The economic decline of the USA under Obama is not a secret; it has been covered to death in the media. However, the decline of values and traditions, which is just as dangerous, is often ignored. Any attempts to point out the danger of a new totalitarianism, which creeps its way into the country under the form of Islam, are usually ridiculed or labelled racist.
A recent legal case in Pennsylvania highlighted that danger, because it may have far-reaching judicial consequences. As usual, the media downplayed it, but thanks to the internet it may really reach many people who should know what is going on in the US courts.
The case involved a Muslim and an atheist. At a Halloween parade, Ernest Perce V appeared dressed as Zombie Mohamed. He holds the bombastic title “Pennsylvania State Director of American Atheists, Inc.” I know that the atheists are not America’s favourites, with their delusion that if they remove Christianity from the public life, all people will start thinking rationally and love each other.
However, in this case, I admire Mr. Perce’s decision to poke fun at Islam (something that atheists usually avoid), although his organization didn’t miss the opportunity to ridicule Christianity as well – next to him was marching a Zombie Pope.
At the time, Mr. Perce had no idea that his joke wasn’t appreciated by one of the spectators. A Muslim immigrant, seeing his favourite “prophet” depicted as a zombie, decided to attack the “blasphemer”. He assaulted the atheist and after they detained him, he said that he was not aware that his actions were illegal in the USA, he didn’t even know that it was legal in the country to represent visually Mohamed. And on top of that he said that he committed the attack to show his 9-year-old son (standing next to him) that he can fight for his “prophet”.
So far, it is clear for everybody who lives in North America that this is a clear-cut case of assault over an action, which is protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution. The perpetrator should’ve received the appropriate punishment.
But that’s not what happened – the real circus began when the case went to court and was handed to Judge Mark Martin, who (accidentally?) happened to be Muslim. Not only did the Muslim criminal go free, but the atheist was also chastised for his behaviour and taught a lesson about Islam.
The whole thing is so unbelievable, that it would be better to quote the Judge directly from the transcripts:
“Having had the benefit of having spent over 2 and a half years in predominantly Muslim countries I think I know a little bit about the faith of Islam. In fact I have a copy of the Koran here and I challenge you sir to show me where it says in the Koran that Mohammad arose and walked among the dead. I think you misinterpreted things. Before you start mocking someone else’s religion you may want to find out a little bit more about it it makes you look like a dufus and Mr. (Defendant) is correct. In many Arabic speaking countries something like this is definitely against the law there. In their society in fact it can be punishable by death and it frequently is in their society.”
Other than the odd fact that the judge had a Koran in his courtroom, the first excerpt shows beyond any doubt that the lefties and the Muslims totally lack a sense of humour. Obviously, what the atheist was presenting at the parade was a satire and not an attempt to show the actual Mohammed rising from the dead. After offending Mr. Perce, the judge establishes very well his view on the events – what happened is often punishable by death in a “right” society and he apparently doesn’t have a problem with that.
“Islam is not just a religion, it’s their culture, their culture. It’s their very essence their very being. They pray five times a day towards Mecca to be a good Muslim, before you die you have to make a pilgrimage to Mecca unless you are otherwise told you can not because you are too ill too elderly, whatever but you must make the attempt. Their greetings wa-laikum as-Salâm (is answered by voice) may god be with you. Whenever, it’s very common when speaking to each other it’s very common for them to say uh this will happen it’s it they are so immersed in it.”
Ain’t that beautiful? The judge establishes the fact that Islam shouldn’t be touched, offended or discussed, because it is “the very essence of their being”. Thus he creates a specially protected religion-based group, which is above any other Americans.
“Then what you have done is you have completely trashed their essence, their being. They find it very very very offensive. I’m a Muslim, I find it offensive. But you have that right, but you’re way outside your boundaries or first amendment rights. This is what, and I said I spent about 7 and a half years living in other countries. when we go to other countries it’s not uncommon for people to refer to us as ugly Americans this is why we are referred to as ugly Americans, because we are so concerned about our own rights we don’t care about other people’s rights as long as we get our say but we don’t care about the other people’s say”
After firmly stating his devotion to the barbaric Muslim cult, the judge finally explains his interpretation of the law – since Mr. Perce has offended such an important and beautiful religion, he has no right of protection under the First Amendment. The judge also admits that he is Muslim (a fact that he later denied) and finds a way to attack his compatriots who don’t share his religious beliefs.
It’s no wonder that after his speech he dropped all charges against the Muslim assailant and even refused to see the video evidence.
I should admit that I was shocked when I read that. This is a classical, textbook sharia court decision – a righteous Muslim who has attacked a blasphemer is acquitted. Islam trumps everything else. Such court proceedings could take place in any sharia court in Saudi Arabia (with the only difference that the Saudi judge would chop off Mr. Perce’s head for ridiculing Old Mo).
It is unbelievable that something like that can happen in the USA, the “Land of the Free”. However, many politicians and common people foresaw that possibility and tried to limit it before sharia takes over. Several states adopted laws that specifically wanted to eliminate foreign laws being used in the USA.
Do you remember the anti-sharia law in Oklahoma? It was recently blocked. When attacking it, the opposing forces displayed the whole rainbow of groups that are against America. CAIR and their servants said that the Oklahomans are despicable Islamophobes. The occupy-style lefty idiots branded them “racist rednecks”. And the high elites mocked their “stupidity”, because according to them the Constitution is enough of a defence against any foreign law.
Unfortunately, Judge Martin proved the Oklahomans right – as a Muslim fanatic, he has zero respect for the US Constitution and he has absolutely no problem replacing it with the Koran that he keeps in his room.
In the beginning I said that the decision may have far-reaching consequences and I stand by my statement.
The first consequence is that the judge would make it difficult for US Muslims in such positions to be trusted. There will be always that doubt that they would make a decision based on their fanatical beliefs rather than on US law. And what about the previous decisions of Judge Martin? Maybe they all need to be re-examined after this horrible law violation. His decision is so blatantly against everything that USA stands for, that it makes you wonder what else the Saudis have bought for the $70 billion they have spent over the years to gain influence (other than mosques and university professors)…
As you know, in the English common law, which applies in the USA, a precedent can change completely how a certain crime is handled. Thanks to Judge Martin, any Muslim savage now is justified whatever he or she wants to do in the name of protecting their religion. Maybe soon we will hear from a sleazy lawyer defending his Muslims clients:
“Yes, your Honour, it’s true that Ahmed and Aisha killed their daughter, but she refused to wear hijab and used to go out in that short skirt you saw in the picture. What she has done is she has completely trashed their essence, their being. They found it very, very, very offensive. Can you blame them?”
Voila – he just legalized the honour killings!
And I don’t even want to think what will happen to Rev. Terry Jones, if he goes to protest in Dearborn…
The whole incident is not just a random act of a Muslim fanatic wearing a US Judge’s robe. It is a result of a consistent policy of the current administration, which provides more and more concessions to the militant Islam.
Obama refused to call terrorist the disgusting Muslim animal Hassan, who killed 13 soldiers in Fort Hood. Hillary Clinton (whose closest adviser has ties with the Muslim Brotherhood) found it important to support the initiative for criminalizing any criticism of Islam, started in the so-called Istanbul Process by the most fanatical Muslim countries in the world.
Judge Martin simply complies with the creeping islamization of the USA. He knows that under the affirmative action President, who obviously hates the traditional freedoms, his actions will be looked upon favourably.
Obama is a temporary idiot, who’ll be gone, but the damage he could cause by giving leading role to the most sinister religious ideology in the world may last for many decades.
The question is: are the American willing to let him do that damage?
© 2012 Blogwrath.com