Archive for April, 2012
Powered by Max Banner Ads
I have been following the Alberta election campaign closely. Even though the media coverage is biased against the Wildrose Party, the polls consistently show that it has a significant advantage over PC Alberta. Polls are often inaccurate and biased as well, but sometimes a small event in a campaign can reveal the real situation in a very profound way.
Such a “small event” is the ad above. Although it supports PC, it looks like it has been made either by a saboteur within the party or the “Liberal Strategist” Warren Kinsella (the Torontonians may remember his Mafia-style radio ads with a Tony Soprano-like voice for Rocco Rossi’s mayoral campaign, which reduced his popularity from 8% to zero).
However, it appears the ad is not a parody. If it is real, it reveals such a sheer desperation that it proves beyond any doubt that Wildrose will win by a landslide.
It’s hard to believe that those snotty hipsters would change anybody’s mind in Alberta (even with the addition of the foul-mouthed self-proclaimed Latino guy, who for some reason speaks with Pakistani accent). Don’t get me wrong – the ad may work in my part of Toronto, but I live in Mrs. Jack Layton’s bunker and the actors in the ad are the common type you meet in the streets. They would vote in even a chimp, if he runs against the conservatives (yes, we have “progressive conservatives” in Ontario).
It is hard to believe that fans of PC Alberta could support the party by attacking the industry, which provides the money they waste, and ridiculing Albertans and their heritage. An interesting twist is that even the conservative Harper is attacked in that “conservative” ad.
Other than providing some strictly emotional criticism – the Flintstones, the lake of fire and the “homophobia” – the ad doesn’t address any real issues that PC Alberta would resolve better if re-elected. That can appeal to the common contingent of Toronto’s hipsters, who are always present at any ridiculous protest, but again – how many of those can you find in Alberta?
It looks like Alberta is in the initial stage of the self-destructive progressivism that has ruined Ontario. Anything in Ontario’s heritage, which doesn’t meet the standards of the Muslim imams or the progressive homosexuals, is being expurgated mercilessly.
Alberta (at least on the surface) is still keeping its heritage. In June 2009 I went there for an event taking place at the Calgary Stampede site. I saw there that nice girl, who demonstrated some of the traditional riding skills. She even showed me how to use a lasso.
I wonder how much longer this is going to last. Once you have the progressives in charge, PETA will insist on replacing the real horses with robots in the name of fighting animal cruelty. Then maybe the Indians would get the Albertan hat banned as a symbol of colonialism and oppression and replace it with some of the funny hats their tribes use. And most of the riders are white – that could be treated as pure white supremacism, which should be eradicated. What about creating quotas for racialized, aboriginal, transgendered, transvestite, two-spirited or any other imaginable special interest group? And why not just shut down the Stampede as a “relic from the colonial past”?
The same week I saw that the progressives were working on that – I watched the Calgary gay parade. Compared to Toronto it was a meager event, with a few dozen participants and even fewer spectators, but I am sure it will grow.
Yes, they were nice people as well. A guy, who was following the angels with balloon wings, handed me some gay pamphlets and a free condom.
So what’s the link between the video and the pictures?
It’s actually very simple – if you let the lefty snobs control the province, you’ll see fewer and fewer cowgirls and more and more chubby gay angels with pink umbrellas.
Of course, both of them are only symbols of what may come to Alberta. Gay angels are just a small part of the set of “progressive” values those snobs carry with them. They are like locusts, which devour everything they can and then move to a new land.
They helped elect three times the homophilic David-Suzuki-eco-friendly multiculturalist government of Dalton McGuinty, which is slowly, but surely bankrupting Ontario. They even managed to drive Caterpillar out of Ontario. Apparently many of those hipsters are moving to Alberta, because it offers better opportunities, but they are still carrying their stupidity with them.
Given the chance, they are going to shut down the oil sands through taxation and regulation, distribute billions of dollars among useless interest groups, which don’t work, and litter the province with windmills, which don’t work either.
But here comes the big surprise – once you shut down the most reliable Canadian industry, the natural resources, there will be no land or province left to devour. It’s strange that Alison Redford has chosen such people to advance her cause. If they have their way, Canada won’t be much different than Northern Siberia, where in the man-eat-man environment the debates about the gay marriage are not exactly the most popular topic.
Canada has become a rich and prosperous country because of the hard work of its people, not because of its stand on gay marriage or due to giving away money to lazy and/or crooked people in third-world countries.
The choice is clear – although Wildrose may not be that experienced, at least it gives Alberta the chance to manage itself properly, while voting for Redford’s party, which promises you spending, censorship and support for special interest groups at the expense of the majority, is the sure-fire way to self-destruction.
It’s your move, Alberta…
© 2012 Blogwrath.com
I took this picture at an event featuring Lars Vilks (the Swedish cartoonist who got into trouble with the Muslims for drawing a dog with Old Mo’s head). It was the first time I saw Lars Hedegaard.
That was a gloomy event – several of the Vilks’s appearances during his tour in Canada were cancelled (citing security concerns). JDL-Canada ensured the safety of the Toronto event, so it could proceed.
Lars Vilks maintained his sense of humour during his talk, explaining how he was beaten by Muslims, how they burned his sculptures and even set his house on fire.
The other Lars (a journalist and historian from the Danish Free Press Society) lacked that artistic cheerfulness. In a somber tone he explained that he had troubles with the Danish law over accusations of hate speech. Apparently, he criticized Islam and its treatment of women in a talk with a journalist who released the recording without his consent.
He was charged under Denmark’s Article 266(b), which has the same vague meaning as Canada’s Section 13 of the Human Rights Code, but unlike Canada, where the Human Rights Commissions grill you, in Denmark the courts deal with the accusation. The point is that to get a conviction, the prosecutor just needs to show that the statement has offended (or might have offended) somebody. It’s irrelevant if the statement is true or not.
After that gloomy evening, both Larses flew back to their countries – Lars Vilks hoping to convince Muslims to be more open-minded and Lars Hedegaard to face the Danish court.
A few months later we heard the great news that Hedegaard has been acquitted – true, on a technicality, because his remarks were verbal – but still that made us proud that the free speech prevailed. That feeling didn’t last – shortly after that the prosecutor appealed the verdict to a higher court and Lars was convicted. Then he appealed and the case went to the Supreme Court of Denmark, which is supposed to make its decision soon.
His whole ordeal shows how ridiculous the hate speech laws are. The Danish law was introduced long time ago to protect the Jews, but more groups and reasons for hate are being added to the point where it simply shuts down any criticism. And in this case, by banning criticism of Islam, the law paves the way for the advancement of one of the most militant religious ideologies in the world today. An ideology, which doesn’t hide its intentions to dominate the world. At the same, time not a single one of the Muslim fanatics, who abound in Denmark, has ever been charged with hate speech.
Whatever the outcome, the fact that in the 21st century a peaceful scholar is dragged through the mud for daring to criticize a violent ideology is a disgrace for Europe and its rulers.
Here is Lars Hedegaard’s statement:
Response to Charges of Hate Speech
by Lars Hedegaard
Honourable Supreme Court,
My attorney has presented juridical arguments to the effect that I must be acquitted and I shall refrain from elaborating.
However, allow me to express my quiet bafflement that somebody can claim that it has been my intention to accuse every last Muslim father in the world of abusing his children – particularly in light of the fact that I have carefully explained that it was never my intention to disseminate such an absurd contention.
For precisely that reason, I would have welcomed an opportunity to review the statements I now stand accused of having uttered before they were placed on the Internet. If the interviewer had fulfilled this basic journalistic obligation, I would have demanded that my remarks be corrected so as to reflect my true opinions and the prosecutor could have saved the trouble of dragging me through the courts.
I am even more baffled at one of the claims about my person that has been circulated in connection with this case, namely that I am a racist. I have never been, I am not now and I shall never be a racist. On the contrary, all my life I have opposed racist attitudes, by which I mean hatred towards and denigrating speech about people due their descent, skin colour or other so-called racial characteristics – in other words, antipathy against or ill treatment of people due to circumstances over which they have no control.
Islam is not a race and therefore criticism of Islam cannot be racism.
Islam, which lurks behind this entire case, has been described from a variety of viewpoints. Some say that it is a religion, others that is an all-encompassing ideology that contains a religion, still others emphasise its cultural norms, its culturally transmitted customs and practices. Some even maintain that Islam is so multifaceted that it is impossible to describe it.
But regardless of one’s approach, it must be clear that Islam is not a hereditary human attribute.
If our Western freedom means anything at all, we must insist that every grown-up person is responsible for his or her beliefs, opinions, culture, habits and actions.
We enjoy political freedom and we enjoy freedom of religion. This implies a largely unlimited right to disseminate one’s political persuasion and religious beliefs. That is as it should be. But the price we all have to pay for this freedom is that others have a right to criticise our politics, our religion and our culture.
Islamic spokesmen have the freedom to advocate their concept of society, which implies the introduction of a theocracy governed by god-given laws, i.e. sharia, the abolition of man-made laws and by implication freedom of expression and democracy. They are free to think that women are inferior to men as concerns their rights and their pursuit of happiness. They are even entitled to disseminate such opinions.
I cannot recall a single instance in this country where an Islamic spokesman has been prosecuted for saying that, of course, sharia will become the law of the land once the demographic and political realities make it possible. This despite the fact that we have several examples of, e.g., imams who have openly declared that the imposition of theocracy is a religious duty incumbent on all believers.
In return, these theocrats and sharia-advocates must accept the right of those who believe in democracy, free institutions and human equality to criticise Islam and to oppose its dissemination and the atavistic cultural norms practiced by some Muslims.
It is this right – I would even say duty – to describe, criticise and oppose a totalitarian ideology that I have tried to exercise to the best of my ability.
My speech and my writings have had no other purpose than to alert my fellow citizens to the danger inherent in the Islamic concept of the state and the law.
I have made no secret of the fact that I consider this fight for our liberties to be the most important political struggle of our time.
I would not be able to live with my guilty conscience if – out of fear of public condemnation and ridicule – I refrained from telling the truth as I see it.
And regardless of the outcome of this trial, I intend to continue my struggle for free speech and against totalitarian concepts of any stripe.
I have always been amazed at the creative ways in which Great Britain is trying to self-destruct. Its politicians wouldn’t sit still until the country goes down the tubes.
The latest case involves Lord Ahmed (Nazir Ahmed), a Peer from the Labour Party. Although “Lord Ahmed” sounds like a name from a corny joke, Ahmed is a real politician with considerable influence. After making a fortune from questionable real estate deals, he went into politics and eventually was granted his Lord status with the help of Tony Blair.
In 2007 the crazy lord became notorious for his opposition against the government when it bestowed knighthood on Salman Rushdie. The lord said that it was the same as if the Saudi government honoured the “martyrs” of the September 11 attacks.
Earlier today it was reported that while in Pakistan, His Lordship has offered £10 Million for capturing George W. Bush and Barack Obama:
“In an expression of solidarity with Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) Chief Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, British parliamentarian of Kashmiri origin Lord Nazir Ahmed has announced a reward for the [capture] of U.S. President Barack Obama and his predecessor, George W. Bush.
“He made the announcement at a reception arranged in his honor by the business community of Haripur on Friday [April 13, 2012]. Former [Pakistani] foreign minister Goher Ayub Khan, Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl’s (JUI-F) central leader Hafiz Hussain Ahmed, and [Khyber Pakhtunkhwa] Provincial Minister for Education Qazi Muhammad Asad were also present [at] the occasion.
“Lord Nazir said that the bounty placed on Saeed was an insult to all Muslims, and [that] by [offering it], President Obama has challenged the dignity of the Muslim ummah.
“‘If the U.S. can announce a reward of $10 million for the [capture] of Hafiz Saeed, I can announce a bounty of £10 million [for the capture of] President Obama and his predecessor, George Bush,’ Lord Nazir said, adding that he would arrange the bounty at any cost, even if he was left with the option of selling all his personal assets, including his house…”
Isn’t England a weird place? Only a few months ago they had a football fan arrested and sent to jail for making racially offensive remarks on Twitter.
Now we have an arrogant Muslim, who is ready to give away millions of his money for a terrorist cause and nothing happens to him. And he is not an ordinary Muslim – as a Lord he has sworn allegiance to Her Majesty the Queen and is supposed to protect the interests of his country. Instead, he is not ashamed to support openly the Muslim terrorism and savagery.
Did Tony Blair get a bribe to promote that Islamic piece of garbage? If Lord Ahmed and Baroness Warsi are the best and the brightest politicians that the Muslim community in Great Britain has to offer, I wonder what the rest of them would do, if they get power.
The case shows that Muslims have no intention of adapting – their elites apparently do everything to undermine the countries they move to. Otherwise, the “moderate Muslims” would’ve condemned the deranged Lord long time ago. You don’t hear a peep from them – they are either too scared or simply agree with everything he does. (It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that the second option is most likely the reason for their silence.)
So dear moderate Muslims, where are you? Are you going to take a stand for your country? Or would you reinforce the idea that Muslims can’t be trusted in a position of power?
© 2012 Blogwrath.com
Tonight I went to the Orthodox Easter service. Just came back with a few pictures (sorry for the quality, it’s the best I can do with my camera at night).
This afternoon the Pakistani shia community in Toronto organized a protest rally near the Pakistani Consulate. I never thought that I would ever say it, but that was a Muslim demonstration that I (to a great extent) supported.
The immediate reason for it was the slaughter of 200 shia Muslims in Pakistan, but it looks like those atrocities have been going on for years. According to the leaflet the organizers were handing out:
“Recent atrocities include: on route to Gilgit, Baltistan, approximately 2000 extremists stopped busses that were heading home, pulled out the shia’s and beat them fatally. Stoning, kicking, bashing with sticks and gouging their eyes out. Around 200 are suspected to be murdered.
43 killed during an Ashura procession in Karachi
34 killed during Arbaeen
43 killed on route for ziyarat to Iran
10 killed during Eid prayers
8 tortured and murdered in Parachinar.
Their hands and feet were cut off and then they were killed. More than 1400 Muslims were slaughtered in Parachinar from 2007-2011. These are human beings. They are your brothers and sisters. What will you do for those innocent victims?”
Yes, they were human beings – and so were the Christians and the Ahmadiyya Muslims in Pakistan, who have been systematically slaughtered in a similar way for decades. However, very little information about those atrocities makes its way into the media.
Maybe if all Muslims showed the same outrage over every case of oppression and mistreatment involving a minority group, the shia would have been safe now.
Walking among the participants, it was such a pleasure to see the signs condemning the most aggressive Muslim bully in the world – Saudi Arabia.
Some called for closure of the Saudi hate schools in Pakistan and attacked the country’s king:
They didn’t spare even the Taliban – it was a strange feeling to learn that they are disliked. You can see “Down with Taliban” and “Shame on King Abdulla” in the picture at the top. Another sign observed that it is “Easy to Be Taliban, Hard to Be Human”:
Even one of the speakers, an imam, whose name I missed, said that everybody in Pakistan had to be treated with respect, especially religious minorities. He stated that the Pakistani government has disgraced itself by failing to protect its own citizens.
I said in the beginning that I supported the rally to a great extend – and here comes the big “but” – instead of paying more attention on what really is wrong with the situation in Pakistan, where even the Muslim sects can’t get along, the organizers didn’t miss the chance to include the Jews in the mix of complaints.
Israel has neither the interest nor the capabilities to control Pakistan, but the sign in the first picture implied that somehow that tiny country has the sinister goal to “divide and conquer” (and of course the Muslims have uncovered that plot).
That insane theory was brought up again in the speech of Zafar Bangash, the notorious Israel hater and fanatic. It was very odd to see him at an event caused by the clash of two groups of Muslims. It was the same as inviting a clown to give a eulogy at a funeral.
Even the best conspiracy theorists would envy his way of weaving totally different ideas and forces into a mad plot. You can listen to his speech at Blazingcatfur, but let me give you a few details.
He started by blaming the Saudi wahhabis’ influence on the Pakistani government. But the wahhabis didn’t act alone – they were lackeys of the British, who installed Saud’s dynasty. Now Saudi Arabia has extended its servitude – it serves Israel and the American imperialism, trying to help them spread their influence. It is not by chance that the Saudis provoked that battle within Islam in Pakistan – their purpose is to create animosity between Pakistan and Iran.
The Muslims should respect Iran because it is the only true Islamic country in the world. Iran’s leaders (whom Bangash met) are the only true Islamic government as well. Only by supporting Iran, Muslims can hope to achieve the goals of their religion. The profound changes in the Muslims countries make the enemies of Islam tremble and with the help of the Islamic Republic, the Muslims will soon march to liberate “Palestine” and “Al Quds” (Jerusalem). So as one could expect, the fight between shia and sunnis will eventually lead to the destruction of Israel.
It was a sad end for the rally. It started as an event marking a real human tragedy and Bangash singlehandedly managed to turn it into a farce with his lunatic ravings.
I wonder if it’s too much to demand sanity from your speakers. If the Muslims in Pakistan take their guidance from people like Zafar Bangash, I see long decades of fights, hand cutting, eye gouging, gutting and plain old stabbing in the future of Pakistan…
Good luck with that!
© 2012 Blogwrath.com
It was nice to see that Mike Tyson has joined the racist choir of the mainstream media and celebrities of different colours and views, calling for George Zimmerman’s lynching.
What else could you expect? Tyson is one of the role models of the US ghetto community. A convicted rapist and skilled ear-eater with the manners of a Neanderthal caveman, he is all that the cool gangsta boys want to be.
In a recent interview with Yahoo News, when asked about the case of Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman, he generously dispersed his wise opinion about the current situation in America. One of his suggestions was about how to deal with Zimmerman:
“It’s a disgrace that man hasn’t been dragged out of his house and tied to a car and taken away. That’s the only kind of retribution that people like that understand. It’s a disgrace that man hasn’t been shot yet. Forget about him being arrested–the fact that he hasn’t been shot yet is a disgrace. That’s how I feel personally about it.”
It looks like the good old lynching, against which Martin Luther King Jr. supposedly fought, is still considered the best solution among the black elites.
Of course, Mike Tyson is a dimwit (the fact that they convinced him that he could perform successfully a one-man show is a testimony to that). And his condition is not a result of a lifetime of head blows. That’s the way he has always been; that’s why they love him more than any black scientist. But the funny thing about our society is that often it takes an idiot to express openly what other people are thinking.
Barack Obama and Eric Holder, although suit-wearing college graduates, have done their fair share of action to contribute to Zimmerman’s lynching, attacking him long before before he was charged. Obviously they act in a much more refined way than Mike the Brute, but their purpose is exactly the same.
Barry Obama must be proud to have Mike Tyson among his voters…
© 2012 Blogwrath.com
Wiebo Ludwig, Canada’s most notorious convicted terrorist, has died.
A look at his life reveals what’s wrong at so many levels with the current situation in Canada.
When CTV Calgaryannounced his death, the news started with:
“The man best known for taking a stand against the oil industry has died of esophageal cancer. Ludwig, 70, spent nearly 20 years at odds with the oil industry.”
Note the language – “stand against…” “at odds with…” – it sounds like he was one of the many cockeyed lefties, who were yelling against capitalism.
The truth is, he was much more than that – a terrorist and criminal, who went through life suffering very little in terms of punishment for all the atrocities he did. He was suspected of shooting a girl at his farm in 1999, but was never arrested. Judging from the fact that a rural farm in Alberta is not as crowded as Chinatown, maybe taking the case seriously could’ve help to catch a criminal…
Then he was finally caught red-handed after bombing gas and oil facilities. For some strange reason, his activities were considered “vandalism”. He got away with only about two years in jail.
His “conviction” showed that the Canadian Government is as bad as the media in dealing with people like Ludwig. Actions, which would’ve been considered terrorist, if committed by anybody else, were ignored – like in many other cases, his self-proclaimed environmentalism absolved him from anything bad he has ever done.
Of course, for the Left he was an undisputed idol. They were ready to overlook his Christian fundamentalism just because they considered him such an important soldier in the fight against the dreaded oil industry. The fact that he looked like their other idol, Karl Marx, didn’t hurt either.
It was a strange connection, because Wiebo was the typical grumpy Luddite, who could’ve survived on his farm for years without oil or gas, while the urban pansies, who adored his destruction spree, couldn’t have lasted a day without those hated commodities.
You probably know the common saying that if you can’t say anything good about the dead, you’d better say nothing.
Wiebo Ludwig’s death is one of the rare cases when you can’t say anything good, but saying nothing is like expressing silent support for a terrorist. The world becomes a much better place when people like him leave it.
Good riddance, Wiebo…
© 2012 Blogwrath.com
It’s nice to know that the black racist industry in the USA is thriving. Other than Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson’s racket enterprises, the black T-shirt business is catching up as well. In the middle of the Trayvon Martin-George Zimmerman case, the black community is sure to take a position against the “pussy ass cracker” Zimmerman in defense of the drugdealing thief Martin. Nice portrait of the “community”! Here is the T-shirt:
About a month ago I wrote about the efforts of the Toronto Police to recruit hijab-wearing Muslimas. Despite the outrage of the ordinary people and a few media outlets, it doesn’t seem like the police have figured out how absurd the idea is. One of my regular readers, “The Lone Ranger”, expressed his opinon about the issue. As it frequently happens, many more people hold the same views (although they often don’t have the time or the courage to write it down).
That’s why I think it is good to have The Lone Ranger’s opinion quoted in its entirity:
OK, I’m going to be controversial here. The slide in policing standards began when they accepted homosexual officers. Political correctness and moral relativism has caused enormous damage in almost all Western societies over the past 25 years. A little later, sprinkle in a large helping of multiculturalism and social engineering to the brew and you end up with an explosive concoction. The very idea of Muslim veiled women walking around Toronto in police uniforms and with high caliber Glock semi-automatic pistols strapped to their hips is a nightmare waiting to become a reality.
Will these Muslim female officers have to police the annual gay pride deviants fest? What will they do when they encounter naked homosexual men and lesbian women on the streets? Or will they be assigned desk duties during gay pride month so as not to be offended by the sight of naked adults on our streets? Will they be excused duties to attend Ramadan, while Christian officers are obliged to work through Easter, Christmas and Thanksgiving? Will they be given sick leave when their husbands beat them black and blue as all “good” Muslim men are supposed to do when their spouses step out of line?
I can see nothing but trouble here. This experiment with Muslim & Sikh officers in the UK police has already floundered badly due to the enormous cultural and religious differences. Indeed, the created of separate ethnic police forces within police forces will ultimately lead to the destruction of any cohesion within the rank and structure of our city police services, and the break up of our society along religious and cultural lines.
” “Police in London already give victims the right to ask for a Sikh officer to be involved in an investigation, but the scheme could be introduced for other religions elsewhere.
Chief Supt Joanna Young, from the Met’s Criminal Justice Policy Unit, said: “If it’s a success, I would encourage the other (police) associations to do likewise.”
The project is intended to help investigate “honour” killings and forced marriages but Metropolitan Police Federation chairman Peter Smyth said: “We’re stretched thin enough already. Are Sikh officers going to have their rotas changed so there’s always one on duty?
“It’s political correctness gone mad. We talking about the creation of a separate force within a force.”
But Palbinder Singh, chairman of the Metropolitan Police Sikh Association, said: “I don’t believe a white officer is ever going to be fully conversant with a Sikh.”
And this from Jihad Watch:
“You remember when far-right extremists blew up those bombs in London on July 7, 2005. This “rebellion” should induce authorities to wonder which side these Muslim police are really on. But it won’t. “Muslim police say Islam not to blame for terror attacks,” by Robert Winnett in the Telegraph, January 20 (thanks to Pamela):
Muslim police officers have rebelled openly against the Government’s anti-terrorism strategy, warning that it is an “affront to British values” which threatens to trigger ethnic unrest. The National Association of Muslim Police (NAMP) claimed that ministers were wrong to blame Islam for being the “driver” behind recent terrorist attacks. Far-Right extremists were a more dangerous threat to national security, it said.
The officers told MPs that Muslims were being “stigmatised” by the Government’s attempts to tackle terrorism, which was adding to “hatred” against entire communities.
In the official intervention, the association said the Government’s anti-terrorism policies could not “continue unchecked”.
The comments, made in a seven-page memorandum to a parliamentary committee investigating extremism, are embarrassing for Gordon Brown. They indicated that Muslim officers may be reluctant to take part in “hearts and minds” anti-terrorism campaigns.
The organisation, which represents more than 2,000 officers, was previously publicly backed by Mr Brown. The Prime Minister said the association was crucial to bridge the historic divide between Muslims and the police….
In an analysis of the Prevent strategy, which is a set of policies designed to stop radicalisation, the organisation claimed: “The strategies of Prevent were historically focused on so-called Islamist extremism.
“This has subjected the biggest black and ethnic minority community, and second biggest faith group, in an unprecedented manner, stigmatising them in the process.
“Never before has a community been mapped in [such] a manner … it is frustrating to see this in a country that is a real pillar and example of freedom of expression and choice.
“Our British system is a model for the world to follow, yet we have embarked on a journey that has put this very core of British values under real threat.”
The association warned there were “echoes” of the racism of the 1970s and 1980s which led to inner city riots. “We appear to have ignored the lessons learnt from these dark days,” the officers said….
The Muslim officers believe the Government is wrong to blame Islam as the main driver of terrorist activity.
Research by “those convicted of terrorism acts shows Islam was not, and is not, a real driver but all our strategy seem to focus on is this un-evidenced view of Islam being the driver,” they said. The Government said that confronting Islamic terrorism was one of the key priorities of the anti-radicalisation strategy. Last night, the Foreign Office admitted that funding for counter-terrorism policies in Pakistan had been cut….”
The Lone Ranger
Here is another specimen from my gallery of people, who are sure-fire supporters of Barry Obama.
According to the person, who posted the video, the following happened:
“In evolution class at Florida Atlantic University
“The slide we were on just before was about Female Sexual Selection. For instance, female peacocks have selection in their mates, preferring the males with the bigger train of feathers.. Somehow she went off on some tangent with a question about how does Evolution play a role in the killing of all black people…
She was escorted out of class and I heard she was tasered and arrested by the police “- Rachel Bustamante”
Scary, eh? It comes to show that affirmative action rarely works in fields that require higher intelligence, like real science – too much effort may cause her head to explode (but she would definitely survive if she enrols in social work or black studies).
Enjoy your voters, Barry…
The inevitable side effect of the civil rights movements and the affirmative action procedures, which followed it, was the addition of the useless “Black Studies” to the numerous other useless courses and subjects in the liberal arts departments of the American universities.
The “scholars” who work in that field depend entirely on the White Man to pay for their “work” just because of his irrational guilt. Most of their students are also guilt-ridden white kids. Their “brothers” and “sisters” don’t give a damn about the black studies.
The funny looking idiot in the video below, who looks and acts like a fag, who just came off of a homosexual parade platform, is Dr. Kamau Kambon, a prominent black studies “scholar”. Just watch the short video, he has some great ideas:
Are you surprised the way I am? His speech is simultaneously a call for genocide and incitement to riots. Imagine if a white person says just one tenth of what Kambon said – he will be immediately arrested, with all mainstream media calling for his execution.
Yet that piece of garbage in the video can get away with anything.
There is just one small detail that Dr. Kambon hasn’t thought of – if he exterminates all whites, the academic bums like him and the ordinary welfare bums in the ghetto will survive only until the next welfare check. Oh, wait there will be no next check, because the white people, who will be supposed to cover it, would be dead. So in about 30 days the blacks, who follow Dr. Kambon would start to kill and eat each other.
I am really fascinated that the black community has such luminaries. I am sure that Dr. Kambon generously supports with parts of his academic welfare handouts the re-election campaign of Barry “The Welfare King” Obama. Go Barry, go! With friends like that retarded “doctor” you don’t need any enemies.
© 2012 Blogwrath.com
While the mainstream media are occupied to stir up even more racial tension around the death of Trayvon Martin, many other racist crimes remain unnoticed.
Just a few days a graphic video shot in Baltimore surfaced on the net. A mob of black animals (there is better word to describe the behaviour of those “people”) attack a white tourist in the downtown area. The man didn’t provoke them in any way.
I want to show you two videos of the incident. The first one is a sanitized newsroom version, which was shown on the TV. It’s no wonder that everything that could make the black community look bad was carefully excised (not unlike George Zimmerman’s 911 call), so you don’t quite get what happened. Here is the video:
Fortunately, there is a raw and rough version shot by the perpetrators, which was promptly posted online. Meek people need not watch it:
Isn’t that better? It puts everything in clear perspective. The brothers and sisters just want to have some fun robbing and beating a random whitey, who had the stupidity to visit their city. Everybody is happy – from the fat cow who rubbed whitey’s groin to the Ebonics-speaking thugs who punched and stripped him.
Even the bystanders were entertaining themselves with the show, because none of them made even the slightest attempt to help out the victim.
I am sure that the whole gang will cheerfully vote to keep the Kenyan loser in the White House. He, in return, would make sure that they get even more free stuff from the government and let them keep all the loot they get from robberies. After all – it’s a payback time for the white people, it’s slavery reparations time (the fact that the victim had nothing to do with slavery is a minor detail).
If anything happens to any of those degenerates, Obama would proudly announce that he feels like they are his sons or daughters.
I don’t want to sound old-fashioned, but when you give more rights to a whole segment of welfare parasites over than to the productive citizens, your country is in deep trouble.
© 2012 Blogwrath.com
A few days ago a book sold at a Muslim bookstore in Toronto stirred controversy. In a marriage guide titled “A Gift for the Muslim Couple” by Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi, somebody found a “sound” advice for husbands on how to beat their wives to maintain the family harmony.
The story was picked by TV stations and newspapers (every one with its own interpretation) and it showed the ugly face of the Muslim “marriage counselling” methods. Only the so-called “moderate” Muslims like Tarek Fatah condemned the book, the rest kept their silence as usual.
However, thanks to the blogger Blazingcatfur, who published the complete text, I found an article on the issue, written by Sheharyar Shaikh. In the end he is described as “the former President of North American Muslim Foundation. He is specializing in contemporary Islamic thought and modernity.” The description implies that we are dealing with a modern and sensible scholar (which turned out to be not that correct).
What I found refreshing about his opinion is that it was very honest. Shaikh openly expresses the point of view that most other Muslims are trying to conceal. He basically agrees with the premises of the Thanvi’s book and explains to the ignorant kafirs why they don’t understand anything.
He wastes no time in attacking Tarek Fatah, who in the Muslim world appears to be some kind of a pathetic apostate:
“Tarek Fatah of course wants the bookstore owner charged under the law. This is not unexpected of Fatah who has made a lifelong career out of stabbing his own community. Strangely he becomes bitterly resentful (as he did on March 1, 2012, at University of Toronto when he isn’t awarded the honor he feels he deserves from his “racist” circus masters in return for vilifying Muslims. What does he think? Fatah, you are nothing more than a cheap condom for the Michael Corens, Jonathan Kays, Ezra Levants and others out there to screw over this community and then flushing it down the toilet. If they begrudgingly bear you on the same panel as themselves, its not for your rugged good looks, but the damage they can inflict on the Muslims using your small brain and a big mouth.”
What a mastery of the English language! I am obviously not a good match of Shaikh’s filthy Muslim mind, because I can’t quite imagine how Tarek is used as a condom by Michael Coren. Do they teach that dirty imagery in the Muslim schools?
Other than misrepresenting the “fixer” incident that caused Tarek’s outburst last March, I admire Shaikh’s honesty in expressing the opinion of the Muslim community about Islam’s reformers. Fatah has spent decades trying to change Islam and make it more acceptable in the eyes of the Westerners. All that he has achieved so far is that the latter find him to be an interesting and courageous speaker, but his influence in his own Muslim community is practically non-existent.
All that he got from them was hatred and the accusations that he is some kind of a Muslim Uncle Tom, who is backstabbing his own community to earn a few crumbs from his Christian masters. I really respect Tarek’s work, but it looks like the barbaric Islam is an impenetrable castle that nobody can change.
Shaikh’s rage doesn’t stop at bashing Tarek. He is furious that nobody of the Muslim leaders defended the wife-beating manual:
“I do however blame the self-appointed Muslim community leadership, which began either mindlessly condemning Thanvi’s book in unison or has remained pathetically silent about the issue. Where is the Imam Council? Where is Ali Hindy? Where are the champions of faith who are foremost in their dawah efforts? Their silence is deafening.”
Yes, where are those nice people, whose job is to force Islam on us? How could they miss such a golden opportunity to show why wife discipline is such a marvelous part of their cult?
Since they are still quiet, Shaikh takes upon himself the task to put the things in order. Please read carefully the following quote, it is the most important one in the article:
“To make things clear on our end: Islam, like all pre-modern religions, does not, I repeat, does not stand for equality of spouses in a conjugal relationship. Man has a role in the family as a protector, provider and a moral leader, which is distinctly different from the one God awards to the woman. This is the truth. To the Muslim leadership that denies it, I say, shame on you for telling people lies! You know well that men have a responsibility to be the captain of the ship, to be the moral guardians first and foremost who will be held responsible before God for the moral direction of the family institution in society – which today is in shambles. Although Islam is certainly not “oppressive” to women, it does require wives first and foremost with guarding the household in their husbands’ absence. Chauvinistic? Unfair? Exploitative? Perhaps. But this is what we are commanded, and if we turn back we hurt none but ourselves.”
Here he gets extra points for honesty. Most of the other imams and “scholars” go out of their way to hide the real nature of Islam, picturing it as some hip religion, which is good for everybody, while Shaikh is very straightforward: “Yes, in Islam women are second class creatures, yes, we beat them, and that’s the way it is – deal with it!”
This should be read by every lefty feminist dimwit, who thinks that Muslims are a misunderstood minority and the burqa is an expression of the independent minds of the Muslim women. Shaikh plainly states that brutality and oppression are vital parts of Islam and you shouldn’t mess up with them.
Then, just like every other cult follower, he tries to justify his delusions by convincing us that they are much better than the real world. He is not shy in his attempts to blackmail the decadent West:
“If invoking this 19th century book is allowed to thrash Canadian Muslims today, then critics should be allowed to cite works from that same era to make the case for Western males’ contempt for women as well. And if the mere presence of this book in the 21st century counted a crime, what then should we say to the world that sees the Western woman objectified, sexualized, and humiliated in bondage and sadomasochistic videos, criminally accessible to 5-year olds on the net, in the name of entertainment by the 20 billion-dollar porn industry here at home? What about the continuing violence committed against women in society at present? In none of the stinging reviews was there as much as a peep about violence perpetrated against women committed overwhelmingly by non-Muslim (white) males. Was protecting Muslim women the Toronto Sun’s real agenda or was it to brushstroke the Canadian Muslim community in a negative light?”
Here I will have to retract some of my admiration – our friend is trying to sneak in a few lies to make himself more convincing. After the condom metaphor, he takes us to the BDSM porn. (Boy, that filthy Muslim mind never sleeps…) That particular genre of porn is a very small part of that industry and it definitely is not accessible to 5-year olds.
Besides, it involves consenting adults and its presence on the net is part of the price we pay to have freedom of expression. Another part of the price is the presence of filthy drivel written by people like Shaikh.
If the fantasy world of BDSM is so important to him, let’s see what the reality is in the Muslim countries. In Egypt and other Muslim places over 90% of women have their genitalia mutilated by men. How is that for a real-life BDSM?
Homosexual pedophilia is perfectly acceptable in many Muslim countries. Wife beating, acid disfigurement, burying women alive is not a big deal. In Saudi Arabia, the castle of Islam, the tent trash hit the jackpot in the oil lottery, but the primitive Bedouin ways are still dominant – under the barbaric sharia law they still behead witches, exterminate gays, cut off the hands of thieves, and kill everybody who disagrees with Islam. Does this “brushstroke Muslims in a negative light”?
Sheikh, not all of us are ignorant idiots who take the Muslim lies at face value. For most of us your concluding statement sounds ridiculous, because it tries to hide the monstrous abuse of women in the Muslim world:
“…Under the current situation, it appears amazingly hypocritical to accuse the Muslim community of a “particularly sinister” kind of misogyny using a little known couple’s guide, all the while ignoring an ocean of a problem around us. It reeks of anti-Muslimism, nothing else.”
But Shaikh is not done yet – he brings in the heavy artillery, attacking the sacred books of other religions, especially the Bible:
“Think about this: I have five copies of the same one book that gives women a status way lower than this Muslim book ever could; it’s called the Bible. And guess what? It’s way more popular in the homes and bookstores.”
He quotes different parts from several books in the Bible, like “woman is the source of all sin, the cause of global death (Ecc. 25:13), the source of all wickedness (Ecc. 42:13), can be shameless like a dog (Ecc. 26:25), is of a sinister nature (Ecc. 7:26) is a recipient of special punishment from God (Gen. 2:15), brings shame when she opens her mouth in church (1 Cor. 14:35), becomes unclean to touch during periods/childbirth (Lev. 15:19)”, etc., etc.
The Hindus can’t get away either: “Would they take on the Hindu scripture Manusmriti, a distilled version of the Hindu Vedas out of the mouth of Lord Brahma, which orders wives to worship their husbands like gods?”
And what Muslim writing could be complete without bashing the Jews: “Similarly, when orthodox Jewish men in western countries get up in the morning and thank God every day for not making them a woman but a man.”
I understand where he is coming from on this issue – in his religion the Koran is the absolute authority, which should be the basis of all governmental, judicial, religious and moral decisions. Despite the fact that it is a poorly written compilation (mostly plagiarized from the Bible), it is considered a monolithic sacred text. Every deviation from it is potentially punishable by death.
As of the Bible, every reasonable Christian knows that it has been written over many centuries by different people. Although its books share the same inspiration, it is clear that every person has left his own stamp and view in his book. It is also clear that many of the events and opinions apply to a historic reality that is long gone.
It is very unlikely that anybody would base a women rights legislation on the views of the Ecclesiastes, who sounds like a grumpy old man, who is disappointed with everything in this world (or maybe some fundamentalist sect in the woods of Montana would go for it).
Unlike the Muslim cult, which is still stuck in the 7th century, Christianity has evolved and although its moral principles are the same, their expression in the laws has changed with the times and contributed to the prosperity of the Western civilization. The same civilization, which Shaikh loathes, but is not ashamed to take advantage of, even though with his views he should feel more comfortable in the barbaric Saudi Arabia.
The same applies to India, where not the Vedas, but the British common law is at the basis of the social interaction and that law, which respects the rights of the individual, has helped transform India into the world’s largest democracy. Israel is not that different – just like in America and India, the respect for the individual has made the country the ONLY democracy in the Middle East.
Maybe not everything is perfect in those countries, but the principles they are governed by, guarantee that they are flexible enough to evolve. But one thing is clear – no misogynic religious text will ever define and control those countries’ laws.
And that’s not the case with Islam – the tribal primitivism, frozen in the Koran, is still considered the supreme wisdom, which should guide all Muslim judges’ decisions.
And now people like Shaikh want to make this barbarism perfectly acceptable in the West. I know that Islam is based on deception and aggression, but such “scholars” simply can’t make wife beating attractive enough even to the most insane lefties, no matter how hard they try to exploit multiculturalism (which was forced on us).
That’s why we should never stop exposing the filth and violence promoted in little guides like “A Gift for the Muslim Couple” (and the religious principles that justify them).
© 2012 Blogwrath.com
Another piece has been added to the mosaic of insanity, which is supposed to cover up what once was known as Canada.
Our confused country suddenly shot up to notoriety because of the Canadian chapter of the Miss Universe Pageant. A tranny from British Columbia (or if you like transgendered, trans sexed, gender reassignment operation recipient) registered for this year’s competition.
She/he/it somehow forgot to mention in the application her/his/its sex. Upon discovering the fact, the participant was kicked out, because the requirement was that he/she/it was supposed to be a natural born female. Unfortunately, Jenna Talackova was born a man and he transformed himself into a woman about 4 years ago.
That’s all fine and dandy, but it obvious hasn’t worked that well. If you are a man and a surgeon cuts off your dong, carves in a hole in its place and adds fake breasts, that doesn’t change you into a woman. I am not going into scientific details, but your biology remains the same, your chromosomes are the same, regardless of what the homosexual junk science fans say.
As you can see in the picture, aside from the pretty face, Talackova still has the enormous (6’1”) height, a man’s narrow hips and definitely can’t miss her size 12 feet.
But of course, the homosexual community can’t miss that golden opportunity to stick it up to the rest of us.
Talackova went into a fighting mode right away, hiring a few notorious lawyers, who tried to make his/her/its case:
Back in B.C., Canadian lawyer Joseph Arvay, who said he was retained over the weekend, said he hopes the announcement means Talackova can compete but he’s not yet sure.
“It’s gobbledygook to me,” he said of the announcement.
When talking about the legal gender recognition requirements in Canada, human-rights laws in B.C. and Ontario apply, he said, adding those laws “prohibit discrimination based on being transgendered.”
“So one would think that she therefore meets the legal gender requirements in Canada.”
So that’s it folks – if somebody has fraudulently changed his/her/its gender characteristics, she/he/it is not to be scrutinized.
It’s no wonder that Donald Trump, who owns the pageant, agreed to get Talackova back – with his show’s dropping ratings, it was a God-sent opportunity to get some notoriety and make more people watch.
But that’s not the point of this post – Talackova is mentally disturbed person, who has the delusion that he/she/it would win, but there is no chance of that happening. Real women are still better in that competition.
What bothers me is that we are facing the next episode of the endless attack of the homosexuals on our civilization. We are not talking about rights here, the homosexuals have achieved them long time ago. It’s about an attack on the foundations of the human civilization, which have sustained us for hundreds of thousands of years. Because that’s what the problem is – when you force an unidentifiable into a girls’ competition, you simply show that you don’t give a damn about anybody outside of you 1% queer “community”.
That may not sound like big deal, but let’s take it one step further.
In the Olympics we have different groups for men and women. It’s clear why – men and women have different physical abilities. But what will happen if the homosexuals try to challenge that and force a huge tranny like Talackova to compete with the female athletes, because technically she/he/it is woman. Would any normal females have any chance in the competition?
Don’t consider that a fantasy. The experience shows that the homosexual extremists are a vicious bunch, who would not spare any efforts to impose on us their peculiar lifestyle and way of thinking. And the pansy bureaucrats from the human rights commissions and the sports organizations will be happy to oblige.
And we could go further, what’s stopping any group to compete in anything? You are 80-years old and want to be in Miss Universe? Great, you’re in; they can’t discriminate because of your age. Want your dog to join a gymnastics team? Great, you’re in – they can’t turn him down, it would be “spaciesm”. So let the insanity reign…
Remember – it’s not about rights anymore, it’s about dominance…
© 2012 Blogwrath.com