Archive for the ‘Racism’ Category

 

It is sad when a person outlives his own legend. Once the undisputed hero of all self-hating Westerners, now Archbishop Desmond Tutu reveals in most of his public appearances that he is a few cards short of a deck.

It’s probably his age – at 80 senility might have hit him. I read that Nelson Mandela is affected by the same condition, but at least the people around him keep him home thus saving his dignity.

On the other hand, Tutu is left to roam free and make a total ass out of himself. He has been involved in numerous weird lefty causes (like the global warming hoax). He also became the darling of the anti-Semites with his bashing of Israel and support for the Palestinian terrorists.

I have always tried to ignore him as a pathetic old man, who doesn’t know what he is doing anymore. However, a recent appearance of his has caught my attention. That was reported by a South African newspaper (h/t BCF).

At a book launch, where he was supposed to deliver a prepared speech, he made a few unusual proposals.

First of all, he wanted a “wealth” tax to be imposed on all white South Africans. As you probably remember, he was the head of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), which was supposed to “heal” the “wounds” of the apartheid.

“Tutu did not say how he wished the tax to be implemented, but said he hoped whites themselves would “agitate” for it to be imposed upon them.” So he hopes that the whites will give their money voluntarily (if they don’t, Tutu can always use the Zimbabwean “methods of persuasion’).

He revealed at the launch that the idea was not new. It came up during the TRC meetings:

There were many in the white community who were ready for this (at the time of the TRC process). It could be quite piffling, maybe 1 percent of their stock exchange holdings. It’s nothing. But it could have helped… maybe building new homes, and that would have been an extraordinary symbol of their readiness.

No matter how you twist the idea, charging only a particular race with a certain tax is nothing but racism – pure and simple. I never heard about the scheme before, but it shows that Mandela’s people were not shying away from introducing their own racism.

The esteemed Archbishop also tried to sneak in the race card into his explanation for the high crime in South Africa. The vicious crime rate is a direct result from the apartheid-induced “self-hate”. That’s a nice one – it takes the blame away from the total incompetence of Mandela’s party.

Those consequences affect even the black-on-black crime. Tutu said:

When you suffer from self-hate you project it on to those who look like you and so we have so-called black-on-black violence, where the victim of a hijacking is shot even when she has surrendered her car keys.

It gets even more entertaining – he blamed even littering on apartheid:

The disgrace of littering… is not a function of poverty. Our parents were poor but our surroundings were scrupulously clean because apartheid had not yet done its pernicious work. This “work”, this eventual impact of apartheid’s policies, had left black South Africans feeling: “I am nothing, I am rubbish and so it does not matter that I live among all this rubbish which reflects what I think of myself.

What an “empowering” statement – with Tutu’s help you can justify even your laziness to clean up the filth you live in.

But wait, there is more – even reckless driving is OK, since it was caused by the apartheid “wounds”:

We show it how we drive recklessly, inconsiderately, aggressively… because deep down we are angry and so the appalling carnage on our roads during the holidays… horrendous statistics we just accept.  We are wounded.

It is sad to read that. It shows the total political and moral bankruptcy of the ANC movement. Do you remember the times when Mandela was lauded as some kind of a messiah supposed to lead Africa out of the swamp?

Even then the whole thing was a scam. The ANC propaganda machine skilfully played the white guilt in the rich Western countries to derive generous financial support for its terrorist activities. The people, who were able the see the truth back then, were silent, otherwise they would’ve been cursed for blasphemy against the “saintly” Mandela.

Even the communist countries were involved in the racket. I remember the South African functionaries housed there as “students”, who were constantly raising funds for their “struggle” and passing petitions to save their terrorists from the gallows. Make no mistake – they didn’t plan to build a prosperous South Africa. Their goal was to replicate the communist system, with the same repression and confiscation of wealth.

In their twisted minds they didn’t plan to work for the country’s prosperity – all they needed to do was to confiscate white people’s wealth. Robert Mugabe believed in that fantasy and after his thugs took away the farms from the whites, he was left to hold the bag.

Unfortunately for them, the communist world collapsed before ANC’s terrorists could grab the power. So they had to compromise by pretending that they are democrats.

However, Tutu’s speech shows that even in the transitional period supposed to bring peace, Mandela’s people were planning to establish their own reversed racism.

Later on, many qualified white people were pushed out of their government positions and replaced with incompetent party activists.  Now they are even talking about nationalizing the mining industry (that would spell the end of South Africa).

There is open hostility, which tries to exclude whites from the public life. You can find facts and information about those atrocities at Orwellian Culture, where
the pictures below were published:

 

 

Yet nobody seems to notice that deterioration, because there are more than enough useful white idiots trying to keep Mandela’s fake halo intact with staples and glue.

Do you remember Amy Biehl? She was a white American girl inspired by South African blacks’ fight against apartheid to the point that she went there to help them. In the summer of 1993, after driving a few friends to the township where they lived, she was attacked by a black “revolutionary” mob of over 80 people.

They dragged her out of her car. Her head was smashed with rocks and she was stabbed repeatedly until dead. The authorities arrested 4 people they believed did most of the damage and sentenced them to a jail term.

Such atrocities against white people were common at the time. A month before Amy’s murder, four armed black terrorists invaded The Saint James Church in Kenilworth, Cape Town. During the massacrethat followed, 11 members of the congregation were killed and 58 wounded. The perpetrators were also caught and sentenced to long jail terms.

Yet in 1998, after spending only 5 years in prison, the criminals guilty for both crimes were given amnesty and freed (along with many others). We have to “thank” for that TRC and its chairman, Archbishop Tutu. He has blood on his hands, because most of those criminals started offending again. Shortly after their release, two of Amy’s killers committed rapes and went into hiding.

In Amy’s case, there was an additional horrifying twist. Her parents, who were self-hating lefties just like her, pleaded for the release of her killers. Her father shook hands with them and blamed the whole thing on the apartheid.

A few years later, Linda Biehl, Amy’s mother, established a foundation in South Africa in her daughter’s honour.

As an act of her own private “reconciliation”, she hired the two remaining killers of her daughter to work for the charity. Not only that, she got very close to the
criminals, they were and still are like family to her:

Easy and Ntobeko are fascinating, and I really do love them. They have given me so much… It was like an adoption. That kind of broke the barrier. These were just children who didn’t have a chance to have a childhood.

So here we have it – the ultimate Darwin Award, the most psychopathic family I have ever seen.

It’s bad enough that Amy’s killers and the four men who killed 11 people were set free after doing only five years. Mandela and Tutu sent a clear message that white people’s lives were worth nothing. What’s even worse is that there are white idiots, who suffered directly from black crime, yet they cheer their blood-thirsty idols.

No wonder Tutu feels so bold in his anticipation of the whites-only tax. With people like the Biehls as supporters, he, Mandela or Zuma can introduce whatever discriminatory or disastrous policy they want and they’ll be praised for it.

And of course, it would never occur to them that they’ll achieve much more for the country, if they are treating everybody the same way.

There’s not much good in the future of South Africa…

© 2011 Blogwrath.com

After breaking the news about the Muslim invasion at Valley Park Middle School in Toronto, the blogger Blazingcatfur unearthed even more disturbing news. This time it involved a document created by the Toronto District School Board in 2003.

It is still in use by the Board and the teachers. Its title is: Teaching about Human Rights: 9/11 and Beyond A Resource Package for Educators Grades 7–12, and you can find the full text here.

On the surface, it looks like a good program, which is supposed to give some orientation to today’s kids, who feel lost in our “multicultural” society. However, when you start reading it, you feel some spiritual stench that turns stronger as you keep reading.

The document is not supposed to enlighten the kids about human rights. Its purpose is to put down and degrade the majority of the Canadians. Here is what the authors say about racism:

While people in different contexts can experience prejudice or discrimination, racism, in a North American context, is based on an ideology of the superiority of the white race over other racial groups. Racism is evident in individual acts, such as racial slurs, jokes, etc., and institutionally, in terms of policies and practices at institutional levels of society. The result of institutional racism is that it maintains white privilege and power (such as racial profiling, hiring practices, history, and literature that centre on Western, European civilizations to the exclusion of other civilizations and communities). The social, systemic, and personal assumptions, practices, and behaviours that discriminate against persons according to their skin colour, hair texture, eye shape, and other superficial physical characteristics.

The gist of the idea of the “learned” people, who wrote that tripe, is that if you are white, you are guilty, period.

If you are living in a trailer park and only have grade one education, you are still over privileged compared to a black guy who runs a bank. It is beyond
comprehension how such idiocy is taught in Canada in the XXI century.

However, it doesn’t matter what I think –not only is anti-white racism taught in schools, but it is also successfully applied in the government hiring practices. Last years I wrote about a woman, who applied for a government job only to find out that white people are not welcome.  During all the fuss that followed the news, the Conservatives promised to review the affirmative action laws, while the NDP kept whining that the “vulnerable” minorities should be protected (while at the same time having  an almost entirely white parliamentary caucus, with the exception of Olivia Chow).

Of course, despite the great promises, nothing changed – the discrimination continues.

Faithful to the principle that there is never only one cockroach, I assumed that this was not an accidental document. It was a result of consistent racism. So I did some research of my own – and lo and behold, it turned out I was right.

The “Principal Reviewer” and major contributor to the document was a certain “gulzar raisa charania”. This is apparently a male name and the guy is  bviously a Muslim. Please note how he spells his name in low-case letters. He is either a k.d. lang fan or he tries to show how insignificant he is. It’s probably the latter, because if you read his drivel, you’d quickly find out that the intellect shown in his writing is below insignificant.

In 2001 he submitted a thesis “in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto”. So he is an OISE graduate. If you have even the faintest idea about the Canadian higher education, you would know that the institution is a Marxist diploma mill, which creates some of the most hopelessly ignorant graduates you can find in Canada.

The thesis was titled ENCOUNTERS WTH NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT WORKERS: REFLECTIONS FROM THE “FIELD” and you can read the full text here.

The work was based on interviews and observations of young development aid workers from Canada. I am not sure if he did it on purpose, but all of his subjects are self-hating Canadian idiots, who constantly try to put down themselves and their country and belittle our achievements.

In his odd terminology, the term “Northern workers” means those who are involved in third world countries development and aid projects. “Northern” here applies to somebody who comes from a privileged Western environment, as opposed to “Southern”, which describes the third world countries regardless of their location.

In the Soviet universities they had a subject called “Scientific Communism” (after the collapse they changed its name to “Politology”) – his thesis can easily pass the requirements of that subject. When you read it, it’s easy to figure out where the TDSB’s document came from.

It is a torture to read through the whole thing, but it gives you an idea why we have such a horrible education system in our schools.

For example, one of gulzar’s subjects states that there is more sexual harassment and injustice in Toronto than in Jakarta or Dar-es-Salaam:

In drawing attention to the prevalence of oppression in Canada, Derek remains hopeful that Northern development workers will develop a more comprehensive analysis of exploitation globally. He identifies the pervasiveness of economic exploitation, racism, sexual harassment and homophobia in Canada, hoping that an acknowledgement of these realities will result in less arrogant Northern development worker practices in the South. He elaborates: sexual harassment isn’t going to just happen in Dar-es-Salaam or wherever right, Jakarta. Sexual harassment happens in Toronto every day right, homophobia happens in Toronto everyday – racism, all that kind of stuff, and economic exploitation happens here every day and I think that if people can start acknowledging the shit in their own backyard, or in their own house then I think the chances are less that they’re going to go overseas with this big chip on their shoulders like I come from the civilized world – we’ve got it all figured out (Derek 1 12, p. 12).

Can you imagine how utterly stupid one needs to be to say all that with a straight face? And even more stupidity is needed to put it in a “scholarly” work.

Other participants say that Canada needs a “truth commission” on the Indian issues:

Participants explore oppressive relationships in Canada’s past and also the way these relations continue to inform contemporary realities. Given the brutality of Canada’s living history in relation to First Nations, Emily argues that Canadians “need truth commission at least as much as South Africa” (Emily, p. 1).

That’s priceless – we are worse than South Africa.

Here comes one of the main statements, which found its place in the document above – coloured people can’t be racist:

Because participants situate racism within a structural analysis that confers power to white bodies, concepts such as reverse racism or racism both ways do not exist. Rather, they employ the term discrimination to account for what is commonly referred to as reverse racism in the cross-cultural. For example, when a person of colour invokes a racial slur against a white person, it can be understood as a discriminatory act. However, it is not equivalent to a white person invoking a racial slur against a person of colour, understood as racist. In society, the white individual is surrounded by affirming images and knowledge of her/his race and its dominance, that are activated in this racist exchange with a person of colour in ways the latter cannot access. (p.133)

So the white people are always in a lose-lose situation – no matter what they do, they always invoke some mystical “white power”, which is deeply offensive to all other races.  On the other hand, the rest can offend them racially as much as they like, but that doesn’t make them racist.

If you think that some of the locals are lazy, then you are exercising your power through whiteness:

Emily narrates an experience in which a Southern person overheard Northern development workers talking about the inefficiency of local workers. The Southern person named this conversation between Northern development workers as racist, provoking anger and denial within this Northern development worker community. Emily recalls, “All development workers showed up angry because if he is racist, then we all are. This is just venting. It’s normal to vent” (Emily, p. 9). Bringing their insights of how racism operates as a system to organize everyday life for Northern development workers, participants expand conceptions of racism beyond overt acts and recognize the multiple ways in which white Northern development workers access social power through whiteness.

Yes, if you complain about the inefficiency, that’s bad. Never mind that in those countries, the local culture doesn’t require the urgency to get things done right away like in the industrialised countries.

However, the funny thing is that instead of analysing reality, the “Northern workers” get into a panic mode over fighting their perceived “power through whiteness”. It’s a hilarious situation similar to the way the Keystone Cops deal when facing“emergency” cases – they don’t have individuality, but stumble and trip over each other.

The bottom line is that you are white, you’re a racist no matter what you do. I pity Canada, if all the aid workers we send to other countries are such losers, whose main objective is to find more and more ways to humiliate themselves over the issue of their race.

That gulzar guy was very successful in implanting the self-hate of the aid workers into the program of the Toronto schools. Now we will have a whole generation, which is going to have no self esteem.

Those, who don’t know OISE, may think that by picking that weirdo to create the program, TDSB has been scraping the bottom of the barrel. Maybe there are better people?

No, there aren’t – the whole barrel stinks like that, all that’s in it is hopelessly out of touch with reality Marxist ideology, mixed with the decomposed mummies of Lenin and Chairman Mao.

The whole system needs an overhaul, but you can’t have it under the current Liberal government of Ontario, which tries to eliminate very hard the teaching of any real values in our schools.

Nevertheless, the ordinary people are neither asleep nor stupid. Many see the coming disaster and are not prepared to accept it.

Here is a letter sent to Mark Harding , which he forwarded to me on July 17, 2011. It is from a parent, who is horrified of what is being taught in our public schools:

Hi Mark,

That is very true. My daughter started to believe that white people are racists and I knew that this bad teaching was coming from her school. I even thought to stoping her from attending the school. They also teach them other bad things such as homosexuality, feminism and anti-christian propoganda. I was shocked to learn what goes on in TDSB. I spent many days teaching my daughter that white people are not bad and that there are bad people everywhere whether black, brown or white. I had to show her videos that show the present day slavery that goes on
in the Sudan and Maurintania etc. The TDSB keep mentioning that America and white people enslaved black people centuries ago but I tell my daughter arab muslims are enslaving the black people today in 2011 and the school never mentions that. I put the blame of all this garbage in the Canadian schools on the Canadian Christians because they are silent and decided to ignore as atheists and islamists are destroying the faith and the traditional values in this country. I fear for my kids because if they keep attending this so called public schools they will be bad and ignorant when they grow up. I am sorry for the Canadian kids but I don’t see any hope because Christians are still ignoring all this and the church is dying here. I am so disappointed of what goes in Canada and in these schools.

JB

You may not agree with his/her Christian position. The criticism of gay and lesbian issues being introduced in the elementary school is not limited to Christians only – Muslims and other cultures are also fiercely critical, although our politically correct elites pretend not to notice the latter. (I wonder how the establishment of a gay club in the Muslim dominated Valley Park School is going to work.)

The main issue raised in the letter is that the school teaches lies about our civilization and tries to accommodate questionable values and traditions. Instilling a feeling of inferiority in white kids is going to scar them for life. This is just as bad as the racism against blacks, which was rampant a few decades ago.

And please note that the author is a parent, who cares about the child and has clear values that he or she tries to convey to her. Not all parents are articulate enough to stand up against the lies – many trust the government-run school system, because supposedly that’s the deal, the parents pay with their taxes and in return the schools must provide superb education.

The schools in Ontario have broken the deal, instead of education, they offer indoctrination provided by ignorant lefties, who spread their insane theories among innocent children.

Yet the merry racists of the Toronto District School Board don’t see anything wrong with that.

Isn’t it time to show them the door?

© 2011 Blogwrath.com

The city government in Edmonton has started a campaign to eradicate racism (H/T Blazingcatfur) with the active participation of the Human Rights Commission of Alberta.

One may think that the noble goal of that enterprise will be to target all forms of racism. However, when you read carefully the materials published online, it is very clear that the campaign targets mostly the white people. The racism is seen as something that only whites practice.

Probably in Alberta they still have few rednecks, who don’t feel guilty over something that somebody in the USA may or may not have done few hundred years ago.

Here is what they said to the stubborn white people:

“Racial “whiteness” is many things, but one of its consistent qualities is power. As people granted unearned privileges by our own whiteness, and as people who have likely harmed non-white people with our own whiteness, it’s our moral and ethical duty to find ways to combat racism.”

It’s clear and simple – if you are white, you are guilty.

And here is how one of those people reacted (although he is not exactly a redneck):

To be fair and honest, I should say that after few angry letters and e-mails, the organizers removed that idiotic text. Yes, there are still few people left in Canada who won’t let anybody walk all over them.

Still, many other anti-racist recommendations are still on the side. One of the important ways to fight racism is through proper pictures:

Visuals. The pictures and other visual representations in our homes should truly be multiracial. Children learn a lot from what they see in their home environment.

Since that requirement is not likely to go away, I wholeheartedly decided to comply with it. Here is the multiracial, multicultural, extremely politically correct poster that now hangs in my living room:

Is it diverse enough? It has them all: Charles Manson, Bob Rae, Mao, Obama, Lizzie Borden, Osama, Jeremiah Wright, Shoko Asahara, Jack Layton, Nancy Pelosi, etc. etc.

I hope it will save me from the Human Rights Police.