Archive for the ‘Social Issues’ Category
Powered by Max Banner Ads
Marc and Connie Fournier run the site Free Dominion. They have been sued several times by people who want to limit free speech on the Internet. They are certainly not rich. These suits could affect everyone of us who write or comment on the Internet. It’s time to help the Fourniers fight suits from people that promote ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’ and the Muslim Brotherhood. Now is the time to fight back.
Toronto Zionist Center
788 Marlee Avenue, Toronto
7:00 P.M. – 9:00 P.M.
For more information call JDL Canada at 416-736-7000 or www.jdl-canada.com
It’s not easy to be Don Cherry. Other than being constantly harassed by his politically correct employer CBC, last month he became a major target of the united transvestite forces, which objected to him receiving a degree from the Canadian military college.
Now those flamboyant attackers have been joined by a powerful reinforcement. I am talking about Raffi, the guy who brands himself the “children’s troubadour”.
He added his voice to the squeaky homosexual chorus, which demands the demise of Cherry and his program. Raffi said:
“He sounds and acts like a bully. That’s not fun and it’s not a good example for the kids who are watching…In this day and age of all the hockey violence, we should be putting a stop to this…there’s absolutely no call for this guy to demean anybody who isn’t into the violence. That’s just really stupid on any level…his act is uncivil and doesn’t belong on our public broadcaster.”
That is the pathetic whining of an effeminate man (despite the beard), to whom anything beyond curling looks like a horrible violence.
I should admit that until the last year I knew very little about him. I remember, years ago, seeing one of his albums in a Columbia House catalogue (do you remember those?) and on the cover he was shown holding a banana as if it was a phone receiver. Weird… At the time I thought he was an Arab.
He actually attracted my attention earlier this year when he endorsed the Canadian boat to Gaza – the pet project of the anti-Semitic Canadian Left. I decided to poke around and find out more about him. For starters, I tried listening to one of his songs on YouTube, but couldn’t take more than 20 seconds of it.
The most astonishing fact that I discovered was that Raffi’s last name was Cavoukian. He wasn’t an Arab, but an Armenian. His family came from Canada from Egypt (he was even born in Cairo). If you are even faintly familiar with history, you may know that one of the worst genocides of the XX century was committed by the Muslim Turks against the Armenians – nearly 1.5 million were killed in 1915. That’s why so many escaped to other countries (like Egypt).
It’s beyond belief that an Armenian will endorse a Muslim terrorist gang, but that’s Raffi’s level. That pathetic lad is ready to endorse any disgusting cause to add another 15 minutes to his fading fame.
It looks like he is the idiot in the family – the others seem decent people. His father and brother are well-known portrait photographers. His sister Ann Cavoukian is Ontario’s Privacy Commissioner. I am curious what her opinion about her dumb brother’s support for Hamas is (but we probably will never know).
It gets even worse – Raffi is closely associated with the old enviro-swindler David Suzuki. They co-wrote in 1992 (with Suzuki’s wife) the so-called Declaration of Interdependence: A Pledge to Planet Earth. It’s a disturbing piece (from psychiatric point of view), in which Suzuki sees himself like some kind of a new Thomas Jefferson, who would restore the harmony among all the species on Earth. Unfortunately, the global warming scam wasn’t developed at the time, so they had to limit the scare mongering just to the ozone layer hole.
It looks like now Raffi has decided to jump on the homosexual bullying wagon – that is expected to be the next big time campaign in Ontario, which they hope to spread all over Canada. It’s a big project, which aims at destroying everything that prevents turning the Canadian boys into effeminate pansies. And besides, with cottage industry that would spring around the issue, Raffi is sure to make quite a few extra bucks.
The game of hockey and people like Don Cherry are the perfect target – they must be blackmailed and discredited. It looks like the final goal is to make boys think that they are unrealized trannies.
And there’s another point to Raffi’s story – you see that his activities are quite diverse. They include Hamas support, anti-Israeli activities, environmentalism, and now a fight against what little masculinity still remains in Canada. However, at the basis of all that lies just one goal – the destruction of our values and our society, which are supposed to be replaced by frightening social experiments imposed on us by “enlightened” artists and clueless liberal arts graduates.
The Western society has never been under such destructive pressure from within. It’s up to us to confront such evil hacks like Raffi, Suzuki and their army of mindless zombies.
© 2011 Blogwrath.com
December 18, 2011
For Immediate Release: Jewish Defence League Open letter to the Jewish Community
The following article written by Bernie Farber Hateful words can hurt is a misguilded attempt to defend the terrible law known as Section 13. The article placates the false left and the author lacks a clear understanding of the new anti Semitism as explained in pipeline_of_hatred . Section 13 is not an effective measure to use against the new anti Semitism but has been used to silence many pro Israel supporters.
The Stephen Roth Institute for the Study of Contemporary Anti-Semitism and Racism at Tel Aviv University, in a new report released in cooperation with the European Jewish Congress, establishes that 2009 was a record year for anti-Semitism. “The year in the wake of Operation Cast Lead was the worst since monitoring of anti-Semitic manifestations began two decades ago in terms of both major anti-Semitic violence and the hostile atmosphere generated worldwide by the mass demonstrations and verbal and visual expressions against Israel and the Jews,” note the institute’s scholars. The anti Jewish campaign was lead by so called ‘progressive’ left wing and radical Islamic groups.
The total number of “violent anti-Semitic incidents” was 1,129, compared to 559 in 2008. That does not include threats, insults, graffiti signs, slogans, “and demonstrations featuring virulently anti-Semitic content.”
What’s more, the institute documents only cases that show “clear anti-Semitic content and intention.” Also, many Jews, fearful of reprisal or skeptical about the outcome, prefer not to file complaints.
“Thus, the number of incidents, both violent and verbal, might actually be far higher than the figures presented here,” write the researchers.
The Roth Institute report is one more worrying reminder that anti-Semitism, the congenital disease afflicting the Jewish people, has metastasized. This new strain is particularly conducive to the currently dominant multicultural environment, especially in western Europe.
As Melanie Phillips reported in The Spectator of London, the key motif in the ³new antisemitism² is ³Holocaust inversion, with the Israelis being demonized as Nazis and the Palestinians regarded as the new Jews. Israel and the Jews are being systematically delegitimised and dehumanized a necessary prelude to their destruction with both Islamists and Western media using anti-Zionism as a fig leaf for prejudices rooted in both medieval Christian and Nazi demonology. This has produced an Orwellian situation in which hatred for the Jews now marches behind the Left¹s banner of anti-racism and human rights, giving rise not merely to distortions, fabrications and slander about Israel in the media but also to mainstream articles discussing the malign power of the Jews over American and world policy.² The Portuguese Nobel prize-winning author Jose Saramago’s suggestion that Israel was guilty of recreating Auschwitz in Ramallah is symptomatic of the current mood. Indeed, comparing the actions of Israel to those of Nazi Germany has become almost de rigueur in Europe. Demonstrators marching through the streets of European capitals and North America today routinely carry placards that label Israeli Leaders as ”the new Hitler”, and call the Israeli response to the terror inflicted on its citizens “genocide”.
It is no coincidence that the present spate of anti-Semitism was triggered by Operation Cast Lead. Nor is it a surprise that the most violent incidents – where identification was possible – were perpetrated by Arabs or by Muslims and that these attacks took place in western Europe, the bastion of multiculturalism.
It is the position of the Jewish Defence League that Section 13 has become an aggressive tool for radical Islam which follows the dictates of the OIC (Organization of Islamic States). In effect, the article written by Bernie Farber does not help the Jewish community defend against the new anti Semitism but rather offers a tool to the OIC in its goal to rid the world of Israel.
The Jewish community needs strong leadership prepared to fight back with new tools against the new form of anti Semitism. This leadership must never placate those very groups that seek to promote the agenda of radical Islam.
With love of Israel,
Meir Weinstein, National Director
Jewish Defence League of Canada
On December 6, 1989, Gamil Ghabri (a.k.a. Marc Lepine) shot and killed 14 women at a Montreal university. It was an action of a deranged individual, a product of an upbringing influenced by the mysogynic and violent character of his Muslim father.
Such events are usually exploited by political extremists of different stripes. The Montreal mass murder wasn’t an exception – it was a God-sent (or rather devil-sent) event to be used by the emerging Canadian militant feminism as an excuse to launch a monstrous men-bashing campaign, which started in 1990 and hasn’t subsided yet. During the campaigns that followed within the next 20 years, the Canadian men learned that they were a despicable bunch of murderers, wife-beaters and spiritual or physical rapists.
The only way men could redeem themselves was to turn into sexless eunuchs (in the 1990’s Michael Moore managed to master that art to perfection). James Bond was out, in was the timid hippy, following his fiery female object of desire, and carrying her heavy bag full of propaganda flyers, tampons, and copies of the S.C.U.M. Manifesto.
Very little has changed since then. This year’s Women Won’t Forget event in Toronto wasn’t much different. The tone was set earlier during the commemoration at Parliament Hill in Ottawa and it was strictly political. Justin, Pierre Trudeau’s dimwitted metrosexual son, firmly stated that the Conservatives were not welcome at the event. Later Nycole Turmel, NDP’s harpy-in-chief, ended her speech hysterically yelling: “Shame! Shame! Shame!” That was supposed to make Harper feel bad about ending the pricey and useless long gun registry.
Toronto had its own controversy – when the Jewish Defence League stated that they would take part in the event, they received a letter from the University of Toronto kindly telling them to get lost (h/t BCF):
“Dear JDL Canada,
It has come to our attention that your website indicates you are planning to host an event next Tuesday, December 6th in Philosopher’s Walk. The property in question is owned by the University and is not available for groups to book. As well, Philosopher’s Walk will be the site of the annual Women Won’t Forget candlelight vigil on the same date at the memorial location.
I would kindly insist that you relocate your event and not use Philosopher’s Walk.
Director, Office of Space Management
University of Toronto
McMurrich Building, 4th Floor
12 Queen’s Park Crescent West
Nice, eh? Those people are sophisticated – although it remains a mystery how the group of Women Won’t Forget managed to book the place, if it is not available for groups to book.
Another thing you shouldn’t forget is that the Office of Space Management kindly provides plenty of space to Canada’s largest annual anti-Semitic event – the Israeli Apartheid Week. For some reason, anti-Semites are more than welcome at the University, while the Jews are not.
JDL found it necessary to explain the situation:
“Dear Steve Bailey,
The Women Won’t Forget candlelight vigil is a public event. I believe it is important for the public to attend. JDL is part of a multi faith coalition that respects and supports events for Dec 6th. The victims of Marc Lepine should be remembered. We are asking our supporters to attend and light a candle.
National Director Jewish Defence League of Canada”
If you think that a civilized explanation was enough, think again. When the JDL members appeared at the event wearing their white ribbons, they were confronted by a bunch of angry young people with hippy-sign pins (the kind we saw at Occupy Toronto), although the one with the goofy Tibetan hat looked quite absent-minded.
The Jews were subjected to a humiliating lecture by a blonde leftard woman, who, with a condescending and contemptuous tone told them that they will be kicked out if they speak loudly, chant or do anything else feminazis don’t like. She even went as far as to state that she visited JDL’s website and considered it racist. The male feminazis surrounding her looked at us with a silent reproach (“How dare you disturb our man-hating sanctuary?”).
As soon as we got into the “sanctuary”, we were handed programs for the event. I should say that one of the organizers said in her speech that even though this was a non-political event, they had to mention favourably Jack Layton, who used to come there before and stand with them in the cold (as if the other men standing in the cold don’t count). Jack’s cult was prominently reflected in the program. They had on the first page a quote from his fake testimony (“Love is better than anger, hope is…” etc., etc.).
I understand their infatuation with Jack – he has wasted millions of dollars of taxpayers’ money to finance useless leftist organizations and programs. But at the same time he and his wife Olivia swindled the Toronto housing authority out of thousands of dollars by living in subsidized housing while making large amounts of money as city councillors (I guess when lefties steal it means noble redistribution of wealth).
And that’s not all – the feminazis chose to forget that Jack was also a low-life philanderer, who got caught by the police with an Asian hooker at a massage parlour. I would like to remind them that feminists were those who alarmed us about the human trafficking – such women are lured from Asia with false promises for jobs and end up being abused by pimps solely because sex-deprived losers like Jack Layton are willing to pay for their services.
What brings even more hilarity to using “Whorehouse Jack” Layton as an inspiration is the fact that the entire last page of the program includes a large quote from Eve Ensler (of The Vagina Monologues fame).
“I am over this rape culture where the privileged with political and physical and economic might, take what and who they want, when they want it, as much as they want, any time they want it
I am over the endless resurrection of the careers of rapists and sexual exploiters – film directors, world leaders, corporate executives, movie stars, athletes – while the lives of the women they violated are permanently destroyed, often forcing them to live in social and emotional exile.
I am over years and years of being over rape.
And thinking about rape every day of my life since I was 5-year-old.
Well, let’s ignore the fact that “Ms.” Ensler is a paranoid psychopath, who sees rape everywhere (probably that’s why the Women Won’t Forget feminazis use her writings to promote their men-hating crusade). Talking of rape in her writings, it’s worth mentioning that a part of her main opus, titled The Little Coochie Snorcher that Could (in its original performance) included a rape scene, in which a 24-year-old woman used alcohol to lower the inhibitions of a 13-year-old girl whom she raped. Ensler even found it important to include in the end a monologue of that grown-up girl, in which she mentioned nostalgically the rape, which supposedly helped her grow as a woman. Apparently, homosexual rape is always a good rape.
However, if you take seriously Ensler’s ramblings, there is no way to miss the point that St. Jack neatly fits into the gallery of horrible enemies of women she describes. He is the politician, who uses his “might” to exploit sexually third-world women, whose lives are destroyed by the traffickers, who bring them here to satisfy the sexual appetite of people like him (he even used his influence to cover up the incident for years).
Were the organizers that dumb that they failed to make that connection or did they think the attendees wouldn’t read the program?
Other than that, the event proceeded according to the classical lefty standards. I spotted a guy (a miniature version of Michael Moore) holding a sign stating among other things: “We love trans women.” There was the obligatory Native introduction with two women wailing a traditional song (not surprisingly, the Native women abuse on the reserves wasn’t mentioned at all). We listened to few narrative poets, who didn’t think too high of men. Even Harper didn’t get away – they condemned him for scrapping the long gun registry. One of the speakers said it was important to keep it, because 80% of the crimes against women were committed with shotguns. That was a despicable lie, but everybody cheered, because that’s what they are supposed to do when Harper’s name is mentioned.
The evening’s bombshell was the appearance of two women (an Indian and a Muslim), who in their talks presented some very real and tangible problems. I am not sure how they could infiltrate that post-modern-structuralist-deconstructing-feminist-otherness event. But they clearly raised the issue of the culturally-based violence (with emphasis on the honour killings). Unfortunately, they had to suppress the fact that those killings are most common among Muslims (but obviously you can’t reveal the whole truth at a feminazi event).
All in all, it was a depressing event, not just because of the memory of the killed women. The main feeling of depression came from the sorry state of the Canadian feminism, which the organizers supposedly spoke for.
Long time ago, the feminism was represented by larger-than-life figures, who fought for true equality of women. Today, the movement has deteriorated into a sect of cranky pseudo-intellectual lesbians, who do their best to shun the problems of the ordinary women. Instead, they proudly manifest their anti-Semitism, defend the niqab, the most barbaric Muslim garment, and are happy to degrade and insult men.
At the same time, they have no problem enlisting the weird Eve Ensler and the philandering Jack Layton as their moral authorities.
It is sad to watch the agony of a once great movement…
© 2011 Blogwrath.com
Strange are the ways in which the Canadian Army works.
When you look at what its commanders promote, you may think that they have resolved all the tasks they have in defending our country and there are few marginal issues to be looked after. Two months ago they invested serious effort into promoting the non-existent Muslim contributions during the Islamic History Months. And that happened in times when our country is at war with the Islamic fundamentalists.
Now a new “pressing” issue has been addressed. The army issued a new policy that details how it should accommodate the transsexual and transvestite troops. Even the activists, who are staunch supporters of such a policy, admit that very few of the tiny Canadian Army fall into those two categories.
The policy promises privacy, respect and understanding to those who are confused about their sexuality. Forgive me for saying that, but such considerations are more fitting in a Victorian all-girl finishing school, where the girls have all the time they need to question their complicated feelings.
The last I checked, the army is an institution that is supposed to defend us from enemies, who try to destroy us. It may not be the best place for a sensitive transvestite who is struggling to define his or her complicated attitude toward sexuality.
Somehow I don’t see the Muslim savages that the army is fighting in Afghanistan as appreciative of those “complex” issues. The army has always been, still is, and always will be a rough environment, where the consequences of your actions are a matter of life and death. No amount of wishful politically correct thinking is going to change that. Such delusions will actually give an enormous advantage to the enemies of the West, who are not shackled by any type of political correctness.
Did the government solve all the problems of the soldiers who come back wounded and maimed? How about showing compassion and helping the family of those who have been killed? Should the transvestite accommodation really be at the top of the current army agenda? I don’t need to give you an answer; everybody can see that most of that hasn’t been resolved.
Actually, that has been tried before (although only in TV Land). Is this the scary future of our army?
“Freedom of speech is an American concept, so I don’t give it any value.”
Dean Steacy, one of the CHRC’s lead investigators
The statement above, which comes from the Human Rights Commission, should resolve the free speech issue in Canada once and for all. After all, they are the ultimate arbiter on that issue. However, there are few annoying little bugs, who refuse to be subjugated by the Commission’s wisdom. One of them is the blogger Blazingcatfur, who is currently sued by a “prominent Canadian lawyer” for expressing his views. On December 1 JDL-Canada organized a Chanukah party to raise money for his defense.
So maybe we should ask: is it that important to spend money to fight the case? Wouldn’t it had been easier if he just stopped publishing his blog?
The short answer is that defending what he is doing is vitally important to all of us.
To give a detailed answer, I should begin with the statement that the current situation in Canada is strikingly similar to the situation in the communist countries in the 1980’s. Although freedom of speech was written down as an inalienable right in the Constitution of the country where I came from, in reality it didn’t exist.
There were no censors and theoretically you could publish anything you want. However, if anything even remotely deviated from the Party line, it was reported immediately (everybody had the duty to do so). That put into motion the scary government machine. Those were not the Stalin’s times, so nobody got shot, but the magazine or the book with the offending material were confiscated and destroyed and everybody involved in the publication was either fired or demoted. In addition, you could lose some of the socialist “perks”: they could strike you out of the 10-year government waiting list for the coveted Lada (“the best car of the socialist camp”). And you could forget about that trip to Czechoslovakia, because the police would deny your application for “international passport supplement” (trips to the “semi-capitalist” Yugoslavia and the rotten West were out of the question). Read the rest of this entry »
Free speech in Canada is a rare commodity. Although guaranteed by Trudeau’s Charter, the same politicians who introduced it made sure that it doesn’t go to far beyond the Liberal Party’s agenda.
A certain Canadian lawyer, who shall remain unnamed for obvious reasons (I would identify him as balding and I hope revealing that fact is not considered libel) has started a personal crusade against speech he doesn’t like. Oops, crusade wasn’t the right politically correct term. He started a personal initiative against those who may intentionally or unintentionally offend or inconvenience a certain real or imaginary group of people or make that group think that they might be inconvenienced in the future or the speech in question may suggest that they should have been inconvenienced in the past.
Okay, my clumsy attempt to define the possible charges according to Section 13 of the Human Right Code and the corresponding sections of the Penal Code show how difficult it is to survive under those vague legal “definitions” when your “free” speech doesn’t fit the official agenda.
It is a shame, but with the current laws in Canada everybody can be charged for speaking their mind.
Well, this time that certain lawyer has gone after a prominent Canadian blogger, who is one of those thinking that free speech is still real. He is Blazingcatfur. People like him are representatives of the missing breed of the investigative reporter in Canadian media. Of course the mainstream media in Canada doesn’t need such people, we all live here in a multicultural paradise and every weird behaviour is just a nice piece of the rich tapestry of the multicultural madness.
However, for a very large number of people who pay the taxes that finance multiculturalism and are branded racists if they question the sanity of that situation, it is important to have somebody that can tell the truth.
Silencing people like Blazingcatfur is a travesty that if expanded will bring an end to our values and eventually to our civilization.
If you think that you prefer the traditional Canada as a home to individuals who work together and respect each other, as opposed to turning it into a medieval society, where the social problems are resolved by stoning and cutting off limbs, you may attend an event in support of Blazingcatfur.
It is organized by the Jewish Defense League of Canada and it will take place on December 1 at the Toronto Zionist Centre (788 Marlee Avenue).
There will be good food, a great opportunity to meet Blazingcatfur and make yourself a part of defending something that is bigger than you (and that’s free speech)…
What shall we do with all those billionaires? Do we have to exterminate them (financially) or can we use them in any way?
Those were the questions, which the student members of the Hart House Debate Club (University of Toronto) pondered during their session earlier this month. As a supreme arbiter they had invited Linda McQuaig, a (very) liberal columnist from Toronto Star.
The theme about whether billionaires are menace to society was discussed from two opposing points of view. The students were well prepared and had to speak extremely fast to fit into the short minutes allocated to each speech.
The first side stated that they are a menace. Their vast wealth buys politicians through campaign donations, because with the current practices in the election campaigns, you cannot be elected without money. Power corrupts – the politicians, who gained their positions through the rich, continue to serve them. Even the judges become corrupt as it was shown in the way Enron was treated in the courts.
Universities are also controlled through wealth. They should be subsidized by the government instead. Billionaires should not have the power they have now, because it is not deserved. For example, those who make billions trading currency should not be entitled to the power given by profits.
The other side defended the opinion that billionaires are important, because they donate money. Tax money is not enough for the different ventures and initiatives, so the gap is filled by billionaires. The money that Peter Munk donated to create the Munk School of Global Affairs is an example. Another one are the Warren Buffett contributions to the AIDS research. For the universities the money received from the government is not enough. It is also wrong to assume that the billionaires always win politically – example of that was Meg Whitman’s gubernatorial campaign in California, which she lost.
Then Linda McQuaig was called to resolve the conundrum.