High Treason – Obama’s Cover-Up in Libya

Obama-Clinton-Oval-Office

 

In an old episode of the Simpsons, Lisa Simpson traveled to Washington, D.C., as a winner of a Springfield patriotic essay contest. Appalled by the corrupt politicians, she re-wrote her essay to begin with the words that Washington was built on a swamp and today it still remains a swamp.

Lisa’s wise observation is still valid. It’s painful to observe the gallery of politicians inhabiting that place – petty thieves, adulterers, idiots… you name it…

And it looks like things are only getting worse. The latest pair of Swamp Things to emerge from the murky waters were Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.  The affirmative action President found his perfect match in the corrupt, Muslim Brotherhood loving Mrs. Clinton. Together, they are very efficient in smearing the US Coat of Arms with their excrements. Unfortunately, their most important ally, the mainstream media, are missing from the picture.

Their latest shitting exercise was related to the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11 this year, when the US Ambassador and three other Americans were killed. I am saying “terrorist attack” but that’s not what we were told for weeks after the event.

Barry and his people tried to convince us that the whole “incident” was a spontaneous reaction of ordinary Muslims to a movie posted on YouTube, which allegedly offended the Muslim “prophet”. Both the President and Hillary, as well as their entourage (including the US Ambassador to the UN), kept yelling that Christopher Stevens died because of a “disgusting” movie, which hurt the feelings of the Muslims around the world.

It was not hard to pull off that deception – everybody who has followed the world events knows that Muslims react like psychopaths to any perceived “insult”. They immediately start killing people and blowing up buildings. That was the case with the Danish cartoons.

The intellectuals copied Barry and Hillary’s outrage and emphasized the poor quality of the movie. It sounded like they would’ve supported the producer, if the movie wasn’t that bad. That simply revealed their cowardice. The same people fiercely defended the talentless whores from Pussy Riot, whose performance in the church was not much better than the Mohammad movie. The reason is very simple – unlike the Muslims, who would cut off your head when offended, the Orthodox Christians are totally harmless, so you can freely abuse them.

I watched the movie – it covered the facts about the fake prophet correctly. It was poorly made, but I thought that was not a crime. Otherwise Ed Wood could’ve been executed for making Plan 9 from Outer Space and Mariah Carey might’ve spent years in jail for Glitter.

Besides, the movie was never released officially other than being on YouTube. I understand that the followers of the homicidal Muslim cult are ready to start killing at every opportunity, but most of them are not movie buffs dedicated enough to their passion to scout the Internet for obscure movies, neither do most of them, who live in those God-forsaken parts of the world, have the computer equipment to indulge in their movie obsession.

However, the Obama administration kept lying for weeks. They even tried to derive a side benefit from the situation by calling for limitations of freedom of speech and arresting the maker of the movie. He was arrested and is still kept in jail without trial.

The truth came out gradually – despite the best attempts of the media to hide it. It turned out it was a well-premeditated attack, which took place late at night and there were not many people involved. Until then I thought the whole thing was a result of a mass demonstration of hundreds of weird guys (like the one we saw in Toronto) who spontaneously decided to kill a few Americans.

That was all false – the only network, which dared publish the truth was Fox News. They revealed the e-mail exchange, which gives us an idea about the situation.

There were three e-mails revealed. Here is Number One:

Subject:U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack (SBU).

 The Regional Security Officer reports the diplomatic mission is under attack. Embassy Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well. Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four COM personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17th of February militia is providing security support.

 The operations Center will provide updates as available.

Number Two:

 Subject: Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi (SBU)

 (SBU) Embassy Tripoli reports the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi has stopped and the compound has been cleared. A response team is on site attempting to locate COM personnel.

Third and last:

 Subject: Update 2: Ansar Al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack (SBU)

 (SBU) Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli.

“The e-mails are time and date stamped respectively at “4:05 PM” “4:54 PM” and “6:07 PM” on September 11, 2012, all Washington time.”

The significant revelation we have here is that the Obama administration received right away the notice that this was a terrorist attack, yet for fourteen days after that the Swamp Things tried to convince us that this attack was caused by an Internet video.

The first thing that makes you yell “WTF” is the fact that the US Ambassador was “protected” by the “17th of February Militia” which is an extremist Islamic group. One may wonder why they were the guards. Did Obama try to get rid of Stevens? Or did Stevens do some work for that militia, which was not liked by the other extremists?

Things get to look even worse when we dig below the general information the e-mails give us. According to the detailed timetable of the events, the tragedy took hours to unravel. Just like a military action movie, it involved a few heroes in the field and many more idiots in Washington, who were either too incompetent or too evil to act, but unlike a Hollywood movie the heroes didn’t make it.

Former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods was part of a small team who was at the CIA annex about a mile from the U.S. consulate where Ambassador Chris Stevens and his team came under attack. When he and others heard the shots fired, they informed their higher-ups at the annex to tell them what they were hearing and requested permission to go to the consulate and help out. They were told to “stand down,” according to sources familiar with the exchange. Soon after, they were again told to “stand down.”

Woods and at least two others ignored those orders and made their way to the consulate which at that point was on fire. Shots were exchanged. The rescue team from the CIA annex evacuated those who remained at the consulate and Sean Smith, who had been killed in the initial attack. They could not find the ambassador and returned to the CIA annex at about midnight.

At that point, they called again for military support and help because they were taking fire at the CIA safe house, or annex. The request was denied. There were no communications problems at the annex, according those present at the compound. The team was in constant radio contact with their headquarters. In fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Spectre gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights.

I have to add that while those dramatic events were unfolding, there were two US surveillance drones flying over the area, which provided live footage, which could be seen in the Pentagon and the White House.

It would be crazy to deny the terrorist attack and blame it on a mediocre movie, but that’s exactly what Barry and Hillary did. Later on they mobilized even Ambassador Stevens’ father, who like a fateful foot soldier of the Party, complained that his son’s death had been politicized. With all due respect to his loss, I should say that the issue is much bigger than his son – that wasn’t a robbery, but a direct assault on the US Government.

In a few days Hillary Clinton took full responsibility, but in a very unusual way – she neither explained why that happened, nor offered her resignation.

The administration and the media were so arrogant that they even attacked Romney for criticizing Obama’s handling the Libya issue.

Romney’s missteps in criticizing Obama’s handling of a deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi – the focus of a vividly testy exchange in the previous debate – have complicated his broader strategy of trying to cast the president as a weak steward of American power abroad.

Although the actions (or the lack thereof), which contributed to the killing of several Americans were bad enough, even more horrifying was the issue with the cover up. During the Watergate scandal, Nixon was not attacked just for apparently approving a break-in – the major issue was that he tried to lie about it. Obama is in a similar situation. The famous question: “What did the President know?” asked during the Nixon’s scandal, remained unanswered.

The same question applies to Obama and it is still not answered – the media are helping him by keeping silent. Other than Fox News and the Internet, very few media outlets show any interest in covering the scandal. The most urgent news about Obama on Yahoo today was some concern he has with his older daughter (I don’t know what it is and don’t care).

The tragedy of the situation comes from the fact that nobody cares about a lying President. It never occurs to most people that if Obama lies blatantly about that event, he has character flaws that make him unfit for his position.

And you can say the same about the media. Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein are dead… Not literally,   but as a paradigm – not many would risk their lives to expose injustice. Nowadays most journalists are cowards, who would cover up anything that may disturb their comfort. They aren’t even endangered in any way, but the conformism of those who work in the media creates an iron pact of silence, which keeps the public from learning the truth.

And for the large part, the public is also indifferent, which helps the media. Of course, the Internet provides a few brave people, but when the majority of the public still gets their thinking points from TV and the papers, it is unrealistic to think that Andrew Breitbart’s spirit could outwrestle Honey Boo Boo. The media reflect the public’s descent into deprivation – when you have millions living on welfare and snubbing the traditional values in exchange for free cash, can you expect courageous and alert journalists?

Under normal circumstances Obama would’ve been impeached, but the USA are not normal anymore. His race will protect him – because he is black, he was able to climb the political ladder without showing any abilities. Nobody would dare start an impeachment process, since they immediately would be called racists, even though (regardless of his skin colour) Barry is a traitor and a liar.

And, like in a vicious circle, an environment like that provides the perfect conditions for mediocre and lazy politicians like Obama to thrive.

© 2012 Blogwrath.com

 

Be Sociable, Share!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *