Ben Levin’s Child Porn Trial Begins amidst Dead Silence

 

 

Before I started attending trials and hearings earlier this year, I never knew that there were so many courthouses in Toronto. This morning I had the chance of visiting a new one, way up north at 1000 Finch Avenue West. It was the place where a hearing concerning Benjamin Rubin Levin, a.k.a. Ben Levin was about to be held.

Ben Levin with the Liberal Royalty in 2013

Ben Levin with the Liberal Royalty in 2013

You may remember that last year, shortly after he appeared in the picture above with Justin Trudeau, Kathleen Wynne, and Bob Rae at the annual homosexual parade, Levin was arrested. Shockingly, he was charged with possessing and producing child pornography.

What made the case even more shocking was the status of the accused. Levin was a high official of the Ontario Liberal Party with strong connections to its leadership. He was a Deputy Minister of Education in McGuinty’s government. When Kathleen Wynne took over, he became a member of her “transition team.” Even worse impression made the fact that he was a professor of education at OISE (University of Toronto).

After waiting for over a year, the case finally started moving through the courts. Today’s proceedings were supposed to be a preliminary hearing, but shortly after it started, Levin’s lawyer Clayton Ruby asked for an immediate trial. The request caught the Crown by surprise – they learned about it the night before and didn’t have the time to prepare. There was a recess to sort out the issues, but eventually the Crown agreed to proceed. The main news is that Ben Levin was arraigned and he pleaded not guilty. There were 7 charges in total, all linked to child pornography.

The judge imposed a publication ban to protect the witnesses. The proceedings will resume on Friday at 10 a.m. in room 304 (1000 Finch Avenue West). Ruby appeared with Gerald Chan, partner in his law firm. Ben Levin looked calm and collected; he was accompanied by a male friend (or relative).

Here is the worst part – other than the prosecutors and the lawyers, the courtroom was empty. One may expect that with such high-profile case of alleged sex transgressions against children by a prominent educator (involved in creating the new sex education curriculum) the journalists would be flocking the court, willing to inform the Canadian public about the extraordinary case.

Nothing like that happened. The only representative of the mainstream press was Faith Goldy from Sun News. After the hearing she tried to interview Levin while he was walking toward his car, but he kept his mouth shut with the resolve of a Zen monk.

The fact that a trial with such importance could be ignored by all prominent journalists is not a big surprise. The media in Canada is morally bankrupt; they have given up on their most important purpose – to inform the public on vital issues. They are much more interested in manipulating the public’s mind according to questionable and often harmful principles. They are ready to spend thousands of dollars to find out what Rob Ford smoked after work or at which tree he peed late at night, instead of following the case of a potential predator, who might have harmed children (of course at this point nothing has been determined – Mr. Levin may turn out to be as innocent as heaven’s angel or guilty as hell, that’s why he is having his day in court; however, the media must report about it).

I suspect that the media’s passionate love affair with the Liberal Party is at the bottom of that indifference. They would crucify a conservative for the smallest transgression, but will give a free pass to the crooks of Queen’s Park, who squandered billions of dollars on cancelling gas plants, eHealth, global warming scams and countless other schemes. The extended halo of the Liberal Party is big enough to protect Mr. Levin from being discussed in the press.

And there are so many questions to be asked. The scandalous sex education curriculum, which was shelved in 2010 after strong protests, is being brought back under the pressure of many “progressive” and homosexual groups. Only this time everything is done in secrecy – the curriculum hasn’t been published and only “select” limited number of parents will be allowed to see it and comment on it with only 30 words (h/t Marvin).

What do Kathleen Wynne and educators like Ben Levin have to hide? Is the curriculum so outrageous that it has to be imposed in secrecy to avoid backlash?

Judging from the stuff they teach kids at OISE, Mr. Levin’s employer, they have quite a few things to hide. At a conference last year aimed at promoting the homosexual school clubs – “gay-straight alliances” – to over 100 underage children, OISE promoted things that no reasonable person would see as appropriate.

Right in the middle of the library, two black gay guys were holding a workshop with underage girls on how to put a condom on a rubber black penis (if you don’t believe it, there is a video of that in the linked post); an organization was recruiting gay kids for intergenerational fun with old homosexuals; there were even booklets by the Government of Ontario with tips on how to work as a tranny hooker (with the disastrous economy under Kathleen Wynne that could become a viable job option).

The largest workshop at the conference was taught by a sex pervert, who was into BDSM, plain sadism and erotic choking (no, it wasn’t Jian Ghomeshi).

And of course you’ll never find that anywhere in the media – protecting children from perverts and predators is not a trendy cause; it may offend and enrage the homosexual lobby.

Is it any wonder that the alleged sex crimes of Ben Levin are being met with dead silence by the Canadian media?

© 2014 Blogwrath.com

Be Sociable, Share!

11 Comments

  1. […] After waiting for over a year, the case finally started moving through the courts.  (more…) […]

  2. Vardit says:

    1000 Finch Ave. W. very close to my home Hope to be a spectator at that trial..

  3. sanwin says:

    Did you know that Trudeau’s right hand man Gerald Butts has been telling me on Twitter that this is not Levin in the picture, rather he’s some unnamed ‘volunteer’ from the United Church? They must be getting desperate and trying to put distance between Levin and the Liberal Party. Check out twitter for the exchange.

    1. admiwrath says:

      That surely sounds desperate. There are several pictures from the same event and it is hard to deny it was him.

  4. Fergus321 says:

    Could you please post when the trial will be. There should be more coverage on this.

  5. Tomasz Winnicki says:

    What I want to know is whether Ben Levin was/is into little girls or little boys, or perhaps into both. I have been following news reports regarding sexual exploitation of children for years now. Even for their tiny percentage of the population, still a vast majority of the charges (in Canada) and consequently convictions upon finding of guilt at trial are against homosexual pedophiles.

    1. admiwrath says:

      That will be found out at the trial. To add to your point – despite the high level of homosexual pedophilia, the judicial experience has shown that very few of the perpetrators have been properly punished. In the USA Jerry Sandusky received a very harsh punishment, while the boy rapist from the Maple Leafs Gardens got a light slap on the wrist.

    2. Jon says:

      Good question! The facts will indeed be reported at trial but the media probably won’t print the answer to your question… It’s not politically correct to call a spade a spade…

      Check out:
      http://jonahintheheartofnineveh.blogspot.ca/2014/11/benjamin-levin-keeps-interesting.html

      Levin’s arrest was “as a result of an international police operation dubbed Project Spade or Operation Spade according to US and Canadian authorities.”

  6. Yes blogger you are correct, the media loves the libs soooo much that all they ever do is report on Harper’s drummer (from his band) was arrested for child molestation, that Vic Toewes impregnated his 16 year old babysitter (Harper liked that judgement so much he put him on the bench as an actual judge!), or that Tom Flanagan, Harper’s mentor is on the record saying that merely viewing (as opposed to creating) kiddie porn should not be a crime. Yes the media brayed on and on about these facts. Wait, no they didn’t they ignored them.

    1. admiwrath says:

      Billy, thank you for defending your Liberal Party’s Chief Pervert – nobody of the people you mentioned could match Ben Levin’s well outlined plan to fuck his own children. Did Kathleen the Grand Lesbian of Ontario oppose him? I think not.

    2. Thomas says:

      Billy, why don’t you post links to the information you say is being ignored by the media? That would at least be topical.

      Instead you post a commercial link to some minor metal band I suspect you’re associated with.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *