Powered by Max Banner Ads
The Torontonians were treated to a new chapter in the never-ending saga of the destructive Canadian political correctness. The Toronto Police announced that they are going to accommodate Muslim women, who want to serve as police officers and wear their hijabs.
It’s just another blow against the Canadian traditions and values. It has been probably orchestrated by the powerful Muslim lobby with the cooperation of our dhimmi politicians (and can even see Barbara Hall’s long shadow lurking behind).
Instead of preserving everything that unites us, those people are bound on fragmenting and destroying our country. We have sheepishly bent over to accommodate another minority that doesn’t want to adapt and doesn’t give a damn about Canada’s values.
Unfortunately, that’s not the first attack – the way was paved by the Sikhs much earlier. If you remember, in the 1990’s they demanded that the Sikh Mounties wear turbans instead of hats. That was forced on RCMP, then on the local police. Seeing those turban policemen in Toronto makes me feel like I am in colonial India. Then they went against the veterans from the Royal Canadian Legion, which didn’t allow people wearing headgear to enter their buildings. The Sikhs managed to wrestle down the veterans on this issue. Last year, Canada’s ultimate freeloaders, Jack and Olivia, engaged in a campaign to let Sikhs carry their big knives in government building, while nobody else is allowed to bring weapons there.
As you can see, this is a very successful model of bullying – people don’t dare oppose any weird culture, otherwise they’ll be branded bigots and racists.
So the Muslims are following the same path. Nothing new here…
If all this was going on in some corporation, it would’ve been much easier to ignore. But we are talking police here – policing, i.e. maintaining order, is one of the most important functions of the government. In a democratic country, the police are supposed to treat everybody in the same way according to the law.
Their uniforms symbolize that equality and impartiality. When you try to “diversify” them, you get into problems on many levels. So you call the police and a weird woman with a gun wearing a hijab shows up. How would you feel if you are a Jew or a Christian refugee from Egypt? Wouldn’t you be traumatized by the suspicion that you won’t be treated fairly?
The hijab is not just a rag covering one’s head – it is a religious and political statement (both are inseparable in Islam). When a woman wears it, it means that
she is either a very devout Muslim or under a strong pressure by her family to wear it. In both cases, her priorities could be questioned. What would she do,
if she has to arrest a suspected Muslim terrorist? Whose side would she take if there is an altercation between a Christian and a Muslim?
In case you’ve forgotten, Major Hassan, the military psychiatrist, who killed 13 people at Fort Hood, was a proud “Soldier of Allah”. Then the soldier who was praised by the US Army as being the model devout but moderate Muslim was arrested right before he was going to kill many people. Needless to say, not all devout Muslims are those characters, but like it or not, the reality shows us that we must be vigilant.
The whole notion of allowing that outfit to be part of the police uniform is beyond ridiculous. Do you think that they’ll accommodate a cop who wants to wear a huge cross as a symbol of devotion? Of course not, Christians are second-class citizens when their religion is concerned.
We also must take into account that a religious Muslim woman is not supposed to be left alone with a man, who is not a member of her family. So when she is patrolling, she must be paired with a female officer. That would be another accommodation.
And what about dogs? Police dogs are loyal and hard-working members of the police force, while to Muslims they are dirty animals, from which they should stay away. In Great Britain Muslims are willing to ban police dogs. How would the hijab police woman handle them? Do we need to exterminate them? Otherwise, if a dog licks her, she would run crying to Barbara Hall and her commission.
What if somebody at the station has a ham sandwich? She could easily sue for violation of her delicate sensitivities.
Then come the safety issues – a criminal big enough can easily overpower such a woman and strangle her with her hijab. The latter is not allowed during sports games for safety reasons – then why should it be allowed in a much worse situation, when dealing with vicious criminals?! Or maybe if the worst happens, the Muslim police woman’s family would sue the police force for not protecting her?
It’s unbelievable how low the West has fallen in its self-destruction. If a Muslim woman demands the same from the police in Japan, South Korea, China or Russia, she’ll be laughed out.
Yet our politicians have no problem ruining our police force.
I am posting this, but maybe I should be watching for a hijab woman with a big gun showing up at my door. Never mind…
© 2011 Blogwrath.com