Archive for the ‘Canada – NDP Madness’ Category
Powered by Max Banner Ads
I have often said that Canada is slowly moving down the way of the European political correctness. We are dominated by politicians, who believe that their utopian and delusional views can replace reality.
The campaign for electing a new provincial legislature in British Columbia has just started and it already claimed the first victim of the local political correctness. The NDP campaign was “forced” to drop Dayleen Van Ryswyk, a candidate who authored a series of “unacceptable” online comments against French Canadians and “First Nations”.
Some sources, in the typical Canadian “holier-than-thou” tradition, called her comments “racist”. In Canada such statements must always be taken with a grain of salt. After all Van Ryswyk is a business woman who operates in the real world, unlike the lawyer-turned-politician type, which defines the bland Canadian political landscape.
What exactly did she say?
The “offensive” statements were made in 2009 as posts in an online discussion. Here is the first post:
“It’s not the status cards, it’s the fact that we have been paying out of the hose for generations for something that isn’t our doing,” reads a section from a post, dated Feb. 11, 2009 under the subject heading “Re: Strip them of the Status Card.”
“If their ancestors sold out too cheap it’s not my fault and I shouldn’t have to be paying for any mistake or whatever you want to call it from MY hard earned money.”
What’s wrong with that statement? Nothing. It came from a representative of that part of our society, which has been taxed to death to provide money for the people on the reserves who prefer to sit on their lazy asses instead of starting some real work. They may feel inconvenienced, because the likes of Grand Thief Theresa Spence steal tens of millions of dollars from the taxpayers’ money from the reserve handouts (and then ask for more), but that is their internal problem.
How much longer would our politicians ignore that truth, which is visible to everybody who has even a rudimentary understanding of what is going on in Canada?!
Another post made on Feb. 16, 2010, under the topic “Re: “More French in the ceremonies” targets the French language:
“Thank God I’m not the only one that was shocked at the French first at the ceremonies … what the heck??? This is B.C. … we speak English here … this isn’t Quebec. I travel quite a lot and when I say we are from Canada I’m always asked if we are French Canadian or western. I always say … hell no … we aren’t French Canadians. Seems the only group of people universally hated around the world other than the Americans are the French and the FRENCH CANADIANS … the bigots are the French not us … get over yourselves already!”
Spot on! Don’t forget that Pierre Trudeau’s catastrophic multiculturalist experiment started as a campaign to denigrate English Canada. Billions of dollars are spent every year to promote a language that very few people outside of Quebec speak.
This is annoying even in Ontario, where only a small minority speaks French, and in British Columbia, where you can barely find any French speakers, it is simply offensive.
On top of that we have to deal with the French arrogance in Quebec, which not only finds it natural to mooch money from the other provinces to finance brainless leftist economic schemes, but also feels superior to the rest of us.
In an interview, which I saw today, Justin Trudeau, Pierre’s dimwitted son and now leader of the Liberal Party, plainly stated that the Quebecers are superior to the rest of Canada because they are Quebecers.
So what was wrong again with Dayleen Van Ryswyk’s statement? O, yes, she refuses to kiss the arrogant French asses! That’s a mortal sin in Canada.
The B.C. NDP leader Adrian Dix made a “wise” remark about the case:
“I can’t see any way that he can stand behind a candidate that would be thinking that comments like this are appropriate in any way.”
That’s the typical Canadian political idiot, who is terrified that reality may burst his progressive bubble. If that happens, he would be lost.
It looks like Canada is beyond salvation…
© 2013 Blogwrath.com
Long time ago the NDP was a party that supposedly defended the interests of the working people. Its leaders like Tommy Douglas usually didn’t get things right, but at least they had the desire to help. Those times are long gone. Nowadays our socialists have turned into a conglomerate, which cares only about freaks, perverts and public union parasites.
A blatant example of that disastrous trend is Bill C-279, which proposes to include “gender identity” and “gender expression” in the hate crimes sections of the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code.
Introduced last year by the NDP MP Randall Garrison (and passed after its second reading), it is due for vote again.
Other than fragmenting our society even more by creating new and smaller special interest groups, there is also another danger emerging from that law, for which it was nicknamed the “Bathroom Bill”. The law provides access to women’s public facilities like toilets, locker rooms, and showers to people who “express” themselves as women.
Designed to protect the very tiny minority of hermaphrodites, who don’t have definitive gender, the bill opens the doors to women’s abuse by mentally ill people and perverts. In the original version of the law, the term “Gender Identity” (which had to be protected) was not defined.
Under pressure, the NDP proposed an amendment, which defined the term. Gender identity should be understood as:
“deeply felt internal and individual experience of gender, which may or may not correspond with the sex that the individual was assigned at birth.”
Read the definition again – it is unbelievable that in the XXI century somebody could propose such a stupid definition, which doesn’t meet even the voodoo science standards. The definition is strictly subjective. If this was in an essay of a high school student, he will get a failing grade (only if he lives outside of Toronto). It is beyond comprehension that such a meaningless definition is proposed as a part of a federal legislation.
To understand that legal insanity, please take a look at the picture above. I snapped the photo at last year’s Dyke Parade in Toronto. The bearded dude in it has a “deeply felt internal and individual experience” of female gender, which is strong enough to make him shave his legs and wear a dress. Sure, he left the beard, but that’s a minor detail.
But under Bill C-279 he is fully eligible to enjoy all the amenities in places reserved for women. He definitely looks cheerful and agreeable, but can you imagine him showering at the gym next to your young daughter? If you can’t, you still should get used to the picture, because he technically is a woman under the proposed law.
However, the mentally disturbed people are not the only ones we should worry about. The law provides full protection to every pervert or wannabe rapist, who goes into a ladies’ washroom or shower. When he is caught, all he has to do is to claim that he “deeply feels” he is a woman to get off the hook. This will turn into a mockery of our judicial system.
I’ve spoken to many women about the terrible consequences of this law and I have yet to hear even one, who hasn’t reacted with fear or disgust. Obviously, the NDP idiots have never communicated with normal women (other than lesbians); otherwise it would be hard to explain their total lack of touch with reality.
One might expect that the Conservative MPs would vote unanimously against that insanity, but that’s not the case. The bill passed initially with the help of a few conservatives – 15 of them voted for it, another 16 didn’t even show up for the vote.
Brave people like Rob Anders (MP for Calgary West) started a fight against the bill, but the struggle is not over. Within the next few days there will be another vote on the bill. To avert disaster, we need to convince as many MPs as possible to get their heads out of the sand and think about their mothers, wives, daughters and all women and girls in Canada – we can’t leave those women at the mercy of every crazy person or pervert who wants to take advantage of them and then get full protection under Bill C-279.
You can help by calling or e-mailing those MPs, who need to reconsider their positions:
John Baird – Ottawa West – Nepean – 613-990-7720 – firstname.lastname@example.org
Ryan Leef – Yukon – 867-668-6565 – email@example.com
Ed Fast – Abbotsford – 604-557-7888 – firstname.lastname@example.org
Ed Komarnicki – Souris – Moose Mountain – 306-634-3000 – email@example.com
Diane Ablonczy – Calgary – Nose Hill – 403-282-7980 – firstname.lastname@example.org
Colin Mayes – Okanagan – Shuswap – 250-260-5020 – email@example.com
Peter Goldring – Edmonton East – 780-495-3261 – firstname.lastname@example.org (Independent Conservative)
Stephen Woodworth – Kitchener Centre – 519-741-2001 – email@example.com
Rona Ambrose – Edmonton – Spruce Grove – 780-495-7705 – firstname.lastname@example.org
Maxime Bernier – Beauce – 418-227-2171 – email@example.com
Deepak Obhrai – Calgary East – 403-207-3030 – firstname.lastname@example.org
Pierre Poilievre – Nepean – Carleton – 613-990-4300 – email@example.com
James Moore – Port Moody – Westwood – Port Coquitlam – 604-937-5650 – firstname.lastname@example.org
Steven Blaney – Lévis—Bellechasse – 418-830-0500 – email@example.com
Kellie Leitch – Simcoe – Grey – 705-435-1809 – firstname.lastname@example.org
You can also contact the Prime Minister and let him know what you think about that disastrous law:
Prime Minister Stephen Harper – Calgary Southwest – 403-253-7990 – email@example.com
If you live in an area represented by a Liberal or NDP MP, you can still contact him or her – after all, even if they refuse to change their position, they should know that not every person in Canada supports insane social engineering.
It is not easy to fight for your rights and freedoms, but we have no other choice except to do it. Otherwise, Canada that we know, which has attracted over many decades so many people from different nations, would turn into some of the totalitarian hellholes those people escaped from.
© 2013 Blogwrath.com
The late leader of the NDP Jack Layton was a petty opportunist, whose only achievement in life was inventing more creating ways to separate people from their money. During the last federal election the Quebecers, pissed off at Bloc Quebecois, punished their nationalists by voting for the obscure candidates of the NDP.
The unexpected win was immediately presented as a result of the strategic wisdom of Jack Layton. Fortunately Jack died on time, before the tide bagan to turn. But the NDP delusions and stupidity didn’t die with him. Now his comrades try to shve down our throats the fantasy of the great leader, who should be worshipped by everybody.
The celebrations held by that party to honour one of the most mediocre politicians in Canada resemble the events in Stalinist Russia or North Korea, where masses have to express their undying love for the great leader.
The video shows one of those celebrations, during which the party leaders try very hard to promote Whorehouse Jack as a socialist saint. You will see Tom Mulcair, Olivia Chow, Raffi and many nameless foot soldiers glorifying him.
Never before in the history of Canada has so much effort been put into the glorification of such an insignificant politician. The NDP’s attempt to turn Jack Layton into a benevolent Father of the Nation is not that different from the “cult of personality” of Stalin or Mao.
And while Stalin and Mao earned the fear and respect of their worshipers by being ruthless and efficient, Jack led a pretty unremarkable life, which revolved around municipal issues and money-grabbing schemes. His crown “achievement” in the last federal election wasn’t actually his work – the Quebecers, pissed off at Bloc Quebecois, voted for the NDP as a punishment against the nationalist party. The Bloc (or whatever other name it’s going to adapt) learned their lesson and most likely would pulverize Jack’s party in the next election.
However, the truth never discourages the NDP masses. Yesterday’s tribute-memorial to Jack Layton in Toronto showed that they believe in their own mythology.
Other than the Batman endorsement, many other people were convinced in the miraculous powers of their beloved Sun Leader. It is hard to describe the level of insanity, which ruled the event, but here are some of the tributes. They speak for themselves…
Jack had the ability to fix the world:
We will see how much “love” some of the other participants displayed, but let’s continue with the writings. God took Jack early to appoint him as His Prime Minister:
Jack has some chemical abilities – since his death the NDP has lost its fizz (isn’t that criticism?)
The next one is a confession, which may make even Chairman Mao blush:
And just like in North Korea, we need a Dear Leader Day:
And of course, never forget to vote NDP:
And just like in Stalin’s case, the revolutionary peoples of the world are smitten with the greatness of Jack Layton:
Apparently, Jack’s body parts have powers of their own, including his moustache:
I am not sure I get the next one. Is Olivia going to restore him as some kind of a hologram with the simple power of her mind?
I am sure Jack would’ve agreed with the following observation, especially when you are visiting a massage parlour:
Looking at all those written tributes, I made the conclusion that good spelling is not a skill revered among the socialists. They definitely had a problem with the word “inspiration”:
Yes, I’m sure “Tom’l” care:
The worst part of his influence from beyond the grave is that he has inspired a new batch of municipal moochers:
And I swear I didn’t write this one:
As I mentioned, not everything at the event was about love and optimism. I saw that strange girl, who could perfectly fit in with the occupy movement, write the following remark against Rob Ford:
She was duly applauded by the crowd, but nobody realized that Jack didn’t miss anything about Rob Ford. He died months after Ford was elected Mayor of Toronto. I wonder if she was high or if the attention span of a lefty is shorter than that of a fruit fly?
Then there was another occupy-type girl, who wanted to stop Harper in September (what the heck does that mean?):
And of course, no NDP event would be complete without even more cheap shots against Harper:
I agree that Stephen Harper should be criticized, especially after he gave a state funeral to a political nobody like Jack Layton (all paid by the taxpayers).
The special interest groups didn’t miss the tribute either:
It looks like Jack inspired even the hardcore communists, because they showed up with their table selling commie propaganda:
And surely we need bike lanes on Bloor Street (as if the traffic there is not that horrible already):
The only breath of fresh air was provided by two magnificent Great Danes that showed up in the early afternoon.
According to their owner, they were brother and sister. With no Muslim savages in sight (except at the halal junk stands on the street) to complain and kick them, the dogs enjoyed the full attention of the most people and even the security wanted to take pictures with them.
Unfortunately, the Great Danes didn’t stay long and we were left with the NDP royalty.
Olivia Chow addressed the cheering crowd and later inspected the written tributes (I have some video footage that I am going to post).
Then the new Dear Leader, Tom Mulcair, descended upon us. He gave quite a few interviews and mingled with the masses.
Even the notorious Libby Davies, the deputy Deer Leader, made an appearance, but strangely enough, the media didn’t approach her for interviews.
As advertised, Raffi, the Socialist Troubadour, showed up as well. He gave a horrific performance, singing a song based on Jack’s fake last testament, but before that he didn’t miss the opportunity to pose with the NDP Royal Babies.
Then we saw a performance by the lady, who sang “Rise Up!” at Jack’s funeral (I can never remember her name):
We were also treated to appearances by the lesser luminaries of the NDP. Andrea Horvath took a few hours off from her work of helping McGuinty to destroy Ontario:
Councillor Kristyn Tam-Wong, the patron-saint of the Occupy Movement:
And as always at such events, the public service union members were ubiquitous, complete with their leaders Sid Ryan and CUPE’s Fred Hahn:
The whole event left a bad taste – there was too much desperation in the attempt to convince Canada that Jack Layton must gain a god-like status. There is a striking similarity between the leftist movements around the world – they always need to put on pedestal a leader they can worship and force everybody else to worship him as well. The NDP is not an exception…
In the communist countries people didn’t have any choice but to admire the leader. However, here in Canada, we supposedly live under a democracy, where everybody is encouraged to make his or her own decisions. I hope we have enough thinking people left to see through the pathetic attempts of the NDP to impose on us as a beacon of morality a mediocre and corrupt politician.
Sorry, Jack, having the ability to smile is not enough to turn you into a holy man…
© 2012 Blogwrath.com
The other day I found out that my MP Olivia Chow had acquired a bold new look. One of her union admirers posted on Twitter a picture of the socialist diva in full Caribana gear at the notorious Caribbean parade in Toronto (h/t BCF).
Just after my shock and horror wore off, I was hit with another shocking news. It turned out the rumoured biopic of her late husband Jack Layton wasn’t just a rumour anymore. CBC notified us that not only will they spend our tax money on that monstrosity, but they also had selected the actors.
It appears that Olivia’s role will be played by Sook-Yin Lee, a Korean-Canadian (can I say that?) actress, who was a TV personality and a DJ. However, she is best known for her role of Sophia in the movie Shortbus. Now, that was a porn movie, pure and simple, with quite a lot of explicit sex (both straight and queer). They added a few heart-breaking story lines to the sex, so I guess the producers would be offended if somebody calls their movie pornography.
I have nothing against sex movies – porn is perfectly legal in Canada – and Sook-Yin Lee’s part-time porn escapades obviously contributed to her career. What seems disturbing is the fact that a porn actress is going to play the role of a sitting Member of the Parliament, who on top of that occupies a high position in the NDP hierarchy. But judging from Olivia’s Caribana picture, she is getting used to the idea to loosen up.
Maybe we need to loosen up the memory of Jack as well. Wouldn’t it be fitting if they cast Ron Jeremy in his role? Nah, Ron Jeremy is too fat and too straight. It would be better if they cast some of the gay actors from Shortbus. After all, that is going to be a great tribute to Jack’s contributions to the homosexual community.
After he died, Xtra (Toronto’s gay rag) published an obituary. They found it very important to say that in 1985-1991 he helped save the bathhouses (something like gay whorehouses) in his capacity of a chairman of Toronto’s Board of Health. They quoted him:
“We had calls at the time for closing the bathhouses and talking about abstinence and absolutely not handing out condoms. So we went on a very active campaign specifically to hand out condoms and to make sure that public education was going on in the bathhouses.”
It’s so touching to imagine Jack cruising the bathhouses handing out condoms like Santa Claus. Later he lost his interest in those establishments and switched to massage parlours with real (I hope so) women, which he fondly referred to as “community clinics”.
It is so ridiculous that CBC is going to spend millions of dollars immortalizing a third-rate politician and his wife, whose only accomplishment had been the invention of more and more creative methods of mooching from the taxpayers’ money for the benefit of themselves and their cronies.
Only in the ridiculous political “reality” of the Canadian Left a ridiculous man like “Smilin’ Jack” could become a national hero.
© 2012 Blogwrath.com
… not literally (at least for now).
But she was advertised as the Chief Guest of the Annual Gala Dinner organized by the North American Muslim Foundation (NAMF), scheduled for December 3:
As you can see in the picture, it’s all for charity, all for the children”. It looks little bit odd that all of the beneficiaries shown n the picture look Muslim, but probably there is no law against charities iscriminating.
Things turn much uglier when you dig deeper into the ackground of NAMF. For starters, Olivia will be sharing the stage (or a table) ith Zijad Delic, a former executive director of the Canadian Islamic Congress (CIC).
CIC is the notorious Islamist organization, which tried hard to make a crime any criticism of Islam in Canada. They mercilessly persecuted Mark Steyn and Maclean’s magazine through the human rights commissions. Due to the moral stench of his organization, earlier this year the Canadian military had to cancel Delic’s indoctrination lecture at their headquarters.
When this summer the Mosqueteria scandal erupted (TDSB allowed Muslim prayers at a public school), NAMF dispatched to all protests, organized by the supporters of secular school system, one of their faithful functionaries, Omar Quyum, who did his best to promote Muslim fanaticism. Here he is arguing with Raheel Raza:
In the same summer, when the war to keep our schools secular was raging, the Muslims had their Ramadan. NAMF used the occasion to introduce through iftar lectures a few “scholars”, who shouldn’t be part of any type of polite society. Here is the ad (h/t BCF):
What an impressive line-up! Dr. Mohamed Al Masry (a.k.a. Elmasry) is the predecessor of Zijad Delic at CIC. He is best known for the statement he made on the national TV – that every Jew in Israel over the age of 18 is a fair target for assassination. No wonder NAMF loves that dirty anti-Semite.
Then comes another Muslim idiot, Abdullah Hakim Quick, who was not ashamed to admit:
“They said, “what is the Islamic position on “homosexuality”? And I told them: Put my name in the paper. The punishment is death. And I’m not going to change this religion.”
Remember that – this is a revered doctor, supposed to be worthy of teaching the Toronto Muslims, yet he wants to kill homosexuals. What does it say about the Toronto Muslims, who want to listen to him, and NAMF, their organization?
And to leave no doubt about their barbarity, NAMF ends the lecture cycle with Dr. Arafat Al-Ashi, who clearly tells you what a nasty bunch the Jews are:
“In the scriptures of Jews we notice that the concept of life after death is a vague one. It is, in fact, a materialistic concept, and it is also a racist one. For Jews God is a pro-Jewish Lord. He gives them the right to crush and eliminate all other nations who are called Goyim (non-Jews). These people do not deserve to be human and naturally do not qualify to enter Heaven. It is a concept of bias, hatred and racism.”
How exciting it is that after those bigoted animals NAMF enlisted Olivia Chow as their next speaker. Was she aware what a glorious row she was joining?
I doubt it, she is not the brightest bulb in the chandelier. In fact, when you listen to her or read her bill proposals, she sounds quite dumb. If she didn’t marry Taliban Jack, I don’t think she could go that far in politics.
One of the last public appearances of Jack and Olivia I caught was at the gay parade earlier this year:
Call me old fashioned if you want, but I find it highly abnormal to march at a homosexual parade and then become a main speaker for an organization, which has no problem with a Muslim scholar, who wants to kill the gays. I understand that Olivia might not be intelligent enough to make the connection, but as a high level NDP functionary, she should’ve been warned by her leadership. Did the party go down the drains after Jack died?
Or maybe I am the dumb one, expecting decency and logic from the socialist dippers. Jack and Olivia have always been despicable political whores, ready to sell anybody and everything for the coveted few extra votes.
Listen Olivia, as your constituent (although I didn’t vote for you) I expect my MP to act a little bit above the level of a kindergarten retard. I understand that the anti-Semitic homosexuals, whom you represent as well, will cheer you up, but please don’t forget that the Islamic barbarians you support will eventually go after them.
© 2011 Blogwrath.com
The NDP MPs are a fascinating bunch. They provide a never-ending supply of comedy material. From the ignorant youngsters, who got elected in Quebec, through Libby Davies, the Vancouver junkie queen and terrorist admirer, to Olivia Chow, the only federal politician to march with the Occupy Toronto numbnuts – Canada’s top socialists never fail to deliver.
When Whorehouse Jack was still alive, he was able to create some semblance of order, but since his death, the NDP menagerie has been let to roam free and freely embarrass itself.
Last week another top NDP guy joined the circus. The Manitoba MP Pat Martin sent the following tweet, expressing his opinion about the budget discussion:
You can read the text in the picture, if I quote it here, I risk turning this post into a family-unfriendly article.
It looks like Pat is a man’s man (or wants to play one) – they say he was a carpenter in his previous life. Maybe his tough language was supposed to impress the native gangs, which infest downtown Winnipeg (although I am not sure if they follow Twitter).
After the tweet gained a wide attention, it was interesting to watch the reactions of the NDP leadership and its supporters. They did their best to whitewash his foul language by stating that he expressed noble anger over wrong policies. Many praised him for articulating the opinions that oppose Harper.
It is strange to hear that from a political party, whose main business is inventing more and more special groups, which should not be offended under any circumstances – militant Muslims, homosexuals, trannies, vegan worshippers, you name it… Didn’t Martin read Jack’s fake testament, where it was stated that love is better than hate? That apparently doesn’t apply to NDP members.
For the sake of juxtaposition, image for a moment that Stephen Harper wrote something remotely similar to Martin’s tweet. He would’ve been dragged through the mud by the whole army of dippers, Liberals, trannies and “progressive” academics. However, when a “progressive” parliamentarian swears like a drunken sailor, they feel empathy and express understanding.
And here is a note about the cause of Pat Martin’s grievances. In Canada we have elections – when a party wins the trust of the voters and has a majority, they can close the debate, since NDP’s endless bickering doesn’t contribute anything. When the Liberals had the majority, the NDP had no problem with similar situations.
In the last Parliament, NDP practically controlled what laws the Conservatives would or would not accept. However, Whorehouse Jack and his not very bright wife decided to follow the delusional Count Ignatieff in his attempt to topple Harper. In such a situation you obviously need a program, which would attract enough voters, but all that Jack and Olivia had in store were the old and tired pie-in-the-sky promises. Was it any wonder that they lost? And their “victory” by default in Quebec just showed that the voters hated the Bloc more than the NDP.
Shouldn’t Pat Martin direct his anger against the party leadership, which put him in such a powerless position? He would never do it, socialists have never been interested in truth.
Another tweet of Pat Martin that went unnoticed was a reply to a guy who had problems with VISA:
I suppose the bastards are the people from VISA. I simply don’t get that: you have a credit card for 20 years, which you keep in great standing, making all the regular payments on time. Then one day you miss a payment and they right away raise your interest rate by 5% and drop your credit limit from $30,000 to $6,000.
Where did he get a credit card with such terms? From the bank of Zimbabwe?
The NDP guys truly live in a different dimension…
© 2011 Blogwrath.com
… My friend Jack eats sugar loaves
Sugarman hasn’t got a care
He’s been traveling everywhere
Been on a voyage across an ocean
Heard the sweet sounds of wheels in motion…
Thank God, it’s over! For over a week, we had to endure the solemn voice of Peter Mansbridge and the desperate attempts of the mainstream media to make Jack Layton’s death look like a disaster of Biblical proportions.
The state funeral was recklessly paid by Stephen Harper by using taxpayers’ money. Yet the NDP cadres didn’t miss the opportunity to turn the occasion into a pathetic circus. Stephen Lewis tried to make Jack, the mediocre socialist, look like a visionary, who left us a prophetic manifesto.
The ugly woman who sang “Rise Up!” urged everybody to clap and shout, turning the official event into a service at a Mississippi Baptist church. The whole thing was painful to watch.
While I was watching, the song above sounded in my head – it looks so much more appropriate as a tribute to the real Jack. His euphoric hyper-activity (usually attributed to sugar), his constant travels in search of those elusive votes – everything is in this Boney M. song. Even the canes they use in the video look the same as his.
Jack might have been a nice guy in his personal life, but that’s not what was displayed on the outside. He was Canada’s ultimate politician, its ultimate bullshit king.
His real great achievement was the perfect timing of his death. He died after NDP won the most seats ever by a fluke of circumstances. Jack didn’t expect that
judging from the people whom he chose to run in Quebec. Now that ragtag gang of new MPs would disgrace themselves in the new Parliament, but Jack won’t be around to be blamed for it.
He was presenting himself as a champion of the working people, yet he never worked in his life. Neither did his wife and son, just like the Trudeaus. He knew how to say the right words and go to the right pubs to create the full illusion of being a folksy guy. In contrast, the poor Michael Ignatieff worked for the most of his life and wasted the summer of 2010 travelling in a bus to bond with people – despite that he looked phoney.
Jack didn’t care that much about working people – the trade unions were much closer to his heart, because that’s where he was getting his funds from.
He never advocated anything that would really improve Canada’s economy. It was always about stealing money from those who produce to distribute it among those who may vote for him. His party was eager to practically shut down the Alberta oil sands in the times of a deep economic crisis. The stupid carbon tax idea from the last election was also something that he actively promoted.
Jack constantly proclaimed his dedication to the unity of Canada, yet was willing to accept the support of any questionable ethnic organization, which could help his re-election. He didn’t shy away from contacts with CASMO, an anti-Semitic shia organization, which had on its website video from the KKK racist David Duke.
To please his Tamil friends, his party even urged the government to spend money for rebuilding Sri Lanka – his weird idea was that if we spend enough money on them, they’ll stop coming to Canada.
Jack Layton and the people around him worked methodically to rob and divide the country. Their legislative initiatives during the 40th Parliament speak for themselves.
Bill C-224 sought to ensure “the right of the individual to proper housing, at a reasonable cost and free of unreasonable barriers”. Somehow they forgot to think about who was going to pay for that (or maybe a room per family should allocated from the existing housing like in the Soviet Union).
Bill C-232 made sure that only judges speaking fluently English and French could be appointed to the Supreme Court, thus placing it under Quebec control.
Bill C-311 aimed at making sure that the Canadian industries are crippled by strict carbon emission limits to comply with the demands of the global warming hoax .
NDP wanted to single out even more special groups who needed “protection” from discrimination – “gender-expression” (Bill C-389, the transvestite-transgendered bill), “genetic characteristics” (Bill C-508), Bill C-531, which criminalizes “sex” discrimination. They even tried to make “social condition” discrimination a crime in Bill C-559. It was defined that: “ In this Act, “social condition” means, in respectof an individual, the condition of the individual experiencing social or economic disadvantage on the basis of their source of income, occupation, level of education, poverty, lack of adequate housing, homelessness or any other similar circumstance.” That’s the ultimate NDP insanity – it means you can’t turn down a grade-three dropout, if he wants to take a teacher’s position. And imagine all the other scary scenarios, which would bring the total disintegration of our society.
Then there was Bill C-545 – a monumental law proposal that was supposed to eliminate poverty in Canada. It proposed creating committees to investigate the reasons for poverty and establishing the office of the “Poverty Elimination Commissioner” with its own flourishing bureaucracy. Those wise people were supposed to
(e) set out targets to eliminate poverty in Canada
(i) in the short term, of one to three years,
(ii) in the medium term, of four to seven years, and
(iii) in the long term, of eight years or more;
Jack and Co. were planning to accomplish in eight years something that nobody had achieved before – the full elimination of poverty. This is a frightening insanity.
And to make sure that no money is left in Canada, NDP proposed Bill C-528, which makes it mandatory to give away 0.7% of the GDP every year as a “development aid”.
Since not many people were dumb enough to vote for such laws, NDP even introduced Bill C-634 demanding the voting age in Canada be dropped to 16.
This is just a small part of the initiatives of NDP, but they are scary enough.
Jack was even involved in the disgraceful campaign to discredit the Canadian Army serving in Afghanistan, a campaign that was based on total lies.
Those endless initiatives to grab money from those who work and squander it on those who don’t, won him the loyalty of students, bums, mediocre artists, government freeloaders, trade unions, and everybody else who was expecting something for nothing.
I am not saying that Harper is the embodiment of fiscal responsibility, but compared to him Jack was a disaster in the making.
It’s often said that the only thing you can say about a dead person should be good or nothing. Sorry, I can’t apply that saying here.
Jack wasn’t a good person; he was a reckless opportunist, who staged his whole life around his political career. Even his famous letter from “beyond the grave” was a carefully planned party stunt.
Now he is gone, but the delusion of the smiley, caring Jack is still alive. There will be more than enough people ready to go for it, wrecking our country and their lives as a result of that.
Wouldn’t it be nice, if they started thinking for themselves?
© 2011 Blogwrath.com
When Stalin died in 1953, the Soviet people were bombarded with an unending coverage from all possible media. The poor isolated masses thought that without him their world was going to fall apart. The crowds that attended the funeral were so confused and disorderly that over 1000 people (mostly women and children) got trampled to death.
I don’t know if we will see any people trampled to death at the funeral tomorrow, but the media behaviour is not much different – I am afraid to tune to a Canadian radio or TV channel, because my mind would be crushed by the unending tributes to Jack’s questionable achievements.
However, it is not difficult to figure out why that’s going on – he has an amazingly large number of dimwitted followers who worship him.
That’s the impression I got when I went today to the Toronto City Hall. The huge queue waiting to see him outnumbered the line for Lenin’s mausoleum. But the most interesting thing was the “tributes” written with chalk on the walls and the tiles.
Did you know that Olivia Chow is groomed to become our next Prime Minister? At least that’s what the masses want:
And they even say it in Arabic! And here is the same wish again:
Did you know that the recent earthquake was a tribute to Jack’s death? He is in the same elevated communist group like Kim Jong Il, whose birth was marked by a new star.
And not to be outdone by Lil’ Kim, somebody demands that Jack get a star as well: “Jack Need a Star on Da Walk of Fame.” (Obviously, he has admirers in the hip-hop community).
Even that is not enough, for Jack is “The Only Superhero Canada Knew”:
Apparently he also achieved a communist sainthood, because someone declared: “Now Canada Has It’s Own Che Guevara. Thanks, Jack.” (It should be spelled “Its”, you illiterate commie).
To remove any doubt about where the loyalty of the “Canadian Che Guevara” lies, somebody added a large Cuban flag to his shrine (for some reason it reminded me of Jeffrey Dahmer’s home shrine):
And of course, the foreigners, who don’t speak English, benefited from his money grabs as well:
The Tamils didn’t forget him either (not so long ago he was pressing the Prime Minister to send money to Sri Lanka to rebuild the country):
And those who wanted to take a bite after the long writing could do so at the halal hotdog stands in front of City Hall (the halal meat merchants in Jack’s riding love him):
In such an atmosphere, it is very dangerous to show disagreement with the Jack worship, unless you want to be kicked and spit on.
It’s no wonder that the only creature, which expressed a different opinion, was a police horse. He deposited the product of his bowel right in front of a Jack
If Jack was alive, he probably would have appreciated the humour in that situation. Or maybe not – most likely, he would have got the horse involved in an NDP fundraiser…
© 2011 Blogwrath.com
Last Monday NDP won 102 parliamentary seats in Canada’s national election. Within hours, the press was flooded with the jubilation of ecstatic lefties, who saw that fact as a sign of a shift to the left in the Canadian public opinion. They didn’t miss to praise Jack Layton for his “visionary” campaign that brought a victory.
As with many events in history, what really happened has very little to do with the picture that is forced upon us. A simple arithmetical calculation shows that out of 102 MP seats for NDP, 58 were won in Quebec. That’s hardly a national surge in popularity. In the other parts of the country the support was flat, with few seats lost in some ridings.
The NDP victory in Quebec was a fluke. Of course, Jack promised the moon and the stars in the French province and even assured them that he would open the Constitution debate. It is hard to believe that his eloquence might have persuaded the voters to follow him. The truth is that for whatever reason they were angry at Bloc Quebecois and voted for the least known party as a sign of protest.
Voting with the feeling of anger is good for the moment – it gives you the satisfaction that you’ve taught the politicians a lesson. However, when that feeling wears out, from the position of the post-anger hangover, you may find yourself in bed with somebody you can’t stand. And that’s what happened in Quebec.
Now Quebec voters are stuck with NDP for the next four years – with Harper’s majority it impossible to call an early election. NDP de facto represents the province, yet few people have any idea about the party’s stand on Quebec’s issues. What’s even worse, with the majority government, they will have even lesser ability to influence the parliamentary decisions.
Let’s face it – Jack Layton and Quebec is not a match made in heaven. Regardless of the opinions about Duceppe, Quebecers benefited greatly from his party. With the constant threat of separation, he was able for decades to beg, borrow, steal, and extort tons of goodies for his province – subsidies, large transfer payments, investments, etc.
Jack doesn’t have that leverage. It will look odd, if he suddenly tries to look like a separatist to get deals for his constituents.
But that’s not the only problem. Despite the leftist euphoria about the NDP wisdom, none in the leadership expected to win so many seats in Quebec.
The objective was to get the 2 bucks per vote that the government pays in party subsidies. Jack’s deep strategy was to find breathing human beings willing to run for his party. Yet those fillers won causing new problems. Most of them never campaigned in their ridings. None of them has any experience. There is a communist (and martial arts instructor), pub manager, few students, some of them don’t even speak French. And the worst part is again the majority government, which means that Jack will be stuck with those people for the next four years.
In the previous parliament, Olivia Chow and Libby Davies were the laughing stock due to their militant leftist ignorance. Now, with the new cadres present, both of them will look like wise elder stateswomen. Not a great future…
What’s even worse, the very far left press is already drooling about how the new NDP radical MP’s will sabotage the House of Commons and Harper’s evil government. That would make things even worse for Jack Layton, because he already promised cooperation in the name of the common interests of all Canadians, instead he would have to spend considerable time policing his caucus.
His situation is difficult because he must also pay back for the endorsements of scores of wacky and dangerous organizations. Organizations like the Canadian Islamic Congress supported him, because they expected the NDP to confront Ignatieff (considered by them a Jew and neo-con) and Harper (whom they expect to help Israel take over most of the Middle East). How is Jack Layton going to pay back to those fanatics?
Maybe we will see him pushing (together with Bob Rae) to bring back to Canada that vermin, the convicted terrorist Omar Khadr. Or maybe he will give nice positions to his family of terrorists and welfare parasites.
Jack has four hard years ahead of him and we will be watching. Maybe NDP’s unique blend of incompetence, revolutionary fervour, and creative ideas to steal taxpayers’ money for idiotic causes, will eventually bring the ultimate demise of that party.
The last 24 hours have been truly amazing – mostly due to the investigative journalism of SUN TV. Yesterday they revealed that Jack Layton, the high-flying Icarus of Canada’s wealth-redistribution movement, was caught in 1996 in a seedy part of Toronto’s Chinatown. He wasn’t buying contraband cigarettes (the main business there at the time).
He was in an “Asian massage parlour” – translation for those who have lived for the last 20 years in an unused tunnel of the subway: this means a Chinese mafia-run whorehouse. If you remember the 1990’s, there was a mafia war at the time over who was going to control Chinatown fought between the Chinese and Vietnamese gangs. Of course nobody dared to mention those events in the papers (God forbid, we may offend the ethnic criminals).
Jack was caught during one of the raids – naked, with the whore taking away a piece of dirty Kleenex.
Well, that wouldn’t have been big deal for a regular person (or even a Japanese politician) or even Jack – we must not forget he was married to that strange woman named Olivia, so he might have needed some action.
The real problem was that Jack at the time was supposed to be the poster boy for social perfection – remember those were the 1990’s when the political correctness was the king and the human rights fascists used to run Ontario unchallenged.
Jack Layton was fighting for the bums, the homeless, and especially for the exploited Asian women imported into Canada to work in the type of establishments that he probably frequented. After getting caught, Jack played stupid and pretended that he didn’t know what kind of a place that was.
From that point on, the events that unfolded and the reactions of the NDP “royal couple” show what a despicable and morally depraved pair they are.
Jack was lying when he said he didn’t know where he was. As a city councillor at the time, he was very well aware where the exploitation of young Asian women took place. There are only two options for his statement – he was either very stupid, if he couldn’t figure out that was a whorehouse, or he was lying through his nose to get away.
Call me old-fashioned, but both situations disqualify him from being a prominent politician.
And I also blame the police – if an average Joe was found naked during a raid in such a place, he would’ve been booked to appear in court right away. How was Jack let go home?
And he was! On his bike he went – all the way to the government-subsidized three-bedroom apartment, for which he and Olivia paid a monthly rent of $800 with a combined income of $170,000. Don’t you love the Canadian socialism?
It only gets worse – when the news hit the TV and the radio waves last night, Olivia issued a statement that Jack was getting there a “therapeutical shiatsu massage” and she was aware that nothing bad happened.
OK, if a Hong Kong woman, whose political riding is Trinity-Spadina, says that her husband went to a Chinatown parlour late at night to get shiatsu massage, she is lying, pure and simple. Unless she is insane – Olivia is ignorant in most affaires she deals with, but definitely she is not insane. (Sorry, Olivia, no offense, but as your constituent, I should say that you have done very little for us, the working people, and too much for the lefty loons from Now Magazine and every imaginable special interest group).
No wonder she is lying – there is too much at stake for them in this election. According to information revealed by CBC last year, the “NDP royal couple” spent over $1,000,000 in their parliamentary allowance, which was much more than the amount spent by Prime Minister Harper or Ignatieff, the leader of the opposition.
Can you leave that gravy train slip away? Of course not – after all, Jack and Olivia have spent their lives stealing from people who work and redistributing the money among those who vote for them, making a nice living in the process.
That’s not all – Jack claims a smear campaign against him, but thanks to the mainstream media, which faithfully bashes the conservatives, we have a great example of a smear campaign (going on right now) orchestrated by Jack’s goons.
Right now, CBC, which can’t let their socialist crooks lose the election, is touting the case of the Conservative Saskatchewan candidate Tom Lukiwski,who allegedly was caught on video tape saying something not that gay-friendly. The incident caught on video happened in 1991 (i.e. 17 years ago) and the tape was cheerfully provided by the NDP campaign.
Now, Jack and his supporters all say that his Chinatown whore adventure happened 15 years ago and is irrelevant now. Then how could an even older incident be relevant? Lukiwski wasn’t been charged with anything, just like Jack, so why does NDP want him to resign? (Are the gays a higher status group than the exploited Asian girls? Maybe that’s the secret.)
This clearly shows what a despicable bunch the NDP strategists and supporters are.
As George Costanza used to say, this situation is like onion – the more you peel, the more it stinks. Jack owes an explanation to the citizens of Canada – what was he doing in an establishment run by the Asian criminal world? It is said that they routinely videotaped visitors to such places getting sexual services to extort them later. Did something like that happen to Jack Layton?
Last year Olivia tried to introduce a bill to repeal the provision that grants Canadian citizenship only to the next generation of people who live abroad. That law would’ve greatly benefited the “Canadian citizens” in Hong Kong, who want their citizenship passed to all future generations, but don’t pay taxes and over 75% of whom don’t consider Canada home and don’t plan to return (there is interesting information about this in a new book about NDP).
How would Jack explain the persistent support for him coming from questionable Muslim organizations? In 2007 he received an award from CASMO, a shia Muslim group, known for its anti-Semitic views, which recently placed on its website videos from the notorious KKK man David Duke. Earlier this month, NDP received an endorsement by activists of the Canadian Islamic Congress, as the only force that can confront the “Jew Michael Ignatieff” (who is not even a Jew, more about that in the same book).
What did Jack Layton do to deserve all that praise? Nothing is alleged here, but the inquiring minds want to know.
I am asking, but I don’t have any illusions about the results. People who ask and think don’t vote for Jack, Olivia and the other thugs from NDP.
They and their party have a very clear and well-defined base, with a major trait that unites them – all of them expect the NDP to get them money and services without working.
It includes the fat unions, which make three times more than the other workers for doing the same job. In 2009 Jack promised the Ontario Federation of Labour that he will create a government institution, which will cover the pensions of union employees, whose companies have gone bankrupt. Guess who is going to cover that, if Jack forms a coalition?
Then come all the welfare people, who have never worked, but have all their expenses covered from your tax money. Do you think they would let Jack lose?
And last are all the activists, who mooch public funds in countless ways in the name of providing social justice. All they want is to follow the shining path of Jack and Olivia – and get one day in the position to steal a cool million from the capitalist pigs. Since they have never done anything productive in their lives, they think that the tax money is paid only by capitalists, so that must be true.
How low should a politician and a party go to make people notice how bad they are?
Well, we will see it on Monday…
The NDP never sleeps. They are constantly on the lookout for new inventive ways to redistribute wealth and part you from your hard-earned money.
Olivia Chow, the NDP MP from Toronto’s Trinity-Spadina, just introduced a private bill that would allow rejected visitors’ visa applications to be reviewed and appealed. Her justification is that similar appeal procedures exist in the United Kingdom and Australia.
Since in her opinion many of the rejections are based on arbitrary decisions by the Canadian visa authorities, she proposes that the rejected cases be heard by the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada.
What could wrong here?
I don’t even know from where to begin. We are talking visitors here, for Pete’s sake. If someone is not allowed into Canada for three months (as the length of most visitors’ visas is) they can choose nearly 200 other countries to go to.
Don’t we already have enough problems with fake refugees, who once in the country, would never leave? We all are paying for their “Western lifestyle”.
Isn’t the security of our country more important than the hurt feelings of a potential visitor? Denying visas to people from Third-World countries who can’t support themselves and most likely would never leave Canada after they arrive, is not the end of the world.
How is that appeal process supposed to work? If the Board is involved, the applicants should be represented by lawyers. The majority of those applicants would not be able to cover their fees, so we the taxpayers should fork out even more money for useless procedures and institutions.
That will increase the workload of the Board’s members, so we will probably have to hire more of them (translation: more of your money will go down the black hole called Canadian immigration).
All of the cases argued in front of the Board require the presence of the people involved. How long would it take for a judge to decide that a failed visa applicant should be present at the hearing, otherwise their rights under the Charter will be violated? Then we will have to fly them into Canada and feed and clothe them for years.
Why doesn’t Olivia put her mind to something useful that will benefit the wellbeing of all Canadians? Why doesn’t she contribute to the increase of the wealth of our nation, instead of squandering it on some idiotic schemes?
If she does something like that, I may vote for her…
On the last day of the spring session of the Canadian Parliament Olivia Chow, an NDP MP from Toronto, moved to introduce Bill C-556, An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (exception to inadmissibility). You can find the complete text of her proposal on her website or in the Parliament’s records.
The purpose of the amendment is to stop the (alleged) discrimination against people with disabilities who want to become legal Canadian residents. As with any issue related to a disadvantaged group, any criticism of that issue could bring the anger of the righteous leftists upon the critic. Nevertheless, let’s see why Olivia’s idea is not good. Read the rest of this entry »
The shameful case of Sara Landriault who wanted to apply for a government job, but was rejected due to her skin colour (she was white) caused quite a stir. The Conservative Government decided to do something about rectifying the situation, even though they so far silently tolerated the discrimination, which has been going on for over 25 years.
The Immigration Minister Jason Kenney was shocked by what happened and stated: “I was very concerned to read the report of a position only being open to people from an identifiable group. All positions should be on the basis of equality of opportunity and merit.”
So far so good. That injustice really should be dealt with.
However, the Conservatives can’t fix the things by themselves. They need the help of the other parties. And that’s the big problem. Read the rest of this entry »