As the Toronto municipal elections approach, it is important to take a closer look at the views and ideas of those city politicians, who will want to rule us for another four years. Recently there was an interesting Twitter exchange (involving Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, a proud lesbian) about the rampant public nudity at the Toronto gay parade (thanks to the blog for the find). While the parade is sold as a wholesome family event, the indecent exposure is always covered up by the media.
Before going into details, let me state that I am indifferent about the issue of homosexuality as long as it is limited to an activity between consenting adults in confined spaces like bedrooms, bathhouses, and gay bar washrooms. My only simple request is to leave the kids alone. Unfortunately, at the gay parade that rule is blatantly violated by many homosexuals that shamelessly expose themselves in front of children.
The gay parade has been relentlessly promoted by the organization that controls most schools in Ontario – the Toronto District School Board. Not only do the lefty teachers encourage kids’ participation, but they also have their own float at the parade.
What the TDSB never talks about is the depravity and perversion to which they willingly expose children. Here is what an average kid is going to see while attending the Toronto “feast of gender diversity”:
The most interesting part of that tweet exchange was that the person who challenged Wong-Tam on the homosexual exhibitionism issue was none else but a TDSB trustee – Sam Sotiropoulos. From my personal experience with the TDSB the chance of that happening are slimmer than seeing an UFO land on top of Queen’s Park. TDSB’s relentless promotion of homosexuality brought us the Gay-Straight Alliances and many other things related to them. At a TDSB GSA school conference at OISE last November, the underage kids were handed “transgender survival” booklets published by the Ontario government, which among other things gave them tips on how to survive as tranny hookers:
As trans and genderqueer sex workers, we have a lot on our plate. Transphobia and negative attitudes towards sex work mean that we are at high risk for violence and that we are sometimes turned away from the services and programs we need. It also makes it difficult for us to ask for and find support when we experience violence and harassment.
Sex work is seen as dangerous work and is looked down on, but the work itself isn’t dangerous, wrong or bad. Sex work is illegal and as a result, we do not have the job protections that many other professions have. Without those protections, sex work can put us into dangerous circumstances where we might face violence and harassment.
However, there are things that we can do…
Actually that makes sense – under the wise leadership of the Ontario Lesbian-in-Chief Kathleen Wynne, a faithful disciple of the Grand Crook Dalton McGuinty, the economy is so badly destroyed that a career of a tranny hooker is going to look more and more attractive to the kids.
So when a trustee opposes that, it is nothing short of a miracle.
Kristyn Wong-Tam has been a professional activist for the most of her life – she has paid for web registration of the anti-Semitic group Queers Against Israeli Apartheid. She has been a vocal supporter of the Occupy Movement, the occupy bums even said she invited them to Nathan Phillips Square:
She has been a very active force in the gay parade, leading the opening ceremony.
That is why it is so interesting to follow the discussion between her and Sotiropoulos. All he wants is to make her admit that public indecency is not acceptable. Looks like a no brainer – every reasonable person, let alone politician, would agree with something that is held as being so self-evident.
Not so fast – Kristyn Wong-Tam is not your normal reasonable politician.
Sotiropoulos asks her a very simple question – does she agree that public nudity is illegal in Ontario?
Wong-Tam is quick to avoid a reply and takes an odd position – she simply makes it a police issue.
“Call the police if you like,” says the wise Councillor. Boy, she as slippery in handling things as a gerbil soaked in KY Jelly. She knows very well that the police would support any special interest group even when what the group is doing is a violation of the law. Just ask the people from Caledonia, who were beaten and terrorized by Indian thugs with the full support of the police (by the way Wong-Tam was a cheerful supporter of the Idle No More thugs).
Then Wong-Tam becomes quite obnoxious:
“@TorontoPolice meet @TrusteeSam. He is looking for an answer to a very specific question about a select group of Pride parade participants.”
She is trying to be sarcastic, but she forgets the fact that when she runs an event financed by funds extorted from the Toronto taxpayers, she is responsible for curtailing all criminal activity that is going on at that event. Trying to get away with the claim that a “select group” is committing the crime is a ridiculous attempt to avoid responsibility.
“@TrusteeSam Not a lawyer versed in the criminal code nor a police officer. Sure no one else can help you with this one? Cc @TorontoPolice.”
Another pathetic attempt at condescending homosexual sarcasm. This is one of the most disgusting statements ever uttered by a Canadian politician. To claim that she doesn’t know whether it is a crime when a filthy pervert flaunts his dick in front of children, you must be either extremely stupid or extremely deceptive and hypocritical. I hope she won’t claim that this is customary in the Hong Kong culture.
I assume that Wong-Tam is not stupid; otherwise we wouldn’t be enjoying her leadership as a Councillor. She is just being deceptive and playing ignorant. I admire the restrained tone of Sotiropoulos – I am not sure if I would be able to keep calm at this point.
Just like Wong-Tam, I am also an immigrant, but I don’t need a lawyer’s advice to figure out that the homosexual exhibitionists are committing a crime. Browsing through the Criminal Code of Canada it is not hard to find that this is a violation of several statutes:
… / Exposure.
173. (1) Every one who wilfully does an indecent act
(a) in a public place in the presence of one or more persons, or
(b) in any place, with intent thereby to insult or offend any person,
is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
(2) Every person who, in any place, for a sexual purpose, exposes his or her genital organs to a person who is under the age of fourteen years is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
[R.S., c.C-34, s.169; R.S.C. 1985 c.19 (3rd Supp.), s.7.]
… / Nude / Consent of Attorney General.
174. (1) Every one who, without lawful excuse,
(a) is nude in a public place, or
(b) is nude and exposed to public view while on private property, whether or not the property is his own,
is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
(2) For the purposes of this section, a person is nude who is so clad as to offend against public decency or order.
[R.S., c.C-34, s.170.]
CAUSING DISTURBANCE, INDECENT EXHIBITION, LOITERING, ETC.
… / Evidence of peace officer.
175. (1) Every one who
(a) not being in a dwelling-house, causes a disturbance in or near a public place,
(i) by fighting, screaming, shouting, swearing, singing or using insulting or obscene language,
(ii) by being drunk, or
(iii) by impeding or molesting other persons,
(b) openly exposes or exhibits an indecent exhibition in a public place…
Of course, the homosexuals and their patrons from the Toronto police would never charge or condemn the exhibitionists.
Then Wong-Tam finds a very “elegant” way to stop the discussion. She simply runs away crying “Harassment!”
Before that, as a last-ditch effort, she tries to bring in the example of ancient Greece. Very well – I should mention then that in ancient Greece (especially in Sparta) it was perfectly acceptable to rape young boys (with their parents’ consent) as part of that culture. Do the Toronto homosexuals want to resurrect that tradition as well?
After the whiny Wong-Tam runs away crying, Sotiropoulos is forced to make a few conclusions:
Yes, he is right – Toronto politicians approve the indecent exposure and so does the TDSB.
I am glad I am not the only person, who finds that outrageous. This was a long post, but I hope it made you think about a disturbing trend – whitewashing of any homosexual wrongdoing, because that group enjoys special privileges.
Think about it: when Kathleen Wynne was appointed by her cronies to lead the Ontario government, we were subjected to months of propaganda that she was the first “openly gay” Premier, who will bring a new style of responsibility. It turned out she was one of the McGuinty gang, up to her neck in filth and lies, responsible for stealing billions of taxpayers’ money in the gas plant scam. Moreover, as a Minister of Education, she oversaw the development of a new, heavily homosexual, sex school curriculum developed by Benjamin Levin, who is now awaiting trial on charges of allegedly making child pornography. A few days before he was arrested, he was a guest of honour at the gay parade, sitting next to Wynne and Justin Trudeau. And homosexual organizations are still pushing for introduction of that horrible curriculum.
George Smitherman, who squandered a billion of dollars in the eHealth scandal, was never charged. Instead, he ran for Toronto Mayor, supported by every lefty in sight. He and his boyfriend Peloso were allowed to adopt children, although Peloso suffered from acute suicidal form of depression and he eventually killed himself. Did anybody think about the safety of the children? Of course not – the sacred right of the homosexuals to adopt children is supposed to be enforced by all means. And on top of that, Barbara Hall, the head of the Ontario kangaroo human rights courts was their official babysitter. Imagine that – the woman, who has ruined the lives of many people for “violating” the human rights code saw nothing different in that dysfunctional “family.”
Compared to them, Wong-Tam is a small fish, but she enjoys the same privileges.
On the other hand, just by questioning those people, I am exposing myself to criminal charges. When you touch the super extremely vulnerable homosexual ego in an inappropriate way, you are liable under the hate speech provisions. Just ask Bill Whatcott, who was convicted for criticising the homosexual lifestyle, even though his points were factual. The point that mattered to the court was the bruised homosexual feelings.
At the same time, the homosexual politicians can steal, lie and cover up crimes. Am I the only one, who finds this abnormal?
If the citizens of Toronto have at least a drop of decency and self-respect left, they should kick out deceptive politicians like Kristyn Wong-Tam at election time.
I know that the angry homosexuals will do everything to demonize and destroy Sam Sotiropoulos, but we must support people like him, if we want to restore honesty and decency in our city.
© 2014 Blogwrath.com