept called “morality”. Sure, you can make a quick buck from Muslim suckers who believe in sharia banking and investment, but you are doing a disservice to all Canadians, dead and alive, who built the country on traditions and laws that treat everybody equally.

Believe it or not, there are millions of immigrants, including Muslims, who came to Canada because of those laws and traditions. You have the word “Canadian” in you corporate name, but there is nothing Canadian in catering to a barbaric ideology (masking itself as religion) in order to make your pathetic profit.

I hereby declare that I am not going to deal with CIBC in any way until that disgraceful catering to sharia continues. I don’t know how many people would support me, but what I have learned from living in a communist country is that no matter how much a moral stand is ridiculed or threatened, it will eventually prevail.

CIBC, you should be ashamed of yourselves!

 

© 2013 Blogwrath.com

Imagine if a large group of Nazis organizes in Toronto a celebration to mark the anniversary of Adolf Hitler’s death. They gather in a large hall, giving speeches about his virtues while the listeners munch on Adolf’s favourite Viennese pastries. Their kids enter a competition for the best Hitler essay in order to win a camera. Probably within minutes the riot police would march in, arresting everybody. The children will be placed under foster care. The Toronto Star would dispatch its most passionate crew to document the intervention and the indignation of the lefties demonstrating in front of the hall.

Sounds absurd, doesn’t it? Well, thanks to the “miracle” of multiculturalism, if you substitute Nazism with a more exotic homicidal ideology and the white supremacists with fanatics whose first language is not English, the event becomes totally acceptable to the Toronto establishment. Last Sunday a similar celebration was held in Toronto for Ayatollah Khomeini.

 

That despicable Islamist is not much better than Hitler. The only reason he couldn’t cause the same damage was that the Islamic hostility toward science prevented him from developing the necessary military power (although his heirs are working on that). Other than creating an Islamic state, which mistreats its citizens and is a danger to all of its neighbours, Khomeini is a world-renowned expert in animal sex.  His advice includes gems like these (h/t BCF):

#2631. It is loathsome to eat the meat of horse and mule and donkey and if somebody makes coitus with them, that is an intercourse, they become unlawful and they must be taken out of the city and sold elsewhere.

#2632. If they have intercourse with a cow and sheep and camel their urine and dung becomes unclean and drinking their milk will also be unlawful and they must be killed and burned without delay, and the person who had intercourse with them must pay money to the owner. Further, if he had intercourse with any beast its milk becomes unlawful.

 

 

Under Hitler, the Wehrmacht was developing sex dolls for the German soldiers, who were about to invade France in order to prevent STD infections from French prostitutes. Obviously, the Ayatollah found an original Islamic way to combat adultery.

The event took place at the Islamic Society of York Region, run by the prominent Muslim community leader Zafar Bangash. Instead of questioning him why he organized the celebration of a murderer, the York Region police provided heavy security for his Islamofascist event.

 

That is the same police force, which last month shut down an appearance by Pamela Geller. They intimidated the rabbi at whose synagogue she was to speak. Their reasoning was that her views were not consistent with the values of the York Regional police. Pamela Geller is opposed to the militant Islamism and it seems they don’t like that.

On the other hand, Zafar Bangash holds very different views. In the video below you can see him speak at a Pakistani shia rally last year. Zafar has no problem praising the leadership of the Islamic Republic of Iran as the best in the world. In the end he even calls for a march to liberate the whole “Palestine” and “Al-Quds” (Jerusalem), which means the destruction of Israel.

Those ideas are in perfect harmony with the views of Ayatollah Khomeini and the Islamic zoo that controls Iran today. Judging from the extra effort that the York Regional police took to protect the event, probably they shared the same values as the Khomeinists. Is that so, Diversity Officer Ricky?

I wonder how they forgot to invite Justin Trudeau. After observing his love affair with the vilest Islamists, that airhead would’ve delivered an excellent speech on what Canada could learn from Ayatollah Khomeini. No problem, they can invite him the next year when he is fishing for votes.

It’s no wonder the Khomeinists are arrogant. Other than the police protection, they have the support by silence of the many that are afraid of them. The Toronto media completely ignored the event. The infamous “Board of Rabbis” found the time last month to condemn Pamela Geller, yet they kept silent about this anti-Israeli fest. Bernie Farber also failed to notice the Islamofascist event, maybe because he is too busy lobbying for the phony gypsy refugees from the European Union. Other organizations think it is a good idea to throw most of their efforts into promoting an upcoming speech of Condoleezza Rice (how is that helping the Jewish cause anyway?).

The only Jewish organization that made the effort to confront the event was the JDL-Canada. The rabbis who hated Geller called the JDL a “fringe” organization in their press release. Well, it looks like it takes “fringe” courage to oppose something against which the “mainstream” cowardice is powerless.  The JDL didn’t do it alone – at the protest we saw Christians, Hindus and, most importantly, a very large group of Iranians representing several organizations.

 

 

 

That’s not how the Islamofascists saw the protest. In their coverage the next day on one of their propaganda websites they wrote:

The Zionist extremists from the terrorist organization, Jewish Defence League (JDL) were there to protest and at one point physically assaulted some of the volunteers and even pushed the police officers who intervened. Three of the volunteers who were assaulted have held discussions with the police which did video record the incident. Based on the analysis of the video captured by the volunteers they may press charges against the terrorist organization JDL. The time has come for the Canadian authorities to follow the example of FBI and declare JDL a terrorist organization in Canada as well. Hopefully the mainstream Jewish community will support the efforts to ban JDL in Canada and will not allow them to speak in their name anymore. The fury of the Zionist extremists stems from their utter failure to suppress the stand against the brutal oppression of the indigenous Christians and Muslims in Palestine. Imam Khomeini (RA) played a critical role in exposing the ugly face of Zionism to the world and JDL seems to be extremely frustrated that his popularity and respect continues to grow. 

Other than sounding like an article of Dr. Goebbels from Der Völkischer Beobachter, the piece is a bold lie. It creates the impression that JDL-Canada was the only group that showed up at the protest. In the twisted world of the Muslim anti-Semites there is always a Jewish conspiracy behind every event.

In fact, the Islamofascists were those who tried to provoke confrontation. The arriving participants in the event taunted the Iranian protesters with obscene gestures, insults in Farsi, and provocative posters. Of course, the police did practically nothing to stop them. That’s what happened in the sequence below (you can see it in the video in the end).

 

 

 

 

And the Iranians had more than enough reasons to be angry. From the posters they brought and the conversations we had with them it was clear that here in the West we have very little understanding of the magnitude of the danger that Iran poses. Daily oppression, executions and an extended network of terror institutions and organizations that promote Ayatollah Khomeini’s agenda abroad – that is the legacy of the Iranian regime.

 

 

 

Yet we see very little of that in our media. Journalists who waste weeks covering a non-existent video of the Mayor of Toronto don’t have the time to cover those horrible events, which threaten not only the Iranians, but also our country.

I also need to mention the brave Iranian women, who were a major part of the protest. As one of the main targets of the Islamofascists, those women know exactly what they are up against. And they were the most vocal opponents of the event. Needless to say, no Canadian feminist organizations were present – to them the murderous Khomeinists are a lesser evil than a “sexist” who says to a girl that she can become a good wife.

 

 

 

I will never forget when a few years ago the Muslim fanatics tried to impose the barbaric sharia law through family arbitration (as they have already done in England). Even the supposed feminist Marion Boyd, a former minister in Bob Rae’s NDP provincial government, when asked for an expert opinion, found sharia perfectly acceptable.

If it weren’t for those relentless Muslim women (most of them Iranian) who organized the resistance against the proposal, we would’ve had a law that treats women as inferior creatures in the “best” traditions of sharia. Their anger scared the otherwise spineless Premier Dalton McGuinty, who would’ve accepted sharia in the name of “diversity”.

The position of the Iranians who protested and of those who stood with them was clear. What I don’t understand is the position of those who gathered in the big farmhouse converted into an “Islamic Society” (I wonder if they still keep any goats in the barn).

If according to Bangash Iran is the beacon of the perfect Islamic rule and Canada is such a horrible place that doesn’t respect Iran, what is he and his buddies doing here?

If they go back to Iran they’ll be able to worship Ayatollah Khomeini each and every day and, as a bonus, will have the opportunity to beat up or even kill everybody who disrespects him. Yet they stay here.

Last month I attended a lecture on the global jihadism by the former CIA officer Clare Lopez. The Khomeinist regime plays a major role in it through its secrets services, which receive unlimited funds. They also operate through organizations like Hezbollah, which plan and execute terrorist acts all over the world. A major resource they use is the large Iranian diaspora around the world, which they either lure to help them or threaten and intimidate them into submission. Those were the people who killed the translators of Rushdie’s “Satanic Verses” following the order from Ayatollah Khomeini.

And they are ready to commit even more murders for him…

The tragedy is that the authorities in Canada on many levels act like total idiots ignoring a real danger. The Iranian protesters risked their safety and probably lives to make their point.

The guys and gals in the Islamic farmhouse gathered to celebrate a filthy murderer. They even threatened to sue the protesting Jews. Canada is turning into a place where the most repulsive Islamic extremists can freely disseminate their propaganda, while everybody else is silenced.

Isn’t it time to ask them: whose interests do you serve?

And here is my video about what really happened:

© 2013 Blogwrath.com

 

The Toronto devotees of the notorious Islamofascist Ayatollah Khomeini are going to mark the anniversary of his death on June 2. The Khomeini Fest was originally scheduled to take place in Toronto, but it has been moved to a different, supposedly larger, venue – The Islamic Society of York Region located at 1380 Stouffville Road, Richmond Hill.

JDL-Canada is organizing a protest against the event. Those who want to participate need to assemble at 4:30 p.m. at the new location.

 

The increasing number of Muslims in Toronto has done nothing to enrich the tapestry of our “enchanting multiculturalism.” On the contrary, it has only emboldened the most arrogant and violent of them. Today we learned about another case of “charming” Muslim presence in Toronto. In his show this morning David “The Menzoid” Menzies told the story of a SUN NEWS employee, verbally attacked by a niqab Muslima, who found her skirt design offensive.

(h/t BCF)

The Menzoid himself was a target of a Muslim attack. Two years ago he was punched by a rabid Muslima over pictures he was taking in a public place. The new incident (and probably many more that were not reported) shows the damage the unrestricted Muslim immigration could bring. Notice how in the end of the altercation the Muslim gargoyle threatened to dial 911 and that scared the SUN employee. No wonder – she most likely would’ve been arrested. Our corrupt police force usually takes the side the weirdest and laziest people (see Caledonia and the Idle No More blockades).

We accept without any screening the followers of a barbaric religion, which oppresses not only its members, but also all kafirs who have the misfortune to live around them. Parts of the city (especially Scarborough) are so infested by those veiled ghosts that they make it look like a suburb of Kabul.

What can such a woman contribute to our society? What kind of a job could she do walking around in her portable black tent? The only job possible is collecting welfare cheques.

I am not sure why that Muslim idiot attacked the Canadian woman. Maybe she was too jealous that she could not wear the same skirt or simply was told to act like that by her imam or husband. The niqab has its advantages – nobody can see how dirty their clothes are under it. You’ll understand what I mean, if you happen to stand near such a veiled woman on a bus in Scarborough in July. The unique blend of stale sweat and odour of mysterious food could make Coco Chanel run away in horror.

We are always told that the extreme Muslims are a minority. Even if it is so, the overwhelming majority of Muslims either silently support them or are too scared to say anything. The ones willing to say something against the extremism are hard to notice, because they are constantly running for their lives.

Total control is part of the nature of Islam. Even in the “moderate” Malaysia the Chinese and the Hindus are always warned that they should dress in a way that would not “offend” Muslims (especially during Ramadan).

Now the same thing is coming to Canada. A few years from now we will have sharia patrols harassing everybody, the way they do now in England and in the Netherlands. Where will be the No One Is Illegal idiots, who want to bring to Canada every savage that shows up at the door? Where are the dumb genderless feminazis, who see “patriarchy” in every institution of our country?

Of course they are silent – no matter how much you bash the Western “patriarchy”, it will keep paying you welfare and art grants. Opposing the Muslim patriarchy is a totally different business, because you can literally lose you head in the process.

The barbaric rules and demands of Islam have no place in Canada. Those who want to live in Canada must adapt to the rules and traditions that built this country. The sooner our spineless politicians figure this out, the longer they’ll stay in power.

 

© 2013 Blogwrath.com

 

So two academics, an artsy “freedom fighter” and a priest walk into a synagogue… The setup that night resembled an old bar joke, but the outcome wasn’t that funny.

The highly-anticipated panel discussion with Daniel Pipes on the issue of Islam and Islamism missed the point. He and the other two participants – Prof. Salim Mansur and Father Raymond de Souza – along with the moderator Fred Litwin (from the Free Thinking Film Festival) delivered a presentation more fitting for an “interfaith dialogue” event than a discussion where most of the people showed up looking for answers to pressing political problems.

 

It was hard to figure out their position on Islam, however, the panel was united in its displeasure with Pamela Geller as a person with supposedly extreme positions. When you criticize someone, who is doing some real work and taking daily blows for it, you are usually expected to offer a better course of action.

None of the panelists offered anything better. Don’t get me wrong – they all had good intentions and were well prepared, but there wasn’t much of practical use for their views. This post will be critical. When somebody is criticized, the most common comeback is that their words have been taken out of context. In anticipation of that I recorded the presentations of Daniel Pipes and Salim Mansur and you can see them in their entirety here (Daniel Pipes & Salim Mansur).

The audience sensed that they were receiving inadequate answers. After all, theorizing about the possible evolution of Islam on the day when in London two Muslim savages beheaded a British soldier in broad daylight is not the best way to address the threat of Islam or Islamism.

The lively discussion and the concerns of the people who showed up at the event were the most interesting part of it. That was when real issues were brought up and that video is much more interesting.

 

In his opening statement Fred Litwin set the tone of hostility for the evening attacking the “wrong” way to deal with Islam. The culprits were Geert Wilders and Pamela Geller. Their actions led to “horrible” side consequences like banning circumcision and kosher slaughter. They are definitely not good, the good people are in the panel.

Daniel Pipes admitted in the beginning that the issue of Islam is controversial and emotional. We cannot ignore the recent attacks in Florida and London. The problem is how to respond. There are different approaches; some fight the radical extremism, others, like Geert Wilders consider Islam to be the enemy. In his movie he linked every appalling practice of Islam with a specific verse from the Koran. A third view is to deal specifically with the foreign Islam as a main enemy.

According to Pipes, Islam can be reformed and become moderate. Can the Muslim leaders make the coexistence possible? Yes, Islam can change, everything human changes including religion. There are many examples – the US constitution, it’s an important document, but you can’t understand the USA by only reading the constitution, the same applies to Islam, the Koran and the hadith.

The concepts of jihad and the place of women in Islam have all changed. It’s not enough to look at documents; you need to look at Islam itself. That religion has changed over time and continues to change. Since the 1960s had been enormous changes in Islam, much for the worse. But if Islam can get worse, it can get better as well.

Sharia is the key to the language with which Islam influences public life. It puts many demands on the Muslims, for example the jihad war against non-Muslims which now is not applied universally. The Koran calls for limited taxation, which now few countries can afford. The prohibition of interest is impossible – without it businesses and banks can’t run.

These are all compromises, which had to be adopted by Islam. There are two directions in the Muslim countries – one is westernizing, the other Islamization. Ataturk in Turkey in the 1920s changed the country through westernization. But in the 1970s resistance appeared, which eventually brought in Erdogan. Turkey is returning to Islam.

In other countries they decided that Muslims are not successful, because they don’t apply sharia properly. In fact they borrowed the idea of returning to something stable and correct from Mussolini and Lenin. The first big success of that trend was the Khomeinist revolution, which inspired Islamists over the world. Islamism could also be non-violent – Erdogan was elected several times.

Many old ideas still exist in Islam – there is slavery in Mauritania and Saudi Arabia and some leaders find it normal. Their banks deny they charge interest but that’s deceptive – they are charging service fees. We have to support the positive changes. Some clerics declared female genital mutilation contrary to Islam. It will take many decades to make those changes permanent. We should resist both violent and peaceful Islamism and support the reformers.

Everybody in the audience was wondering what Mr. Pipes’ point was. Other than demonstrating his knowledge on the issue, he didn’t have any definitive position. Islam in his view was an amorphous entity that could take both good and bad shapes and no one knew when the new change would occur. His lecture offered no answer to the question what the ordinary people could do protect themselves. Those doubts resurfaced later when the audience asked quite a few inconvenient questions.

In his presentation Father de Souza observed that the majority of victims of Muslim terrorism are fellow Muslims. It is a war within the Islam, a theological struggle. After quoting several politicians discussing the expansion of radical Islam, he said that the best solution is to work with those in the Muslim world who want to change the minds of the dangerous people.

Commenting on the now famous speech of Pope Benedict, in which he mentioned Islam (and Muslims rioted over it), he said that the speech was distorted. The Pope asked the question whether it is possible to justify religious violence. That boiled down to the nature of god in Islam. Despite the initial violent reaction, later Islamic scholars wrote a letter concerning the issues he raised. Then the king of Saudi Arabia organized a conference with Muslims, Jews and Christians, although he couldn’t do it in his country. It had to be held in Spain with the help of the Spanish King.

I am not sure if Father de Souza realized the dark irony of the situation. The Muslim “understanding” of the Pope’s message was limited to organizing an interfaith conference in Europe, because the filthy kafirs, Christians and Jews, can’t be allowed into the citadel of the Muslim barbarism. And he considers this “progress”. It’s no wonder that Christians in many countries feel betrayed by the cowardly behaviour of their clerics.

The presentation of Prof. Salim Mansur focused on defining the difference between Islam and Islamism. Are they the same? The answer has an immense implication about understanding the Muslim world. Islamism is a fascistic and totalitarian ideology, regardless of how Islamists are dressed or educated.

Islamism is about power. Its purpose is the establishment of a sharia state, a theocracy. The Muslim Brotherhood has such goals.

At the same time Islam is a faith tradition with a message to worship one god and live truthfully. It began under Mohammed as a spiritual quest. Islam can’t be reduced to political ideology. Islamism in its current form is promoted by the Saudi Wahabism with the oil money. Islamism glorifies violence.

The West needs to distinguish between Islam and Islamism. If we consider them the same that means the West is at war with the whole Muslim world and you can’t engage with them. On the flip side Islamists have a similar view and consider everybody infidel.

Islamism is a perversion of Islam. The west should support those Muslims that fight against Islamism.

I understand that (at least nominally) Prof. Mansur is Muslim. He wants to defend his religion. However, it is very difficult to tell the difference between Islam and Islamism. Islam has always had political aspirations; it always boasts that it offers the perfect solution to all moral, social and political issues. Islam is never willing to play the second fiddle in a society – it can sense any weakness and exploit it mercilessly to achieve its goal of domination. Prof. Mansur himself acknowledged in his book on multiculturalism how the western liberal democracy is targeted by such movements. Maybe someday Islam would limit itself to the activities of worship (like most other religions) but it looks like it may take many decades to see that change.

 

I don’t know if the panel expected everybody in the audience to agree with their mushy positions, but the people present had their own opinions and they were not afraid to express them. Thinking people have that nasty habit to see through bullshit and call it.

That became painfully obvious to the panel when the Q&A session started. The hostility was rekindled by the moderator Fred Litwin, who found it necessary to ask the first question and it was again about Pamela Geller and the way she sees Islam. This part of the post covers the events in another video, which shows exactly how things went on (that’s in case somebody blames me that I take statements out of context). You can see it here.

Again, the panel was unanimous. Daniel Pipes flatly stated that she was wrong. His example was Egypt, where the Muslim Brotherhood wanted power but they were confronted by the people and failed. (That was a lame argument – in a Muslim country where the majority of people are backward and uneducated, with no perspective of developing any economy, the support for theocratic parties will always be strong).

Salim Mansur said that she and her supporters were wrong – she raises theological questions, but only Muslims can resolve those theological questions. Who is Pamela Geller to decide how those problems will be resolved? The pendulum swings toward the Islamists, but it will swing back because the Islamists have nothing to offer. Father de Souza echoed Mansur’s statement saying that you cannot offer an answer to a theological problem unless you have knowledge of theology and she doesn’t.

That was sad to watch – three respectable men trying to diminish what a brave woman tries to do to deal with the threat of Islam, all of them hiding behind some questionable theory.

The audience obviously didn’t buy those arguments. A woman asked the panel how they can dismiss Pamela Geller’s work, when she has done so much to defend the victims of Muslim violence (like the victim of honour killing Aqsa Pervez). Besides, Geller doesn’t deny the fact that Islam may evolve, but she is dealing with Islam now, isn’t there anything important in what she does?

Pipes’ reply was shockingly snobbish – he simply dismissed her again saying that the members of the panel are not students of Pamela Geller. That definitely wasn’t met with applause by the audience.

A friend of mine asked an excellent question about Salim Mansur’s statement that Islam started as a spiritual religion. How could that be true, if Mohammed was a very successful warlord, who conquered many peoples, he was not just a spiritual person?

Mansur replied with an example from a Kurosawa movie where the same event is seen by the same people in several different ways (he probably meant “Rashomon”). Mohammed in his century established one of the most successful societies outside of Europe. Mohammed is not responsible for what happened later as the Jews are not responsible for the end of the Roman Empire. (That was totally unconvincing – no amount of verbal equilibristic could change the fact that Islam was established as a political ideology with expansionist goals and remains the same even today.)

The inconvenient questions didn’t stop. Another attendee observed that the Nazis wouldn’t have been able to achieve their goals without the willing participation of the Germans. Isn’t that what Pamela Geller is talking about when discussing what is going on in the mosques?

Prof. Mansur finally descended from his theoretical pedestal and faced the reality saying that he has talked for a long time about the same things. Not only Pamela Geller sees that, many people have noticed it. There is recruitment going on at mosques and very little is done about it. Multiculturalism makes that easier for the jihadis. Even Muslims have concerns about the same things. Mansur finally took the strong position he displayed last month after the plot to bomb the VIA Rail was uncovered (you can read and see what he said here.)

Even though Pamela wasn’t there, she obviously couldn’t get a break. Fred Litwin started to bash her again – the reason he puts down Pamela, he said, is not because she fights Islamism, it’s because she goes one step further. If you read her blog and Robert Spencer’s writings, you’ll see that she wants a confrontation with Islam. Both Spencer and Geller criticized the Pipes article about the distinction between Islam and Islamism.

Another attendee asked a question about what is to be done, we are dealing with violent jihadis, whose number is huge, even if their percentage among Muslims is small, we don’t want to become collateral damage.

Pipes again gave a strange response, offending the person who asked and the audience, and then said that we have to support Muslims who fight Islamism.

Here Litwin decided to educate the audience by sharing his encounters with “moderate Islam.” For a time he worked for Intel in Singapore and took trips to Malaysia and Indonesia. He noticed that Islam in Malaysia is different. Islam is very diverse. He had no problem being Jewish in Malaysia. Muslims in Malaysia or Indonesia were not Islamists.

It was kind of him to provide the perspective of the wealthy Western tourist. He sounded as pathetic as a TDSB multiculturalism specialist lecturing a bunch of 5-graders in Toronto. Visiting those countries is not like living there. In Malaysia the Muslims are barely a majority, but they are as pushy as everywhere else – just listen to the two large minorities that keep the country going, the Chinese and the Hindus. They pay more taxes than the Muslims and are regularly harassed when they don’t “respect” the Muslim customs.

Recently a Japanese company making mayonnaise was harassed by the Malaysian government to change its logo in order to do business in Malaysia. The logo depicted a doll with tiny wings, which the Muslims considered an angel.

The whole issue is as demented as the Muslim riots over cartoons, but to Litwin that may look like a reasonable moderate Muslim demand. I have seen Fred Litwin on the TV stating that he is homosexual. There is nothing wrong with that in Canada, but it is very, very wrong in Muslim Malaysia. Anwar Ibrahim was a powerful member of the government a few years ago. His career was destroyed and he did time in jail, accused of being a homosexual. If a government minister is treated like that, could Mr. Litwin imagine what would happen to an ordinary Malaysian homosexual? Or even better – what would happen to Mr. Litwin, if he picks up a guy in Malaysia and gets caught? I am sure his concept of Muslim moderation would change overnight.

In Indonesia the persecution of Christians has never stopped (they don’t have local Jews to persecute). In 1997, during the crisis, the moderate Indonesian Muslims exterminated thousands of Christians. And maybe I should remind Mr. Litwin what the Muslims did in a night club in Bali a few years later…

 

This is the problem with people like Fred Litwin – they sound impartial and respectful, but actually they treat their audience like a bunch of ignorant idiots willing to believe anything.

The last round of the argument was started by a guy who had a very simple question – where are the moderate Muslims? What happens in the Muslim world is shocking – if let’s say 10% of the Christians are violent, there will be huge outcry. Churches and governments would be condemning the violence. That doesn’t happen in Islam, where the extremists are supposedly 10%.

Daniel Pipes responded by pointing at the moderate Muslims in the room (Raheel Raza, Tahir Gora, Salim Mansur). There is a strong faction of them in Ontario. We need to find and help them all over the world. (Frankly, that was far from convincing and the person who asked didn’t buy it.)

He said that was wonderful but that’s not the point. We are told there are many moderate Muslims and that appears not to be true.

Finally, Pipes, visibly irritated, made his final estimate – Islamists are 10-15%, the moderates are 1-2% and the vast majority are in between. The domination by Islamises is regrettable.

That wasn’t comforting either – a large passive Muslim mass that can be easily won by the Islamists, if they offer them enough goodies is a very real threat.

R. Erdogan, the Prime Minister of Turkey, once said that there is only one Islam. And this is the only thing he said, with which I fully agree. The scholastic discourses about Islam and Islamism are meaningless. It’s all about Islam. Islam is a doctrine with built in violence (jihad). Aggression and mistreatment of the others is part of its nature.

The only way to deal with it is to curb its political aspirations, which will bring destruction to the West. That means limiting the powers of all Islamic organizations in the Western countries. Islam would be much less dangerous if it really gets limited to the mosque. We can hardly afford to wait for it to evolve into something more docile. Its bloodthirsty “warriors” would do everything to stop that evolution.

But putting Islam in its place, as one of the many cults existing in the West, won’t be an easy task. It will require courage and a lot of work to repair the damage caused by the multiculturalism.

 

© 2013 Blogwrath.com

The dreaded Pamela Geller event came and went and the carefully crafted Canadian multicultural Tower of Babel survived it (that tower doesn’t need anybody’s push, it is quietly self-destructing from within). The doom and gloom predictions that her “inflammatory” speech will divide the country didn’t come true.

 

Over the years she had been the target of such a consistent demonization that after listening to her critics, you may expect to see Lucifer’s twin sister. Nothing is further from the truth – the first impression she made on me was that she is an open, optimistic, what-you-see-is-what-you-get type of person. Not a trace of snobbery or “hate speech” – every statement she makes is based on facts (which doesn’t mean much in Canada, where telling the truth could be a crime according to the human rights commissions). Pamela also has two other things going for her – enthusiasm and eloquence, which help her easily convince you in her opinions.

The talk took place at the Toronto Zionist Centre. In the afternoon the Facebook page of the event had only 61 confirmed attendees, but the word of mouth reached far beyond Facebook, because the crowd of people willing to see Pamela exceeded the capacity of the large hall. The organizers had to open another large room on the third floor, where people could watch her talk on a big screen. People still had to be turned away for the lack of space.

 

I am sure that Pamela’s enemies also contributed to the popularity of her talk. The Zionist Centre wasn’t the first choice as a venue – the event’s original location was in the Chabad Flamingo Synagogue in Thornhill. But then Insp. Ricky Veerappan of the York Regional Police visited its rabbi (Rabbi Kaplan) and threatened him with dismissal from his position as a police chaplain, if he let her speak in the synagogue. The reason – Geller’s ideas contradicted the local police values, which for some strange reason were identical to the values of two vile Khomeinist organizations operating in the same area.

On the day of the event we witnessed a new twist – an organization going under the bombastic name “Toronto Board of Rabbis” issued a press release condemning Pamela Geller. I have never heard of them, but my sources told me that they are a group of about 40 people from two synagogues. Thanks to Bernie Farber from the now-defunct Canadian Jewish Congress, who promoted the press release and whole-heartedly supported it, I have the text.

 

Among other things, the learned rabbis said:

The TBR is a strong supporter of freedom of speech for all, including Ms. Geller. Ms. Geller’s voice and message are already well known here in Canada and beyond. There was no sense in inviting her here to Toronto to speak before a Jewish audience. Sadly the only sure result of this event will be increasing tensions within the Jewish community and between Jews and Muslims in Toronto.

The TBR, which represents rabbis from all denominations of Judaism, wishes to make clear to all that it finds the invitation distasteful, just as it finds Ms. Geller’s views distasteful. We dissociate ourselves from the actions of the radical fringe Jewish group that extended the invitation. We call for more events here in Toronto that will build up friendship and understanding between local Jews and Muslims.

After paying lip service to freedom of speech, they say that Ms. Geller has spoken enough, everybody knows her and she shouldn’t be speaking in Toronto. What pathetic arrogance! It sounds like Pamela will single-handedly ruin the flourishing love between Jews and Muslims in Toronto. Never mind that the extremist imams invited to every Islamic conference despise Jews.

The “radical fringe Jewish group” is obviously JDL-Canada. That “fringe group” is one of the very few, which confront Muslim fanaticism face to face on the street, while those rabbis hide like mice in their synagogues and limit their thunder to writing half-baked press releases. At last year’s Al-Quds day at Queen’s Park a huge crowd of fanatics carried Hezbollah flags, pictures of Khomeini and anti-Israeli signs, while chanting “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free”. Two idiots from Neturei Karta (are they members of the Board of Rabbis?) were paraded around like gypsy dancing bears to demonstrate the Jewish support for the destruction of Israel.

The only group that confronted them was the JDL, with the support of Christians, Hindus, and secular Iranians.

Pretending that everything could be resolved with “friendship events” is naïve. No matter how many halal food tastings or school bus trips to Niagara Falls they organize, nobody is willing to face the issue of the future of Israel in a real discussion. And organizing boring interfaith dialogues won’t help either, because the bearded imams that they try to “reach” don’t like Jews that much. At the same time, the “progressive” rabbis totally ignore Muslims who want to promote the Canadian values (like Salim Mansur and Raheel Raza from Muslims Facing Tomorrow).

Anyway, if that cowardly press release came one day earlier, it could’ve attracted even more attendees.

As of the event itself – you can see it on videos. I uploaded eight videos, which show the topics Pamela Geller covered in her talk (that’s at the Blogwrath channel on YouTube). If you have time, you can watch the complete uninterrupted recording uploaded by Blazingcatfur.

Pamela Geller in Toronto – Introduction by Meir Weinstein

Pamela Geller in Toronto Part 1 – On Free Speech

Pamela Geller in Toronto Part 2 – On the Islamic Supremacy Groups in the USA

Pamela Geller in Toronto Part 3 – On the Freedom Ad Campaigns 

Pamela Geller in Toronto Part 4 – On the Anti-Jihad Ad Campaign

Pamela Geller in Toronto Part 5 – On How People Fight for Freedom 

Pamela Geller in Toronto Part 6 – On the Ground Zero Mosque

Pamela Geller in Toronto Part 7 – On the Jihadi Hatred for Israel

 

 

The main event was preceded by a small reception, where a few people got to know Pamela Geller and many others had the opportunity to see her again.

 

Meir Weinstein, the National Director of JDL-Canada, introduced Pamela Geller. He thanked the police for helping to ensure the safety of the event in Toronto, although he criticized the politization of the York Regional police. Catering to the questionable values of the Khomeinist organizations operating in the area, shows a disturbing double standard. While Rabbi Kaplan was intimidated, their other (Muslim) chaplain attended without any problems a conference in Saudi Arabia organized by  a group with ties to Al-Qaeda. Such troubling affiliations make the work of Pamela Geller even more important, because she is one of the few who has the courage to confront Islamic extremism.

Pamela Geller started her talk with the statement that free speech is the most basic of all freedoms. Its enemies realize that and that is their first target when they want to suppress somebody’s ideas. That’s what officer Ricky tried to do when intimidating Rabbi Kaplan. She had never experienced in the USA such a blatant anti-free speech action by the police. Similar purpose had the shameful press release written to suppress her right to share her ideas with those who are interested in them.

In the USA Obama abandoned the quest for freedom and on the international arena he supported the Muslim Brotherhood as a “moderate” group. The result was disastrous, with many governments losing power and giving way to Islamic supremacy regimes. Yet despite that, the media never criticized Obama’s actions and they are even trying to make her shut up.

That disturbing trend is not limited only to the Muslims countries. The Islamic supremacy groups are expanding their base in the USA as well. Many of them are trying to cover up their true actions. “Official” Muslim organizations like CAIR and the Islamic Society of North America have been determined to be unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation case, yet they still are considered mainstream moderates. The media create the impression that no major terrorist threats have been uncovered in the USA, but that’s a lie – every week there is an unsuccessful plot, which is almost always ignored by the media.

That happens even when we are facing catastrophic attacks, which the Obama administration cover up of the Benghazi case proves.

Pamela tries to bring awareness to those issues through her ad campaigns, which are demonized in the same way as her other work.

 

Despite the media negativity, ordinary people are very much aware of the real problems and respond positively to her campaigns. In a recent case, Islamist organizations paid to run ads demonizing Israel. She had to run a counter-campaign to state the facts. She is not and has never been anti-Muslim – her main target is the Islamic savagery, which affects everybody, including most Muslims. She has worked for years to save Muslim girls from abuse and honor killings.

Jihad is the main element of that savagery. Recently the Islamists in the USA tried to whitewash that concept through another ad campaign. They showed jihad as an innocent desire for improvement, which is far from the truth. She responded with her own campaign based on the jihad statements and actions of prominent Muslim terrorists and politicians.

That was also rejected by the “progressives”. The most curious case was in San Francisco, where the homosexuals objected to her ads showing how gays are treated in most Muslim countries. The Muslims, who voice their objections against extremism in the USA are ignored or treated with hostility. A few years ago a small group of Muslims organized a demonstration to condemn the “underwear bomber”. Their leader received three death fatwas from Muslim extremists for organizing the event.

That fight is very difficult, but only the ordinary people can really take a stand for their freedoms. They love their country and the way they live and are ready to defend it. Most politicians are not reliable, because they are willing to sacrifice their principles and values for short-term gains. In the case of the Canadian victim of honor killing Aqsa Pervez, many ordinary people gave their support to restore the girl’s dignity by providing a gravestone with her name (despite the objections of her family that killed her).

 

In the end Pamela had a long questions and answers session, during which she answered many questions from the audience. Those included her role in stopping the “Ground Zero Mosque”; the hatred of the jihadists for Israel and  many more.

All in all, that was an excellent event and everybody who attended it left with more knowledge and better understanding of the problems that we face in North America.

The only terrifying thing (at least to me) was the thought that if the Khomeinists, officer Ricky, the “Rabbi Board” and their protectors from the Human Rights Inquisition have their way, we will never be able to see and listen again to passionate and informed people like Pamela Geller. All they are going to allow us to do would be to listen to the bland sermons of the political correctness, which taste worse than English porridge or goat intestines. (Is it racist to criticize food?)

 

© 2013 Blogwrath.com

I received the message below in my e-mail. It is from Prof. Salim Mansur, a copy of his letter sent to the chief of the York Regional Police concerning the pressure on Rabbi Kaplan to cancel Pamela Geller’s talk hosted by his synagogue. Prof. Mansur is a staunch defender of the traditional Canadian liberal democratic values. He is also one of the few Canadian Muslims, who have the courage to openly oppose the dogmas of Islam that breed extremism.

Here is his letter:

Dear Sir,

In a recent interview with CBC, when asked what he would do about terrorism, Justin Trudeau replied that he would go after the “root causes” and the issues of exclusion and alienation. As a recently elected leader of the Liberal Party maybe we should pay attention to his words.

So let’s try to look at those root causes. Last year many Muslims in the world went berserk over a YouTube movie about Old Mo. Although the movie was poorly made, it pictured accurately the “prophet” of Islam as a bloodthirsty warmonger. Many people were killed during those demonstrations and riots (mostly by their fellow Muslims).

The event in Toronto featured a large crowd of Muslim fanatics. They didn’t kill anybody, but spending time among them provided some understanding of their way of thinking. The video below shows them in action. This is the face of the Canadian multiculturalism.

Do those people are also the face of the Muslims of Canada? Most of them are dressed as if they came straight out of an Afghanistani cave. They carry anti-Semitic signs and are ready to “take care” of anybody who offends their cult. They shout incoherently like inmates from a mental institution. Is it a surprise then that some of them can take that insanity one step further and start actually fighting the “enemies of Islam”?

As I reported earlier, Pamela Geller, the outspoken activist against the Islamization of America, was scheduled to speak in Toronto on May 13. The event will still take place, but today we learned about a curious twist concerning the venue.

Rabbi Mendel Kaplan from the Chabad Flamingo Synagogue, where Geller was supposed to appear, was visited by officers from the York Regional Police. They made him an offer he couldn’t refuse – he can either host her and lose his job as a police chaplain or keep her away and keep his job. He decided to keep Geller away.

It is not a surprise that the police in Toronto is doing the dirty job of the Muslim fanatics. The political correctness has made them servants to every group of enemies of Canada, as long as they belong to an ethnic or religious minority.

You can see the interview of Meir Weinstein, in which he provides the details, but let me add a few things to that.

 

The Muslim center, which is located not far from that synagogue, is under the control of sympathizers of the murderous regime of Iran. Every year they  mark there the anniversary of the pedophile Ayatollah Khomeini. Many celebrities from the political elite have been taking part in those hate fests, including representatives of the York police. Their former chief Armand Labarge even received an award from those fanatics:

 

 

It is beyond puzzling that the force that is supposed to protect us takes the side of the groups, which have done very little to face and expose the Muslim terrorism. The latest terror plot in Toronto involved two men, who were planning the VIA rail bombing with the help of Iranian forces.

How can we trust our government when they try to shut down a speaker, whose only “fault” is that she exposes an ideology that is trying to destroy us?

This is not the first brush of Rabbi Kaplan with the York police’s political correctness. Not so long ago he suffered a six-month ordeal being investigated for “homophobic” views. Kulanu, a Jewish homosexual group, viciously attacked his religious views, making their case to dismiss him. Eventually, the York police concluded that he did nothing wrong.

However, in the pecking order of the offendable groups the Muslims trump the homosexuals. So he can’t get away this time.

Many people agreed with his decision to cave in, but I beg to differ. He practically helped the police to suppress the free speech of a person, who has never done anything wrong. Unlike the Khomeinist barbarians, who support a homicidal regime, Pamela Geller’s opinions are based on facts about the damage done by the militant Islamism. Taking part (even indirectly) in covering those facts is not an honorable thing to do.

Moreover, even if the York police tries to fire the Rabbi, he has a very good legal case against them, because there is nothing in her presentations that is criminal or offensive to anybody (except the supporters of the militant Islam).

All these efforts of the police and their Muslim buddies are not going to bury the truth. We will find another venue for her talk.

Although cases like this one are frustrating, they are useful in outlining the real positions of the sides involved. When an institution, which has the duty to make our city safe, panders to the “hurt feelings” of a group of fanatics, who don’t even bother to take a position against terrorism, we have a problem.

Will we be able to resolve it?

 

© 2013 Blogwrath.com

It was only two weeks ago when the Supreme Court of Canada declared the criticism of homosexuality to be a hate crime. It seems that in Toronto Islam is also under the same high protection. Today, at a protest somebody was arrested for mocking Islam.

As I wrote earlier, a protest event was scheduled for March 20 at the offices of the Liberal Party of Ontario. It was caused by the fact that the Minister of Labour of our ruling party, Yasir Naqvi, endorsed an Islamic book, which (in accordance with the Koran) recommended wife beating as a tool for solving family problems. Despite the public outrage, the Liberals chose to ignore the issue and turn a blind eye on Muslim misogyny.

 

The protest attracted a tiny group of participants carrying signs like:

“Beat wife only for honour & discipline, Holy Koran 4:34”

“Those that deny Islam will be killed, Holy Koran 33:16”

“Expose jihad with free speech or die”

However, what they lacked in numbers, they made up for with their creativity. Eric Brazau, who was one of the organizers, was dressed like an imam and accompanied by a woman in a full Muslim niqab.

 

Using a microphone, he gave a mock Muslim sermon, assisted by the veiled woman. He was “praising” Canada as a place, where you can beat your wife with impunity. Reading from sheets of paper, he also counted all the benefits you would get here if you are a religious fanatic. It was a satirical performance, which still focused the attention on the flaws of Islam.

In the beginning the people didn’t pay much attention. Then two police women stopped by and a police van for transporting people under arrest parked in the side street.

 

Many of the people who were passing by found the event amusing – laughing and stopping to take pictures. Then some Muslims started to argue with the protestors, although everything was kept peaceful.

At certain point the police decided that the mockery of Islam is getting dangerous and sprang into action. Even more officers arrived and Eric Brazau, along with the other organizer, Ron Banerjee, were led to the police vehicles in the side street.

 

After the customary processing, Brazau was handcuffed and led away in the van. After some questioning, Banerjee was released.

 

 

 

Although the police measures against a peaceful protest were outrageous, they didn’t surprise me. Now every special interest group is beyond reproach regardless of how despicable their positions or actions are.

But truth is truth, no matter what the Supreme Court of Canada says. Islam is a barbaric religion, because it openly promotes violence against women and deprives them from their rights. Of course, the police can arrest me for saying that, but that is not going to make Islam more likable or acceptable.

And we also have a double standard applied here. There is a similar type of protest going on in front of the Israeli Consulate every Friday. A tiny group of lefties, Muslims and self-hating Jews stands there handing out flyers and holding signs. They are also peaceful, but the materials they give away are virulently anti-Israeli and anti-Jewish. And yet I have never seen police talking to them; none of them has ever been arrested.

It looks like the critics of Islam are lesser people who can be on the receiving end of the police wrath for no apparent reason.

Welcome to the new Toronto, where the Canadian values mean nothing and their defence becomes a dangerous business.

 

© 2013 Blogwrath.com

The latest scandal of the embattled Liberal Party government of Ontario involved the endorsement by one of its ministers of a book, which promotes violence against women as outlined in the Koran. Our lesbian Premier Kathleen Wynne, who never misses the opportunity to flash her homosexuality in everybody’s face, is silent on this issue.

That seems strange when you consider the fact that from a Muslim point of view she has two strikes against her – she is both a woman and a lesbian – two inferior categories in the Islamic view of society. And unlike other religions, Islam takes very tangible measures to keep those categories in their place. Women should be obedient and if they are not, the Koran recommends beating as an acceptable “correction” (that was also recommended in the book praised by Wynne’s minister). Homosexuality is a capital crime in many Muslim countries in accordance with the barbaric sharia law and Wynne definitely won’t survive in those places.

When you look more carefully, her position is not that surprising. Wynne was one of the politicians, who allowed Muslim fanatics to take control over one of the secular Toronto schools.

As it is often the case, you can’t expect our lefty politicians to support us - they are  usually busy taking care of every imaginable special interest group.

A group of concerned citizens are organizing protest against that betrayal of the traditional Canadian values:

WEDNESDAY March 20th 2013 PICKET KATHLEEN WYNNE 6 pm- 8pm 10 St Mary’s Street, Downtown Toronto

 

Next week JDL-Canada and Act For Canada organize a meeting with Gavin Boby, a prominent British lawyer, who helps communities to resist the forceful Islamization of their neighbourhoods. Here are the details:

An Evening With Gavin Boby, from the Law & Freedom Foundation, U.K.

 Wednesday, February 6, 2013 7:30 p.m. sharp

 Place: Toronto Zionist Centre

 Address: 788 Marlee Road (just south of Lawrence Avenue)

 Metro line: Lawrence West subway station (University Line)

 Cost: $10.00 at the door; students free

Gavin Boby is a British lawyer who specializes in town planning law. He runs The Law and Freedom Foundation, dedicated to preserving a lawful society that protects freedom. Their first project is a legal effort to assist community groups, on a pro-bono basis, if they are faced with inappropriate planning applications for more mosques in their neighborhood. They focus on legal procedure but also on the nature of Islamic doctrine and as a result have won 16 out of 17 cases.

The National Post just disclosed that a Canadian Security Intelligence Service’s (CSIS) report stated that “a large number of venues” that are used by “Islamist extremists” are “radicalizing Canadians” across Canada. In this Canadian context Gavin Boby’s message is even more relevant.

 The Muslim Brotherhood, operating in Canada, just purchased a 10,000 square foot building in a Montreal neighborhood. On record, this will be the 4th real estate acquisition in a very short time span. Last fall, the Muslim Association of Canada (MAC) was also involved with the establishment of a new Mosque in Quebec City that also needed rezoning. In Edmonton, the Lessard community countered the establishment of a MAC run school in their neighborhood for fear of radicalization. Again, several zoning laws have already been transgressed by the local MAC- run Mosque and in several new Saudi and Muslim Brotherhood linked Mosques that have been built. In Ottawa, MAC is also administering several venues, one of which is the Abraar school that made international headlines because “two teachers (…) who praised a pupil’s essay about killing Jews with hand grenades” were suspended.

Mr. Boby’s is scheduled to speak in a few cities, including Ottawa. His appearance in Ottawa is under threat due to smear campaign organized by Muslim fanatics. The very extremists, who promoted the radicalization described in the previous paragraph, are trying to falsely present him as a deranged fanatic.

Our old fiend from Muslim Perspectives is attacking the event:

Jewish extremists attempt to import hate to Canada

Urge Ottawa Public Library to rescind platform for anti-Muslim speaker

Friday, February 01, 2013 10:00 am

(February 1, 2013) The Canadian Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR.CAN), a national Muslim civil liberties organization, is calling on supporters and concerned Canadians to immediately contact the Ottawa Public Library (OPL) to urge that it revoke permission for the appearance of an anti-Muslim hatemonger at its main branch on February 4, 2013.

 Gavin Boby is an openly Islamophobic British activist linked to the extremist English Defence League. Mr. Boby advocates publicly against the building of mosques, a fundamental right protected under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

 ”CAIR.CAN fully supports freedom of expression within the bounds of the law. At the same time Canadian taxpayers should not be expected to subsidize speech which aims to denigrate and undermine Canadian values and threaten social cohesion. We look to our elected officials to clearly denounce this sort of speech and to send a message that vilifying minorities in a public venue will not be tolerated,” says CAIR.CAN Executive Director Ihsaan Gardee.

 ”We understand that the OPL, according to its own policies (lines 20-21), does not allow its facilities to be used for activities that contravene the Ontario Human Rights Code or the Criminal Code of Canada. Freedom of worship is a Canadian value and protected by law, whereas Mr. Boby and his sponsors openly seek to undermine this human right and demonize Muslim communities. The library should therefore rescind the invitation on those grounds.”

Nothing new here – the Muslims are using their old tools of threats and intimidation, which work most of the time in our cowardly society. These tactics managed to disrupt the appearances of the Swedish cartoonist Lars Vilks in Canada a few years ago. Most venues were too scared of potential Muslim violence to allow Vilks to speak. JDL-Canada was the only organization, which refused to be intimidated and the event took place according to the schedule.

On the bright side, if a speaker causes such an extreme reaction from Muslim fanatics, it is obviously worth it to hear what he has to say.

The CAIR methods of handling other people’s speech seem odd, if you consider the fact that a few months ago they sponsored and led an event at the University of Toronto, which practically turned the convicted terrorist and murderer Omar Khadr and his family of Osama bin Laden-loving welfare bums into heroes of the “fight against Islamophobia”.  Guided by Mr. Gardee, the glorification of Omar the terrorist was facilitated by the token Jewish lefty doormat Rick Salutin and the idiots from Amnesty International.

Here is a suggestion – instead of stabbing Mr. Boby in the back, why don’t the CAIR members show up at his event and explain to him in a calm and civilized way why it is so important to litter our neighbourhoods with mosques.

Unlike a Muslim audience, where disagreement with Islam may have deadly consequences for the speaker, the Canadian Jews are more than willing to hear a different point of view (unless the points are screams of mindless fanatics, the kind we saw during the demonstration last September, when the fanatics loudly demanded blasphemy laws against those who offend the “prophet”).

Just a friendly reminder – Canada is still a democratic country, where freedom of speech is important and the barbaric sharia laws are not welcome.

 

 

Recently JDL-Canada announced that it will hold a protest against the speech of Justin Trudeau at a Muslim conference in Toronto. Here are the details:

The Jewish Defence League Will Protest Justin Trudeau’s Appearance At The Following Radical Islamic Conference:

 Reviving the Islamic Spirit Conference – 2012, Toronto Convention Centre

 Saturday December 22, 7:00 pm

255 Front Street West

 Justin Trudeau is scheduled to speak on Sat. 22-Dec. 2012, 7:30PM – 8:00PM

For additional information call JDL at 416-736-7000

They are not the only Jewish organization, which objects to the event, but as usual they’ll be the only ones with the courage to confront the event on the street.

Those of you, who don’t know what is going on, may find the protest strange. After all, the conference is just about the “Islamic spirit” – and the posters you will see in the subway convey that touchy-feely message of light and revival through some mystical light that comes from far away to embrace Toronto.

But as it is the situation with many Muslim events, what you see is not what you get. The event is not a shiny bed-in with John and Yoko, but a long fest with lectures from “who is who” of Muslim fanaticism.

For starters, the event always takes place in the week of Christmas. It’s carefully chosen timing for Muslim propaganda. During that week downtown Toronto is flooded with hijabs and niqabs and angry-looking bearded men.

I find it to be one of the worst Muslim provocations of the year – out of all 365 days available they choose Christmas. As a Christian I find it deeply offensive (and don’t give me the “Jesus is Islam’s junior prophet” bullshit – it only adds insult to the injury).

If Christians decide to preach during Muslim holidays or in Muslim areas, they’ll regret it. Just ask the missionaries in Dearborn, who were beaten by Muslims and then arrested by the police. Unfortunately, nowadays every cult (be it Wicca, Voodoo or Islam) has many more privileges than Christianity.

Until this year, the conference hadn’t attracted the media attention, but this new edition is different. Justin Trudeau, the Crown Prince of the Liberal Party and main contender for its leadership, is a speaker. Trudeau is often blamed for his stupidity, but this is not the first time Liberal dignitaries get involved in questionable Muslim events – a few years back “sponsorship” Jean Chretien, during a visit to Lebanon, sat next to a leader of Hezbollah and pretended he didn’t know who he was (although Hezbollah was already designated as a terrorist organization).

Trudeau has even worse history of sympathy to Muslim extremism. He was the only Canadian politician to object to the honour killings being called “barbaric”. Educated in the Papa Pierre and Papa Fidel’s school of equal value of all cultures, it wasn’t a surprise he saw that form of “family therapy” as just another way of solving problems.

When discussing that Islamic “contribution” to the world culture, which was defined as a barbaric practice in a pamphlet explaining to the new immigrants the customs of Canada, the “Shiny Pony” said:

“There’s nothing that the word ‘barbaric’ achieves that the words ‘absolutely unacceptable’ would not have achieved.”

He later apologized in his usual weird way, which makes you wonder if he means it, and even managed to attack the Conservatives in his “apology”:

 ”Perhaps I got tangled in semantic weeds in my comments, particularly in view of the Conservatives’ cynicism on these issues,” Trudeau said in a statement. “I want to make it clear that I think the acts described are heinous, barbaric acts that are totally unacceptable in our society.”

Honour killings are an essential form of “justice” in sharia law and they are not punishable in many Muslim countries. The people who are more than willing to introduce sharia in Canada didn’t forget his opinion. Since they owed him one, they invited him as a speaker to this year’s conference edition.

Like many other questionable events, this one was questioned first by bloggers and their findings were reluctantly followed by the mainstream media. For example, it turned out that the main sponsor of the conference was involved in financial transactions with Hamas:

In April 2011, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) revoked IRFAN’s charity status after having concluded that only for the 2005-2009 period, it transferred $14.6 million to Hamas (GMBDR – Toronto Star).

 According to its charter (article 13), Gaza-based Hamas is committed to the destruction of Israel. The launch of missiles toward Israel and the suicide operations planned by Hamas in the past confirm its goal. Outside the Middle East, Hamas share the objective of Islamic conquest with the Muslim Brotherhood. Hamas presents itself as a wing of the Brotherhood in its charter (article 2).

The Trudeau appearance, which in the beginning looked just like any other mundane PR action of his party, suddenly put Justin in a very delicate situation. As a result of the publicity, it was just announced that IRFAN has pulled out from sponsorship (although it is not clear whether the organizers have already been paid by them).

The damage control came right away – in an article published in Huffington Post a certain Mr. Abubakar Kasim started a frontal attack against the “bigoted” bloggers who dared attack the beloved Mr. Trudeau.

Anti-Muslim bigots have gone too far in criticizing Justin Trudeau for his anticipated speech at a major Islamic conference that is going to be held next week in Toronto.

As reported by CBC, the critics have raised concerns about radical views and the alleged affiliation of other speakers at the event later this month; they have also pointed to alleged ties between major conference sponsors and the Islamic militant group Hamas.

I have been attending this conference for years. The speakers include intellectuals of high calibre such as Kristiane Backer, former MTV Host; Dr. William Fray Vendley, the Secretary General of the World Conference for Religions of Peace (WCRP), Dr. Karen Armstrong and Dr. John Ralston Saul among many other notable scholars and religious leaders of different denominations.

The funny thing is that there are many speakers booked for the long event, but Mr. Kasim cherry picks the names of those who look more presentable in his opinion. We will see later what the positions of those peaceful people are.

Then he invokes the power of CAIR, an organization closely linked with the Muslim Brotherhood, which condemns those horrible bigots:

The Canadian Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-CAN) had condemned the attempts of anti-Muslim bloggers to smear Canada’s largest gathering of Muslims at the annual Reviving the Islamic Spirit (RIS) Conference.

In a bulletin issued on Wednesday, it had urged Canadians to thank Justin Trudeau for standing by RIS and had urged the media to fact-check anti-Muslim claims.

“With 30,000 attendees last year alone, the RIS conference has become one of the leading events of its kind, anywhere in the world,” says Ihsaan Gardee, CAIR-CAN’s Executive Director. “To suggest that there is something untoward about a conference that invites leading thinkers like John Ralston Saul and Karen Armstrong to speak on topics such as inter-faith dialogue and mutual understanding is ludicrous. This is yet another example of Islamophobic vitriol aimed at marginalizing and vilifying Muslims.”

Again, CAIR mentions only the most “innocent” speakers. Recently I had the chance to attend an event presided by Mr. Gardee – a discussion about the future of Canada’s favourite baby terrorist Omar Khadr.

It was very revealing to listen to the panel’s laments about the bad treatment of poor Omar without even a word of condemnation of his terrorism. Even the token Jew on the panel (Rick Salutin) sang in the same choir. Even if we accept that Khadr was a “baby soldier” they still had to admit that his family had to be charged with the crime, because they were the ones to turn him into terrorist (but nobody raised that question). How can you trust another event organized by the same people?

Mr. Kasim, the CAIR mouthpiece, ends his thunder with a great exit:

“They take advantage of every opportunity they can find to create panic in the society as if Muslims are coming to take over the land, slit the throats of babies and force their beliefs on everyone.

These alarmists might have issues with some of the speakers. We live in a world of diversity in opinion where one’s freedom fighter is considered a terrorist by others. We should learn to disagree without creating phobia and hate towards one another.”

What an exit! He condemns the bigots who are just fear-mongers trying to blackmail Islam. And at the same time he is convinced that his understanding of terrorism is right – because some terrorists are actually freedom fighters. Such as the Palestinian terrorists who slaughtered the Fogel family in Israel, or the Hamas freedom fighters who are trying to destroy Israel, or the traitor Omar Khadr whom CAIR loves so much.

So how are they going to deal with those unruly bloggers? Is he going to send a few “freedom fighters” to take care of them? Or are they going to sue them?

A curious detail about Mr. Kasim and his peculiar definition of a terrorist is that he has worked as a ticketing agent at the Toronto airport (h/t FFF).  In a piece published earlier he pondered again his difficulties in determining what should be considered terrorism:

“In spite of the media’s attempt to portray extremism as a Muslim predicament, the truth is all of humanity is affected by this ailment. Terrorism has no color or creed. Neither does extremism.

Extremism is the reason why George W. Bush could claim that God had instructed him to invade Iraq. Extremism is why Timothy McVeigh and Anders Breivik massacred innocent people in the name of Christianity. Extremism is why rightwing politicians are gaining momentum in Europe and North America by fanning fear about the growing number of Muslim immigrants who they claim intend to take over the West.”

Nice try, if you ignore the fact that Muslims have committed more than 20,000 acts of terror since September 11. 2001. Or maybe they see the coexistence between Muslims and Jews resolved in the way Muhammad did – by exterminating the Jews.

Is this Mr. Kasim and CAIR’s diversity, which they want to impose on us? You will see that those questionable values are reflected in the selection of the speakers.

Despite all that touting of diversity and tolerance, I don’t remember large Muslim event, which didn’t preach some kind of hatred, which is always ignored by the media and the human rights commissions.

At the Al-Quds rally at Queen’s Park earlier this year Muslim fanatics faked tolerance by inviting self-hating Jews and at the same time called openly for the destruction of Israel.

Yet the police and the Ontario government totally ignored those haters, and arrested a peaceful man walking his dog, who was assaulted by Muslims.

 

A few months later, at a large event in front of the US Consulate in Toronto, a large crowd of Muslim fanatics demanded blasphemy laws and censorship in Canada following the infamous YouTube movie about Muhammad. Some of them even wanted to kill the people who produced the movie.

It was unbelievable to see in the 21^st century Canada a crowd of medieval savages demand medieval laws.

 

 

So this conference is supposed to be different – conducted by nice Muslim scholars, crème de la crème of Islam. Then let’s see who they are.

Let’s start with Dr. Karen Armstrong, who is presented as a very distinguished scholar. I have read some of her books and they display one-sided bias of glorification of Islam. Her extreme views even got one of her books banned in Malaysia, which is difficult to achieve when you know that there are so many radical imams competing with her there.

Another speaker is the notorious Dr. Jamal Badawi, a Canadian Muslim “scholar”, author of the masterpiece The Status of Woman in Islam, in which he offers such bold ideas as excluding women from political leadership (in full compliance with the plans of the Muslim Brotherhood). He has also advocated wife-beating and polygamy.

Then we have another unsavoury character – Dr. Mustafa Ceric– Grand Mufti of Bosnia.

I wonder what the Canadian Muslims can learn from a person from a backward country, which is broke and the only thing keeping its economy alive is the Serbian area. The Bosnian Muslims contributed more than anybody else to start the horrible civil war in Yugoslavia. As if this is not enough, Ceric has called for incorporating sharia into the Bosnian constitution – a sure way to get rid of the remaining Christians in the country.

Then the conference participants will learn from Dr. Yasir Fazaga, a staunch supporter of Wahhabism, one of the most extreme forms of Islam.

Shaykh Abdalla Idrisis in a class of his own.

A former president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) he has enforced the Wahhabi theological dogmas. ISNA controls the halal market in Canada. It is also a very corrupt organization, whose officials have misappropriated donations (according to an audit). ISNA has no problem supporting extremist speakers at its events (one of which was confronted by JDL-Canada last year).

Then we have Dr. Abdal Hakim Jackson, whose affiliations are not a secret:

“If one were to list all of Guirard’s contributors who are associated with, for example, the Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy (CSID), one might be able to glean a web of Muslim Brotherhood associations. From the TrueSpeak list, it turns out that the following CSID members are also members of identified Muslim Brotherhood entities: Dr. Aboul-Hakin (Sherman Jackson). Trustee of NAIT and the MSA (Muslim Student Association), Board Member of the Fiqh Council of North America (ISNA affiliate)”

The most distinguished among the speakers is Prof. Tariq Ramadan, who is the grandson of Hassan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood.

It looks like his time has come to shine. As an MB activist he has been seen as a suspicious and dangerous person. Due to his radical views, he was unable to enter the USA from 2004 to 2009, but after the election of Barry Hussein Obama things changed. Trying to reach out to the Muslim fanatics and show them what a cool guy he is, Obama let people like Ramadan into the USA.

The Muslim Brotherhood has triumphed in Egypt making Ramadan even more important. In the new constitution they have incorporated the barbaric sharia law. Now he can share the experience of the takeover with the Canadian Muslims and tell them how to work toward domination.

These are the people with whom Trudeau will share the stage. I am sure that if you ask him about their extremist views, he would plead ignorance and probably say that he wants to appeal to the good people in the audience.

Make no mistake – the sponsors of CAIR and many of those who are going to speak don’t want peace and tolerance. Although they try to deceive you into thinking like that, the goal of Islam is complete domination. History has shown what the outcome of Islam’s advancement is time after time. Now their immediate goal is the destruction of Israel, but once they are done they’ll continue with attacks against the West.

The main spiritual sponsor of the event is the Muslim Brotherhood, a sinister organization, which took power in the Muslim countries after the “Arab Spring”. In Egypt they are already creating a theocratic dictatorship. The extermination of Christians and subjugating of women in those newly “liberated” countries are advancing in full force.

The Muslim fanatics who took over Egypt have sentenced to death the makers of the movie which showed Old Mo’s life. Even Terry Jones, who has nothing to do with the movie, received a death sentence. Are these the people who will lead the Muslim world to progress and new achievements? With primitive fanatics like those who come from the Muslim Brotherhood, the Islamic world is guaranteed to remain poor and pathetic.

However, those fanatics have mastered one thing – they know how to exploit the idiotic political correctness of the West to their own benefit. Muslims use the ridiculous Western laws to silence their critics in Europe, USA and Canada. They even push through the UN for an international law that will criminalize all criticism of their cult. If they have their way, we will get the same murderous dictatorship we see now in Egypt or Iran.

I understand that Justin Trudeau, just like Papa Pierre and many other politicians, is a vote whore willing to endorse any event, which has even the faintest chance of bringing new voters. I also understand that he is trying very hard to dig out the Liberal Party from the deep hole, in which it is stuck now.

But I am sure that next year Justin will be marching proudly in the homosexual parade in Toronto trying to woo the gay vote. I am not sure how this is going to be accepted by the Muslim voters (after all they played a big role in defeating the homosexual Smitherman in the mayoral election).

Isn’t it time, Mr. Trudeau to get some spine and face the real problems the Canadians have? Hanging out with Muslim fanatics is not going to help you in any way.

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

 

On my way to an exhibition at City Hall this afternoon, I stumbled upon a small rally of angry Egyptians, who protested against their president Morsi’s decree that gave him practically absolute power.

 

Their signs were quite clear about the positions they took:

“USA R U supporting Egypt or Muslim Brotherhood coz it differs!”

“USA enough U R double faced policy”

“Obama stop supporting Morsi!”

“USA & MB are destroying Egyptian identity”

 

 

It was nice to see that those people so enthusiastically opposed the Muslim fanatics in Egypt. After all, they were the educated ones, who immigrated to Canada (and other Western countries) and created the illusion that the rebellion in Egypt is going to turn the country into a true democracy.

I talked briefly with one of the protesters (the guy who holds the Morsi portrait). He was convinced that this struggle was not about religion but democracy. When I asked him if he is worried that the Muslim Brotherhood president had so many supporters, who rallied in his support, he replied optimistically that the country is divided, but the people will eventually understand that democracy is best for them.

I wish he was right…

 

As usual, an Arab rally of any kind, no matter how well intentioned, can’t happen without some kind of attack against the Jews or the West. I saw a woman holding high a sign saying:

“Harper, Baird, Israel – Palestine in the UN, if you didn’t hear”

That looked out of place at an anti-Morsi rally. After all, he was one of the people who so passionately wanted to establish that “country” as a tool to destroy Israel, that he supported wholeheartedly Hamas in its provocations against Israel.

So we had today a gathering of supposedly educated people supporting a half-baked country, which resembles more the Frankenstein monster than a normally functioning society. And on top of that, the villain they are protesting against supports the same strange entity.

Is it any wonder that the Arab world is so dysfunctional?

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

 

Today Pastor Terry Jones was stopped from entering Canada. He was supposed to take part in a debate in front of Queen’s Park.  It was a disgraceful day for our supposedly conservative government, which took away his right to free speech. From what I heard from the organizer Allan Einstoss (the owner of the famous mastiff Cupcake), all the reasons Terry was banned were so phony that nobody else in his place would’ve been treated like that.

 

Despite Pastor Jones’s absence, the event went on. It was quite bizarre event, because other than the speakers and the spectators, it also attracted some strange people, who are abundant in Toronto (you’ll see them below).

Allan started by introducing the speakers. After expressing his outrage over the mistreatment of Pastor Jones, he mentioned other problems – the notorious imam Steve Rockwell, who was supposed to debate Terry Jones, refused to show up when he heard that Mubin Shaikh was going to speak. In his opinion, Mubin (the sharia fan, who exposed the Toronto 18 Muslim terrorists) was not a real Muslim and Steve couldn’t be at the same event with him.

About an hour later, Steve Rockwell (strange name for a Muslim, sounds like an action figure name) miraculously appeared and said that he changed his mind and was ready to speak.

The event started with a prayer in Sanskrit and English by a Hindu priest.

 

 

Ron Banerjee explained the special role of Islam, which differs significantly from the other religions and functions like an ideology, which controls completely the lives of its followers and the countries, which it dominates.

 

When Mubin took the stage, we learned that he was working on his postgraduate degree, specializing in anti-terrorist work. Despite that he still appears to be a devout Muslim, because he criticized the views of Ron and a Muslim scholar, who spoke before him.

 

The main attraction was Imam Rockwell. I have never listened to him before, but he is an impressive one-man travelling show. He complained that he was given only ten minutes to speak, and then attacked every speaker and said that nobody of them knew Islam. He studied Islam for many years (from the time when he became Muslim, after being a Baptist pastor).

 

First he scolded Allan for bringing his dog to the Al-Quds rally and said that he was rightfully detained. “Didn’t you know that Muslims don’t like dogs?” Then the absent Pastor Jones had it as well – he had no business criticizing Islam, because he didn’t know the Koran. As an ex-Baptist, Steve knew both the Bible and the Koran. The Bible was the most anti-Semitic book, because some of the sayings of Jesus were very anti-Jewish.

Terry deserved the reaction he got, because he offended the Muslims. Steve’s logic was that if you offend 100 people, 50 may walk away and the rest would react somehow. But when you insult 1 billion by burning their Koran, there will be many, who would react violently and that’s the way it is (he didn’t explain why other religions don’t react in the same way). The whole speech was delivered with a loud voice and a tone that didn’t accept any criticism. Maybe that’s why some people heckled him.

I spotted Col. Jonathan Halevy from SUN TV, but he was just a spectator and didn’t speak.

 

As I mentioned in the beginning, there were a few weirdos in the crowd. That’s not a surprise for anyone who lives in Toronto – every free event attracts its fair share of strange people (even if there is no free food). There was that creepy guy, who looked like he just came from a Stormfront meeting, carrying a large anti-Semitic sign. The numerous police officers didn’t show any interest in his “message”.

 

Then I saw the anarchist junkies with their dogs, whom I remember from the Occupy Toronto camp. They came to tell everybody that the organized religion must be abolished. They told me to “fuck off” when they saw me taking their picture.

 

A fat-ass Muslim girl with a hijab displayed on her backpack her pleas to free the “Palestinian” terrorists, a.k.a. freedom fighters. She didn’t miss, of course, the obligatory “no justice, no peace”.

 

The scariest appearance was courtesy of a couple from Aurora, who brought boards densely covered with slogans and demands, which looked like products of the collective efforts of all inmates of a mental institutions. They also were a constant presence at the occupy camp. Their main demand was to arrest Harper over the Indian “genocide” (I have no idea how both are related).

 

Those retards also asked everybody to watch Jesse Ventura’s conspiracy show. They stood behind the speakers and interrupted everybody from time to time, yelling often “9/11 was an inside job!”

 

 

It was a strange event. Just another day in the madhouse called Toronto.

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

 

The last few weeks didn’t contribute much to improving the image of Islam. Raging crowds of Muslim film critics rioted all over the world and even killed the American Ambassador to Libya. President Obama handled that assault with the decisiveness of a Vietnamese nerd, who wants to explain to his quarterback roommate that he should not loot his food from the fridge without ending up being dangled from the balcony of their apartment. Last week a large crowd of fanatics gathered in front of the US Consulate in Toronto to demand censorship and blasphemy laws for Canada. Yesterday the convicted murderer and terrorist Omar Khadr was quietly brought back to Canada by the supposedly conservative government.

Amidst that doom and gloom, it was like a breath of fresh air to attend the inaugural meeting of the Council for Muslims Facing Tomorrow. It was refreshing to hear people discussing things in calm and rational manner, instead of constantly yelling “Allahu Akbar!” as many did last week.

 

Prof. Salim Mansur gave a short introduction, after which Raheel Raza – the president of the new organization explained the goals and objectives of the organization. This is not a religious organization, it is an association created to address the wide spectrum of issues that the Muslims are facing now and which will become even more acute in the future. The Muslims need to get away from the 7^th century. At the same time, the group wants to expose those who have no loyalty to Canada – example of that was her encounter with a man from a certain well-known Muslim organization, who stated at an event that Canada had no values, its values came from Israel, and she confronted him about that. The movie protest was another issue – Raheel asked people in Toronto going to the protest if they have seen the movie, and most of them haven’t – that was definitely a manufactured event. Maintaining the individual freedoms is the most important task in our country – the pluralism and preserving of the Charter are also very important, including freedom of expression. The new movement should respect the equal rights of Muslims, homosexuals, atheists, etc. She is well aware of all the challenges and threats she would face working in that field, because from the traditional conservative Muslim point of view she is seen as an aggressive woman.

Christine Williams from the Canadian Race Relations Foundation and the Simon Wiesenthal Center was the next speaker.

 

In her opinion, the main problem with the modern Islam is the blending of religion with politics. That trend could be noticed all over the world, where even countries, which were not that affected in the past, like Turkey and Indonesia, are turning to Islamic control. The issue with the Muhammad movie was that it was a planned attack, it wasn’t caused by the movie itself. The solution the fanatics are recommending is to impose blasphemy laws on the West, which will severely restrict our freedoms, mostly with regard to criticism of Islam. In contrast, Christianity is still criticized or ridiculed without any consequences, like in the example of the “artwork” of Jesus Christ immersed in urine.

There are even attempts to impose sharia law, like the case of the Iranian embassy, which wanted the Iranians in Canada to work for the Iranian government and gradually take over the Canadian government and then attack the USA. In many other cases we are dealing with taqiya – a tactic where Muslims pretend to be friendly while secretly working against the Canadian values. Sharia law already has had bad consequences in England – after being accepted in 2008 to deal with civil matters among the Muslims in the country, it has quietly expanded to include even criminal matters. Even the Bishop of Canterbury defended its introduction in the name of creating better cultural cohesiveness. The Muslim extremists tried the same in 2004 in Ontario and we were very close to accepting it, if it wasn’t for the campaign organized by Muslim women, who didn’t want to see themselves in the inferior position that sharia has reserved for them.  A common misconception is that if Muslims don’t follow those laws, they seize to be Muslims. That is nonsense – in other religions, like Judaism, there are punishments like stoning adulterers according to the Torah, yet nobody gets stoned today – the Jews have outgrown those concepts. Muslims should be able to do the same. The reality of the Muslims blasphemy laws is frightening and they should be abolished.

M. Zuhdi Jasser, M.D., the Founder and President of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy (AIFD), was the keynote speaker.

 

He said that all the ideas about reforms in Islam discussed tonight cannot be presented in the same way in the Muslim world, because they’ll be considered blasphemous. The key difference is that here in the West we have freedoms, which don’t exist in other places. What binds us together here? It’s the idea that we live in a country, which protects you as an individual.  Those freedoms are under attack and they have been condemned for decades by the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamic organizations, which advance quietly in the West. They were irritated by Al-Qaida, which with the 9/11 attacks blew the cover off the project and attracted scrutiny and attention to Islam.

Those fanatical organizations demonize the West. They attack the very nature of the Western societies and try to redefine and change the identity of our countries. Islam as a religion doesn’t require dominance, because it is a spiritual experience of the believers. He gave as an example the former Bosnian President Alija Izetbegovic who said that he never felt more Muslim than during the 15 years of solitary confinement under Tito’s regime (I definitely didn’t like that example). We need to firmly identify and convey through our narrative the identity of the citizen of the West. Making those values clear would insulate many Muslims from radicalization. The problem is that the modern Islam is departing from its spiritual principles and turning into a political movement. Those Muslims, who want to reform their religion, need to restore the spirituality in it.

One important way to do that is to encourage criticism of Islam, especially among young people. Under the current stagnation, the leaders discourage free discussion in every possible way – for example, they claim that only people with degrees in Muslim studies can discuss Islam. That leaves out people like Jasser or Daniel Pipes, who though knowledgeable, are disqualified. The resulting rigidity has created an oligarchy that prevents any meaningful reforms.

From that perspective Islam has something to learn from Christianity. Along with the great Christian leaders and theologians, many laymen have contributed to reforming it, like for example Thomas Jefferson and the other founding fathers, who created a new paradigm of religious freedom and tolerance with the US Constitution. Why can’t Islam do the same?

Obfuscating the problems by pretending that Islam has nothing to do with its current situation makes things much worse. The claims that people like Osama bin Laden are not Muslims, because of the way they act only obscures the issues in Islam. The statement that the recent riots in the Muslim world were caused primarily by a movie (parroted by the Western media) distracts us from the violence within Islam and is aimed at changing the values and the laws of the West. The constant blaming of the USA, Canada, and other Western countries is designed to distract the attention from the real issues. The perpetual parade of grievances and victimization stop any discussions of the flaws of Islam as manifestation of “Islamophobia”.

We have to find our narrative and show that the USA is not about jeans or other superficial things; the core issue is that this type of society allows you to achieve anything you want. The Islamic theology must be reformed to respect the values of liberty and the independence of the individual, which cannot be achieved without separation of mosque and state. That also includes the questioning of the principle of jihad. The issue of values and identity is crucial for the personal development. For example Dr. Jasser and Major Hassan, the Fort Hood terrorist, had strikingly similar biographies. Both received medical education and had careers in the army. The difference is that Hassan probably grew up in a family environment hostile to the Western values, which built in him an identity of violent hater.

Once again, the discussion within Islam is crucial, if we want it to change – hiding behind hadids to justify the reluctance to think is not helping anybody. The role of the reasonable discourse must be increased. It is important to remember that these are not some abstract theological or ethical issues – on the contrary, the consequences from them are very tangible and affect the national security.

The problem is that the people in the government and many private citizens are not aware of the quiet advancement of the Islamic extremism. During the Cold War things were very clear and polarized – nobody saw the communist parties as some benevolent organizations contributing to our progress. Since the demise of communism that polarization disappeared and many people have a hard time determining what is good or bad. Thus dangerous Islamic organizations are perceived as charities dedicated to spiritual enlightenment. The reality is different – for example, the Muslims are a very small minority in the USA, yet in the last few years 85% of all arrested and charged with terrorism were Muslim. No matter how some people would like to twist the things, this is a problem.

Even within the Muslims countries it is difficult to evaluate the political forces. Often we see confrontation between theocratic and secular fascism with nothing in the middle. These complex issues would probably take a generation to resolve.

 

Dr. Jasser has been often accused that his understanding of Islam is not real and it’s outside of the mainstream. However, in his opinion, that situation of turning Islam into a political movement is relatively new and happened within the last 100 years – by its nature Islam is not hostile toward invention and progress  (remembering the role of Islam in Southern Europe for over 500 years, it’s hard to agree with that statement). During the Q&A session he added more clarifications to his position – he didn’t believe that the extermination of the Jews under Muhammad and most of his war atrocities described in Islam really happened; he didn’t believe that Muhammad had sex with a 9-year old girl either.

His conclusion was that no matter what, we must support and advance liberty. Now we are battling for the soul of our nations. Multiculturalism, as it is understood and practiced today, could kill us because it cannot distinguish between a culture and a political movement. The political Islam is a dangerous movement, whose purpose is to dominate the West. It is incorrect to see it as an odd, but harmless culture.  We will be doomed if we ignore that fact.

After that I had a chat with a friend, who also attended the event. She asked me what I thought about it. I said that while I found Dr. Jasser’s ideas bold and challenging, there were things I didn’t like that much. Presenting Izetbegovic as some kind of a morally elevated type was a bad idea – those who know the new history of Yugoslavia remember that he and his henchmen provoked the violence in Bosnia by shooting their own people in Sarajevo to demonize the Serbs by blaming the bombings on them. The Western intervention, which resulted from those events, caused a domino effect of even more violence. Also, saying that Islam was recently corrupted or that the worst things didn’t really happened probably saves the reputation of the Muslim prophet, but doesn’t sound very convincing as a position. Wouldn’t it be better to say (like in Judaism or Christianity) – yes, we’ve had some bad things in our past, but we will do our best to outgrow them.

My friend replied that what I say may be true and many other critics of Dr. Jasser see things in a similar way, but we still need to support him and other people with his convictions, because they are doing a very difficult work, which eventually would change the Muslim world.

I hope she is right, because the situation now is quite scary. On one hand, we have a mild-mannered lady, who came from Pakistan, and a rational doctor speaking in a Toronto auditorium about the need to reform Islam (and many in their audience are not even Muslim); on the other hand, we see on the TV news crowds of mindless savages who, like a singular of boars, crush everything under their feet and destroy the property of their fellow Muslims over a YouTube movie they have never seen. Faced with these two alternatives, it’s not difficult to decide whom to root for.

Let’s hope that one day Mrs. Raza and Dr. Jasser will succeed with our help. We have no other choice…

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

 

Today the psychotic Muslim rage over a YouTube movie finally reached Toronto. A rally was held in front of the US Consulate. It was supposed to be an interfaith event, but it was attended mostly by the scary people you see in the news from Afghanistan and Pakistan.

 

The organizers and the speakers were basically the same people we saw last month at the Al-Quds rally. I appreciate it that they kept the rally relatively peaceful – unlike the Muslim savages in almost all other countries, who killed and destroyed, the Toronto Muslims managed to organize an event, where nobody was killed. But that doesn’t mean that the Muslim savagery was subdued – they found other ways to display it.

My friend Sharon also came to protest peacefully, holding two flags – Canadian and American – she was insulted by the “docile” Muslims and urged to burn the American flag. Then some Muslim psychopath snatched it from her hand and ran away.

Everything in the rally was designed to emphasize the superiority of the barbaric Muslim cult and its false “prophet”. The message they wanted to convey was beyond clear: “Don’t touch our cult or else…”

 

The message about what was to be done to address the insults against Mo the pedophile was also very clear. The participants wanted the UN to introduce blasphemy laws.

 

There were also guys, who expressed their aesthetic tastes in cinema, demanding punishment for the makers of that infamous movie. It looked like that was the opinion of all Canadian Muslims.

 

 

Even Google wasn’t spared from the Muslim rage – they advised its YouTube division to go to hell:

 

I even learned a new term – “ethical terrorism” – which the USA committed by releasing that movie. (Boy, those retards are insane, blaming every video they don’t like on the Great Satan).

 

The Muslims went out of their way to show how worthless their lives are. According to some signs, they have no value outside of their love for Mohammed. They must be right, because for the last 1,400 years they haven’t contributed almost anything to the world other than killing people over imaginary insults against Old Mo.

 

 

Among the signs were also flags with inscriptions in Arabic (or Farsi) around bearded men, who looked like action heroes from a gay comic book. I wonder what the meaning of the phrases was – it obviously let them express their real thoughts without being understood by the infidels.

 

 

Another interesting thing was the way the Muslims exploited their children to spread the message of hatred for everybody, who didn’t submit to their cult. Children were carrying signs and dressed in a way that was sure to turn them into homicidal savages. These little boys, dressed like mujahedeens, were supposedly ready to give their lives for Mohammed.

 

It was hilarious to see those three girls, probably no more than 10 years old, displaying the hippy peace sign while two of them were wearing hijabs and the third had her face completely covered.

 

Muslims are a very creative bunch, which can find the long shadow of the Jews everywhere. This rally wasn’t an exception. As usual, the vast Zionist conspiracy was showing its ugly head behind the insults, which made the poor Muslims behave like insane cavemen killing each other all over the world.

 

And again a child is holding an anti-Israeli sign:

 

And another kid holds the sign enlightening us that Mossad and CIA are the sinister forces, which make the innocent Muslims behave like rabid savages:

 

As I said, the organizers were the same people I saw at the Al-Quds rally. We heard the same hostile speeches, interrupted by “Allahu Akbar” chants. We even heard the same lies – that the Al-Quds rally was attended by 3,000 people and today’s rally broke that record because it brought over 5,000 people. You must be a complete idiot to believe that 5,000 could fit into the small space across the US Consulate, but apparently critical thinking is not a part of the Muslim mind.

 

The whole rally (and not only the signs) was sending a very clear message, not unlike the gay parades – “We are here, we are weird, and we will not rest until you completely submit to our cult!” The participants went out of their way to look and act differently, showing that they have absolutely no intention to blend into the Canadian realities and traditions. Why should they? The milti-culti lefties have always encouraged them to act that way.

 

 

 

 

In case anybody thought that Islam was some kind of a benevolent religion, the participants made sure to state that after America burned the Koran and offended the fake “prophet”, it would never see peace.

 

That was a declaration of war and it should be taken seriously. We have more than enough evidence to realize that Islam is serious about that when we see how it is controlled by homicidal maniacs. So far Canada has avoided the terror, which those maniacs have unleashed elsewhere. Some think that we were spared because of the fact that many Muslim terrorists, extremists and plain idiots hold Canadian passports and want to keep their home base peaceful until they decide to turn it into a Muslim hell.

However, several speakers at the rally viciously attacked the current Canadian government for its support for the fight against terror. It is only a matter of time before those savages turn against us…

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

I wrote on Friday about the “bring your dog to the mosque” event. While huge crowds of rabid Muslim savages were bringing death and destruction all over the world, the Toronto Muslims tried their best to pretend that they loved dogs.

In this video you will see some of the participants speaking, like Ron Banerjee, Mark Harding and the British Dog Loving Muslim Lady. For an event involving Muslims, it was almost peaceful, but it didn’t go without arguments and confrontation…

 

 

Last month at the Al-Quds rally, held by supporters of the Iranian terrorist regime, a dog named Cupcake and its owner were assaulted. Muslims kicked the dog and punched Mr. Eintoss. That inspired today’s protest at the Salaheddin Mosque, a known centre of Islamic fanaticism. The purpose of the organizer was to state that (unlike in the Muslim countries) dogs and their owners are free to walk in Canada without being assaulted.

The Facebook page, where the event was promoted, quickly became a magnet for Muslim rage. Among the messages of hate there were also death threats.

 

In the screenshot above a certain Mr. “Ali Shirazi” warned the organizers (h/t BCF):

“I’ll tie you all up and throw you in a lake of fire if you show up at the salahuddin mosque ahhaahah every dog will be shot on spot, bring as many as you want!!!”

I am not sure if the mosque has at its disposal a dungeon with a lake of fire, but the threat of shooting is scary enough, especially when you consider the Muslim hatred for dogs.

The Muslim arrogance was growing in the days after that – on September 11 a bunch of Muslims and their lefty friends disrupted a candlelight vigil commemorating the victims of the terrorist attacks. They booed and jeered the National Anthem of Canada and the Lord’s Prayer.

It looked like the confrontation at the “bring your dog” event would exceed everything that happened before. However, over the last few days, crowds of deranged Muslim psychopaths started attacking Western embassies and killing diplomats and other people. The excuse was a mediocre movie about their fake “prophet”, but all signs show that the attacks were well coordinated with the purpose to intimidate the Western world. It worked to a certain degree – the Kenyan Marxist in the White House apologized right away.

However, with the beating the police took in the public opinion after the Cupcake case, it was to be expected that the Islamists will be more cautious. Any action of the Toronto Muslims resembling the actions of their barbaric brethren in the Arab world would’ve been heavily scrutinized. So they had to change their tactics (more about that later).

 

Unfortunately, the rain kept many people from attending, but we saw a few great dogs.

 

 

The participants made their opinions very clear:

 

 

Along with other participants I saw Ron Banerji and the evangelist Mark Harding.

 

 

Due to the reasons I mentioned above, the Salaheddin mosque people were in full damage control mode. There were no dog shooting squads. They desperately tried to convince everybody that Islam is a cool religion. They managed to find a hijabbed Muslim lady with a sophisticated British accent, who attempted to give a human face to Islam.

 

The lady (whose name I missed) did her best to show what a dog-loving religion Islam is. It turned out she loved dogs and she carefully tried to pretend she didn’t hear all the questions about the poisoning and mistreatment of dogs by Muslims.

 

She was handing out a leaflet (shown in the picture above) explaining the role of the dogs in Islam. Although the dog saliva is considered dirty, it turns out Muhammad was a huge dog fan. Dogs freely roamed Medina and even entered his mosque. When they urinated on the floor, water was sprinkled and dogs weren’t killed.

Once the “prophet”, while on one of his death marches, found a dog, which had just given birth to a litter of puppies. He ordered that the dog and the puppies be guarded.  And then there was the following quote:

“The Prophet asserted that a prostitute, and in some versions, a sinning man, secured their places in Heaven by saving the life of a dog dying of thirst in the desert.”

I had no idea Muhammad was such a cool dude or (which is closer to the truth) that the Muslims are such skillful liars. The lady never answered straight any questions about the mistreatment of dogs by Muslims, the refusal to take service dogs in taxis, etc. There is nothing unusual in that – takiyya or lying in the name of defending Islam is an essential part of the Muslim religion.

 

The ultimate taqiyya moment came when a Muslim guy dressed as if he came straight from Osama’s compound, brought two huskies and claimed he was breeding them and he and his friends loved dogs.

The interesting thing was that he kept the huskies at the entrance, outside of the mosque area. Banerji yelled that the Muslim dog breeder can prove his point by taking the dogs inside the mosque. The Muslims pretended they didn’t hear that. Wait a minute – wasn’t it cool in the “prophet’s” times to let dogs piss in the mosque? Are the Muslims nowadays better than their prophet?

There is no need to answer the question – Islam is based on lies and deception and only the useful lefty idiots can take its propaganda seriously.

 

Some of the Muslims from the mosque came out with the intention to start fights, but were quickly ushered in by their seniors (and I suppose the cops staring at them contributed to restoring the peace). In the picture above the gentleman with the glasses (who studied the violence in Islam for years) was told by the African Muslim that he has no real knowledge about Islam, because he read the Koran in English. Nothing new here – the usual smoke and mirrors, which try to hide the real nature of the barbaric Islamic cult.

A video is coming…

© 2012  Blogwrath.com

 

On Canada Day the Toronto homosexual community was preparing to march in their annual parade. An important part of the event was a group named Queers against Israeli Apartheid (QuAIA), which hides its virulent anti-Semitism behind a hypocritical concern about the “Palestinians”. I can’t understand how they can condemn the only country in the Middle East, where gays have full rights. Aren’t the homosexuals supposed to be smarter and more educated than the rest of us?

At the same time, a lone man with an Israeli flag was standing a few blocks away doing what he has been doing all his life – handing out pamphlets designed to awaken people from their spiritual slumber. This time the sheet the Torontonians were receiving, printed with a tiny font, covered the danger of Islamic infiltration of the Canadian political life (there were way too many facts to squeeze on the sheet, thus the tiny font).

 

That was Mark Harding’s second time standing at the same place (he did it last year as well), with only a few friends around him. It was interesting to observe him speaking with the people passing by – most of them were interested in his message and listened attentively, many had never had the chance to discuss those issues with anybody.

Mark is a simple man, without college education, who relies on his faith and on everything he has learned from observing and communicating with people around him. Yet he has much better understanding of the importance of Israel and the threat of violent Islam than the hundreds of thousands of highly educated homosexuals, who cheerfully support savages willing to exterminate them.

Telling the truth is not always popular or safe in Canada. Mark Harding was far ahead of most “experts” in our country in exposing the dangers of Islam. In 1990’s, when the political correctness was tightening its grip on our collective throat and the worst atrocities of Islam were still far ahead, Mark paid dearly for his opinions and received very little support.

I mentioned last year that he was prosecuted for “hate crime”, spent time in jail (after he was arrested) and was sent to be re-educated by a thief from the corrupt Islamic Society of North America.

At the time I had a very vague idea about what Mark has been through. The fact that he had heart attacks and his health was ruined gave me a hint about what happened to him.

However, I got the full picture only recently, after reading the full transcripts from his trial. In nearly a thousand of pages a picture of disgrace gradually emerges. You see the repressive apparatus of the Ontario Attorney General united against a street preacher and his little pamphlets and phone messages.

The army of hostile witnesses could probably give you more than two heart attacks. The “expert witness” Professor Jane McAuliffe, a Muslim doormat, provides a totally distorted and sympathetic picture of Islam. In the post-9/11 times her “testimony” would’ve been seen as ridiculously biased, but at the time she was untouchable.

The list of the Muslims witnesses reads like who is who in the current Canadian Muslim extremism, but at the time those people were perceived as pious bearded imams in white. They were free to lie and slander Mark, because nobody had the knowledge to confront them. Even Bernie Farber, the embattled chairman of the now defunct CJC and Don Quixote of internet censorship, was called to say his bit against Mark Harding (even though he didn’t know him and wasn’t an expert in anything).

As of the pamphlets, which were the reason for the trial, when I read them I couldn’t help but wonder – they charged him with a hate crime for those??? Nowadays you can read online things that are hundreds of times more offensive and many Muslims openly advocate the destruction of Israel, killing of Jews and subjugating the West to the barbaric sharia with no consequences at all.

The only witnesses supporting Mark were called only to discuss his good character in a few short sentences. To give you an idea how lonely he was at the trial, let me just mention that after the judge handed down a suspended sentence, Mark’s own lawyer suggested he be put on house arrest.

Fortunately, Mark Harding survived that ungodly circus and continued his work – quietly, his only reward being the fact that he was right and many more people are now willing to listen to him. The slaughter on September 11 and the recent “Arab Spring”, which brought to power the most outrageous Muslim fanatics, vindicated him and showed that the support for Israel, the only civilized country in the Middle East, is more important than ever.

As of the Jew-hating homosexuals, I am sure they’ll soon understand that the Palestinian terrorists are not their best bedfellows.

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

 

 

This afternoon the Pakistani shia community in Toronto organized a protest rally near the Pakistani Consulate. I never thought that I would ever say it, but that was a Muslim demonstration that I (to a great extent) supported.

The immediate reason for it was the slaughter of 200 shia Muslims in Pakistan, but it looks like those atrocities have been going on for years. According to the leaflet the organizers were handing out:

“Recent atrocities include: on route to Gilgit, Baltistan, approximately 2000 extremists stopped busses that were heading home, pulled out the shia’s and beat them fatally. Stoning, kicking, bashing with sticks and gouging their eyes out. Around 200 are suspected to be murdered.

43 killed during an Ashura procession in Karachi

34 killed during Arbaeen

43 killed on route for ziyarat to Iran

10 killed during Eid prayers

8 tortured and murdered in Parachinar.

Their hands and feet were cut off and then they were killed. More than 1400 Muslims were slaughtered in Parachinar from 2007-2011. These are human beings. They are your brothers and sisters. What will you do for those innocent victims?”

Yes, they were human beings – and so were the Christians and the Ahmadiyya Muslims in Pakistan, who have been systematically slaughtered in a similar way for decades. However, very little information about those atrocities makes its way into the media.

Maybe if all Muslims showed the same outrage over every case of oppression and mistreatment involving a minority group, the shia would have been safe now.

Walking among the participants, it was such a pleasure to see the signs condemning the most aggressive Muslim bully in the world – Saudi Arabia.

Some called for closure of the Saudi hate schools in Pakistan and attacked the country’s king:

 

 

They didn’t spare even the Taliban – it was a strange feeling to learn that they are disliked. You can see “Down with Taliban” and “Shame on King Abdulla” in the picture at the top. Another sign observed that it is “Easy to Be Taliban, Hard to Be Human”:

 

Even one of the speakers, an imam, whose name I missed, said that everybody in Pakistan had to be treated with respect, especially religious minorities. He stated that the Pakistani government has disgraced itself by failing to protect its own citizens.

 

I said in the beginning that I supported the rally to a great extend – and here comes the big “but” – instead of paying more attention on what really is wrong with the situation in Pakistan, where even the Muslim sects can’t get along, the organizers didn’t miss the chance to include the Jews in the mix of complaints.

Israel has neither the interest nor the capabilities to control Pakistan, but the sign in the first picture implied that somehow that tiny country has the sinister goal to “divide and conquer” (and of course the Muslims have uncovered that plot).

That insane theory was brought up again in the speech of Zafar Bangash, the notorious Israel hater and fanatic. It was very odd to see him at an event caused by the clash of two groups of Muslims. It was the same as inviting a clown to give a eulogy at a funeral.

 

Even the best conspiracy theorists would envy his way of weaving totally different ideas and forces into a mad plot. You can listen to his speech at Blazingcatfur, but let me give you a few details.

He started by blaming the Saudi wahhabis’ influence on the Pakistani government. But the wahhabis didn’t act alone – they were lackeys of the British, who installed Saud’s dynasty. Now Saudi Arabia has extended its servitude – it serves Israel and the American imperialism, trying to help them spread their influence. It is not by chance that the Saudis provoked that battle within Islam in Pakistan – their purpose is to create animosity between Pakistan and Iran.

The Muslims should respect Iran because it is the only true Islamic country in the world. Iran’s leaders (whom Bangash met) are the only true Islamic government as well. Only by supporting Iran, Muslims can hope to achieve the goals of their religion. The profound changes in the Muslims countries make the enemies of Islam tremble and with the help of the Islamic Republic, the Muslims will soon march to liberate “Palestine” and “Al Quds” (Jerusalem). So as one could expect, the fight between shia and sunnis will eventually lead to the destruction of Israel.

It was a sad end for the rally. It started as an event marking a real human tragedy and Bangash singlehandedly managed to turn it into a farce with his lunatic ravings.

I wonder if it’s too much to demand sanity from your speakers. If the Muslims in Pakistan take their guidance from people like Zafar Bangash, I see long decades of fights, hand cutting, eye gouging, gutting and plain old stabbing in the future of Pakistan…

Good luck with that!

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

About a month ago I wrote about the efforts of the Toronto Police to recruit hijab-wearing Muslimas. Despite the outrage of the ordinary people and a few media outlets, it doesn’t seem like the police have figured out how absurd the idea is. One of my regular readers, “The Lone Ranger”, expressed his opinon about the issue. As it frequently happens, many more people hold the same views (although they often don’t have the time or the courage to write it down).

That’s why I think it is good to have The Lone Ranger’s opinion quoted in its entirity:

 

OK, I’m going to be controversial here. The slide in policing standards began when they accepted homosexual officers. Political correctness and moral relativism has caused enormous damage in almost all Western societies over the past 25 years. A little later, sprinkle in a large helping of multiculturalism and social engineering to the brew and you end up with an explosive concoction. The very idea of Muslim veiled women walking around Toronto in police uniforms and with high caliber Glock semi-automatic pistols strapped to their hips is a nightmare waiting to become a reality.

Will these Muslim female officers have to police the annual gay pride deviants fest? What will they do when they encounter naked homosexual men and lesbian women on the streets? Or will they be assigned desk duties during gay pride month so as not to be offended by the sight of naked adults on our streets? Will they be excused duties to attend Ramadan, while Christian officers are obliged to work through Easter, Christmas and Thanksgiving? Will they be given sick leave when their husbands beat them black and blue as all “good” Muslim men are supposed to do when their spouses step out of line?

I can see nothing but trouble here. This experiment with Muslim & Sikh officers in the UK police has already floundered badly due to the enormous cultural and religious differences. Indeed, the created of separate ethnic police forces within police forces will ultimately lead to the destruction of any cohesion within the rank and structure of our city police services, and the break up of our society along religious and cultural lines.

” “Police in London already give victims the right to ask for a Sikh officer to be involved in an investigation, but the scheme could be introduced for other religions elsewhere.

Chief Supt Joanna Young, from the Met’s Criminal Justice Policy Unit, said: “If it’s a success, I would encourage the other (police) associations to do likewise.”

The project is intended to help investigate “honour” killings and forced marriages but Metropolitan Police Federation chairman Peter Smyth said: “We’re stretched thin enough already. Are Sikh officers going to have their rotas changed so there’s always one on duty?

“It’s political correctness gone mad. We talking about the creation of a separate force within a force.”

But Palbinder Singh, chairman of the Metropolitan Police Sikh Association, said: “I don’t believe a white officer is ever going to be fully conversant with a Sikh.”

And this from Jihad Watch:

“You remember when far-right extremists blew up those bombs in London on July 7, 2005. This “rebellion” should induce authorities to wonder which side these Muslim police are really on. But it won’t. “Muslim police say Islam not to blame for terror attacks,” by Robert Winnett in the Telegraph, January 20 (thanks to Pamela):

Muslim police officers have rebelled openly against the Government’s anti-terrorism strategy, warning that it is an “affront to British values” which threatens to trigger ethnic unrest. The National Association of Muslim Police (NAMP) claimed that ministers were wrong to blame Islam for being the “driver” behind recent terrorist attacks. Far-Right extremists were a more dangerous threat to national security, it said.

The officers told MPs that Muslims were being “stigmatised” by the Government’s attempts to tackle terrorism, which was adding to “hatred” against entire communities.

In the official intervention, the association said the Government’s anti-terrorism policies could not “continue unchecked”.

The comments, made in a seven-page memorandum to a parliamentary committee investigating extremism, are embarrassing for Gordon Brown. They indicated that Muslim officers may be reluctant to take part in “hearts and minds” anti-terrorism campaigns.

The organisation, which represents more than 2,000 officers, was previously publicly backed by Mr Brown. The Prime Minister said the association was crucial to bridge the historic divide between Muslims and the police….

In an analysis of the Prevent strategy, which is a set of policies designed to stop radicalisation, the organisation claimed: “The strategies of Prevent were historically focused on so-called Islamist extremism.

“This has subjected the biggest black and ethnic minority community, and second biggest faith group, in an unprecedented manner, stigmatising them in the process.

“Never before has a community been mapped in [such] a manner … it is frustrating to see this in a country that is a real pillar and example of freedom of expression and choice.

“Our British system is a model for the world to follow, yet we have embarked on a journey that has put this very core of British values under real threat.”

The association warned there were “echoes” of the racism of the 1970s and 1980s which led to inner city riots. “We appear to have ignored the lessons learnt from these dark days,” the officers said….

The Muslim officers believe the Government is wrong to blame Islam as the main driver of terrorist activity.

Research by “those convicted of terrorism acts shows Islam was not, and is not, a real driver but all our strategy seem to focus on is this un-evidenced view of Islam being the driver,” they said. The Government said that confronting Islamic terrorism was one of the key priorities of the anti-radicalisation strategy. Last night, the Foreign Office admitted that funding for counter-terrorism policies in Pakistan had been cut….”

The Lone Ranger

A few days ago a book sold at a Muslim bookstore in Toronto stirred controversy. In a marriage guide titled “A Gift for the Muslim Couple” by Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi, somebody found a “sound” advice for husbands on how to beat their wives to maintain the family harmony.

The story was picked by TV stations and newspapers (every one with its own interpretation) and it showed the ugly face of the Muslim “marriage counselling” methods. Only the so-called “moderate” Muslims like Tarek Fatah condemned the book, the rest kept their silence as usual.

However, thanks to the blogger Blazingcatfur, who published the complete text, I found an article on the issue, written by Sheharyar Shaikh. In the end he is described as “the former President of North American Muslim Foundation. He is specializing in contemporary Islamic thought and modernity.” The description implies that we are dealing with a modern and sensible scholar (which turned out to be not that correct).

What I found refreshing about his opinion is that it was very honest. Shaikh openly expresses the point of view that most other Muslims are trying to conceal. He basically agrees with the premises of the Thanvi’s book and explains to the ignorant kafirs why they don’t understand anything.

He wastes no time in attacking Tarek Fatah, who in the Muslim world appears to be some kind of a pathetic apostate:

“Tarek Fatah of course wants the bookstore owner charged under the law. This is not unexpected of Fatah who has made a lifelong career out of stabbing his own community. Strangely he becomes bitterly resentful (as he did on March 1, 2012, at University of Toronto when he isn’t awarded the honor he feels he deserves from his “racist” circus masters in return for vilifying Muslims. What does he think? Fatah, you are nothing more than a cheap condom for the Michael Corens, Jonathan Kays, Ezra Levants and others out there to screw over this community and then flushing it down the toilet. If they begrudgingly bear you on the same panel as themselves, its not for your rugged good looks, but the damage they can inflict on the Muslims using your small brain and a big mouth.”

What a mastery of the English language! I am obviously not a good match of Shaikh’s filthy Muslim mind, because I can’t quite imagine how Tarek is used as a condom by Michael Coren. Do they teach that dirty imagery in the Muslim schools?

Other than misrepresenting the “fixer” incident that caused Tarek’s outburst last March, I admire Shaikh’s honesty in expressing the opinion of the Muslim community about Islam’s reformers. Fatah has spent decades trying to change Islam and make it more acceptable in the eyes of the Westerners. All that he has achieved so far is that the latter find him to be an interesting and courageous speaker, but his influence in his own Muslim community is practically non-existent.

All that he got from them was hatred and the accusations that he is some kind of a Muslim Uncle Tom, who is backstabbing his own community to earn a few crumbs from his Christian masters. I really respect Tarek’s work, but it looks like the barbaric Islam is an impenetrable castle that nobody can change.

Shaikh’s rage doesn’t stop at bashing Tarek. He is furious that nobody of the Muslim leaders defended the wife-beating manual:

“I do however blame the self-appointed Muslim community leadership, which began either mindlessly condemning Thanvi’s book in unison or has remained pathetically silent about the issue. Where is the Imam Council? Where is Ali Hindy? Where are the champions of faith who are foremost in their dawah efforts? Their silence is deafening.”

Yes, where are those nice people, whose job is to force Islam on us? How could they miss such a golden opportunity to show why wife discipline is such a marvelous part of their cult?

Since they are still quiet, Shaikh takes upon himself the task to put the things in order. Please read carefully the following quote, it is the most important one in the article:

“To make things clear on our end: Islam, like all pre-modern religions, does not, I repeat, does not stand for equality of spouses in a conjugal relationship. Man has a role in the family as a protector, provider and a moral leader, which is distinctly different from the one God awards to the woman. This is the truth. To the Muslim leadership that denies it, I say, shame on you for telling people lies! You know well that men have a responsibility to be the captain of the ship, to be the moral guardians first and foremost who will be held responsible before God for the moral direction of the family institution in society – which today is in shambles. Although Islam is certainly not “oppressive” to women, it does require wives first and foremost with guarding the household in their husbands’ absence. Chauvinistic? Unfair? Exploitative? Perhaps. But this is what we are commanded, and if we turn back we hurt none but ourselves.”

Here he gets extra points for honesty. Most of the other imams and “scholars” go out of their way to hide the real nature of Islam, picturing it as some hip religion, which is good for everybody, while Shaikh is very straightforward: “Yes, in Islam women are second class creatures, yes, we beat them, and that’s the way it is – deal with it!”

This should be read by every lefty feminist dimwit, who thinks that Muslims are a misunderstood minority and the burqa is an expression of the independent minds of the Muslim women. Shaikh plainly states that brutality and oppression are vital parts of Islam and you shouldn’t mess up with them.

Then, just like every other cult follower, he tries to justify his delusions by convincing us that they are much better than the real world. He is not shy in his attempts to blackmail the decadent West:

“If invoking this 19th century book is allowed to thrash Canadian Muslims today, then critics should be allowed to cite works from that same era to make the case for Western males’ contempt for women as well. And if the mere presence of this book in the 21st century counted a crime, what then should we say to the world that sees the Western woman objectified, sexualized, and humiliated in bondage and sadomasochistic videos, criminally accessible to 5-year olds on the net, in the name of entertainment by the 20 billion-dollar porn industry here at home? What about the continuing violence committed against women in society at present? In none of the stinging reviews was there as much as a peep about violence perpetrated against women committed overwhelmingly by non-Muslim (white) males. Was protecting Muslim women the Toronto Sun’s real agenda or was it to brushstroke the Canadian Muslim community in a negative light?”

Here I will have to retract some of my admiration – our friend is trying to sneak in a few lies to make himself more convincing. After the condom metaphor, he takes us to the BDSM porn. (Boy, that filthy Muslim mind never sleeps…) That particular genre of porn is a very small part of that industry and it definitely is not accessible to 5-year olds.

Besides, it involves consenting adults and its presence on the net is part of the price we pay to have freedom of expression. Another part of the price is the presence of filthy drivel written by people like Shaikh.

If the fantasy world of BDSM is so important to him, let’s see what the reality is in the Muslim countries. In Egypt and other Muslim places over 90% of women have their genitalia mutilated by men. How is that for a real-life BDSM?

Homosexual pedophilia is perfectly acceptable in many Muslim countries. Wife beating, acid disfigurement, burying women alive is not a big deal. In Saudi Arabia, the castle of Islam, the tent trash hit the jackpot in the oil lottery, but the primitive Bedouin ways are still dominant – under the barbaric sharia law they still behead witches, exterminate gays, cut off the hands of thieves, and kill everybody who disagrees with Islam. Does this “brushstroke Muslims in a negative light”?

Sheikh, not all of us are ignorant idiots who take the Muslim lies at face value. For most of us your concluding statement sounds ridiculous, because it tries to hide the monstrous abuse of women in the Muslim world:

“…Under the current situation, it appears amazingly hypocritical to accuse the Muslim community of a “particularly sinister” kind of misogyny using a little known couple’s guide, all the while ignoring an ocean of a problem around us. It reeks of anti-Muslimism, nothing else.”

But Shaikh is not done yet – he brings in the heavy artillery, attacking the sacred books of other religions, especially the Bible:

“Think about this: I have five copies of the same one book that gives women a status way lower than this Muslim book ever could; it’s called the Bible. And guess what? It’s way more popular in the homes and bookstores.”

He quotes different parts from several books in the Bible, like “woman is the source of all sin, the cause of global death (Ecc. 25:13), the source of all wickedness (Ecc. 42:13), can be shameless like a dog (Ecc. 26:25), is of a sinister nature (Ecc. 7:26) is a recipient of special punishment from God (Gen. 2:15), brings shame when she opens her mouth in church (1 Cor. 14:35), becomes unclean to touch during periods/childbirth (Lev. 15:19)”, etc., etc.

The Hindus can’t get away either: “Would they take on the Hindu scripture Manusmriti, a distilled version of the Hindu Vedas out of the mouth of Lord Brahma, which orders wives to worship their husbands like gods?”

And what Muslim writing could be complete without bashing the Jews: “Similarly, when orthodox Jewish men in western countries get up in the morning and thank God every day for not making them a woman but a man.”

I understand where he is coming from on this issue – in his religion the Koran is the absolute authority, which should be the basis of all governmental, judicial, religious and moral decisions. Despite the fact that it is a poorly written compilation (mostly plagiarized from the Bible), it is considered a monolithic sacred text. Every deviation from it is potentially punishable by death.

As of the Bible, every reasonable Christian knows that it has been written over many centuries by different people. Although its books share the same inspiration, it is clear that every person has left his own stamp and view in his book. It is also clear that many of the events and opinions apply to a historic reality that is long gone.

It is very unlikely that anybody would base a women rights legislation on the views of the Ecclesiastes, who sounds like a grumpy old man, who is disappointed with everything in this world (or maybe some fundamentalist sect in the woods of Montana would go for it).

Unlike the Muslim cult, which is still stuck in the 7^th century, Christianity has evolved and although its moral principles are the same, their expression in the laws has changed with the times and contributed to the prosperity of the Western civilization. The same civilization, which Shaikh loathes, but is not ashamed to take advantage of, even though with his views he should feel more comfortable in the barbaric Saudi Arabia.

The same applies to India, where not the Vedas, but the British common law is at the basis of the social interaction and that law, which respects the rights of the individual, has helped transform India into the world’s largest democracy. Israel is not that different – just like in America and India, the respect for the individual has made the country the ONLY democracy in the Middle East.

Maybe not everything is perfect in those countries, but the principles they are governed by, guarantee that they are flexible enough to evolve. But one thing is clear – no misogynic religious text will ever define and control those countries’ laws.

And that’s not the case with Islam – the tribal primitivism, frozen in the Koran, is still considered the supreme wisdom, which should guide all Muslim judges’ decisions.

And now people like Shaikh want to make this barbarism perfectly acceptable in the West. I know that Islam is based on deception and aggression, but such “scholars” simply can’t make wife beating attractive enough even to the most insane lefties, no matter how hard they try to exploit multiculturalism (which was forced on us).

That’s why we should never stop exposing the filth and violence promoted in little guides like “A Gift for the Muslim Couple” (and the religious principles that justify them).

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

 

A few months ago I wrote about the decision of the Metropolitan Toronto Police to actively seek recruits among the Muslim women wearing hijab.

I thought that the outcry generated by that weird intention would be enough to make the police board and the Chief to reconsider it.

I was wrong. In an interview of SUN TV with Tarek Fatah it was revealed that not only didn’t the police give up the hijab issue, but they also went further and are now considering the niqab (or the veil), one of the worst garments that the fanatical Muslims wear. Here is the interview (h/t BCF):

 

That made me think that I can help to design the new sharia-compliant uniform – you can see it at the top. I should tell the lefties and the Muslims that the picture is a satire (that’s necessary, because the sense of humour in the politically correct lefties and the Muslim fanatics is usually excised at birth).

It is very odd that in a highly developed and democratic country like Canada somebody could seriously contemplate adopting one of the most barbaric symbols of Islam. And it is horrific when that somebody is the police force of the largest Canadian city.

If the members of the police board think that a woman could wear that body bag voluntarily, they must be out of their minds. The niqab is the piece of clothing designed to reduce women to a non-entities – without face, without shape, without presence.

The worst part is that they want to make such non-entities, which can’t even be identified, control the free citizens of Canada.

Even in those countries, which have adopted the most awful and primitive forms of sharia (like Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Afghanistan) they don’t allow veiled women in the police force (if they allow any women there at all).

So the Metropolitan Toronto Police want us to look even worse than Saudi Arabia. Are these changes disguised as an “accommodation” a preparation for the future takeover of Canada? It is hard to believe that a woman who appears in public in those weird clothes would come from a family that yearns to accept the Canadian values and customs as their own.

The idea of veiled police officers patrolling the streets of Toronto is not only stupid; it is horrible, hideous, atrocious and dreadful.

Dear Toronto Police, what have we, the ordinary citizens, done to deserve to be policed by scary Muslim fanatics?!

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

At the opening of the Israeli Apartheid Week at the University of Toronto last night they invited a representative of Palestine House. Presented as a “martyr” organization defunded by the evil Conservative government, they had the opportunity to state their points.

The points are clear – inviting anti-Semitic speakers is a free speech right; all Palestinians in Israeli jails are political prisoners; the map in their logo is right, because you can’t define the Israeli borders; and Palestine might be liberated by the next year.

Here is the speech, as I wrote it down in shorthand and transcribed it:

“Good evening, with the Canadian government – Harper, Kenney – they state they share the same values as Israel, you would expect that they will take actions against Palestine House and other organizations that support the Palestinian struggle. We were surprised when we haven’t heard from them. Why? Were we doing something wrong, were we not political enough, are we not supporting the BDS campaign? And on January 31 they brought it to us: no, you guys are doing the right thing and that’s why we are cutting you off.

Unfortunately, 31 employees lost their jobs because of Kenney’s action. Fortunately, now we are independent from any pressure by this government. They used to come and put conditions on us: you don’t have to do this and you don’t have to do this. Even the charity BBQ – we were not allowed to do it. We didn’t listen; we continued to work in support of our struggle, in support of the Palestinian people’s struggle.

Mr. Kenney mentioned three issues in this letter for cutting the funding. The first one that we invited Abdul Atwan, the senior journalist based in London, who stated that Iran has the right to defend itself. We invited him and we were punished for inviting Atwan. By doing so he is telling us that we don’t have the right to (free) speech – and this is the Minister of Immigration.

The second issue was that Palestine House celebrated the release of 1000 political prisoners. Can you imagine that someone cut you off, because you celebrated the release and freedom of a thousand political prisoners? Mr. Kenney, we will not only celebrate the liberation of our political prisoners, our heroes, we will use all source of power, any action, any effort to release all the Palestinian prisoners.

The third issue Mr. Kenney mentioned is that Palestine House put a map of Palestine on the outside. (laughter in the audience) And by putting that map he said that you are denying the right of Israel to exist. We sent a letter: please Mr. Kenney, would you define the Israeli borders? We never heard back. We don’t deny anybody’s right to exist, we support the Israeli people, the Jewish people who live in Palestine to exist, but no one can pressure us to recognize the right of an apartheid state to exist in our land. Palestine belongs to the Palestinian people, those people who are living in Palestine; we will not rest until the last Palestinian refugee returns to Palestine. Palestine will always be unified regardless of who is living there.

The funding should make the Palestinians activists and those Palestinians, who claim that they are the leaders of the Palestinian Canadian community, they should show leadership to their community. And they should show that they can provide services to the Palestinian community without any funds, and we are planning to do so.

Before I end, let me just say one thing – today many people received an e-mail from an Israeli think tank. They are saying that they are coming to Toronto on March 26 to discuss with those organizations that criticized Israel. And why are they criticizing Israel? Isn’t that stupid? In their words, they’ll discuss the gradual erosion of the Israeli international support. And that’s a proof that the struggle of the Palestinian people, the anti-apartheid movement and the BDS campaign is solidifying and spreading, while the image of the Israelis and their supporters is shrinking.

Thank you, and don’t underestimate that work that Canada is doing, and let’s hope that the next year we will not have the ninth apartheid week – we will have a celebration of the liberated Palestine.”

 

 

A few days after the judge announced the life sentences in the Shafia “honour killings” trial, 34 Muslim clerics from Canada signed a fatwa against that type of crime, which also condemned the domestic violence and hatred of women. The organization they belong to bears the pretentious name “Islamic Supreme Council of Canada”. There was not a word about the legitimacy of the Council – were they really elected to rule supreme over all Muslims in Canada?

However, behind all that brouhaha we see the notorious imam Syed Soharwardy from Calgary. He was the one who announced the fatwa during a news conference in Mississauga, Ontario. Among other things he stated:

“These crimes are major sins in Islam, punishable by the court of law and almighty Allah.”

Now, Soharwardy has that face expression of an abandoned puppy, which can create the impression that he is a compassionate and thoughtful cleric. That appearance never fails to fool the champions of multiculturalism, who even today didn’t miss the opportunity to praise him. In the Toronto Star comments they were ecstatic about how the imam took a firm position against extremism.

Unfortunately, not all people in Canada are that dumb – many know that the esteemed imam has a long history of supporting Muslim fanaticism, which can be easily found out, if you follow the Muslim life in Canada.

It was Soharwardy who about five years ago charged Ezra Levant with blasphemy for printing Mohammed’s cartoons in Western Standard. At one of his public appearances, Ezra explained how the imam went first to the Calgary police and demanded that they arrest him. That didn’t work. It’s unbelievable that a “supreme” Muslim leader could be so ignorant – by expecting the police to act like in Saudi Arabia he showed how well he has “adapted” to the rules of his new country.

Then some “good” souls referred him to the Human Rights Commission. He filed the complaint with pencil and in the semi-literate explanation even quoted the Koran. After long prosecution conducted by the HRC fascist censors, the imam suddenly dropped the case, but by that time Ezra had already piled up a legal bill of about $100,000 (while Soharwardy didn’t pay a penny).

In the end of the last year, when the immigration Minister Jason Kenney introduced a new rule asking Muslim women to remove their veils (niqabs or burkas) during their citizenship ceremonies, the Calgary imam didn’t miss the opportunity to parade his ignorance again.

Not only did he defend the most repulsive Islamic garment, the ultimate symbol of Muslim oppression of women, but he also compared the new rules to an attack similar to the treatment of the Jews before Hitler began their extermination.

The shameless Muslim fanatic went on to say that intimidating Islam and belittling the Koran will end in a tragedy:

“Muslims are going through that situation right now that the Jews faced before the Holocaust. That was going on in Germany before the Holocaust, same thing is happening now about Muslims. So this is absolutely an alarming situation.”

It takes a special breed of a hypocritical liar to say something like that with a straight face, but Syed is exactly the type of a liar, who can generate sympathy among the Canada-hating lefties.

You may have noticed that the fatwa was announced in Mississauga. Ironically, that was the hometown of Aqsa Pervez, the beautiful girl, who was strangled by her father and brother for refusing to wear the Muslim head covering, which is so dear to Soharwardy’s heart. Unlike the Shafia girls, who got proper burial, Aqsa was buried like an animal in an unmarked grave.

I don’t recall a single word of condemnation uttered by Soharwardy about Aqsa’s murder. Why is that, Syed?

And another thing – what’s the deal with that “fatwa”? Its definition is “a legal pronouncement in Islam”, which makes it a part of the Muslim sharia law. Last I checked, Canada is ruled by common law, which is supposed to be equally applied to everybody. Is that creepy imam trying to sneak in a parallel judicial system?

The fatwas are a major part of the rules and laws in fanatical Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran and Afghanistan. Is Syed attempting to turn our country into the same type of hellhole?

Is it just me or is that fatwa condescending toward Muslims? It presupposes that they need somebody to explain to them that they can’t kill their children and wives. But according to our immigration authorities, Canada is a multicultural paradise, which attracts the brightest and the most qualified immigrants in the world. After those “honour” killings, I have serious doubts about the qualifications of our immigration officers – if they can’t weed out people who still live in the 7^th century, we are really in trouble.

In another interview, Soharwardy claimed that after he condemned the killings, he received nine death threats from Muslims. Just imagine that – although the imam is a fanatical creep, there are people from the same religion, who find him too mild. How do you feel about the safety of our country after such a revelation?

Our future doesn’t look very bright – the left and the Human Rights Commissions are constantly trying to suffocate any real debates on the militant Islam, which is one of the main threats in the world. Don’t forget that thousands of Muslims have fled to Canada to get rid of people like Soharwardy, who tried to run every aspect of their daily lives.

Yet when they are here, they see that the media give publicity to fanatics like him, creating the wrong impression that they represent all Muslims. At the same time, the voices of the Muslim reason, like Tarek Fatah, Raheel Raza, Salim Mansur and others, are shunned and ignored.

Years ago, there was a fitness TV guru named Susan Powter. Her late night infomercials used to start with showing her listening to voices discussing health and fitness, which were getting louder and louder. She was getting tenser and tenser and in about a minute you could see her screaming: “Stop the insanity!  Stop the insanity!”

After looking at Syed Soharwardy, reading the Toronto Star, and watching CBC in their attempt to ruin any real discussion on fanatical Islam, I feel like screaming just like Susan: “Stop the insanity!  Stop the insanity!”

I hope I am not the only one in Canada, who feels this way…

 

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

Last summer I wrote a rather long post about the halal food invasion in Toronto. It is imposed in more and more places in the city – even many public schools provide only halal food.

Along with the usual Muslim threats I received a few messages from readers telling me that I have missed to mention several other places that serve such food. I didn’t plan the post to be an extensive study of the phenomenon. However, a popular name came up several times – that was Popeyes, the chicken fast food chain.

Frankly, I had no idea that they were serving halal chicken. The restaurants were advertised as “Louisiana Style” and I would’ve never guessed that they were controlled by Muslims. The readers also notified me that years ago “halal” was proudly displayed there, but later disappeared.

I went to several locations and found out they were right – halal wasn’t mentioned anywhere. The staffs were vague about the issue when I asked them.

Fast forward to this month – last week Toronto Star published an article about a court case involving the chain. A group of Muslim franchisees are suing the management over halal chicken delivery. I am not going into details, the whole issue sounds like a fight of vultures over carrion, but there are some curious facts I would like to note.

There are 59 restaurants in Southern Ontario and ALL of them have served ONLY halal chicken for the last 25 years. From 50 to 80 per cent of their clients are Muslim.

So what, you may ask.

Here is what – for over two decades we have had in our province a massive Islamic enterprise, which has operated on the basis of deception.

Instead of openly declaring that they serve halal chicken, the owners decided to hide the fact, probably to get more customers. There are many people who find the barbaric halal slaughter disgusting and would never eat at such a place. Yet, a countless number of them have been deceived by the Muslim owners.

When confronted about halal, the Muslims usually say: “If you don’t like it, don’t eat it!” That’s precisely what I want to do, but those crooks are basically tricking you into eating their garbage.

Imagine if we had the reverse situation – a Christian restaurant owner secretly adds pork to the meals, tricking the Muslims to eat it. Can you imagine what would happen when he gets caught?

His windows will be shattered; he may even get a fire bomb or two. There will be endless lawsuits and the human rights commission would most likely confiscate the restaurant as a compensation for the hurt Muslim feelings.

Frankly, I am not surprised – deception (the taqiyya principle) is an integral part of Islam. Anything that advances the spread of that cult is good. Halal is also an essential part of the barbaric sharia law. And the Muslims are working diligently to impose it on us with force or deception (whatever works).

Here is what I want to know – how much longer should we do everything to accommodate sharia? The Muslims can impose their religion in the secular public schools; openly discriminate against non-Muslims in rental ads; cheat about the food at Popeyes – yet even the slightest criticism of their cult is met by an army of human rights vultures, ready and willing to destroy you.

In our overregulated food industry, the manufacturers are forced to disclose even the tiniest ingredient, but the Muslim owners of Popeyes are free to lie and cheat.

It is humiliating to feel like a second-class citizen in your own province, but apparently that’s all we can expect from McGuinty’s Islamic government…

 

© 2011 Blogwrath.com

The Torontonians were treated to a new chapter in the never-ending saga of the destructive Canadian political correctness. The Toronto Police announced that they are going to accommodate Muslim women, who want to serve as police officers and wear their hijabs.

It’s just another blow against the Canadian traditions and values. It has been probably orchestrated by the powerful Muslim lobby with the cooperation of our dhimmi politicians (and can even see Barbara Hall’s long shadow lurking behind).

Instead of preserving everything that unites us, those people are bound on fragmenting and destroying our country. We have sheepishly bent over to accommodate another minority that doesn’t want to adapt and doesn’t give a damn about Canada’s values.

Unfortunately, that’s not the first attack – the way was paved by the Sikhs much earlier. If you remember, in the 1990’s they demanded that the Sikh Mounties wear turbans instead of hats. That was forced on RCMP, then on the local police. Seeing those turban policemen in Toronto makes me feel like I am in colonial India. Then they went against the veterans from the Royal Canadian Legion, which didn’t allow people wearing headgear to enter their buildings. The Sikhs managed to wrestle down the veterans on this issue. Last year, Canada’s ultimate freeloaders, Jack and Olivia, engaged in a campaign to let Sikhs carry their big knives in government building, while nobody else is allowed to bring weapons there.

As you can see, this is a very successful model of bullying – people don’t dare oppose any weird culture, otherwise they’ll be branded bigots and racists.

So the Muslims are following the same path. Nothing new here…

If all this was going on in some corporation, it would’ve been much easier to ignore. But we are talking police here – policing, i.e. maintaining order, is one of the most important functions of the government. In a democratic country, the police are supposed to treat everybody in the same way according to the law.

Their uniforms symbolize that equality and impartiality. When you try to “diversify” them, you get into problems on many levels. So you call the police and a weird woman with a gun wearing a hijab shows up. How would you feel if you are a Jew or a Christian refugee from Egypt? Wouldn’t you be traumatized by the suspicion that you won’t be treated fairly?

The hijab is not just a rag covering one’s head – it is a religious and political statement (both are inseparable in Islam). When a woman wears it, it means that
she is either a very devout Muslim or under a strong pressure by her family to wear it. In both cases, her priorities could be questioned. What would she do,
if she has to arrest a suspected Muslim terrorist? Whose side would she take if there is an altercation between a Christian and a Muslim?

In case you’ve forgotten, Major Hassan, the military psychiatrist, who killed 13 people at Fort Hood, was a proud “Soldier of Allah”.  Then the soldier who was praised by the US Army as being the model devout but moderate Muslim was arrested right before he was going to kill many people. Needless to say, not all devout Muslims are those characters, but like it or not, the reality shows us that we must be vigilant.

The whole notion of allowing that outfit to be part of the police uniform is beyond ridiculous. Do you think that they’ll accommodate a cop who wants to wear a huge cross as a symbol of devotion? Of course not, Christians are second-class citizens when their religion is concerned.

We also must take into account that a religious Muslim woman is not supposed to be left alone with a man, who is not a member of her family. So when she is patrolling, she must be paired with a female officer. That would be another accommodation.

And what about dogs? Police dogs are loyal and hard-working members of the police force, while to Muslims they are dirty animals, from which they should stay away. In Great Britain Muslims are willing to ban police dogs. How would the hijab police woman handle them? Do we need to exterminate them? Otherwise, if a dog licks her, she would run crying to Barbara Hall and her commission.

What if somebody at the station has a ham sandwich? She could easily sue for violation of her delicate sensitivities.

Then come the safety issues – a criminal big enough can easily overpower such a woman and strangle her with her hijab. The latter is not allowed during sports games for safety reasons – then why should it be allowed in a much worse situation, when dealing with vicious criminals?! Or maybe if the worst happens, the Muslim police woman’s family would sue the police force for not protecting her?

It’s unbelievable how low the West has fallen in its self-destruction. If a Muslim woman demands the same from the police in Japan, South Korea, China or Russia, she’ll be laughed out.

Yet our politicians have no problem ruining our police force.

I am posting this, but maybe I should be watching for a hijab woman with a big gun showing up at my door. Never mind…

 

© 2011 Blogwrath.com

 

Despite all the protests, the Muslim prayers at the Valley Park Middle School are still going strong due to the contempt of the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) for the traditional values of Canada.  Today a large group of Muslims gathered in front of the TDSB offices to celebrate.

They advertised the event as a victory for tolerance. Nothing is farther than the truth – just look at the picture below. Nothing speaks tolerance better than a niqab Muslima holding a sign TDSB – We appreciate your work, with the little Miss TDSB-Hezbollah behind her (the Miss recently attended an anti-Semitic eventat Queen’s Park).

 

If the work that TDSB did made a woman, who looks like a Saudi gargoyle, like them, there is something profoundly wrong with the bureaucrats who run our country.

And what about the slogan Beautiful Diversity Thanks to TDSB? What could be more convincing than seeing the sign held by two hijab girls, one of whom raises her fist like a wannabe Hamas bomber? And what’s the deal with the hippy signs? How do they fit in with the hijab? The imam should have looked better before approving the sign.

 

 

JDL and other organizations held a counter event to show that there are people who still don’t think that putting our schools under Muslim control is a good idea. The events were heavily guarded by the police and both groups were separated by a fence.

 

The participants made their messages very clear:

 

 

 

The good Muslim people were even treated to recitations of the Koran, courtesy of JDL. Strangely, they booed, even though Rob made sure to add “peace be upon him” after each time old Mo’s name was mentioned.

 

A nice surprise was the presence of the Muslim activist Mubin Shaikh. I am not sure which side he was on, but he spent almost all the time in the JDL sector.

 

 

There was a lot of yelling and chanting on the Muslim side. When they advertised the event, they asked everybody who plays musical instrument to bring it. There wasn’t a single instrument (if you don’t count the whistles). It’s no wonder – there are not many fatwas in defence of music.

 

 

 

Of course, there were the usual useful idiots on the Muslim side:

 

Despite the separation, people of both sides mingled and argued, although nobody convinced the other of their position. Here is a blogger, who shall remain
unnamed, discussing something with a very Muslim looking Muslim guy:

And here little Miss TDSB-Hezbollah pays a visit to JDL:

 

In a short, but emotional speech, Meir Weinstein, Director of JDL, emphasized the danger of Islamicism. That radical doctrine has as its purpose the destruction not only of Israel, but also of the Western civilization at large. The Muslim radicalism is trying to get a foothold at any institution that can be transformed for its purposes. The careless way in which that invasion is handled in Canada endangers not only Christians and Jews, but also the ordinary Muslims, who came here to escape from fanaticism.

There are only a few weeks left to the provincial elections and yet the candidates of the major parties pay very little attention to the spread of Islamic fanaticism in our schools. Isn’t it time that we reminded them who they work for?

 

 

© 2011 Blogwrath.com