Posts Tagged ‘Canada’
Powered by Max Banner Ads
Yesterday the Toronto pride week culminated in the annual gay parade. The mainstream media go again through their annual ritual trying to convince us that over a million people attended the parade and countless Torontonians dropped everything to line up in anticipation along Yonge Street.
It’s true that many parents brought their children, who were treated to a shocking spectacle of depravity. The media would never admit that – to them the event was a display of our “diversity.” I am sure that all “progressive” politicians who attended agree with the media point.
In the NDP and the Liberal Party the depravity has become a norm. Our thieving Premier Kathleen Wynne, who continues to lie and destroy the province, fits perfectly into that display of perversion. Justin Trudeau also felt like fish in water among his homosexual base. As of Tom Mulcair and Olivia Chow, they felt even better at the event, because in their party’s platform the fringe groups are a major tool for subduing the productive majority.
For writing on the homosexual issues, I am often called “homophobic” (what a dumb term). I should point out that I have no fear of men (that’s what the term means) and if I accept the validity of the other meaning, I can say that I am neither “homophobic” nor “homophilic.” I support the right of the homosexuals to practice their activities in bathhouses, gay bars or other confined spaces, if those activities involve well-informed consenting adults.
However, when children get involved or the truth of the self-destructive gay lifestyle is suppressed, that changes the game. Earlier this year the Christian activist Bill Whatcott was convicted of hate speech in Canada for pointing out in a flyer that the homosexuals are much more likely to contract AIDS. Maybe the US Center for Disease Control should be branded “homophobic” for confirming that fact in their statistics. The HIV infections among the homosexuals are much higher than among the rest of the population:
The proposed teaching of homosexuality in the Ontario schools as a harmless “alternative” lifestyle ignores those issues. Having at the parade old naked men flaunting their junk in front of children is not helping the homosexual “acceptance” either. The last I checked, indecent exposure is still a crime under Canada’s Criminal Code. But in Canada homosexuals are above the law, otherwise it would be difficult to explain why the police shield homosexual perverts and ignores the interests of children.
Other than promoting perversion, the organizers of the gay parade have no problem with anti-Semitism. They did everything possible to ensure that the notorious anti-Semitic group Queers against Israeli Apartheid is a major part of the program – with sponsoring their Jew-bashing lecture (post about the event is here; lecture video here; questions and answers session here) and allowing them to march in two parades. Homosexuals often boast that they are more intelligent than the rest of us, but it’s hard to believe that they accept without any criticism the blackmail against Israel (the only country in the Middle East where the homosexuals have full rights) and ignore the Muslim countries where they are killed.
Every time I write about what really happens at the gay parade, I am accused by the pink brigade that I lie and their event oozes love, diversity and family values. That’s why now I have a video, in which everybody can see what kind of values the children attending that pervfest were exposed to.
Before the parade started I spotted Justin Trudeau and Kathleen Wynne. They were going out of their way to demonstrate that they were homosexual people’s people.
Large corporations and unions were overrepresented on the floats at the parade (you can see them in the video). It was hard to reconcile the anti-corporate and anti-capitalist rhetoric of many marching groups with the large donations accepted from those corporations to finance that freak show.
The revolutionary spirit was also expressed in the appearances of the Toronto District School Board (main promoter of Marxism and homosexuality) and the various teachers’ unions.
In their teaching materials promoting “diversity” the TDSB always urged kids to attend the gay parade and choose pictures that express its spirit. Here are some pictures that express the homosexual spirit:
Nothing is going to create a better empathy to homosexualism than a bunch of ugly men flashing kids with their penises.
As a part of overcoming the “traditional prejudices,” mocking religion was an essential part of the homosexual parade. We saw a mock Pope and Anglican Bishop, but a mock Mohammed was strangely absent from the displays. Obviously, the homosexual cowards are really too scared to make fun of a religion that can REALLY hurt them.
As I already mentioned, the QuAIA anti-Semites were well represented, expressing the values of the organizers of the homosexual freak fest. They carried many signs calling for boycott of the gay tourism to Israel. Although I am in awe of their revolutionary fervour, I find it hard to believe that the Israeli economy depends on a tiny percentage of perverts who go to Israel for sex.
They definitely won’t be able to cruise Kabul or Tehran, if they ignore Israel. The only beneficiary might be the ladyboy industry of Thailand.
Of course, the anti-Semitic homosexual freaks had nothing to say about the Iranian gay group that marched after them. It was too inconvenient to face people who are really angry about how Muslim fanaticism treats them.
In contrast, the homosexuals from the Ismaili sect of Islam were as delusional as QuAIA, saying that they somehow can make their lifestyle acceptable to Islam. Acceptance of homosexuality is out of the question in Islam and when their imams see the signs they were carrying, the only thing to guess is whether they’ll be moderately or extremely pissed off at statements like: “Allah Is My Ally” and “Allah Is an Equal-Opportunity Lover.”
There were only two redeeming features of the event. The first one was that, because of Muslim hostility, there was no halal food and pork was abundant at the food stalls. The other redeeming feature of that madness was the presence of dogs. Seeing there those noble animals, which don’t lie and manipulate, made the experience a little bit more bearable.
Like every year, I heard again the story about how the gay parade was started as an event that would bring about the gay rights. The parade now is redundant, because the gay rights in Canada have been achieved long time ago.
Yet the parade continues and it becomes more aggressive in its depravity and in the way it blackmails politicians. Rob Ford, the Mayor of Toronto, is ridiculed and belittled every year for choosing not to participate. And he has been persecuted mercilessly by the Toronto “homophilic” media. If you don’t accept unconditionally the disgusting perverts you saw in the pictures and the video, you are not fit to occupy a public office.
At least that’s what the mighty homosexual lobby wants us to accept. If you don’t agree with them, your life will be ruined like the life of Bill Whatcott or that poor Mississauga real estate agent, who was fired by ReMAX for supporting the traditional family in his newsletter. No matter how they try to look acceptable, their behaviour is repulsive and disgusting.
I know that not all homosexuals share the bullying tactics of their activists and want to live their lives like everybody else, but the activist bullies would be out of job if they quit doing what they do now. They have no other way of supporting themselves than extortion and hatred.
Isn’t it time to retire the disgusting show named gay parade, whose only purpose is to provoke confrontation, and enjoy the freedoms that we all have?
© 2013 Blogwrath.com
The Doctor of Death, whom the Canadian Left delicately praised as a “difficult hero,” finally died. It looks fitting that his Wikipedia biography is illustrated with a photo of him with Jack Layton.
Leftists like Whorehouse Jack, who consistently and ferociously attacked the traditional values, made it possible to benefit from legalized murder. Slimeballs like Morgentaler took a full advantage of the newly established contempt for human life and became millionaires in the process.
Recently the American abortionist Kermit Gosnell was convicted of several murders. The materials of the trials read like a script for a horror movie, but the media chose to ignore the trial. Here in Canada we have no abortion law at all, so obviously anything goes. The media won’t touch that issue, neither will the “conservative” Harper. For now, the horrors lurking in the clinics of Morgentaler and other like him remain hidden.
One of my readers, The Lone Ranger, sent me a piece he wrote about Morgentaler. It deals in part with his shady past. The “Holocaust survivor” angle has always been a huge part of the marketing of Morgentaler’s image. I have always found it repulsive to exploit a catastrophe in order to promote a person with questionable credential and values and make him look like a hero, who is beyond reproach.
Here is The Lone Ranger’s article:
As everyone in Canada now knows, Henry Morgentaler, the man who brought the culture of death called abortion to Canada, died on March 29th at his luxurious home in Toronto from an apparent heart attack. He was 90 years of age. He became enormously wealthy by establishing several abortion clinics around the country, leading his crusade under “women’s health rights.” An estimated three million or more children are dead because of Morganteler, who had performed at least 80,000 of those abortions personally. And we wonder why we can’t sustain our population?
Yet, in spite of the controversy surrounding this man, he was given the highest civilian award in the land, supported by arch feminists, Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin and Governor General Michaelle Jean. The Order of Canada was designed to reward individual Canadians whose achievements would bring Canadians together. However, this award is now nothing more than a worthless piece of junk, stained with the blood of millions of dead Canadian children, whose lives were snuffed out in the name of ‘choice.’ Morgentaler’s abortion clinics have raked in an estimated $11 million since they started operating in 1988. Needless to say, this is far more money than he could have ever dreamed of making if he had remained a hard working family doctor in Montreal. The man who allegedly survived two Nazi death camps was known as a militant atheist and dyed-in the-wool socialist had only one god; money. But my question is, did he really survive two Nazi death camps?
The Nazis tattooed serial numbers on the arms of all Jewish prisoners as they entered the concentration camps as slave labour. Morgentaler’s number was apparently 95077, but it wasn’t tattooed on his arm. Apparently the Nazis were “rushed”, which I find hard to believe. Yet this number seems to be way too low numerically speaking. According to the Toronto Star and the CBC, Morgentaler spent five years, almost the entire duration of World War Two, in two Nazi concentration camps.
However, according to other published sources, he was first indentured in the Jewish ghetto of Lodz, Poland (where he was born in 1923) from 1939-1944. Morgentaler, his mother and brother are eventually shipped to the Auschwitz concentration camp after the death of the family patriarch. Morgentaler and his brother are eventually moved to Dachau, where they remain until 1945. So his time in actual concentration camps spanned a year and a few months, and not the five years as claimed by his supporters.
Henryk Mandelbaum, another Polish Jew who also arrived at Auschwitz on April 10, 1944, had a tattooed number 181970. This means that Morgentaler did not have his number tattooed on his arm, even though he was an earlier arrival than Mandelbaum and others who were still tattooed by the “rushed” Nazis. During his months in the camp, Mandelbaum witnessed the death of some of the 400,000 Jews brought in transports from Hungary in the summer of 1944, and handled their dead bodies. He does not remember Morgentaler, although he would have been hard to miss in that kind of environment. If Morgentaler was lying, the only way he could have gotten away with this fabrication would be if Germans were to recycle their numbers. However, they did not do so with Jewish prisoners.
Indeed, some records were recovered from Auschwitz and reveal 297 finds of numbers in the 95xxx range. Many entries indicate that those prisoners died in March or April of 1943. Some were shot dead on 19 of February of 1943, others were shot after an escape attempt on 13 February of 1943.
Here’s how the Nazi concentration camp numbers worked:
Henry Morgentaler claims that his prisoner number was 95077. The first (Jewish) name on that list starts with “Ab” and has the assigned number of 95043. Another name started with “Pu” and had number 95103, assigned to it.
Morgentaler starts with “Mo” and he claims that his prisoner number was 95077. It does make sense as M falls between A and P in German alphabet. So was Morgentaler telling the truth about his time at Auschwitz? Here’s what I found:
Thirteen year-old Abramek Morgentaler (no relation to Henry) lost his whole family, including his mother and three sisters in Chelm concentration camp. He was later sent to Auschhwitz as a labourer and survived to see the end of the war. In 2008, when Henry Morgentaler was receiving his Order of Canada, Abramek Morgentaler was 81 years of age and living in Israel.
Morgentaler also claimed to have been a trained and licenced physician. But again, certain facts about his past cast doubt on this:
According to Henry Morgentaler’s self-report to International Red Cross he married Chava Rosenfarb in 1949 in Belgium. Given that Chava Rosenfarb returned to Belgium sometime after March of 1948 it is quite unlikely that Henry Morgentaler showed up in some time after March of 1948 immediately after leaving Marbur/Lahn on August 4, 1947. Henia Reinhartz in her memoir describes the hard economic conditions of her family while waiting in Belgium for immigration to Canada and she never mentions anything about Henry studying medicine while in Belgium. Given Henry Morgentaler’s late arrival in Belgium, his lack of language skills and lack of money it seems impossible that he was in a position to enter University of Brussels supported by his wife’s family working two jobs just to stay afloat.
Henry Morgentaler arrived in Canada in February of 1950 and he graduated from University of Montreal school of Medicine in 1953. It takes six years of medical studies in order to get a medical degree today, and this was no different in 1950. There is no record that can confirm that Henry Morgentaler finished high school in Lodz Ghetto during WWII. Since Henry lied about his studies of medicine in Germany to journalist Heather Mallick, it is more than possible that he also lied to University of Montreal officials in order to obtain academic credits for three years of medical studies he never attended. Worse still, Morgentaler brought a culture of death to Canada that enabled him to destroy the grandchildren of the men who liberated the death camps in 1944.
Going back to Morgentaler’s Order of Canada, I recall when feminist Judy Rebick, the outspoken former president of the National Action Committee on the Status of Women, described the award to Morgentaler as long overdue and the reaction from the pro-life supporters as “predictable.”
“Dr. Morgentaler has contributed a tremendous amount to Canadian society and the only reason he hasn’t got an Order of Canada until now is because all of the noise that the anti-choice cause,” she told the Toronto Star.
Really? How interesting that feminists like Ms. Rebick remain silent on gendercide, a practice that sees millions of unborn baby girls murdered every year because of their gender. But the feminazis were never really known for their critical thinking skills anyway. And as for women who tell me that a woman’s choice to have an abortion is “none of my business;” well, you’re dead wrong on that one, lady. I work for a living. I pay my taxes. I obey the law.
If some broad gets knocked up without using any kind of birth control, then goes to some house of horror to get the life sucked out of her body paid for via healthcare – and at MY expense – then I have a problem with that. Back in 1980s when people like Morgentaler and his supporters demanded that abortion be legalized specifically for victims of rape and incest, they lied. Big time. Today, Canada has 100,000+ abortions every year, and almost all of those abortion procedures are performed as a form of birth control. Victims of rape and incest don’t even register in those numbers. Perhaps, tellingly, Morgentaler stated publicly that he had an insatiable craving for the affection of women. The Nazi survivor story may have been entirely concocted to elicit sympathy from women, and might cast him in a more respectable light in some eyes, i.e., victim-hero rather than killer-coward.
Morgentaler is dead. His fame, his wealth, his Order of Canada and his gushing extremist-feminist supporters cannot help him now. And I rather doubt that he is in the same place where the countless souls of the precious children whose bodies he tore apart in their mother’s wombs now rest; in the presence of Almighty God.
On May 21 I attended a lecture titled “Alarming Truths: Subversion and Security Threats to Our Society” delivered by the US strategic policy and intelligence expert Clare Lopez, a former operations officer with the CIA (the event was organized by Toronto’s Speakers Action Group).
It wasn’t a cheery event – the whole point of the lecture was to explain the threats we are facing as a society and to warn that many of us choose to ignore them at our own peril. There was something ominous in the dark picture of imminent danger painted by Clare Lopez through dozens of facts. That ominous feeling took a shape the next day when two Muslim savages beheaded a British soldier in London. It showed the inevitable result of our refusal to deal with the threats.
Clare Lopez covered most of the same topics that Pamela Geller talked in Toronto over a week ago. However, the delivery was very different – they spoke about the same Islamic cancer, but Pamela talked with the emotion of a family member discussing the cancer of a relative. Clare, on the other hand, sounded more like a physician clinicly describing the advancement of the same cancer, but of course the troubling impact on the listeners was the same.
She specifically stated that all the facts she shared were publicly accessible (for those willing to look for them), there was nothing classified.
Clare said in the beginning that the main problem we deal with is one of the basic pillars of Islam – jihad. It is the foundation of the activities of the “axis of jihad” – Iran, Hezbollah and al-Qaeda. Jihad is an obligatory action for all Muslims everywhere and in every era, which will end only when all the world is under Allah rule alone.
A lot has been written to figure out what we have done to deserve the Muslim hatred. Writers and journalists have been looking for years to find our shortcomings as a society. The sad truth is that the reason is our very existence, they see a dangerous influence of the free societies, which stands in the way of the universal Caliphate and shariah law. Jihad , as a tool of that offensive, is global, organized and encompasses nation states and sub-national groups. The mission is to overthrow non-shariah governments by force, targeting all “enemies” regardless of there they are. There is absolutely nothing we can do to accommodate Muslims demands other than complete surrender.
Islamists had always been very open about those goals. Al-Zawahiri said shortly after Obama was elected that he will be facing a jihadi awakening Renaissance, which is shaking the foundations of the Muslim world.
The threat is complex, dangerous and affects the whole world. In order to confront it, a long-term counter jihad strategy is urgently required. It should include education, understanding, and acknowledgement and will not be effective without an integrated international socio-political plan covering all diplomatic, economic, intelligence, legal, and military aspects of the problem.
At this time in history the main forces pushing jihad are Iran, Hezbollah, and Al-Qaeda, which work very actively and their attack is imminent in North America, as the intelligence sources show.
The jihad indoctrination starts at an early age. It is common to teach Muslim children at schools and mosques to hate. Clare Lopez gave an example with curriculum from a Toronto Imam that taught jihad warfare and Islamic Jew-hatred. Sayyid Muhammad Rizvi supports interfaith dialogue and at the same time demands death for apostasy and child marriage. The curriculum is derived directly from the Koran, Sunna, and sharia. That is the result of multiculturalism and cultural relativism.
There was a similar case at Lady Evelyn Alternative School (Ottawa), which used Farsi language textbooks authorized by the Iranian Ministry of Education. They glorified child ‘martyrdom’ and anti-Semitism. What must be done in such cases? Many people, even Muslims, have taken notice and reported that curriculum to school boards and the RCMP.
That extremist Muslim infection has affected even the government institutions. Recently free speech has been under fire in Canada: on May 13 a speech by Pamela Geller at Thornhill Synagogue was cancelled by the rabbi after York police threatened his chaplain position. The officer who did that was responsible for diversity, equity and inclusion, yet that didn’t include free speech.
The accusations against Pamela Geller were totally baseless. Lopez said that it’s enough to recall Aqsa Pervez (the Canadian honour killing victim) and what Pamela did in her memory. Even though her initiative for a memorial was refused because ISNA owns all plots in Meadowvale Cemetery in Brampton, Ontario, the memorial was finally placed in a lovely grove in Israel.
CAIR-Canada is one of the main organizations battling for shariah in Canada. In November 2012, CAIR-Canada’s Amira Elghawaby (author, journalist, teacher, and Muslim Brotherhood operative) urged Muslims to use the Canadian multiculturalism and non-discrimination laws to defeat the Canadian secular legal system and insinuate shariah instead.
We are the target – the Islamic jihad presence throughout the Americas reflects Iranian regime policy to export revolution. That happened over many years and through several organizations. In 1980s-1990s Hezbollah rode vector of Lebanese Shiite emigration to South America. In the 2000s Iran’s diplomatic initiatives opened new opportunities for terror ties to cartels, gangs, and organized crime. The threat is not hypothetical, it is mature, robust, and is here now.
Iran is the focus of tension and threat across the Middle East through many different actions: nuclear weapons program; terror sponsorship; genocide threats vs. Israel; arming, funding, training Iraqi terror; narcotics trade and Taliban support in Afghanistan.
Its purpose is to influence Western governments, buy time for a nuclear program, increase geopolitical influence, and confront Israel. Its immediate objectives in the USA are to avoid harsh, coercive measures or attack; remove sanctions and unfreeze assets (imposed under the Iran Sanctions Act of 2008); remove terror designations (IRGC, banks); gain recognition, status for the regime without offering any concessions.
One of its tools is the Supreme Council for Iranians Living Abroad, formed in 2000, headed by the Iranian President. The goal is to win academic sympathizers; law enforcement; local Arab, Lebanese and Muslim communities; National security agencies; media and mosques. In Canada Iran has a fifth column, which operates in the information battle space and attempts to control educational institutions like the already mentioned Toronto East End Madrassah and the Ottawa Lady Evelyn Alternative School.
The Iranian ‘outreach’ in Canada also includes influence operations targeting the Iranian diaspora, and the Toronto Center for Iranian Studies, which was an Iranian front facility. It is suspected that Hamid Mohammadi, Iranian ‘cultural counselor’, likely had other “responsibilities”.
Al-Qaeda also has its presence in Canada. The recently uncovered VIA Rail terror plot, sponsored by the Al-Qaeda Shura Council in Iran, was preceded in August 2010 by the Ottawa parliament terror plot and earlier in 2006 by the Toronto 18. The accused in the railway attack plot (which the US media ignored) Chiheb Esseghaier and Raed Jasser worked for the Al-Qaeda Shura Council in Iran. Essenghaier declared in court he did not recognize Canadian law, but only shariah.
There is a strong evidence of an Al-Qaeda – Iran alliance. Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri met the top Iranian leadership in Sudan in 1991. Bin Laden met Imad Mughniyah (prominent Iranian intelligence operative active in Hezbollah) in Iran and Sudan – wanted his explosives expertise. Iran tasked Mughniyah and Hezbollah to train Al-Qaeda. Later al-Zawahiri established personal relationship with the Iranian intelligence and the Qods force. The 9/11 Commission implicated Mughniyah and Iran in the 9/11 attacks. The 9/11 hijackers transited Beirut and Iranian territory; Mughniyah shared a flight with some of them from South America to Beirut in November 2000.
That developed a jihad alliance – Osama bin Laden was impressed with the Beirut bombings and the suicide bomber concept. According to the 9/11 Commission Report, the IRGC/Qods Force, Hezbollah/Mughniyeh set up 11 training camps for explosives training. The ties between Iran and Sudan expanded to Somalia – the alliance was behind the Somali warlord Aideed in 1993.
The same report also stated: “In October 2000, a senior operative of Hezbollah [Imad Mughniyah] visited Saudi Arabia to coordinate activities there. He also planned to assist individuals in Saudi Arabia in traveling to Iran during November. A top Hezbollah commander [Mughniyah] and Saudi Hezbollah contacts were involved.”
The Iran connection was confirmed by a court in the little-known Havlish Case. It was started by widows of people who perished in the 9/11 attack, who were not satisfied with the government’s investigation. Clare Lopez was an expert witness in the case. The government tried to cover up the proceedings, two of the witnesses were threatened and had to be taken to safety until the end of the trial.
Despite that, in December 2011 Judge George Daniels, Southern District NY, ruled that Iran provided “direct and material support” to Al-Qaeda in the 9/11 attack. The mainstream media completely ignored the findings.
IRGC and Qods Force, which deal with the Islamic expansion, have their role codified in the Iranian constitution as defenders of the revolution and in charge of the expansion abroad. They control all weapons of mass destruction, like nuclear arms and missiles. They have extensive liaisons abroad and own a large segment of Iran’s economy (over 30%). They have played a key role in the Iran-Iraq war due to their fervor and ideological fanaticism.
They and the IRGC comander Jafari directly command the Hezbollah terror cells. Qods Force has a global mission implemented by its 21,000 personnel.
Another player in Iran’s jihad is VEVAK – an intelligence institution with a wide reach. They have a virtual carte blanche on tactics and are provided with practically unlimited funds. VEVAK is under the Ministry of Intelligence and Security, but that is a ministry only in name, it is under the direct control of the Supreme Leader. It has a secret budget and no legal accountability. Up to 30,000 officers and support staff work for it, it is one of the largest in the Middle East. It’s responsible for protecting the regime and dealing with enemies (through assassinations, terror, and kidnappings).
Hezbollah is an arm of those organizations. It used to receive about $1 Billion a year after 9/11, now the amount they get is less. The Iranians operate smuggling networks for arms, drugs, explosives and use the embassies diplomatic pouches. Hezbollah is under direct Iranian control and funding.
That is clear from their political platform (February 1985):
“We view the Iranian regime as the vanguard and a new nucleus of the leading Islamic state in the world. We abide by the orders of one single wise and just leadership, represented by “Wali Faqih” and personified by Khomeini… Whoever offends the Muslims, offends in fact the body of our Umma, and we shall therefore endeavor to stand up against this threat, guided by a legitimate ruling and an all-embracing political doctrine determined by the leader, i.e. Wilayat al-Faqih.”
Hezbollah is an immediate threat. They work with Al-Qaeda, Iran, (what was known as) KGB, the North Koreans, narco traffickers, organized crime, and Syria. They also deal with explosives research and development, training, money laundering, weapons smuggling, and forged documents. They have a long rap sheet of terror before Al-Qaeda appeared and joint terror missions after that.
Other than the current leaders, like Nasralla, who have deep connections with Iran – it is necessary to mention again Mughniya, who was their most effective terror operative. He was assassinated by Mossad in Damascus in February 2008. For 30 years he was the head of Iran’s worldwide terror operations. 9/11 commission implicated Iran in attacks in part because of Mughniya’s involvement. Hezbollah promised revenge for his death.
In 2003 the former CIA Director George Tenet testified that 12 Hezbollah cells were operating in the USA. Hezbollah has sleeper cells in Canada. In June 2008 the US and Canadian intelligence warned that the Hezbollah sleeper cells had been activated. Their purpose is to strike Jewish targets in revenge for Mughniya’s killing.
Hezbollah is also increasing its presence in South America through support of criminal groups and anti-American regimes.
Under the regime of Hugo Chavez they widened their presence in Venezuela, with the purpose to expand their operations (in the past they were limited to Argentina bombings like the Jewish community Center in 1994 , and the Israeli Embassy in 1992, both in Buenos Aires).
Iran also has a direct military presence in Venezuela: Parchin Chemical Industries (produces explosive propellant); Qods Aeronautics Industries; Kimia Sanat (building unmanned aerial vehicles); Iranian Offshore Engineering Construction Co. (sanctioned for work on the Fordow enrichmnet site, operating on Paraguana Peninsula, where the Iranian IRGC Construction battalion is building in-ground missile silos).
Hezbollah is also involved in banking on Venezuela’s Margarita Island, where they have a finance center. It is also linked to the Mexican drug cartels to use their criminal trafficking channels into the USA. They are involved in human smuggling as well. In 2008-2010, according to the US intelligence and sheriffs’ information, over 180,000 illegals have entered the USA, including Afghans, Egyptians, Iranians, Iraqis, Pakistanis, Sudanese and Yemenis, possibly including terrorists.
In February 2011 a Lebanese Canadian Bank was identified by the US government as a Hezbollah money laundering front.
Iran and its proxies are also very interested in obtaining military equipment. The US-Canada Hezbollah network sought laser-range finders, aircraft-analysis software, GPS gear, night-vision goggles, blasting equipment, and mine-detection devices. In Colombia they trade in US military weapons stolen in Iraq, traded by Hezbollah with FARC for cocaine to sell in the USA.
Those forces even infiltrated the US government. A good example is the Prouty case. Nadia Nadim Prouty (nee al-Aouar) was a Hezbollah spy who penetrated both CIA and FBI. Despite her proven family terrorist ties and fraudulent citizenship, she was given security clearances. When discovered, she wasn’t even deported.
There are many such disturbing cases of willful blindness displayed by the media and the government. So far, they have stubbornly refused to discuss the Iran-Hezbollah role in the 9/11 attacks despite the strong evidence (see for example http://iran911case.com ).
The attack from Iran or its proxies is imminent and will be triggered by possible Israel or US strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities or the fall of Bashar al-Assad or Iran judges US susceptible to coercion, deterrence.
In the end Clare Lopez mentioned the difficulties in handling the jihadist attacks. The Obama administration is less and less willing to acknowledge the danger to the USA. They are reluctant to use the terms terror and terrorism and obfuscate their links with Islam. The study materials for the army and the intelligence forces are purged from criticism of Islam. The purge affects personalities as well – people like Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer are less likely to be used and the government even hires as experts on Islam and terrorism people who have connections with the Muslim Brotherhood.
It’s not a pretty situation, but this puts the burden of change on the ordinary people, who are the direct victims of the failed government policies. It is very unlikely that things will get better without their pressure, which can eventually influence the politicians.
© 2013 Blogwrath.com
A bunch of assorted lefties held today a candlelight vigil for the late Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez (thanks Sassywire for the info). When I attend such events, I always recall Albert Einstein’s observation that two things are infinite – the universe and the human stupidity – and he isn’t sure about the first one.
The people gathered in the park were mourning the death of a man, who, though elected, exercised full control over his country. His government didn’t like the free press or anybody else who disagreed with his revolution.
He oversaw a corrupt country where few rights were respected; where a business never had the security to operate safely. Not surprisingly, the economy tanked and the huge inflation ate up the savings of many people.
All those misfortunes had little effect on Hugo Chavez and his friends. The modest colonel, son of teachers, reportedly died a billionaire – his family was $2 billion richer at the time of his death. It is hard to believe that he saved the money from his salary. He also provided the discounted oil supply to Cuba, which prevented the old vampires Fidel and Raul Castro from turning into dust.
All that didn’t find its place in the speeches of the Toronto revolutionaries. One could’ve thought that they were talking of a completely different person.
The speakers from different organizations praised Old Hugo as a compassionate, but uncompromising saint, who did nothing but good. All of them condemned the message of the Canadian Government to the Venezuelan people as insulting – they were sincerely outraged that it didn’t worship the genius of Hugo.
An old lady from the Communist Party of Canada delivered a fiery speech condemning Harper’s government as a bunch of thieves who not only stole the election, but also committed many crimes and robbed the people from their money. She promised a revolution to overthrow them, the kind that Chavez made (you can see her in the video).
Other than the usual ancient Canadian hippies, who don’t know any better and take any leftist ideology at its face value, there were people from other countries. Other than Venezuelan I saw Salvadorian, Ghanaian, Cuban and other flags, including the flag of Farabundo Marti, the guerrilla organization from El Salvador.
And that was the saddest part, because there were many people from South America. After the rally, all of them would return to their houses and apartments, paid either by the social services or the money they make from working for somebody. They won’t starve and nothing will disturb their mundane existence in Canada. The “horrible” and “murderous” capitalist system, which all speakers condemned, will ensure their carefree life.
At the same time, many people in Venezuela and Cuba would go to bed hungry thinking how to escape from the incredibly “successful” societies that the genius of the Castro brothers and Hugo Chavez built. And for some reason the revolutionaries chose to come to Canada instead of helping Chavez to build the perfect socialist society.
I agree with Einstein – the human stupidity knows no limits…
© 2013 Blogwrath.com
Earlier today the Supreme Court of Canada issued the long-awaited ruling in the case of Bill Whatcott. The justices confirmed his conviction of “hate speech” expressed in four flyers, which he distributed door to door in Saskatchewan nearly 10 years ago.
The decision is quite long and many of the points are inconsistent, but the gist of it is that Whatcott has committed a crime by distributing information based on his Christian beliefs. The court handed to the militant homosexuals another tool that would help them finish the destruction of what’s left from our Judeo-Christian society.
The decision practically criminalizes Christianity, because many statements critical of homosexuality are an integral part of the Bible. The Jews can’t get away either, because the books of their Torah are part of the Old Testament. As usual, the Muslims, who not only have numerous texts against the queers, but also apply them diligently by exterminating the homosexuals in their countries, get off the hook. It’s not that hard to figure out why – the docile Christians mostly talk and get scared easily, while the Muslims can chop off your head, if you criticize them too harshly.
There are many things to be said to defy that march against free speech, which may turn our country into a giant gay parade. And I’ll definitely say them. However, today I would start with the worst of the worst – the texts on homosexuality in the Bible that may soon be deleted.
Genesis 19 (God just can’t appreciate some wholesome homosexual fun)
Sodom and Gomorrah Destroyed
1 The two angels arrived at Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gateway of the city. When he saw them, he got up to meet them and bowed down with his face to the ground.
2 “My lords,” he said, “please turn aside to your servant’s house. You can wash your feet and spend the night and then go on your way early in the morning.”
“No,” they answered, “we will spend the night in the square.”
3 But he insisted so strongly that they did go with him and entered his house. He prepared a meal for them, baking bread without yeast, and they ate.
4 Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom—both young and old—surrounded the house.
5 They called to Lot, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them.”
6 Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him
7 and said, “No, my friends. Don’t do this wicked thing.
8 Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them. But don’t do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof.”
9 “Get out of our way,” they replied. And they said, “This fellow came here as an alien, and now he wants to play the judge! We’ll treat you worse than them.” They kept bringing pressure on Lot and moved forward to break down the door…
14 So Lot went out and spoke to his sons-in-law, who were pledged to marrya his daughters. He said, “Hurry and get out of this place, because the Lord is about to destroy the city!” But his sons-in-law thought he was joking.
15 With the coming of dawn, the angels urged Lot, saying, “Hurry! Take your wife and your two daughters who are here, or you will be swept away when the city is punished…”
23 By the time Lot reached Zoar, the sun had risen over the land.
24 Then the Lord rained down burning sulfur on Sodom and Gomorrah—from the Lord out of the heavens.
25 Thus he overthrew those cities and the entire plain, including all those living in the cities—and also the vegetation in the land.
Leviticus 18:22 (God has a few harsh words)
“Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable.”
“If a man practices homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman, both men have committed a detestable act. They must both be put to death, for they are guilty of a capital offense.”
Matthew Chapter 19 (for some strange reason Jesus doesn’t endorse the same-sex marriage):
3 The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?
4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made [them] at the beginning made them male and female,
5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
Romans 1:26-27 (Apostle Paul is very unlikely to be a guest on MSNBC):
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones.
27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.
Jude 1:7 (a friendly reminder about the past):
In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire.
1 Timothy Chapter 1 (another warning)
9 For the law was not intended for people who do what is right. It is for people who are lawless and rebellious, who are ungodly and sinful, who consider nothing sacred and defile what is holy, who kill their father or mother or commit other murders.
10 The law is for people who are sexually immoral, or who practice homosexuality, or are slave traders, liars, promise breakers, or who do anything else that contradicts the wholesome teaching
1 Corinthians 6:9-10 (God might be charged by the Canadian Human Rights Commission and forced to open His Kingdom)
9 Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders
10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.
(Quoted according to New International Version 1984, New Living Translation.)
© 2013 Blogwrath.com
The last few weeks didn’t contribute much to improving the image of Islam. Raging crowds of Muslim film critics rioted all over the world and even killed the American Ambassador to Libya. President Obama handled that assault with the decisiveness of a Vietnamese nerd, who wants to explain to his quarterback roommate that he should not loot his food from the fridge without ending up being dangled from the balcony of their apartment. Last week a large crowd of fanatics gathered in front of the US Consulate in Toronto to demand censorship and blasphemy laws for Canada. Yesterday the convicted murderer and terrorist Omar Khadr was quietly brought back to Canada by the supposedly conservative government.
Amidst that doom and gloom, it was like a breath of fresh air to attend the inaugural meeting of the Council for Muslims Facing Tomorrow. It was refreshing to hear people discussing things in calm and rational manner, instead of constantly yelling “Allahu Akbar!” as many did last week.
Prof. Salim Mansur gave a short introduction, after which Raheel Raza – the president of the new organization explained the goals and objectives of the organization. This is not a religious organization, it is an association created to address the wide spectrum of issues that the Muslims are facing now and which will become even more acute in the future. The Muslims need to get away from the 7th century. At the same time, the group wants to expose those who have no loyalty to Canada – example of that was her encounter with a man from a certain well-known Muslim organization, who stated at an event that Canada had no values, its values came from Israel, and she confronted him about that. The movie protest was another issue – Raheel asked people in Toronto going to the protest if they have seen the movie, and most of them haven’t – that was definitely a manufactured event. Maintaining the individual freedoms is the most important task in our country – the pluralism and preserving of the Charter are also very important, including freedom of expression. The new movement should respect the equal rights of Muslims, homosexuals, atheists, etc. She is well aware of all the challenges and threats she would face working in that field, because from the traditional conservative Muslim point of view she is seen as an aggressive woman.
Christine Williams from the Canadian Race Relations Foundation and the Simon Wiesenthal Center was the next speaker.
In her opinion, the main problem with the modern Islam is the blending of religion with politics. That trend could be noticed all over the world, where even countries, which were not that affected in the past, like Turkey and Indonesia, are turning to Islamic control. The issue with the Muhammad movie was that it was a planned attack, it wasn’t caused by the movie itself. The solution the fanatics are recommending is to impose blasphemy laws on the West, which will severely restrict our freedoms, mostly with regard to criticism of Islam. In contrast, Christianity is still criticized or ridiculed without any consequences, like in the example of the “artwork” of Jesus Christ immersed in urine.
There are even attempts to impose sharia law, like the case of the Iranian embassy, which wanted the Iranians in Canada to work for the Iranian government and gradually take over the Canadian government and then attack the USA. In many other cases we are dealing with taqiya – a tactic where Muslims pretend to be friendly while secretly working against the Canadian values. Sharia law already has had bad consequences in England – after being accepted in 2008 to deal with civil matters among the Muslims in the country, it has quietly expanded to include even criminal matters. Even the Bishop of Canterbury defended its introduction in the name of creating better cultural cohesiveness. The Muslim extremists tried the same in 2004 in Ontario and we were very close to accepting it, if it wasn’t for the campaign organized by Muslim women, who didn’t want to see themselves in the inferior position that sharia has reserved for them. A common misconception is that if Muslims don’t follow those laws, they seize to be Muslims. That is nonsense – in other religions, like Judaism, there are punishments like stoning adulterers according to the Torah, yet nobody gets stoned today – the Jews have outgrown those concepts. Muslims should be able to do the same. The reality of the Muslims blasphemy laws is frightening and they should be abolished.
M. Zuhdi Jasser, M.D., the Founder and President of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy (AIFD), was the keynote speaker.
He said that all the ideas about reforms in Islam discussed tonight cannot be presented in the same way in the Muslim world, because they’ll be considered blasphemous. The key difference is that here in the West we have freedoms, which don’t exist in other places. What binds us together here? It’s the idea that we live in a country, which protects you as an individual. Those freedoms are under attack and they have been condemned for decades by the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamic organizations, which advance quietly in the West. They were irritated by Al-Qaida, which with the 9/11 attacks blew the cover off the project and attracted scrutiny and attention to Islam.
Those fanatical organizations demonize the West. They attack the very nature of the Western societies and try to redefine and change the identity of our countries. Islam as a religion doesn’t require dominance, because it is a spiritual experience of the believers. He gave as an example the former Bosnian President Alija Izetbegovic who said that he never felt more Muslim than during the 15 years of solitary confinement under Tito’s regime (I definitely didn’t like that example). We need to firmly identify and convey through our narrative the identity of the citizen of the West. Making those values clear would insulate many Muslims from radicalization. The problem is that the modern Islam is departing from its spiritual principles and turning into a political movement. Those Muslims, who want to reform their religion, need to restore the spirituality in it.
One important way to do that is to encourage criticism of Islam, especially among young people. Under the current stagnation, the leaders discourage free discussion in every possible way – for example, they claim that only people with degrees in Muslim studies can discuss Islam. That leaves out people like Jasser or Daniel Pipes, who though knowledgeable, are disqualified. The resulting rigidity has created an oligarchy that prevents any meaningful reforms.
From that perspective Islam has something to learn from Christianity. Along with the great Christian leaders and theologians, many laymen have contributed to reforming it, like for example Thomas Jefferson and the other founding fathers, who created a new paradigm of religious freedom and tolerance with the US Constitution. Why can’t Islam do the same?
Obfuscating the problems by pretending that Islam has nothing to do with its current situation makes things much worse. The claims that people like Osama bin Laden are not Muslims, because of the way they act only obscures the issues in Islam. The statement that the recent riots in the Muslim world were caused primarily by a movie (parroted by the Western media) distracts us from the violence within Islam and is aimed at changing the values and the laws of the West. The constant blaming of the USA, Canada, and other Western countries is designed to distract the attention from the real issues. The perpetual parade of grievances and victimization stop any discussions of the flaws of Islam as manifestation of “Islamophobia”.
We have to find our narrative and show that the USA is not about jeans or other superficial things; the core issue is that this type of society allows you to achieve anything you want. The Islamic theology must be reformed to respect the values of liberty and the independence of the individual, which cannot be achieved without separation of mosque and state. That also includes the questioning of the principle of jihad. The issue of values and identity is crucial for the personal development. For example Dr. Jasser and Major Hassan, the Fort Hood terrorist, had strikingly similar biographies. Both received medical education and had careers in the army. The difference is that Hassan probably grew up in a family environment hostile to the Western values, which built in him an identity of violent hater.
Once again, the discussion within Islam is crucial, if we want it to change – hiding behind hadids to justify the reluctance to think is not helping anybody. The role of the reasonable discourse must be increased. It is important to remember that these are not some abstract theological or ethical issues – on the contrary, the consequences from them are very tangible and affect the national security.
The problem is that the people in the government and many private citizens are not aware of the quiet advancement of the Islamic extremism. During the Cold War things were very clear and polarized – nobody saw the communist parties as some benevolent organizations contributing to our progress. Since the demise of communism that polarization disappeared and many people have a hard time determining what is good or bad. Thus dangerous Islamic organizations are perceived as charities dedicated to spiritual enlightenment. The reality is different – for example, the Muslims are a very small minority in the USA, yet in the last few years 85% of all arrested and charged with terrorism were Muslim. No matter how some people would like to twist the things, this is a problem.
Even within the Muslims countries it is difficult to evaluate the political forces. Often we see confrontation between theocratic and secular fascism with nothing in the middle. These complex issues would probably take a generation to resolve.
Dr. Jasser has been often accused that his understanding of Islam is not real and it’s outside of the mainstream. However, in his opinion, that situation of turning Islam into a political movement is relatively new and happened within the last 100 years – by its nature Islam is not hostile toward invention and progress (remembering the role of Islam in Southern Europe for over 500 years, it’s hard to agree with that statement). During the Q&A session he added more clarifications to his position – he didn’t believe that the extermination of the Jews under Muhammad and most of his war atrocities described in Islam really happened; he didn’t believe that Muhammad had sex with a 9-year old girl either.
His conclusion was that no matter what, we must support and advance liberty. Now we are battling for the soul of our nations. Multiculturalism, as it is understood and practiced today, could kill us because it cannot distinguish between a culture and a political movement. The political Islam is a dangerous movement, whose purpose is to dominate the West. It is incorrect to see it as an odd, but harmless culture. We will be doomed if we ignore that fact.
After that I had a chat with a friend, who also attended the event. She asked me what I thought about it. I said that while I found Dr. Jasser’s ideas bold and challenging, there were things I didn’t like that much. Presenting Izetbegovic as some kind of a morally elevated type was a bad idea – those who know the new history of Yugoslavia remember that he and his henchmen provoked the violence in Bosnia by shooting their own people in Sarajevo to demonize the Serbs by blaming the bombings on them. The Western intervention, which resulted from those events, caused a domino effect of even more violence. Also, saying that Islam was recently corrupted or that the worst things didn’t really happened probably saves the reputation of the Muslim prophet, but doesn’t sound very convincing as a position. Wouldn’t it be better to say (like in Judaism or Christianity) – yes, we’ve had some bad things in our past, but we will do our best to outgrow them.
My friend replied that what I say may be true and many other critics of Dr. Jasser see things in a similar way, but we still need to support him and other people with his convictions, because they are doing a very difficult work, which eventually would change the Muslim world.
I hope she is right, because the situation now is quite scary. On one hand, we have a mild-mannered lady, who came from Pakistan, and a rational doctor speaking in a Toronto auditorium about the need to reform Islam (and many in their audience are not even Muslim); on the other hand, we see on the TV news crowds of mindless savages who, like a singular of boars, crush everything under their feet and destroy the property of their fellow Muslims over a YouTube movie they have never seen. Faced with these two alternatives, it’s not difficult to decide whom to root for.
Let’s hope that one day Mrs. Raza and Dr. Jasser will succeed with our help. We have no other choice…
© 2012 Blogwrath.com
The survey of 1,500 Canadians, conducted over three days last week for the Montreal-based Association for Canadian Studies, showed 56 per cent of respondents see Western and Muslim societies locked in an unending ideological struggle, while about 33 per cent — just one-third of the population — held out hope that the conflict will eventually be overcome.
Are you surprised at all? People are not as dumb as the mainstream media want to present them. They can figure out for themselves that the Muslim countries, shackled by their backward religion, have little chance to join the civilization.
Pretending that all cultures are the same is not going to fool the ordinary people, who still see the mortal danger coming from the Islamic ideology. Islam is more than willing to destroy our civilization, while the Western politicians look the other way.
You can read the rest here.
What a “touching” news! In today’s The Globe and Mail you can read how a mosque built in Manitoba was transported all the way to Inuvik in the Northwest Territories. It took 23 days for the trip to cover the 4,000-kilometre distance. The challenges that the venture had to overcome “captured records and the national imagination along the way.”
The author makes it appear that it was some kind of a fascinating event that made everybody in Canada proud. Well, it wasn’t… For starters, the article doesn’t explain why it was necessary to move the mosque all the way from Winnipeg to Inuvik. Wouldn’t it have been easier to just build it there?
It was most likely a publicity stunt for the organization, which started the whole thing, the Zubaidah Tallab Foundation. Read the rest of this entry »
I have always found Haroun Siddiqui’s columns in Toronto Star very entertaining. He has the funny ability to twist facts and concepts to the point where you wonder if he really means what he writes. It is not clear if he is clueless about what he covers or if the newspaper keeps him to stir controversy and bring in more readers.
He usually offers some simple idea, backed with questionable arguments, which in his world would resolve all complex issues. His latest column is not an exception.
Commenting on the recent arrests of four suspect terrorists in Ottawa, he takes on the enormous task to resolve the secret of terrorism in Canada. His solution is very simple and easy: all terrorism in Canada is rooted in our war in Afghanistan, if we leave, everything will be fine and dandy again. Read the rest of this entry »
Recently Toronto Star ran a story about the labour conditions in Toronto’s Chinatown. Their main example was a woman, who came from China in 2006. Apparently, she didn’t start work until this year, because she was raising two young children. She didn’t speak any English, so her only option was working in Chinatown.
She found a job at a manicure salon, but then was asked to pay $400 deposit for the privilege to work there. On top of that she agreed to work seven days a week, ten hours a day and receive for that $25 daily wage. Eventually, she had to leave the job due to exhaustion. Read the rest of this entry »
It is strange that somebody finally realized that the hiring policies of the Government of Canada are plagued with racism. That’s nothing new. Everybody with even a modest IQ level has been painfully aware of that while applying for any government job.
The strange thing is that the Government finally stated that they plan to do something about it. All that commotion was started few days ago by Sara Landriault. Being a stay-at-home mom she was out of the work force for few years. After raising her children she decided to look for a job. She was interested in the position of an administrative assistant at citizen and immigration, but the friendly multicultural racists from the human resources department had a nasty surprise for her. It turned out the job was open only to aboriginal applicants. Read the rest of this entry »